[16:13] thanks beuno [16:13] I didn't want to do it myself. It's sort of a conflict of interest thing you know... I don't want to be seen as forcing through Canonical news without community review [16:14] makes sense [16:15] Rinchen, np, seems reasonable, finishing it up now [16:15] thanks boredandblogging, I'll give you the link now [16:15] reviews/edits from both are welcome :D [16:16] http://fridge.ubuntu.com/node/1276 [16:16] boredandblogging, Rinchen ^ [16:16] thanks [16:16] taking a look [16:16] aarggh that damn theme bug [16:18] that line break on the last sentence looks funny. maybe remove it or

it? [16:18] like that, yeah [16:18] thanks [16:19] * beuno didn't add any
's [16:19] just added an extra new line [16:20] wasn't sure if I should link to mark's post, but I think it's pretty insightful on the topic [16:21] yeah, maybe we would should mention the license the daily pdf concept? [16:21] yeap, we could slap more information directly on the story too [16:23] they also meet on #ubuntu-training on irc.freenode.net [16:23] me personally, am happy with whatever you guys want to do [16:24] boredandblogging, you've got the final OK, so feel free to tinker with it and publish [16:25] I'm off to lunch [16:25] ok, gonna make some edits [16:37] Rinchen: you want to take a look at it now? [16:37] sure [16:38] oops, forgot to save the changes [16:38] works for me. I don't know if the license statement adds anything but I'm not a professional writer [16:39] yeah, unless we bother to describe the impacts, its not. I'll take it out [16:39] after the refresh, looks good to me... [16:40] if you're happy with it boredandblogging, go ahead and pub it [16:40] published. [16:40] sweet, thanks [16:40] np