=== mdz [~mdz@69-167-148-207.vnnyca.adelphia.net] has joined #launchpad === mdz [~mdz@69-167-148-207.vnnyca.adelphia.net] has joined #launchpad === mdz [~mdz@69-167-148-207.vnnyca.adelphia.net] has joined #launchpad [01:47] what did tla tag turn into in baz 1.0.1 again?> === Kinnison [~dsilvers@haddenham.pepperfish.net] has joined #launchpad === mdz [~mdz@69-167-148-207.vnnyca.adelphia.net] has joined #launchpad === mdz [~mdz@69-167-148-207.vnnyca.adelphia.net] has joined #launchpad === mdz [~mdz@69-167-148-207.vnnyca.adelphia.net] has joined #launchpad [02:04] lamont: branch [02:04] with interesting behaviour when given only one argument [02:05] right - I remembered that === ddaa enjoys looking at all this green in hoover's status [02:17] ddaa: Are they getting to arch.ubuntu.com? The supermirror still shows 54 archives, of which 17 are populated [02:17] successful syncs go arch.ubuntu.com yes [02:19] you should have about 28 empty [02:19] (needing eyeballing and syncing or bugfixing) [02:19] atm, 34, but the supermirror is up to 13 hours out of date from arch.ubuntu.com [02:19] anh about 30 populated [02:19] 21 populated atm. [02:19] but earlier that was 17, so the sm is started to hit them [02:19] I should probably have a look at it monday === stub [~stub@dsl-246.248.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au] has joined #launchpad [02:20] ddaa: It can just be that the sm hasn't hit them yet. It only strikes earch archive, on average, twice a day. [02:20] mh... there was a lot of fixage in the last few days, and I do not know how many were held back previously [02:21] the point is the mirror is created quite early in the import process [02:21] btw [02:22] you sdould to remove the libunicode@arch.ubuntu.com archive [02:22] I moved it into gnome [02:22] Ok. [02:22] thanks [02:22] that is an empty archive anyway [02:23] Ok. its gone. [02:23] its gone on arch.ubuntu.com, right? Otherwise, the mirror will just end up rescanning it in [02:24] yup, I have deleted one file at a time in sftp... [02:24] yup [02:24] did I mention how sftp's not using readline terribly sucks? [02:25] you have now. :) [02:26] Ok. I'm coming off my cough medicine, so I'm going to go out for some lunch, get back and fix a bunch of bugs. [02:26] did you ever heard of weekend? [02:26] Its a work weekend for me. baz freezes monday. [02:26] i head that's the time when you work on the stuff you are not paid for [02:27] besides, today is a nomral work day for me anyways [02:27] Okay... I plan to spend it on pyarch... unless my gfriend suddenly decides to come and visit me. [02:27] maybe after freeze. We have stuff that needs to get fixed before then though. [02:27] (me is celebrating this productive week with good glass or wiskey) [02:28] This is the version thats probably going into hoary, so whatever we don't get done this weekend, we're stuck hearing complaints about for the next six months [02:28] Might be good to set up a "stable" apt source for bas. [02:29] So when people complain about things which have been fixed, you just tell them to use this source. [02:29] we don't have a developed stable version yet. [02:29] Well, I guess 1.1 will be one. [02:30] sorry. a stable tree yet. [02:30] we're still cutting from head. [02:30] My point what that the "stable" source would get only the releases. [02:30] as opposed to the cotm [02:31] ahhh. [02:31] So that would be something you could point "users" at. [02:31] isn't distro already doing that? [02:31] Distro as a different release cycle than baz. [02:31] Baz supposedly releases every month. [02:32] Heh. distro has a live version too. (In fact, that's what I'm using) [02:32] While the distro releases every six months. [02:32] Wait... are you telling me that cotm is what's been going into hoary? [02:32] No, hoary has 1.0.1 [02:32] Yeah. [02:33] And you are putting out 1.1 so it will get into hoary too. [02:33] which technically is latest. === jblack decides to ponder this issue. [02:34] But then you do not want people to bitch about problems which were fixed in 1.2 or later for the 9 months that separates the hoary freeze from the following release. [02:35] So that's why I think a "stable" source for baz, where you put releases and bugfixes, would be good. [02:35] ok. I see your point. [02:35] Not a big overhead either. [02:38] Next week, I'll have to get nicole data got into production, or have rob2 write more product descriptions... [02:38] That's going to be an... uhm... interesting week === stub [~stub@dsl-246.248.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au] has joined #launchpad === ChanServ [ChanServ@services.] has joined #launchpad === stub [~stub@dsl-246.248.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au] has joined #launchpad === stub [~stub@dsl-246.248.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au] has joined #launchpad === daf [daf@muse.19inch.net] has joined #launchpad === kiko [~kiko@200-206-134-238.async.com.br] has joined #launchpad === stub [~stub@dsl-246.248.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au] has joined #launchpad [12:44] stub the stud [12:55] ddaa: I'll be doing a single stable deb repository for the 1.1 release. [12:55] Mark made the same points in Mataro. [12:56] okay, so either it's a good idea or we are both wrong :-) === cprov [~cprov@200.158.100.251] has joined #launchpad === stub [~stub@dsl-246.248.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au] has left #launchpad [] === ddaa [~ddaa@deep-thought.xlii.org] has left #launchpad [] === ddaa [~ddaa@deep-thought.xlii.org] has joined #launchpad === salgado [~salgado@200-206-134-238.async.com.br] has joined #launchpad