=== warthylog [~warthylog@port49.ds1-van.adsl.cybercity.dk] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== Topic for #ubuntu-kernel: Ubuntu kernel development discussion | http://www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/KernelTeam | kernel-team@ubuntu.com--2005/kernel-debian--pre26--2.6.10 | anything else t-bone needs to get off his chest | cows don't like to do DST | ||
=== Topic (#ubuntu-kernel): set by T-Bone at Fri Mar 4 13:06:53 2005 | ||
=== #ubuntu-kernel [freenode-info] help freenode weed out clonebots, please register your IRC nick and auto-identify: http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#nicksetup | ||
fabbione | anybody alive? | 07:38 |
---|---|---|
=== fabbione sighs | ||
fabbione | guy the enable-inotify patch is kinda of horrible | 08:21 |
fabbione | it would have been enough to modify the inotify-*-optional patch | 08:21 |
fabbione | instead of adding a 3rd one on top | 08:22 |
=== fabbione [~fabbione@port49.ds1-van.adsl.cybercity.dk] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== calc [~ccheney@ip70-185-4-246.ma.dl.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== abelli [~abelli@host-84-222-39-20.cust-adsl.tiscali.it] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
fabbione | YAYAYAAYYA | 10:17 |
fabbione | inotify doesn't crash anymore! | 10:17 |
fabbione | it will be in 2.6.10-26 and no ABI change :P | 10:17 |
fabbione | FUCK NO | 10:18 |
fabbione | it crashed on the second removal | 10:18 |
=== abelli [~abelli@host-84-222-39-20.cust-adsl.tiscali.it] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== abelli_ [~abelli@host-84-222-39-20.cust-adsl.tiscali.it] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
fabbione | hmmmm | 11:04 |
=== abelli [~abelli@host-84-222-39-20.cust-adsl.tiscali.it] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== zul [~chuck@198.62.158.205] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
zul | hey | 02:53 |
fabbione | hey zul | 02:58 |
zul | hey fabbione how is it going? | 02:58 |
fabbione | good and bad | 02:58 |
zul | oh? | 02:58 |
fabbione | i merged inotify 0.20 from 2.6.11-3 into 2.6.10 | 02:58 |
zul | and? | 02:59 |
fabbione | and i managed to unplug my usb device without crashing the kernel once | 02:59 |
fabbione | it dies the second time | 02:59 |
zul | lol | 02:59 |
zul | i think we should take out rml | 02:59 |
fabbione | now i am cleaning up the patch mess from inotify-*-optional and enable-inotify | 02:59 |
fabbione | so that there is one good patch | 02:59 |
fabbione | and that's it | 02:59 |
zul | good | 02:59 |
fabbione | and leave inotify disabled by default | 03:00 |
zul | ill have to see the patch once its done so i know what to do next time if this pops up again | 03:00 |
fabbione | well it's pretty simple | 03:00 |
zul | did you get the inode error when compiling? | 03:00 |
fabbione | see the original inotify patch | 03:00 |
fabbione | it changes the dnotify entries in fsnotify entries | 03:01 |
fabbione | zul: no but that's becaused i used a more recent patch and the error is easily fixable | 03:01 |
zul | yeah | 03:01 |
fabbione | parse the calls to fsnotify to see what are the inotify_ calls | 03:01 |
fabbione | that leads to 5 functions | 03:01 |
fabbione | inotify_inode_queue_event | 03:02 |
fabbione | inotify_dentry_parent_queue_event | 03:02 |
fabbione | inotify_inode_is_dead | 03:02 |
fabbione | inotify_super_block_umount | 03:02 |
fabbione | inotify_get_cookie | 03:02 |
fabbione | so basically inside inotify.c in these 5 functs | 03:02 |
fabbione | you add the check | 03:02 |
fabbione | if (!inotify) | 03:02 |
fabbione | return; | 03:02 |
zul | ah ok | 03:02 |
zul | so no need to push my inotify stuff to you in the next patchset from me | 03:03 |
fabbione | nope | 03:03 |
fabbione | i am going to commit it to baz in a few minutes | 03:03 |
fabbione | i only need to do a test build | 03:03 |
fabbione | and see if it works as expected | 03:03 |
zul | btw when do you want my stuff by | 03:04 |
fabbione | asap? | 03:05 |
zul | sure | 03:06 |
zul | i can put them up when i get home tonight am at work right now | 03:06 |
fabbione | ok | 03:06 |
fabbione | we are not going to upload today | 03:06 |
fabbione | preview release is still ongoing | 03:07 |
zul | yeah thats what i thought | 03:07 |
zul | alsa is messing some people up when they upgrade because of the alsa driver for their winmodem | 03:08 |
fabbione | i know... | 03:08 |
fabbione | atleast | 03:08 |
fabbione | i heard | 03:08 |
zul | heh its the kamion kult | 03:16 |
lamont | zul: the question is, does alsa provide a working modem then?? | 03:26 |
zul | lamont: i think i dont have a modem havent had one in the past 10 years :) | 03:26 |
lamont | ah sure you do... it's just not plugged into a phone line... any semi-modern laptop will do... :-) | 03:27 |
zul | if i had a phone line...i just have a cell phone | 03:27 |
lamont | ah,opk | 03:27 |
=== lamont can accept that. :-) | ||
zul | i like making things dificult for you lamont :) | 03:28 |
=== lamont throws things | ||
fabbione | there are serial cables for cell phones | 03:29 |
lamont | fabbione: if you can tell me how to make the DKU-5 work with linux and my nokia phone, I will buy you _3_ beers | 03:29 |
lamont | (no linux driver last I knew) | 03:30 |
fabbione | i have an ericsson phone that has an internal modem | 03:31 |
fabbione | i just plug the serial cable and do ATZ | 03:32 |
lamont | DKU-5 is a usb cable | 03:32 |
lamont | and vendor id isn't recognized. | 03:32 |
lamont | OTOH, the last time I tried was 2.6.8 timeframe... | 03:32 |
fabbione | hmmm | 03:33 |
fabbione | i have the usb version too | 03:33 |
fabbione | and i see the cell phone as a usb-serial | 03:33 |
fabbione | same story.. minicom -> ATZ | 03:34 |
=== lamont will play with his phone today | ||
zul | *sigh* why do people have to use cheap kvm switches | 03:38 |
lamont | zul: because they're _poor_, of course. | 03:38 |
zul | heh...duh...it was rhetorical | 03:39 |
lamont | heh | 03:41 |
fabbione | http://x3.putfile.com/videos/6608573980.wmv | 03:44 |
fabbione | AHAHHA | 03:44 |
fabbione | it's work/wife safe :) | 03:44 |
=== lamont tries to think of something that's not canonical-work safe... | ||
fabbione | well if you have some emploies watching your shoulders ;) | 03:46 |
lamont | heh | 03:46 |
zul | lol!!! | 03:50 |
lamont | fabbione: heh | 03:51 |
lamont | but you notice he had it pointed in a safe direction... | 03:51 |
fabbione | he still managed to hurt himself | 03:52 |
lamont | yeah - had on the slide while you pull the trigger is kinda stupid... | 03:52 |
lamont | note also that "accidents" like that always involve empty guns | 03:55 |
lamont | first rule is: it's always loaded until I see the inside of the chamber | 03:55 |
fabbione | yeah | 03:55 |
lamont | that's like when people ask if a concealed-carry gun is loaded. duh! | 03:59 |
=== jbailey [~jbailey@206.108.148.138] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
zul | hey jbailey | 03:59 |
lamont | morning jbailey | 03:59 |
fabbione | hey jb | 03:59 |
jbailey | Heya Chuck | 04:00 |
jbailey | G'morning Lamont, G'd afternoon Fabio. | 04:00 |
fabbione | T-None: | 04:02 |
fabbione | debian/ext3-modules-2.6.10-4-itanium-smp-di lib/modules/2.6.10-4-itanium-smp/kernel/fs/mbcache.ko | 04:02 |
fabbione | debian/ext2-modules-2.6.10-4-itanium-smp-di lib/modules/2.6.10-4-itanium-smp/kernel/fs/mbcache.ko | 04:02 |
fabbione | some modules are in more than one package | 04:02 |
fabbione | command exited with status 255 | 04:02 |
fabbione | make: *** [binary-udebs] Error 2 | 04:02 |
zul | gah? | 04:02 |
=== lamont wonders what an mbcache is | ||
fabbione | wth is that module? | 04:02 |
fabbione | these errors are coming out after we fixed the build system | 04:03 |
fabbione | i386/amd64 are ok | 04:03 |
fabbione | ppc is building | 04:03 |
fabbione | ia64 dies with that error | 04:03 |
lamont | at least one of those builds with either ext2 or 3 =y | 04:03 |
fabbione | it means that eitehr there is an error in kernel-wedge | 04:03 |
lamont | or both | 04:03 |
fabbione | or that module needs to be shared | 04:03 |
fabbione | lamont: right... | 04:04 |
fabbione | which one should we compile in? ext2 is my best bet | 04:05 |
zul | lowest common demoniator | 04:05 |
lamont | yeah | 04:05 |
lamont | ext2 is what's on the livecd, so we know we need it. :0) | 04:05 |
lamont | and it's small | 04:06 |
lamont | ish | 04:06 |
fabbione | ok | 04:06 |
fabbione | but i also rememeber that changing to y has other implications | 04:06 |
lamont | hrm.. | 04:06 |
lamont | no clue | 04:07 |
fabbione | i need to figure what | 04:07 |
fabbione | like updating some d-i/ stuff | 04:07 |
lamont | the other alternative is a shared package or something | 04:07 |
fabbione | yes | 04:07 |
fabbione | if there is a fs-common something | 04:07 |
fabbione | anyway that's T-Bone decision | 04:09 |
zul | yay perl is almost done | 05:01 |
zul | crap more changes | 05:09 |
zul | wtf? | 05:23 |
fabbione | dude.. i am not kidding | 05:24 |
fabbione | that machine is IDE | 05:24 |
fabbione | and it has been until yesterday | 05:24 |
fabbione | nobody here was in my office other than me | 05:24 |
fabbione | either i updated it in my sleeps | 05:24 |
fabbione | or something is really WEIRD | 05:24 |
zul | *sigh* could it be hotplug? | 05:25 |
fabbione | no | 05:25 |
zul | grr...i hate it when something breaks | 05:28 |
fabbione | read #u-d | 05:30 |
fabbione | either i misread partitioner | 05:30 |
fabbione | or it did change | 05:30 |
fabbione | in the latter case it IS an issue | 05:30 |
zul | ok if that is the case how can we fix it mandrake has libata_enable_atapi | 05:31 |
fabbione | i need to check again first | 05:31 |
zul | ok | 05:31 |
zul | time for lunch | 05:47 |
zul | yay...i was having a little heartattack | 05:53 |
zul | ok lunch | 05:54 |
=== lamont [~lamont@mix.mmjgroup.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== lamont_r [~lamont@dsl-254-198.dynamic-dsl.frii.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
zul | ok what the hell is going on? | 06:37 |
fabbione | zul: libata_enable_atapi is broken | 06:42 |
zul | fuck.. | 06:42 |
zul | it was ripped straight from mandrake and when we tested it worked | 06:43 |
fabbione | ok the problem is not the ATAPI | 06:47 |
fabbione | but the PATA change | 06:47 |
fabbione | static struct pci_device_id piix_pci_tbl[] = { | 06:47 |
fabbione | #ifdef ATA_ENABLE_PATA | 06:47 |
fabbione | { 0x8086, 0x7111, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, piix4_pata }, | 06:47 |
fabbione | { 0x8086, 0x24db, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, ich5_pata }, | 06:47 |
fabbione | { 0x8086, 0x25a2, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, ich5_pata }, | 06:47 |
fabbione | #endif | 06:47 |
fabbione | this means grabbing old IDE controllers and treat them as SATA | 06:47 |
fabbione | sorry PATA | 06:48 |
zul | oh crap.. | 06:48 |
fabbione | the fact that a patch is taken directly from Mandrake or Suse or Gentoo means nothing | 06:48 |
fabbione | if they did apply other patches on top to fix this stuff | 06:48 |
fabbione | or have older code than us | 06:48 |
fabbione | so now we have 2 options | 06:49 |
zul | ok im sorry it wont hapen again | 06:49 |
fabbione | either we kill the PATA and we see how it goes | 06:49 |
fabbione | or we figure if in newer libata versions it works as it should | 06:50 |
fabbione | clearly this has very very high priority | 06:50 |
jbailey | Is this undoing the SATA fix? | 06:50 |
jbailey | SATA CDrom fix, rather? | 06:50 |
fabbione | zul: nothing to be sorry.. it could have happen to me | 06:50 |
zul | jbailey: yes | 06:50 |
fabbione | jbailey: now it's giving I/O corruption on piix chipsets | 06:50 |
jbailey | Oh. Joy. | 06:51 |
fabbione | so either we get the fix NOW | 06:51 |
fabbione | or we revert the change | 06:51 |
zul | rever the change on pata | 06:51 |
jbailey | In the face of corruption definetly revert. | 06:51 |
fabbione | zul: let's divide the tasks instead | 06:51 |
jbailey | But we'll have to reopen the bug with an explanation as to why. | 06:51 |
fabbione | zul: do you have such chipset somewhere? | 06:51 |
fabbione | or jbailey ? | 06:51 |
zul | fabbione: no i dont but jbailey does i think | 06:52 |
fabbione | (it's 12 hours and more than i am here and i need to rest) | 06:52 |
jbailey | I do, yes. | 06:52 |
fabbione | jbailey: i urge you to test and see if you can reproduce the problem | 06:52 |
fabbione | it's enough to boot the live cd | 06:52 |
jbailey | It's in a data centre three time zones from here. | 06:52 |
fabbione | the installer will fail | 06:52 |
fabbione | jbailey: well.. when i ask if you have it.. i mean handy :) | 06:52 |
jbailey | sabdfl also has hardware to match it. | 06:53 |
fabbione | yeah but he quite not around | 06:53 |
fabbione | and i can't ask him to build/test kernels | 06:53 |
fabbione | what i don't understand is why a kernel upgrade didn't show the problem | 06:53 |
zul | i can build a kernel without the pata enabled | 06:53 |
jbailey | It's handy in the sense that I can test kernels if we're somewhat confident it won't eat the system, and I can get all sorts of status information about the box. | 06:54 |
fabbione | why on an upgrade it didn't switch to sda? | 06:54 |
fabbione | jbailey: the problem seems to affect only cdrom | 06:54 |
=== T-Bone whispers 'hppa.u.c' at lamont... :) | ||
fabbione | since i could boot from such machine | 06:54 |
zul | T-Bone: not a good time | 06:54 |
T-Bone | fabbione: WTF is that mbcache crap in the backlog? :P | 06:54 |
fabbione | T-Bone: not a good time | 06:54 |
T-Bone | oh | 06:55 |
T-Bone | because there is such a thing as a "good time" ? | 06:55 |
fabbione | jbailey: but i can't ask you to risk on a machine that far | 06:55 |
jbailey | fabbione: Is it any piix driver or just the ata_piix driver? | 06:55 |
jbailey | fabbione: The laptop I'm on has piix. | 06:55 |
fabbione | jbailey: for what i can see is any | 06:56 |
fabbione | i have 2 machine with piix and both fails | 06:56 |
fabbione | jbailey: using the livecd is ok | 06:56 |
fabbione | it won't touch your hd at all | 06:56 |
fabbione | it will stop much earlier than that | 06:56 |
=== T-Bone is trying to figure out what's going on... | ||
fabbione | T-Bone: I/O corruption from cdrom with the new libata changes | 06:57 |
jbailey | Hmm, I wonder if I have a CD here. | 06:57 |
jbailey | Ugh, teenagers. Looks like the local school is having a field trip to the local coffee shop. | 06:57 |
jbailey | (first time I looked around) | 06:57 |
fabbione | cdrom only *APPARENTLY* | 06:57 |
T-Bone | fabbione: sweet, how comes this made it in? | 06:57 |
lamont_r | jbailey: I was here for one of those too. | 06:57 |
T-Bone | s/this/this shit/ | 06:57 |
fabbione | T-Bone: the same way people are already complaining about the ppc LED turned on | 06:57 |
lamont_r | well, time to go retrieve my latin scholar | 06:57 |
T-Bone | i see | 06:57 |
jbailey | fabbione: Is there anything I can test from my running system | 06:58 |
fabbione | patch -p1 < somefancystuff.diff | 06:58 |
T-Bone | we've been too laxist on the mergein policy | 06:58 |
lamont_r | so who checked in the ppc changes, anyway? | 06:58 |
fabbione | jbailey: no. you need to boot the livecd | 06:58 |
fabbione | not me | 06:58 |
T-Bone | part my fault | 06:58 |
fabbione | i was approx 20000KM or 12000NM from any pc | 06:58 |
T-Bone | but otoh i must blame zul for that one | 06:58 |
fabbione | NO TIME TO BLAME | 06:59 |
fabbione | we need a fix | 06:59 |
T-Bone | disable it | 06:59 |
fabbione | and who can test the fix | 06:59 |
jbailey | fabbione: Lemme pull down a livecd then. Lesse how good the net connection at this web caf really is. =) | 06:59 |
fabbione | jbailey: ok. | 06:59 |
T-Bone | revert to pre-25 | 06:59 |
fabbione | jbailey: to verify: | 06:59 |
fabbione | boot on the liveCD | 06:59 |
fabbione | and the installer should fail with "unable to load installer components" or something like that | 06:59 |
fabbione | check dmesg | 06:59 |
fabbione | and /proc/partition to verify that your hardware is actually recognized as scsi | 07:00 |
lamont_r | T-Bone: need -25 for kickstart for kamion. Don't think we can revert | 07:00 |
fabbione | probably checking the PCI id from above should be enough to know if it will happen or not | 07:00 |
lamont_r | and I'm inclined to call this 25.1, since we already have -26 in the works... thoughts? | 07:00 |
T-Bone | lamont_r: how comes we couldn't revert the libpata diff (which is 2 lines btw), since it was working just fine before except for a few users with specific hardware?? | 07:00 |
lamont_r | T-Bone: that's what we need to do. | 07:01 |
fabbione | few = a lot dude | 07:01 |
fabbione | piix is quite common intel hw | 07:01 |
=== lamont_r read 'revert to pre-25' to mean 'use -24 on the preview'. which is much different than reverting that patch | ||
T-Bone | fabbione: hell, your call. If you prefer more supported user with broken implementation... | 07:01 |
T-Bone | lamont_r: yeah sorry i wasn't clear enough | 07:01 |
jbailey | fabbione: array6 is fine for the livecd, right? | 07:01 |
jbailey | Or do I need something more recent? | 07:02 |
fabbione | jbailey: dunno.. it needs to have -25 | 07:02 |
T-Bone | if we need a minute-made fix, the only solution is reverting that patch | 07:02 |
lamont_r | I prefer some unusable implementations to silent data corruption anywhere | 07:02 |
jbailey | Do you have the URL for a mor recent snapshot handy? | 07:02 |
T-Bone | we wouldn't have enough time to test any other invasive change | 07:02 |
T-Bone | and would introduce potential new bugs that way | 07:02 |
=== lamont_r really must run and fetch the kid - back online in about 40-45 minutes | ||
T-Bone | lamont_r: same here, hence my comment. Trying to fix both 'support more users' and 'fix data corruption' would go against our safe commit policy | 07:03 |
T-Bone | but that's just my 2 cents | 07:04 |
jbailey | fabbione: I'm getting 60k per second to cdimage.ubuntu.com 3 hours to download at this rate. =( | 07:07 |
T-Bone | ouch | 07:07 |
=== T-Bone can't help. No x86 hw around | ||
zul | i have a pentium 3 where i can build a 686 kernel if you want to test | 07:16 |
jbailey | The question got missed in #u-devel, Is this only for cases where ata-piix intead of piix gets loaded for pure pata systems? | 07:20 |
=== T-Bone needs to run out | ||
T-Bone | i'll be back in ~30' | 07:23 |
zul | im building a kernel for 686 that disables undef pata again | 07:24 |
T-Gone | zul: that's a no-go alas. We don't have time to rebuild a full set of kernels... | 07:24 |
=== T-Gone runs off anyway | ||
zul | im only building 686 | 07:25 |
jbailey | zul: Do you know whether it's only for cases where ata-piix gets loaded instead of piix? | 07:25 |
zul | im not sure | 07:26 |
jbailey | I've been running that kernel on my laptop for a while with no problem, and I've been using that kernel on a sata system that does a couple emails a second with no problem. | 07:26 |
jbailey | I'm still sitting at 40k/sec for this livecd download, though. | 07:27 |
jbailey | My laptop does the cdrom no problem. | 07:29 |
jbailey | So I'm not sure where he's seeing the issue. | 07:29 |
zul | do a hdparm on the cdrom | 07:30 |
jbailey | 16 bit, a pile of offs, readahead 256, HDIO_GETGEO failed. | 07:32 |
jbailey | afk a sec. | 07:34 |
jbailey | back | 07:36 |
zul | fabbione: is that the same message that jbaileiy got? | 07:37 |
jbailey | zul: I think thats' pretty normal for hdparm'ing a CDROM. I don't htin it provides the geometry info. | 07:37 |
zul | k | 07:37 |
jbailey | My guess is that what he's seeing is that the controller is being detected as ata_piix intead of piix. | 07:38 |
jbailey | It wouldn't affect upgrades because initrd-tools isn't that bright. | 07:39 |
=== abelli [~abelli@host-84-222-39-20.cust-adsl.tiscali.it] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
jbailey | Is that PCI ID add that you pasted here the only change with that patch? | 07:40 |
fabbione | no | 07:42 |
fabbione | it also enables another thing | 07:42 |
jbailey | fabbione: Is my assumptions right so far? That you're running off of ata_piix instead of running off of piix? | 07:42 |
fabbione | i need dinner | 07:43 |
fabbione | bbl | 07:43 |
jbailey | Mm, lunch sounds like a good idea too. | 07:44 |
jbailey | I'll finish this first. | 07:45 |
=== lamont_r [~lamont@phantom.acmeps.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== lamont_r sits on the "neighbor"'s front porch, leeching bandwidth | ||
lamont_r | "neighbor" is about 3.5 miles away | 08:21 |
T-Bone | lol | 08:22 |
T-Bone | would that mean anything good for me? :} | 08:22 |
lamont_r | fabbione: from a logistical standpoint, whatever fix we do should probably just happen on mainline, and then we can merge it over to -pre26, and then think about renaming said branch... :0) | 08:22 |
=== T-Bone ducks | ||
zul | ok im building the linux headers for 2.6.10 with #undef pata | 08:23 |
T-Bone | zul: what are you trying to do? | 08:23 |
zul | im trying to get a test kernel going | 08:23 |
zul | or...trying to help out | 08:24 |
T-Bone | zul: actually, any solution involving a kernel rebuild is mostly ruled out, afaict | 08:24 |
T-Bone | zul: actually it turns out that I just said crap. Forget it :P | 08:30 |
zul | i have a linux-image with pata turned off again if you want to test | 08:30 |
T-Bone | zul: i'd love to. Don't have the hw :P | 08:32 |
jbailey | zul: Did you revert the whole patch or just the extra PCI ids? | 08:33 |
zul | just the pci ids | 08:33 |
jbailey | I could test the kernel here just to make sure it doesn't load both anymore. | 08:34 |
zul | -#undef ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI /* define to enable ATAPI support */ | 08:34 |
zul | +#define ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI /* define to enable ATAPI support */ | 08:34 |
zul | #undef ATA_ENABLE_PATA /* define to enable PATA support in some | 08:34 |
zul | * low-level drivers */ | 08:34 |
T-Bone | zul: tel kamion/fabbione what you're doing on #u-devel, seems they're not aware... | 08:35 |
T-Gone | dinner time, bbiab | 08:50 |
fabbione | i am preparing 25.1 | 08:55 |
zul | ok | 08:55 |
T-Bone | lamont: how are you going to integrate 25.1 into the baz archive? | 09:28 |
=== T-Bone tries to return to the adequate channel | ||
lamont | T-Bone: simple. grab source, apply diff, commit to mainline | 09:32 |
lamont | then branch it to -2,6,10-25,1 | 09:32 |
lamont | merge to --pre26, and commit there | 09:33 |
T-Bone | woot | 09:33 |
T-Bone | seems so simple :) | 09:33 |
lamont | T-Bone: that's why we don't work on the mainline branch... :-) | 10:02 |
lamont | alternatively (if we had already checked in -26 on mainline), then it would go in as a patch on the -25 version branch | 10:02 |
T-Bone | ic | 10:04 |
T-Bone | btw. what about the issue that would possibly be solved today? Will it have to be postponed? (just asking, mind you :) | 10:05 |
lamont | which issue is that? | 10:07 |
lamont | oh. that. nfc | 10:07 |
T-Bone | heh | 10:07 |
T-Bone | i feared such an answer :| | 10:07 |
zul | right ill be back later tonight...going to go play some soccer and ill be in pain later :) | 10:07 |
lamont | step 1: preview release ships. step 2: figure out status of everything else, act accordingly | 10:08 |
T-Bone | heh | 10:08 |
=== T-Bone has gone for a 'nobody cares' policy on ia64 | ||
zul | later | 10:08 |
T-Bone | zul: have fun | 10:08 |
zul | oh i will | 10:08 |
T-Bone | hehe | 10:09 |
Mithrandir | T-Bone: nobody (read HP) has cared enough to send me an ia64 yet, so.. ;P | 10:09 |
T-Bone | Mithrandir: heh. Otoh you've got full access to mine... | 10:09 |
Mithrandir | T-Bone: true enough. | 10:09 |
T-Bone | Mithrandir: more access would be "physical" at that point :) | 10:09 |
Mithrandir | I could use one, it's cold up here in Norway. | 10:10 |
T-Bone | lol | 10:10 |
T-Bone | Mithrandir: btw if you need it right wrt lib32gcc1... I can let it on 24/7 if needed :) | 10:11 |
Mithrandir | T-Bone: I'm going home now. If gf is sleepy, I might fix it now so it's ready when preview freeze is over. | 10:11 |
Mithrandir | I'll let you know in 30-ish minutes | 10:11 |
T-Bone | perfect | 10:12 |
T-Bone | thx alot :) | 10:12 |
=== calc [~ccheney@ip70-185-4-246.ma.dl.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== jbailey [~jbailey@CPE000ded9d787c-CM014260028338.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
Mithrandir | T-Bone: ok, home, Karianne is already in bed, so I can hack the ia32-libs stuff. | 10:56 |
T-Bone | hehe ok | 10:56 |
T-Bone | hold on, booting the beast | 10:56 |
T-Bone | there it goes. Give it 2' and it'll be all yours :) | 10:57 |
T-Bone | feel free to dist-upgrade if needed | 10:57 |
Mithrandir | shouldn't need to | 11:02 |
T-Bone | whatever you want :) | 11:03 |
=== lamont notes that t-bone has turned into the 'willy switch' | ||
T-Bone | lamont: huh? :) | 11:33 |
lamont | I used to have willy walk over and power-cycle my A500 in my cube in 5L. | 11:34 |
lamont | hence, willy switch. | 11:34 |
lamont | far better than X10. :-)( | 11:34 |
lamont | more expensive, too | 11:34 |
T-Bone | lol | 11:34 |
T-Bone | damn you :) | 11:34 |
lamont | oh where oh where is fabbione... | 11:45 |
T-Bone | to bed | 11:49 |
T-Bone | not necessarily sleeping, mind you ;) | 11:50 |
=== T-Bone ducks |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!