[12:25] Did something like http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/11/96 get applied? [12:26] lemme check [12:26] no it conflicted with the pmac_pdisk patch [12:27] Ok [12:27] Can you do one that just adds device_shutdown() as the first line of the PM_DISK_PLATFORM case? [12:27] (Context is that without doing that, we cut power to disks before their cache has been flushed) [12:29] sure.. [12:30] So just before the local_irq_save() stuff [12:30] so like this? [12:30] case PM_DISK_PLATFORM: [12:30] device_shutdown(); [12:30] local_irq_save(flags); [12:30] error = pm_ops->enter(PM_SUSPEND_DISK); [12:30] local_irq_restore(flags); [12:31] break; [12:33] brb [12:37] Yup, that's perfect [12:38] cool [12:41] Hm. I may have this ACPI issue sidestepped. [12:42] what acpi issue? [12:46] kacpid taking all CPU time after resume from disk. [12:47] ah ok [12:55] mjg59: done [01:11] zul: Rocking, thanks! [01:12] np [01:15] mjg59: is that related to the 0xff-after-resume problem you were having? [01:17] dilinger: Nope [01:17] I haven't tracked that one down yet === zul is debating whether to update the sata driver for ich5 [03:47] update the ipw2200 driver too :) [03:47] the one from dec doesn't work on amd64 [03:48] it was a rhetorical debate i wasnt actually going to update it [03:48] oh :\ [03:51] fabbione: i dont think im going to make any changes to my tree so you should be able to pull it in now [04:01] later [04:02] later [05:39] morning [06:21] mjg59: still around? [06:23] 3 [06:28] mjg59: [06:28] * s/CONFIG_pm/CONFIG_PM/g : [06:28] Update uninorth-agp-ppc-suspend.dpatch [06:29] otherwise you don't get to build it at all :-) === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [12:23] fabbione: Ugh. Yeah. [12:27] i applied also the other patches you submitted to zul [12:27] they will be in for -29 === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [02:21] fabbione: Rocking === jbailey [~jbailey@CPE000ded9d787c-CM014260028338.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === zul [~chuck@198.62.158.205] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [02:52] hey [02:53] fabbione: the config_pm was my bad [03:22] fabbione: So we're expecting -29 on Wedensday or so? [03:51] am at meeting bbl [04:18] re [04:18] zul: ok.. doesn't matter. [04:18] anytime tomorrow... [04:18] mjg59: ^ [04:19] after 15:00 UTC [04:54] Rock === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [05:37] fabbione: BTW, the 2.6.10 marvell gige patch worked fine on a gentoo kernel, so i wonder if there is some ubuntu-specific breakage that this causes ? [05:40] svenl: What's the failure mode? [05:40] mjg59: failure mode ? [05:40] In what way does it not work on the ubuntu kernel? [05:40] mjg59: wait, i need to re-image the partition to check. [05:41] mjg59: the module loads, the interface comes up, but you can't communicate through it. [05:41] Do you get interrupts? [05:41] didn't check. [05:41] Right. Interrupt routing is the most likely issue. [05:41] i will reimage the partition, and give it a try. [05:42] may well be that this is the issue. [05:43] mjg59: thanks. [06:44] wow...that was a fun meeting...not === T-None is now known as T-Bone [07:20] hey T-Bone [07:20] howdy [07:20] how is it going? [07:24] ermm. "couci couca" i would say in french ;P [07:24] been better? [07:25] yeah [07:26] but it should getter better soon. I've decided to take a few non paid vacation days to unplug and "reset the hardware" [07:26] but it should getter better soon. I've decided to take a few non paid vacation days to unplug and "reset the hardware" [07:27] oops [07:27] that should have been "going to ski in the french alps between Mar 25 and Mar 29" [07:30] cool...right before release ;) [07:34] yeah [07:35] i'm used to "run on D day" thing ;) [07:35] been pretty good at it [08:21] fabbione: what do you want to do about the dell perc stuff? [08:26] fabbione: never mnid [08:28] zul: i assume he didn't, anyway 8)) === T-Bone ducks === zul smakcs T-Bone for good measure [08:29] lol [08:48] hah im not going crazy [09:18] hmm. Does anyone remembers what's the max number of files per directory on Linux? [09:18] (ext3) [09:19] hmm. nm, found the proc file where that value is [09:20] Isn't that the maximum number of open files, not the maximum number of files per directory? [09:21] indeed [09:21] looks like i'm being confused [10:12] right im heading home