=== minghua [~minghua@danube.mems.rice.edu] has joined #ubuntu-motu === minghua [~minghua@danube.mems.rice.edu] has left #ubuntu-motu ["Leaving"] === koke [~koke@rm-001-26.serve.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:49] good night [12:49] night daniel === Mithrandir waves to dholbach [12:53] bye crimsun, Mithrandir [12:55] thats awfully early for him [12:56] yep, he has to help a friend moving [12:56] anybody else seriously annoyed by the new "feature" of nautilus? [12:57] no === ogra is very happy with it [12:57] what feature is that [12:58] tseng, left and middlebutton behavior changed in nautilus [12:58] if you mean closing the parent window [12:58] it bugs the sh** out of me [12:58] I thought he meant the auto-closing of parent [12:58] how do i change it back [12:58] it has a gconf key [12:58] see nautilus hangelog [12:58] * debian/patches/02_ubuntuspatial.patch: [12:58] - changes to the spatial mode. Close the folders by default while browsing. [12:58] You can set "/apps/nautilus/preferences/no_ubuntu_spatial" to get the [12:58] previous spatial behaviour. [12:58] eek, sorry about that [12:58] why in the world would we do that [12:59] tseng, sabdfls word ;) [12:59] UGH [12:59] ugh === motaboy [~motaboy@host168-41.pool80182.interbusiness.it] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:59] gconf key> [12:59] ? [12:59] whose idea of crazy was that? (Yes i know it was marks) [01:00] Burgundavia, i like it...like i said :) if you dont, just switch it back [01:00] ok [01:01] -devel or just ubuntu for a discussion on it? [01:01] it makes sense to say "just switch it" for a theme or a wallpaper [01:01] this is a little more buh, its buried deep in gconf [01:01] tseng: http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8516 [01:01] read that [01:01] and, at the last second i should note [01:03] tseng, thats not last second.... [01:03] last week? [01:03] almost last second [01:03] wait until release day ;) [01:04] working to package libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir. we've got 1.1.4, debian has 1.1.7. For something like this (mostly minor bug fixes, but does fix the build problem), should I just package up the newer version? [01:04] clearlooks was pulled in 1h before preview....thats last minute [01:04] that was also preview. [01:04] and it also made sense [01:04] i think the nautilus change makes a lot of sense for newbies [01:05] i dont [01:05] i also don't [01:05] i think windows jumping around like babies on crack, and the old one disappearing will confuse newbies silly [01:05] it makes "swimming up the tree" very difficult [01:05] w00t?!? [01:05] spatial is great! [01:05] you need to be familiar with the old spacial behaviour before you have any fucking clue what is happening at all [01:06] if you wanted to be friendly to people coming from windows, you would give them browser mode [01:06] now, the old spatial wasn't really that must better with it barfing screens all over the place [01:06] well, once you realize that every window is spatial [01:06] how is the "new" mode?? [01:07] koke: its like doing shift+click [01:07] swapped middle and leftclick [01:07] koke: the new window opens, and the old one closes [01:07] hummm, not as bad [01:07] (I admit I've not used nautilus in some time) === thoreauputic [~debianarc@wolax7-014.dialup.optusnet.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:08] middle clicks and gconf keys are really not discoverable [01:08] that was my major beef [01:08] absolutely they arent. [01:08] tseng: talking about windows user, IIRC win98 default behaviour was like "old" spatial [01:08] sabdfl: what is the rationale for this nautilus change please? [01:08] koke: windows 95 [01:08] koke: that was windows 95 [01:09] it's now 10 years later :) [01:09] koke: was psuedo-spatial [01:09] in fact, it was window-per-folder, not spatial at all [01:09] that said, i hate all file managers. none really feel comfortable to use [01:09] spatial includes remembering windows size and position [01:09] every window relates in a 1 to 1 with an object [01:09] folder, file, what have you [01:09] and it has its own properties which are persistant [01:09] oh, my mind try to remove those remembrances :) [01:10] windows did none of those. [01:11] i can see the threads on osnews now [01:12] "i tried ubuntu but it sucks because windows pop up at random omglolbbq [01:12] would you find useful an options in nautilus preferences dialog to set the behaviour?? [01:12] i think you mistyped o*ne*s [01:12] I want to be an option [01:12] just not the default one [01:12] i would find it less offensive if it had a preference [01:13] and not having it an option to turn off in the GUI means that it should never ever have been considered [01:13] but i still dont understand it at all [01:13] its not spatial or browser, its broken for everyone [01:13] except ogra. [01:13] :) [01:13] tseng: have you added your comments to 8516? [01:13] yes [01:13] but not at length [01:14] since sabdfl isnt even cc'd [01:14] and the bug is closed [01:14] tseng, the alternative for me would be a broken shift key, since i used it a lot.... [01:14] what is his email? [01:14] I will add it to the cc [01:14] Burgundavia, he wrote to the ML [01:14] ok [01:14] very recently [01:14] which one? [01:15] apt-get org for example [01:15] sorry [01:15] duh [01:15] I read that as he had written something about this to an ML [01:15] no, for the mail address :) [01:16] hmm [01:16] mark@canonical won't take in bugzilla [01:17] he might not even be signed up [01:17] he is not directly involved in development [01:17] he is in bugzilla [01:17] Burgundavia: just type mark and you'll get a list of choiced. [01:17] but under something else then [01:17] uhm, choices === jani just changed dch to add ubuntu automatically [01:23] which should be the text for the preference?? [01:24] "C_lose folder when opening a children" ?? [01:24] close folder when opening a subfolder [01:25] previous folder?? [01:25] close previous folder when opening a subfolder? [01:25] yep [01:25] that could work [01:25] is this going in asap? [01:25] goodnight all [01:25] which is exactly the gconf preference?? === jani [~pet@Home03207.cluj.astral.ro] has left #ubuntu-motu [] [01:26] true == old behaviour, or true == new behaviour?? [01:26] Burgundavia: only if I'm able to hack nautilus :) [01:26] ok [01:27] I would say, from a usablity perspective, that is should be unchecked [01:27] change the backend to suit that [01:27] thus checked== close parent [01:28] (the current and rather dumb default behaviour) === Duck_busy [duck@orfeo.duckcorp.org] has left #ubuntu-motu [] [01:41] ogra: ping === diamond [~diamond@194.46.78.95] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:41] lo folks [01:41] Burgundavia, pong [01:41] ogra: do you drag and drop files between folders? [01:42] Burgundavia, mostly only from the desktop to folders [01:42] ok [01:42] just wondering [01:42] or the other way around.... [01:42] I just realized how often I do it [01:42] and how borked the new scheme is for that [01:43] /msg nickserv link diamond 9639365 [01:43] oh nice [01:43] very nice === diamond_ hangs head [01:44] anyway.... i have a question, dredg uploaded a package for me earlier (http://people.ubuntu.com/~lamont/buildLogs/s/snacc/1.3bbn-5.1ubuntu2/), === Amaranth ghosts [01:44] but it doesn't build. however, that version isn't avialable in apt, [01:44] nice password [01:45] when fixing the package, should i incement the version to ubuntu3? [01:45] steve you chump :) [01:45] yes [01:45] dredg: right [01:45] bump the version [01:46] the old files from earlier are still in the archive. reuploading is bad, wrong and bad [01:46] diamond: that _source_ isn't in the archive? [01:46] dredg: uploading new files with the same version will just get rejected... [01:46] lamont: ' apt-cache showsrc snacc' shows ubuntu1 [01:46] lamont: yeah, been there. [01:47] * snacc_1.3bbn-5.1ubuntu2.diff.gz [01:47] * snacc_1.3bbn-5.1ubuntu2.dsc [01:47] * snacc_1.3bbn.orig.tar.gz [01:47] that'd be ubuntu2 in the archive... [01:47] diamond: hence your mirror is out of date, or you haven't said 'apt-get update' in a while [01:47] lamont: right, probably the latter, so my bad [01:48] i'll just be very quiet now -) [01:49] heh === bradb [~bradb@modemcable087.14-130-66.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu === koke building nautilus with new patch... [01:56] what a clean code! it's sooo easy to hack it :) [02:03] lamont: ah. i am vindicated! t'was my mirror. they probably only sync every 6 hours or someat. 'bout time it wasn't my fault for something -) [02:04] heh [02:04] (at least i just did an update, and still ubuntu1) [02:04] diamond: what mirror? [02:04] dredg: heanet [02:04] hmm [02:05] esat is out of sync too [02:06] ah [02:06] @ERROR: max connections (15) reached - try again later [02:06] that's in the heanet log [02:07] if anyone has time, I could use a review (libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir): http://thorin.battleaxe.net/~stone/hoary/ [02:12] Burgundavia: I got it!!! :D [02:12] koke: ? [02:12] the patch works? [02:12] the nautilus patch [02:12] cool [02:12] yeah, it works :D [02:12] but has a bug [02:12] now we can stop this insanity by offering the option [02:13] bug? [02:13] well, the bug was really for seb128's patch [02:13] in the new behaviour [02:13] ah [02:13] what is the bug? [02:13] if you open the parent window (Alt+Up), the current one keeps open [02:14] I see [02:14] got that too [02:14] not a major bug though [02:20] ugh @ monodoc [02:20] right. sleeping time. nite folks === Vollstrecker [~werner@p54AB3B87.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [02:48] Hi all. [02:48] salut [02:48] Why has libcurl3 such an old version? [02:49] In debian sarge is 7.13.1 I have an amule pkg for sarge, and the ubuntu of my tester can't install it because of the too old version. [02:51] hi all [02:52] libcurl3 in hoary? [02:52] pe7er knows what he uses. He told me. [02:52] 7.13.1 would have been uploaded after the upstream version freeze [02:53] it appears to be in main, not universe [02:53] I don't know, I use only sarge. [02:53] ajmitch: is in main [02:54] yep, 7.13.0-1 has a changelog entry of 5th Feb, well after UVF [02:54] 7.13.1 is required. [02:54] https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8088 [02:55] Vollstrecker: we can't do anything about packages in main here [02:55] and I don't think there'd be much chance of a change at this late stage in the release cycle, sorry [02:56] ajmitch: and it takes an act of god, pretty much, to change libraries in main less than a week before release [02:56] it'll be in breezy once that opens, though... :) [02:56] lamont: or sabdfl :) [02:56] god == mdz [02:56] I have no prob with this, but it would be nice, that ubuntu users could have easy to update cvs snaps of amule. [02:56] the archangel == jdub [02:57] I thought ubuntu is based on sid, how can they have older versions than in sarge? [02:57] this late in the game, even sabdfl at least listens to mdz [02:58] because ubuntu tracks sid up until upstream version freeze, and then doesn't grab any new packages automatically [02:58] sarge is still unfrozen apart from base, so packages can migrate into testing [02:58] When is your freeze? [02:58] Or release [02:59] release is in a week [02:59] And then came new pkg's [02:59] ? [03:03] once it is reopened [03:09] FUCK YEAH MUINE [03:09] ? [03:09] im not sure if these packages are good enough to release [03:09] but they work === arzajac [~arzajac@modemcable201.119-200-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:23] Hello. Is there anyone here? [03:31] sure, what's up? === arzajac [~arzajac@modemcable201.119-200-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:09] There is a bug in sl-modem-source [04:10] It would be really easy to fix it and make sl-modem-modules. Would this be possible for Hoary? [04:11] what's the bug? [04:12] http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2005-March/006183.html [04:12] Basically, it makes modules for debian using kernel-headers. [04:12] It can be changed to linux-headers. [04:13] hmm [04:13] Is it too late for this. Can the sl-modem-modules package be introduced? [04:13] there should not be a sl-modem-modules* package. [04:13] Why? [04:13] that's created by the user by compiling from sl-modem-source. [04:14] sl-modem-modules is replaced by sl-modem-modules-new [04:14] Yes, but then the user must download module-assistant and the sl-modem-source. It would be easier to just make the modules for the user. [04:15] that's only done for ubuntu-maintainable ones, i.e. in 'main' [04:15] I am quite active on the forums. I would assume that this represents about 35-50 per cent of all winmodems in North-America. [04:16] ...Judging from the amount of questions on this. Also, this driver can be used with most AC97 codec modems, That is significant. [04:16] Because Universi is not updated [04:17] Because Universe is not updated/maintained after release? [04:17] universe is frozen for Hoary when Hoary releases and unfrozen for Breezy as soon as it opens [04:18] I think the Depends needs to be changed, yes. [04:18] So modules made today would become obsolete and not be updated. Is there any way to put the modules elsewhere? [04:18] kernel-image-_KVERS_ | linux-image-_KVERS_ should suffice [04:18] Right. At least the packages generated would work. [04:19] I should have caught that last time around. [04:19] I should have notified you six months ago when the first complaints came in on the forums. [04:19] well, I was asked yesterday to modify a different field in debian/control, which I did, but I didn't check the rest [04:20] The lucent modem drivers were added to restriced-modules. Any chance here? ( I know it is late!) [04:21] ...That would be a new feature... [04:21] And the modules are useless without the daemon. === bddebian [~bddebian@pcp08717087pcs.phnixv01.pa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:23] essentially, you're asking if we can compile an sl-modem-modules-new-$arch for every linux-image-$arch ? [04:23] s/arch/uname -r/g [04:23] They only work on 386 AFAIK. [04:24] It is a precompiled binary from SmartLink. [04:24] yes, for each arch under i386 [04:24] Oh. Yes. [04:25] hmm. It's not my call (and I think this should be discussed in #ubuntu-kernel, too). [04:26] I understand. I am willing to help in any way. I only wish I had navigated the wiki sooner. [04:27] Is there any work a guy like me can do to help right now? [04:27] I'll go ahead and fix s/kernel/linux/g [04:27] but I don't feel it's wise to generate kernel modules for each arch under i386 without speaking with the rest of the kernel team [04:30] Okay. Thanks. I gotta go - the baby's crying.... [04:30] np. === robitaille [~robitaill@d154-5-117-228.bchsia.telus.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:37] hey robitaille [04:45] hi crimsun [04:47] Anyone feel like reviewing prj2make? http://thorin.battleaxe.net/~stone/hoary/ [04:51] oh geez, yeah, I should take a look at the ToDo [04:54] StoneTable: please put a link on MOTUTodo === Amaranth [~travis@amaranth.user] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:55] okay, will do :) [04:58] thanks. [05:43] howdy [05:43] howdy [05:46] Hello schweeb [05:47] howdy [05:47] ajmitch!! [05:47] bddebian!!!1one! [05:47] ajmitch: Hey, are you gonna get a different laptop or do you still want me to send you the memory and such?? [05:48] I'll get a different laptop [05:48] but not for quite a few months yet [05:48] maybe not till the end of the year, so feel free to send the RAM :) [05:49] Or do you want the whole laptop?? :-) [05:49] hah. that'd be nice :) [05:49] what is the laptop? [05:49] near-death? [05:52] No it's my old Dell. 650Mhz but needs a keyboard and the battery latch is broken so it falls out easily.. :-( [05:54] probably similar than the cdrom latch on the current one [05:54] it's a different model latitude, right? [05:54] Xfce 4.2.1.1 transition complete. === crimsun breathes a sigh of relief. [05:55] good work, crimsun :) [05:55] danke [05:55] jani did nearly all the plugins :) === ajmitch might have to take a look at xfce :) [05:56] as simple as apt-getting xfce4 :-) [05:57] ajmitch: Yeah it's a CPx but the keyboard in your CPi might fit [05:58] alright [05:59] Well there goes my Ubuntu box.. ;-P [06:02] heh, I couldn't take that off you.. [06:03] you need something for MOTU work ;) [06:03] Nah, that's OK. I have another laptop waiting in the wings at work. :-) [06:03] Bah, you know I'm worthless.. :-) === lamont gives back everything that was building, dep-wait, or failed, on all architectures. enjoyh [06:05] lamont: thanks :) [06:06] ajmitch: the biggest effect it will have is to cause things you're currently working on that are down the list a ways to not get built for an hour or 12. [06:06] not too much of a problem here, I think [06:07] OTOH, out-of-date things (older version is in the archive) are built first [06:19] man, some people really reacted pretty strongly to the Ubuntu login prank. I thought it was hilarious (man, I didn't think mdz was that young) [06:20] yeh i thought it was pretty funny [06:21] someone claiming his computer had been raped ;) [06:21] I got to work, started my PC up, and cracked up [06:21] heh [06:21] so who was in it [06:21] and then there was the whole Fleck thing [06:21] I laughed for a good 3 hours straight this morning [06:22] Lathiat: top is elmo (ftp-master and admin), right is sabdfl (shuttleworth), left is mdz [06:23] ah cool [06:24] http://www.whiprush.org/2005/04/back_to_solaris.html <- haha [06:24] " The other, more popular theory is that the user merely starved to death waiting for Netbeans 4 to launch on the Sun machines." [06:24] yea [06:24] I was at the bar with whip earlier [06:24] he was still wearing the Sun shirt [06:24] lol [06:25] heh === lamont tries to understand the 0-25, 25-50, 50-75, ... on UniversePriorityList [06:39] lamont: well, the percentages are a bit off now, since some packages have been knocked out already [06:39] and by a bit, I mean a lot [06:39] yeah, but % of what? [06:39] the original list [06:39] ?? [06:39] percent of the distance down the list? [06:40] yes [06:40] oj [06:40] ok even [06:40] they were ordered by popcon [06:40] and then divided by distance [06:41] hence making it easier to accomplish a goal of fixing the top 25% of packages according to popcon [06:53] " [06:53] I've added links to the corresponding directories for all hoary packages [06:53] now. [06:53] " [06:54] http://higgs.djpig.de/ubuntu/www/hoary/gnome/muine [07:07] by request :) [07:08] oh excellent, higgs is back [07:08] and taylored to ubuntu. [07:08] yep [07:08] we asked him to add links to build logs [07:09] yeah, that rocks [07:10] indeed === Usiu [~Usiu@ursus.spray.net.pl] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:36] Hi, I get compilation error 48:38: X11/extensions/scrnsaver.h: No such file or directory and I have libxext-dev instaled what's more the file doesnt contain that header... [07:36] libxss-dev [07:37] schweeb, thx [07:38] no problem [07:38] schweeb, is it ubuntu specyfic or it's as on debian ? [07:38] I've run into that problem before, myself :) [07:38] can't remember. [07:38] use packages.debian.org to check [07:39] schweeb, I moved to ubuntu but I want still to maintain unofficial debian packages.. I have a sponsor now.. [07:39] Usiu: use a pbuilder chroot with unstable [07:39] ^^^^ [07:40] tseng, yes.. I always use it for building for sid/sarge [07:40] well then [07:40] that will verify your deps by force === pe7er [~losof@pD954E79F.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu === doko [~doko___@dsl-082-082-197-199.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === hsprang [~henning@p508A1A5A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:43] good morning :) === Burgundavia [~Burgundav@S01060004e220d70a.du.shawcable.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === dholbach [~daniel@td9091c9e.pool.terralink.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:36] morning === encolpe [~encolpe@81.56.211.189] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:47] hello world :) [10:48] hey siretart [10:48] huhu dholbach [10:48] how are things going? [10:50] quite good... i should be helping a friend move, but he didnt tell me his adress, so i have some more time reviewing apt-get.org untill he tells me [10:50] :) [10:50] apart from that: the guys were pretty active in tackling build problems === siretart noticing dholbach skripts for universe priority list [10:50] :) [10:51] i'm really proud of everyone in #ubuntu-motu [10:51] :-) [10:51] :) [10:52] I finally managed to write my wiki page.. ;) [10:52] yes! :-) [10:52] is anything missing? [10:53] btw, is universe frozen for hoary? when does breezy start? [10:54] on your wiki page? [10:54] universe will not be frozen until hoary release [10:54] ah, ok [10:54] (april, 8th) [10:54] gladly [10:54] :-) [10:55] i guess breezy will start right after UDU, but i'm not sure at all [10:55] thing will be pretty bumpy after the auto-sync, i guess [10:55] your wiki page looks good to me [10:55] you could add a list of packages you fixed [10:55] wuuhu :) [10:55] ah, ok, will do.. [10:56] so everyone will know you BELONG here [10:56] :-) [10:56] as a MOTU [10:56] btw, do you happen to know why cpp-2.95 is missing on ppc and amd64? [10:56] not at all [10:57] hm [10:57] i guess doko will be able to tell [10:57] shoudn't it be in main? [10:57] I think gcc-2.95 is quite a bit outdated, but still usable... [10:57] i guess it's no longer supported [10:58] hm [10:58] and we should start a plan of chucking it out when breezy is open [10:58] then it would be a good candidate for main [10:58] gcc-2.95 doesn't work on amd64. [10:58] there are some packages hard-depending on it, so we should tackle those first [10:58] I don't have an amd64 yet, so I have no clue about that.. [10:58] ok === jani [~pet@Home03207.cluj.astral.ro] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:00] hey jani [11:00] hey dholbach [11:00] jani: how's xfce coming along? [11:00] I have it installed ;) [11:00] there are still some helper apps to be built [11:00] ah ok [11:00] cool! [11:00] :-) [11:01] but not xfce4-core apps just things the xfce livecd guys added [11:01] I wanted to see if crimsun is around to see how we share the load :) [11:02] gcc-2.95 is in sarge/unstable to satisfy some very old build deps, i.e. 2.0 and 2.2 kernels. it shouldn't be used for anything else ... [11:02] both crimsun's and my email address is banned from hoary-changes [11:02] so we don't know what the state is (spamfilter) [11:03] doko: ah, thanks for explanation.. [11:04] jani: lists.ubuntu.com/archives/hoary-changes/2005-March/thread.html [11:05] dholbach I mean hoary-changes does not _receive_ from us :) [11:05] so noone sees what we upload :) [11:05] arg yes, ok... of course [11:06] we work under the veil of secrecy [11:06] jani: good one... did you upload the kernel-image i gave you? ;-) [11:06] yup [11:06] all set :) [11:06] rock :-) [11:29] i guess debian/copyright: "freeware" isn't really redistributable [11:31] freeware is not excatly a license, I would consider that rather than intention.. [11:31] s/than/as an/ [11:32] example: one could consider sun java as freeware, because you can download it free of charge [11:33] i have loads of doom-levels, fortune cookies, ... stuff here, that is either not building or has funny licenses [11:34] I think it would be best to ask the author under which terms he would allow redistribution, with pointer to bsd oder gpl license [11:35] yeah... i'll do that for breezy [11:35] atm i just look what builds and is ok [11:35] dholbach how is the pat-ge.org progressing? [11:35] apt-get [11:35] www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/AptGetOrg [11:35] i think i do quite well [11:37] whow lot's of work there [11:37] yup [11:37] popcon is the guide? [11:37] that's why i didnt help out with the build-lists [11:38] jani: no... not for apt-get.org [11:38] maybe there should have been a poll on ubuntu-users [11:38] i checked each and every source repo [11:38] there might be a lot of useless sw out there [11:38] _source_ [11:38] yes [11:38] i weeded out the woody backports [11:38] and wrote a script that checked if we have the source packages already in [11:39] and wrote mail templates to all those guys :-) [11:39] :) [11:39] spam eh? [11:39] python ROCKS [11:39] no... didnt send them out yet [11:39] yep it sure does [11:42] i only wished people would use pbuilder to check their packaging [11:42] dholbach I don't (yet) ;P [11:42] I did not yet figure out how to reuse apt-cache [11:42] and want to do that before using pbuilder [11:42] didn't want to blame you for anything [11:42] but I have to otherwise it's too tedious and error prone [11:42] but your packaging is more reliable [11:43] :-) [11:43] I know I just admitted it [11:43] hello, I am jani and I do not use pbuilder, next ? ;) [11:43] jani: good to have you around... even without pbuilder :-) [11:43] ubuntu 1 point below mandrake for 6 months statistics onm distrowatch! [11:43] thanks [11:44] I have a feeling by the end of the year ubuntu will be almost synonimous to linux for many people [11:44] hahaha... yes! :-) [11:48] bbl [11:48] bye [11:50] nnect, address 3 [11:50] uhm.. right? === dholbach doesnt understand a single thing === koke [~koke@rm-001-26.serve.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:51] hey koke [11:51] koke: NICE nautilus patch [11:51] dholbach: thanks :) [11:51] koke: did you ask seb128 for inclusion? [11:51] I'm still of the opinion that big changes like that shouldn't be introduced during Deep Freeze [11:51] dholbach: no, yesterday when I finished, he has already leave [11:52] Treenaks: I agree [11:52] ah ok [11:52] I'd propose the change but defaulting to old behaviour [11:52] hope you don't just leave it on your harddisk [11:52] *ARGARGARG* 50MB NATIVE PACKAGE [11:53] thank god it ftbfs [11:54] dholbach: which package?!? === trulux [~lorenzo@trulux.user] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:54] flightgear-scenery-w130n40 from http://jeroen.coekaerts.be/debian/ [11:55] unfortunately all those fortunes-* packages ftbfs too [11:57] arg... they're all native [11:58] w0w, flightgear is a huge package so the sceneries are === maskie [~maskie@196-30-109-22.uudial.uunet.co.za] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:58] dholbach: where do you see that these ftbfs?? [11:58] buildd logs?? [11:58] i try [11:58] ALL [11:58] are they already imported? [11:59] no [11:59] that's why i'm trying :-) [11:59] hehe [11:59] www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/AptGetOrg [12:02] can I ask stupid question? [12:02] nup [12:02] what is FTBFS [12:02] fail to build from source [12:02] ah [12:02] ok [12:02] I knew it was a stupid questin [12:03] Burgundavia: not at all, I also think it is rather an unobvious acronym.. [12:04] I think I'm going to patch bsdgames ;) [12:04] good idea :) [12:04] to add ftbfs and sabdfl to wtf :D [12:05] ;) [12:07] anyone here with an amd64? I think I fixed an ftbfs for amd64 (package libhdf4), but I cannot test it [12:07] I found a patch from the debian amd64 guys claiming to fix it.. [12:07] siretart: url? [12:08] who manages planet.ubuntu?? jdub?? [12:08] koke: yes [12:08] he told me about a month ago "do you want to be in planet...?" and I'm not yet there :) [12:09] mail him [12:10] dholbach: http://siretart.tauware.de/ubuntu-packages/libhdf4 [12:11] upload just finished, builds on i386, so no regression [12:11] wow that's a patch :-) [12:11] yeah. THAT wasn't my fault ;) [12:12] there seems to be some scientific packages depending on that lib, I found it investigation some build failures which led me to that lib (never heard before about it) [12:13] googling pointed me to a patch from debian-amd64 team. would be very nice if the patch would work [12:13] siretart: could you try to dpkg-source -x *.dsc on your source package? [12:13] i get this one: tar: Read 8192 bytes from - === maskie [~maskie@196-30-108-50.uudial.uunet.co.za] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:15] hae?! same here.. investigating.. [12:16] to enable dpatch in a package, the patch-stamp goes into build or build-stamp?? [12:16] I always forget that :( [12:17] koke: i forgot as well :-/ [12:17] xD [12:17] dholbach: the same on the original source package, [12:17] dholbach: package seems to be extracted ok though.. [12:17] siretart: ok === HostingGeek [~HG@200.48.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:19] siretart: looks good, although the package could do with a shlibs file as well [12:19] oh sorry [12:20] seems not to be your fault (or of the package maintainer) [12:20] morning [12:21] hey ogra [12:23] huhu ogra === ajmitch [~ajmitch@port163-21.ubs.maxnet.co.nz] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:50] I have bsdgames patched :D [12:51] hahahahaaa :-) [12:51] sabdfl will like that [12:51] ;-) [12:52] :-) [12:52] sabdfl: then you will receive 50 mails less each day, hm? :-) [12:53] no, I'll *read* 50 mails less each day :-) [12:53] hehe :-) [12:54] I don't know if my key is already in the ring, dholbach do you want to upload?? [12:55] koke: sure === motaboy [~motaboy@host146-36.pool80182.interbusiness.it] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:57] is there a way to use sed or vi to change all the occurrences of a string into something else in a whole bunch of files? [12:58] sabdfl: perl -pi -e 's/foo/bar/' file1 file2 ... [12:58] not sure if that works [12:58] do some tests first :D [12:58] sed -i -e 's/a/b/' file1 file22 [12:58] ok koke :-) [12:58] shuold work too [12:58] koke: done [12:58] yay for revision control [12:59] that was my very frien for the python transition :D [12:59] grep -r "2\.3" ... [01:01] nit: both perl and sed though should add global in case something appears on the same line s/foo/bar/g [01:01] appears more than once I meant [01:02] jani: sure, I forgot the /g [01:03] do you guys think a patch to dch to know about ubuntu versioning would be in order? [01:04] cause I got my local dch modified [01:04] saves a few keystrokes and helps geratly in scripting [01:04] greatly [01:04] jani, rather call it uch then, we still are a platform for DDs :) [01:05] well it works with plain debian versioning as well of course :) [01:05] oh, its KI code :) [01:05] alias uch='dch -D hoary' sounds reasonable [01:05] s/KI/AI [01:05] oh, with ubuntu versioning increment.. hmm i see.. [01:06] not just that siretart but in generating new revision number make 2.3-1ubunut1 instead of 2.3-2 when the last is 2.3-1 [01:06] ogra you lost me with KI AI :) [01:06] siretart: uploaded [01:06] woohoo. lets see if it fixes some more amd64 packages :) [01:06] jani, Artificial Intelligence :) [01:07] ah, nah just regexp stuff ;) [01:07] jani, thats near ;) [01:07] I thought AI != BM [01:07] black magic [01:07] vodoo [01:09] seriously ogra, do you think it'd harm anything if we had that changed, to handle our case? [01:09] nope [01:09] if it works like you described i dont see any harm... [01:09] ok, I'll ask the devscripts maintainer over in devel what they think [01:11] after building and reviewing 70 packages I get WTOOMUCHCRACK - i'm out on the flea market - see you later ;-) [01:12] ciao dholbach, nice work :) [01:12] enjoy the spring [01:12] ogra: will do :-))))) [01:13] cu dholbach, have fun! : [01:20] Treenaks, koke: you guys rock, the sed -i -e thing worked perfectly [01:32] bye dholbach. [01:33] tseng how's mono packaging going? [01:33] its fine [01:33] are you going for 1.1.x ? [01:33] it works but its not cleaned up [01:33] i dont think hoary is a great idea [01:33] it wont go in for a few days, which would leave no time to fix stuff [01:33] so no beagle ? === dholbach [~daniel@td90919bb.pool.terralink.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:34] tseng: do you think that a backport for mono 1.1 for hoary would be feasible? [01:34] siretart, please avoid that word in here [01:34] i think backports are bad. [01:34] ogra: sorry [01:34] heh [01:35] I still think it would be nice if universe remained open after hoary release for NEW packages only [01:35] ... [01:35] jani, we have breezy for that... [01:35] no regressions, but no need for some backports either [01:35] ogra, yes but you know how poeple are :) [01:35] jani, there is no need at all for backports [01:36] there will always be one piece of software that comes out after freeze [01:36] and goes in the next release [01:36] jani, and if i see how they are done (~ in the version number etc) i start crying [01:36] ogra, I agree that's wny such semi-closed hoary uni would make many backports unneeded [01:36] is there some pointer to policy for hoary-updates? what goes in there for universe? [01:36] people who want a "stable system" and "bleeding edge' are on their own [01:36] siretart, nothing... [01:36] and probably hitting too much pipe [01:36] it's not about bleeding-edge [01:37] siretart, its a leftover of an idea afaik [01:37] no beagle at all vs beagle is not about bleeding edge but about having smt or not [01:37] ogra: huh? whats hoary-updates for then? [01:37] hoary-updates is for data loss bugs and calander updates [01:37] I don't want already existing sw in universe touched either [01:37] jani, it is....if you cant wait 6 months tfor software to stabilize, its about bleeding edge [01:38] ogra,tseng it's not all black and white :) [01:38] its is here :P [01:38] siretart, it was an idea for warty.... [01:38] its in or its out [01:38] freezes do tend do categorize software in these two categories but real world is colorful [01:38] like i said, software either makes the freeze or it doesnt [01:38] jani, its our release plan... [01:39] black, white [01:39] ah, I understand, its similar to volatile.debian.org, yes? [01:39] but until we have better (with sound engineering foundation) methodolgies I guess we're stuck with it :) [01:39] jani, and 6 months are not to long to wait for well tested stuff [01:39] night all [01:39] night Burgundavia [01:39] bye Burgundavia. [01:40] ogra, tseng people _will_ make backports even if we don't like it and users _will_ try those pesky repos anyway [01:41] those users will break their upgrade path [01:41] jani, yep, sad but true.... the bad thing is that they brak a lot... [01:41] it would be nicer if we had more endorsed aletrnatives so we avoid confusion and bugreports we have nothing to do with [01:41] and we'll tell them why they wont do it again [01:41] yeah dude, why dont we just package everything we can find [01:41] and so we waste our time because of them [01:41] jani, nope, the right way is to convice the users like tseng said [01:41] then we wont have to worry about it [01:41] convince users ;) where do you live ? [01:42] we'll call that the "apt-get.org argument" [01:42] tseng, the plan is to package everything we can [01:42] I know about it and I am not refering to every piece of junk [01:42] my personal plan is to make the best packages I can [01:42] jani, we dont waste time on them....its up to the backport people to tell them how to fix it....and we get more and more users following our path through their experience [01:42] with no regard to quantity [01:43] but tseng I would find it way nicer that if you can get beagle and mono 1.1 working in 2 weeks after the release but have a way of putting them in universe without introducing regressions since it is all NEW software it is way nicer for users [01:43] tseng, ack [01:43] whats new software? [01:44] beagle [01:44] mono, dbus-mono, monodoc [01:44] we dont have it yet do we? [01:44] gtk-sharp [01:44] i need to touch all of those [01:44] and more. [01:44] jani, but then we could stop making releases at all.... [01:44] then muine, f-spot blam did I make my point yet? [01:44] none of that is NEW [01:44] tseng, I didn't know you have to touch other mono stuff [01:44] in that case I rest my case :) [01:44] jani, if we set ourselves a deadline we have to cope with it.... [01:45] ogra, I know [01:45] it's a misunderstaning [01:45] I thought beagle and mono-1.1 take a lot of time to package and test but that's all [01:45] didn't know they imply touching so many mono libraries [01:45] ive spent hours for the last two days touching every piece [01:46] jani: they are all currently installing in a non-standard path [01:46] it needs to be undone is a certain order for the deptree [01:46] are you _the_ mono team ? [01:46] there is a debian mono team [01:47] who is seemingly too busy to do this job in the time frame id like [01:47] ok my argument wrt open for NEW only still stands, it's just that it doesn't apply to mono stuff :( [01:48] then we'll agree to disagree [01:48] fair enough [01:48] I'm looking for something eat, bbl! [01:48] i dont want to be an ass, just i have different ideas on the direction of MOTU [01:48] you're not an ass I saw your hackergotchi :) [01:49] sure I understand [01:49] which is less adding every piece of software to coddle users, and more making the stuff we do have nice. [01:50] my proposal by applying only to NEW packages is orthogonal and caters for making our stuff nice _and_ coddling users :) [01:51] however it is a 'what if' I don't care that much [01:51] jani, its not arguable....if we freeze, we freeze for all parts of the distro... [01:51] ogra, I agree with freezing I only want to redefine the meaning of freeze ;) [01:51] jani, we had this discussion in the last meeting [01:52] ogra, that was about uni being open to all [01:52] not just NEW packages [01:52] I wa sin that meeting [01:52] was in [01:52] jani, in any case freeze is freeze and not arguable === janc [~janc@dD576265C.access.telenet.be] has joined #ubuntu-motu [02:00] OT: any way in the new gnome open dialog to enter the file path by hand? [02:00] Ctrl+L [02:00] cool thanks! [02:00] np. [02:00] wow it even does completion [02:00] works in nautilus too. [02:01] I only use gnome open in firefox, I am using xfce [02:01] ok. === gremid [~gremid@pD956B81D.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [02:25] re [02:38] hey, I know how to mobblog now :D [02:38] http://movil.amedias.org/post.php/2 [02:41] you know what? === gremid [~gremid@pD956B81D.dip.t-dialin.net] has left #ubuntu-motu ["Verlassend"] [02:45] dholbach: post in a blog by my cell phone [02:45] actually by email [02:46] i never thought one could need that ;-) [02:48] but what i already thought about was waking my box up from my mobile :-) [03:24] dholbach: what's the policy for apt-get.org's ftbfs packages [03:24] fix the package, notify upstream, discard it,...? [03:25] koke: atm nothing [03:25] koke: because we won't have time [03:25] koke: but for next release, we can try to contact them and get them working in here [03:25] :-) [03:30] http://people.ubuntu.com/~lamont/buildLogs/Test/l/lxdoom/1.4.4-9/lxdoom_1.4.4-9_20050327-0327-amd64-failed <-- quite strange [03:31] I guess builders will try again soon, won't they? [03:32] w0w, builders are crazy: [03:32] /build/buildd/akregator-1.0-beta8/./configure: line 21: /dev/null: Permission denied [03:32] http://people.ubuntu.com/~lamont/buildLogs/Test/a/akregator/1.0-beta8-2/akregator_1.0-beta8-2_20050327-0910-i386-failed [03:34] koke: akragato is now in kdepim 3.4 [03:34] s/akragot/akregator [03:34] hmmm, to morgue then [03:34] yes [03:35] koke: there's an alone versions for systems with <=kde3.3 [03:35] ok... 3 pbuilders running, i guess i can go a bit out again ;-) [03:35] motaboy: but I guess the binary akregator package from kdepim can run standalone... [03:35] dholbach: not a bad idea at all :) [03:36] time for a coffee? [03:36] koke: yeah. [03:37] dholbach: my firefox takes about a minute to load UniversePriorityList [03:37] should I split in two? [03:37] hrm [03:38] i think it's hard enough to keep all of the lists under control atm :-/ [03:38] i'd rather leave it as it is [03:39] maybe a wiki is not the best option :) [03:39] and plone is very powerful but I don't like the resulting html [03:45] koke: I already fixed lxdoom a few days ago, problem was some spurios "extern int errno;". This is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=274929 btw === koke going for a coffee [03:58] bye koke [04:01] alright... i'm out for a bit as well === pe7er [~losof@pD954E79F.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === bddebian [~bddebian@pcp08717087pcs.phnixv01.pa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:12] Morning === hsprang [~henning@p508A1DC8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:24] jani: yep, I'm around [04:25] jani: currently debugging an xfdesktop4 bug with the root menu [04:27] (missing symbol) === ogra [~ogra@p5089D9B2.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:09] I'm back too crimsun [05:10] I saw a bug related to the menu [05:10] I suppose that's what you're reffering too [05:10] I've got a question on cdbs. [05:10] I wonder why mousepad did not build [05:10] If I use the kde.mk rule, then dh_install is called different times for every package. [05:11] in this way if I had the --list-missing option, it will complain for the uninstalled files from the other package... [05:11] So I don't know what's the right way to look for missing files :( [05:11] s/had/add [05:12] sorry I know nothing about cdbs [05:13] jani: thanks anyway. :D [05:13] koke: the dev/null permissions issues were part of the reason that I did the mass-giveback of hoary building/depwait/failed stuff. === ogra [~ogra@p5089D9B2.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:14] jani: yeah, it's annoying :( (RE: menu) [05:14] it's a missing "quit" symbol [05:15] do you think it got 'lost' when building on ubuntu? [05:15] when I installed from os-works it worked [05:15] it's possible, since xfce4 has a fairly strict build order [05:16] but the actual exiting is fine, since we can both quit our Xfce4 sessions [05:16] hmm can we trigger a rebuild without uploading first?just curious [05:17] lamont would be able to [05:17] then we'd have to apt-get and retry [05:17] jani: or tell me which packages to kick.. [05:17] mind you, better build-deps would solve that as well... [05:18] lamont, we're not sure it's the build deps but it could be [05:18] the b-d are all versioned high enough to require >= 4.2 [05:18] so none of the older stuff is getting pulled in [05:19] right [05:19] crimsun, you talked about the order....i think lamont means that [05:19] jani: actually, all of xfce on i386 is either installed or uploaded, atm. [05:19] I wonder if gdm could have anythiong to do with it [05:19] lamont, right [05:20] even on ia64. :-) [05:20] btw lamont any clue why mousepad did not build? http://people.ubuntu.com/~lamont/buildLogs/m/mousepad/0.2.0-1/ [05:20] it installs the package it needs but does not find its .pc file [05:20] strange [05:21] jani: we don't have such a package [05:21] libxfcegui4-dev is the package and it's apparently there but libxfcegui4-1.0.pc [05:21] there's no .0 [05:21] dpkg -L libxfcegui4-dev |grep pc [05:22] need to fix debian/control to b-d on the correct package iirc [05:22] I looked at it last night but was too tired to fix it [05:22] note that mousepad is currently 'Needs-Build' on all 4 architectures [05:22] but Ii builds for me locally [05:22] what does needs-build mean? that it failed so far [05:22] jani: in a clean chroot? [05:23] lamont, nope I admit [05:23] jani: it means that the buildd's will give it another shot [05:23] oh, I see [05:23] hmm, it should build fine [05:23] but pkg-config finds that file if I do the step it chokes on manually [05:23] Needs-Build is the state that buildds' take it _from_ === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:24] but any idea why it can fail like that if it looks like(at least to me) pkg-config should have succeeded [05:24] oooh, wait a sec [05:25] configure script is broken === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:25] did you say it built locally on yours? [05:25] yup [05:25] in pbuilder? [05:25] nope [05:26] is the check wrong? [05:26] chroot or on your system? === diamond [~diamond@194.46.78.95] has joined #ubuntu-motu === jani has to set up pbuiilder already [05:26] morning. [05:26] my system [05:26] I believe the check is wrong; it's looking for libxfcegui4-1.0 when it should be looking for libxfcegui4-3 [05:27] but libxfcegui4-1.0 is the name of the .pc file [05:27] the check is correct. [05:27] I thought configure prints out the binary name, not the .pc file [05:27] gah, /me apt-gets source [05:28] yes it confised me too [05:28] hey, some days ago I fixed usbview, but I'm not sure if I used the best method [05:28] http://www.amedias.org/~koke/misc/usbview_1.0-6_to_1.0-6ubuntu1.diff [05:28] give me your opinions [05:28] http://people.ubuntu.com/~lamont/buildLogs/Test/u/usbview/1.0-6/usbview_1.0-6_20050328-0655-powerpc-failed [05:30] configure.in:4: your implementation of AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE comes from an [05:30] configure.in:4: old Automake version. You should recreate aclocal.m4 [05:30] autocrap version issue [05:30] you probably want to build-dep on automake-1.7 or something [05:31] else, you get 1.4, which is ancient. [05:32] Mithrandir: automaken gets you 1.8, automake gets you whatever apt decides to give you, prolly 1.4 [05:35] so we should add automake explicitely to the build-deps?it's not there currently is it a build-essential? [05:35] f-spot doesn't have an menu image or is it just me? [05:36] jani: testing a workaround for mousepad [05:36] ok [05:44] ? [05:44] HostingGeek: you mean a icon in the gnome menu?? [05:45] koke: yes [05:46] it does for me [05:47] me too [05:47] tseng: not for me... ;( [05:47] well you're a tool [05:47] so dunno what to tell ya. [05:47] i got that default icon for anything missing an icon [05:51] HostingGeek: which version of f-spot?? [05:51] HostingGeek: blam! showed up without an icon for me too until i started a new session [05:52] HostingGeek: log out then back in [05:52] http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/f-spot/0.0/f-spot-0.0.10.changes [05:52] we are in 0.0.12 now [05:53] the icon has been there for a long time [05:54] * f-spot.desktop.in.in: add file for .desktop menu-spec support [05:54] i think he is saying the entry is there but the icon for it isn't === jani [~pet@Home03207.cluj.astral.ro] has left #ubuntu-motu [] === ogra [~ogra@p5089D9B2.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === rubenv [~lambda1@83-134-126-115.Leuven.GoPlus.FastDSL.tiscali.be] has joined #ubuntu-motu === ogra [~ogra@p5089D9B2.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === jani [~pet@Home03207.cluj.astral.ro] has joined #ubuntu-motu [06:47] jani: not sure regarding mousepad, and I'm pressed for time atm. I'll work on the menu problem this afternoon. [06:47] ok I'll look at mousead then [06:47] great, thanks [06:47] same here :) [06:51] http://www.amedias.org/~koke/misc/usbview_1.0-6_to_1.0-6ubuntu1.diff <-- this looks better ?? [06:52] package is at http://www.amedias.org/~koke/debian/hoary/ if anyone wants to upload === koke needs an urgent shower [06:57] lamont can you kick xterminal please? [06:57] if kicking means trigger a new build that is :) === Danten [~danten@h125n9c1o1049.bredband.skanova.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === dholbach [~daniel@td90919bb.pool.terralink.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu === herve [~hcauwelie@ip-3.net-81-220-179.nice.rev.numericable.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:08] heya! [07:09] hey herve [07:11] laters [07:19] jani: enough people use 'kick' with enough different meanings that I really take it to mean 'go check on this package and make it try again' [07:19] I just heard dit thrown around [07:20] would be nicer if people said give back foo, pretend foo is available, clear the dep-wait for foo, etc./ [07:20] jani: exactly. === Mithrandir usually says "retry" or whatever. [07:20] and the way it's being used in this channel, it means any one of the 3 things I just said [07:21] so if you do not make it explicitely when would a rebuild take place? [07:21] lamont: I think people often just see "hasn't built yet" and doesn't know whether it's dep-wait or something else. [07:21] right [07:22] xterminal depended on libexo and failed to find it but now libexo is in [07:22] I haven't insisted on precise terminology here, just bitched about it. :) === sindre [sindrete@ritchie.ping.uio.no] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:35] jani: build depends are broken: checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool [07:35] xterminal? === jani looks again [07:35] jani: yes [07:36] needs an explict build-dep on libxml-parser-perl, and possibly a bug filed with debian [07:36] if they didn't already fix that [07:36] http://people.ubuntu.com/~lamont/buildLogs/x/xterminal/0.2.4-1/xterminal_0.2.4-1_20050402-0625-i386-failed [07:36] is this the link? [07:37] oh I see other archs are ahead of i386 [07:37] I'll look at fixing it === slatkin [~slatkin@ip24-255-23-159.tc.ph.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:38] janc: it's still needs-build on i386. building (==failed?) on the other 3 [07:39] hrm.. python-kde3 probably needs python2.4 love [07:39] s/janc:/jani/ === sindre [sindrete@ritchie.ping.uio.no] has left #ubuntu-motu [] [07:41] aha so needs-build means it is waiting for build-deps? === sabdfl [~mark@host217-37-231-22.in-addr.btopenworld.com] has left #ubuntu-motu [] [07:47] have to go === SeanQ [~sean@68.205.198.0] has joined #ubuntu-motu === matt_good [~matt_good@ip68-98-143-137.dc.dc.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [08:59] jani: needs-build means that it's waiting for a free buildd [09:00] dep-wait means that it's waiting for build-deps to be in the archive === rubenv [~lambda1@83-134-131-7.Leuven.GoPlus.FastDSL.tiscali.be] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:00] ok thanks, and where do you see in which state is a certain package === arakno [~araknoooo@200191177109-dial-user-ECP.acessonet.com.br] has joined #ubuntu-motu === sivang [~sivang@box79162.elkhouse.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu === HiddenWolf [~hidden@136.93.dynamic.phpg.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:14] did anything come of the idea to have updates to hoary? (like point gnome and kde releases?) [10:15] Riddell: i'm quite sure the opinion is "release is release" [10:15] I remember something like that too [10:15] dholbach: I definatly mind reading some idea for an ubuntu-updates repository [10:16] it exists, but it was for critical stuff only IIRC [10:16] security of course [10:17] hrm [10:17] well, ask mdz/jdub, they will know for sure [10:17] hmm yes [10:19] ho good [10:19] a source package wih {arch} and .arch-ids [10:19] woohoo... [10:20] herve: you never saw apt-get.org-packges :-) [10:22] you're supposed to motivate me to work on this, not afraid me! === skyrider [~skyrider@195.128.178.150] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:22] "install: cannot change owner and/or group of `debian/archway': Operation not permitted [10:22] " [10:22] it needs to install -o root -g root [10:23] am I supposed to run debuild as real root... [10:23] *argl* [10:27] I understand its point of view [10:27] but I thought dpkg was doing this at install time === Arrogance [~aks@CPE0050ba556e4b-CM001225423850.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === dopey is now known as dopey_ === dopey [matth@uruk-hai.bioinformatics.unsw.EDU.AU] has joined #ubuntu-motu === ogra [~ogra@p5089D9B2.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === jani [~pet@Home03207.cluj.astral.ro] has left #ubuntu-motu [] === wasabi_ [~wasabi@c-24-1-61-51.hsd1.tx.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:49] enough apt-get.org for today