/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2005/04/15/#ubuntu-kernel.txt

T-Bonelamont: please enable CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM in all hppa configs (to support more than 4GB RAM). kylem says it's ok on all configs, debian has it12:10
T-Bone(more than 3.75GB to be precise)12:11
lamontTotal Memory: 3840 Mb12:13
lamontgrukble12:13
=== lamont needs more RAM, dammit
lamontT-Bone: can 32-bit machines have > 4GB RAM?12:15
T-Bonelamont: sure, if you run a 32bit kernel12:15
lamontdoh12:16
T-Boneshould ask in #parisc, they're discussin that issue12:16
lamontactually get 2^44 bits of address space for physical12:16
T-Bonebut we *really* want it for -34 for the builders ;)12:16
lamontfabbione: next ABI event, hppa should have CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM=y in all 4 configurations. (causes an ABI event)01:22
lamontfabbione: and is the abi checker smart enough that one can just change the abi version, and it just generates the new files and ignores the old?  that'd be cool.:-)01:44
=== mainer [~mainer3@bb-205-209-66-252.gwi.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
mainerhi: new to ubuntu: are there any people or sites that provide .deb pkgd kernel-images?03:53
maineranyone home?03:54
=== mainer [~mainer3@bb-205-209-66-252.gwi.net] has left #ubuntu-kernel ["Leaving"]
crimsungoodness03:59
dilingerhah03:59
=== kylem groans.
calci found out the problem i was having yesterday with mdz's help04:09
calcthe initrd doesn't load the chipset specific ide driver so it ends up getting loaded after the generic one04:10
fabbionemorning04:50
lamontmorning fabbione04:50
zulevening04:51
lamontfabbione: we planning to keep the 2.6.10 tree alive for breezy, or roll to 2.6.11?04:51
zuli thought it was 2.6.1204:51
lamont2.6.13!!04:51
lamontor will they skip that one out of superstition?04:52
fabbionelamont: if version X has an abi change, it ignores X-1, but we still need to generate the abi for X+104:52
lamontright04:52
fabbionei was thinking to skip .11 completely04:52
fabbioneaccording to dilinger is a crappy kernel04:52
fabbioneand it would be heaps load of work to port to .1104:53
lamontalthough I must admit that I'm tempted to let -34 be an hppa-abi event and bastardize things to keep it at 5.  It's not even in the archive and all that... :-)04:53
fabbionespecially the security fixes that are not in .1104:53
lamontright04:53
lamont12 sounds good to me04:53
fabbionelamont: i have no isseus if you want to modify hppa04:53
lamontand that can go in as soon as breezy opens, yes?04:53
fabbionenobody other than you and T-bone are using it right now04:53
lamontfabbione: is ABI event...  I have to debate whether I care enough to worry about it.04:53
fabbioneand it has never been published04:53
lamontright04:53
zullamont: heh its giong to be a party once breezy opens ;)04:54
lamontzul: zact;y04:54
lamontzactly, even04:54
fabbionelamont: we will go .12 as soon as .12 is released04:54
lamontdoh04:54
fabbionelamont: that will take us more or less 2/3 days to prepare04:54
lamontno 2.6.11.really.2.6.12?04:54
fabbioneis there any reason why you need .12 so badly?04:55
dilingerwhen does breezy open?04:55
lamontI rather expect after UDU, truthfully04:55
fabbionedilinger: a few days after hoary is released04:55
fabbionelamont: i think james will be faster this time :)04:55
lamontprior to really opening breezy, there are plans to rebuild everything with gcc-4.0...04:55
lamontnot sure if that's going to lockstep or not.04:56
fabbioneah right04:56
fabbionegcc-4 transition04:56
zuliirc there are some kernel build issues with gcc-404:56
lamontso it's really a question of "what are the plans between hoary-release and breezy-start...04:56
lamontotherwise, breezy could start _now_04:56
fabbionezul: yes04:56
lamontzul: there are build issues with lots of stuff..04:56
fabbionezul: we can't stay with 2.6.1004:56
lamontthe full build wouldn't go into the actual archive04:57
fabbioneit will probably FTBFS04:57
zulheh one of should try building with gcc-4 :)04:57
fabbionei can do that right away :)04:57
zulahhh...i was going to do that...04:57
zul:)04:57
fabbionebut iirc the miscompilations were on arch != i38604:57
lamontgiven that the current gcc-3.4, gcc-4.0 are FTBFS on hppa..... :(04:58
fabbionezul: go ahead and do it04:58
zulgoody04:58
fabbionehppa sucks :)04:58
lamontfabbione: feh04:58
fabbionethey build on sparc04:58
lamontjava assertions, doko thinks he knows what the fix is, won't go in before release04:58
zuldoes ubuntu actually work on sparc now/04:58
lamontif I get bored this week, I'll test his fix04:58
=== lamont has 3 ubuntu/hppa machines in his house
lamont(2 buildd's and a router)04:59
lamontanyway, bed time for me.,04:59
fabbionezul: yes it does05:00
=== dilinger slaves over a hot 2.6.11
fabbionelamont: don't rush.. i woke one hour earlier than usual :)05:01
zulcool...i have an ultra1 lying around05:01
fabbionezul: unfortunatly it won't install05:01
fabbionebecause elmo stopped rsyncing sparc.u.c05:01
zulblah05:01
fabbionedue to some server load problems05:01
fabbionehe promised me to move it somewhere else05:02
fabbionebut afaik he didn't yet05:02
zulok...well i can wait...somtimes patiently05:03
fabbioneperhaps i can convince elmo to do a pulse todya05:03
fabbionelet see05:03
fabbionelamont: sometimes soon i will need some help to add breezy/hoary-security/hoary-updates to the buildd.05:04
fabbionebecause tbh i never had the need to build more than one release05:04
fabbioneand i can't remember crap on how to do it :)05:05
zuli think it might be time for me to go to bed...later folks05:10
fabbionelamont: i was thinking that it could actually be an option to open a 2.6.12 branch05:11
fabbionecreating an orig from bk05:12
fabbionebut that means that the orig must be used internally and not published05:12
fabbionebecuase we will replace it with the real one once it's out05:12
=== cc [~cc@c210-49-121-44.eburwd3.vic.optusnet.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== Seveas [~seveas@ksl403-uva-131.wireless.uva.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== zul [~chuck@198.62.158.205] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
zulmorning02:43
lamontfabbione: other option is to open a 2.6.12 branch with a 2.6.11pre12.orig.tar.gz02:45
=== makx [~max@baikonur.stro.at] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
makxlamont around?02:47
lamontyo02:47
makxi wanted to ask question how you'd think daily builds should be properly set up.02:47
makxdoing it d-k wise but it should be same, i guess.02:48
makxfabbione hinted me that you may have usefull pointers on last u-k meeting.02:48
makxi've played around a bit and have a skript that svn co d-k and builds images atm.02:49
lamontif the plan is to have these in the archive, then it's simply a matter of uploading fresh source every day.  Ideally, it'd have an orig.tar.gz that had nearly everything, and then just a diff.gz for the day, until such time as the diff got large enough and we cut a new orig.tar.gz02:51
lamontless bits to up/down load that wya02:51
lamontfabbione: cutting even an internal-only orig.tar.gz that's incorrect is a bad plan...02:52
makxlamont: aah you are building u-k directly out of source.02:52
makxforgot that bit.02:53
makxexperimental still sounds like a nice target for those.02:54
makxok, so i'll have to work on the unifying of the d-k packaging.02:55
makxlamont: ok thanks for the hint.02:58
lamontkids->school03:00
zulfiggin xp03:01
=== makx [~max@baikonur.stro.at] has left #ubuntu-kernel ["bella]
zuloh this sucks..ply a matter of uploading fresh source every day.  Ideally, it'd have an orig.tar.gz that had nearly everything, and then just a diff.gz for the day, until such time as the diff got large enough and we cut a new orig.tar.gz03:27
zullamont less bits to up/down load that wya03:27
zulfrig...stupid gnome...sorry03:28
zulwhat i really wanted to say dpkg-architecture: warning: Couldn't determine gcc system type, falling back to default (native compilation)03:28
zuluh...nevermind03:34
zulftbs with gcc-4.003:39
=== lamont returns
zulhey lamont 04:09
lamontfabbione: you around?04:27
=== lamont changes the abicheck code
zulheh that will get his attention04:34
lamontgrumble.  worse than I wanted it to be04:36
lamontchanging the ${arch}.ignore case to still do diffs04:49
lamontif it can, that is.04:49
fabbionelamont: i am now04:53
fabbionei completely crashed04:54
lamontheh04:57
lamontadded some code to the .ignore case to still do the diff if there's both an abi file and the .ignore file04:57
fabbionelamont: i make no objections if it has been tested :)04:58
lamonttest build is running now04:58
fabbionecool04:59
lamontwell, actually, the .dsc is packaging now.04:59
fabbioneif everybody is happy and the situation is normal i am off again to enjoy a bit of sunshine04:59
fabbioneand i will be back in an hour or so04:59
lamontlater05:00
fabbionelater :)05:00
zultoodles05:00
lamontfabbione: of course, the new code is so that hppa can have a well documented non-abi event. :-)  We're testing to see if there are more than 2 users, you see... :)05:04
zulheh...its not like you would break something on i386 like i usually do and people notice these things05:06
lamontzul: this is intentionally ignoring the abi change that really should create 2.6.10-6, but won't.05:13
zulah i c05:13
lamontyeah.  both t-bone and I agree that we should, so that's 100% of the known user community of our non-existant port.05:17
lamontwell, s/non-existant port/non-advertised archive/05:17
lamontwhich means that we have abi files, we're breaking abi compatibility on that archtecture only, and specifically ignoring that fact.05:18
lamontlalalalalala05:18
zulheh05:18
zulcrap..i have a dentist appointment today05:19
lamontzul: that'd be protcologist. :-)05:23
zulspeaking of protcologist...nah...i dont think you wanna know :)05:24
lamontreally crappy work05:25
zulhehe05:25
lamontgotta wonder what makes  a med student _decide_ to specialize that direction...05:25
zulfetish maybe05:26
=== lamont bets money
zulcould be a little from column a, a little from column b05:27
=== lamont grumbles
lamontgotta figure out where the hppa.ignore file gets removed05:42
lamontok.  empty files and debuild -S don't seem to mix.05:46
fabbionelamont: it's the kernel make clean target that kills empty files05:58
fabbioneUnpacking libmpfr-dev (from .../libmpfr-dev_2.1.0-2ubuntu1_sparc.deb) ...05:58
fabbionedpkg: error processing /opt/sparcbuildd/chroots/chroot-hoary/var/cache/apt/archives/libmpfr-dev_2.1.0-2ubuntu1_sparc.deb (--unpack):05:58
fabbione trying to overwrite `/usr/share/info/dir.old.gz', which is also in package texinfo05:58
fabbionedpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)05:58
fabbionehmmm05:58
fabbionei guess i have some crap in the buildd cache06:00
lamontwas old texinfo bug did that.06:00
fabbioneyeah i remember that06:01
fabbionebut gcc-4.0 has been built a while ago06:01
fabbionei mean that i did build gcc-4 other times06:02
fabbionewithout problems06:02
zulfabbione: ccache me thinks07:06
fabbionezul: nah. i am talking about building gcc-4.007:07
fabbioneccache can cope with a different compilare07:07
fabbionecompiler07:07
fabbioneit did build before today07:07
zulfabbione: i got the same with export CC="ccache gcc-4.0"07:07
fabbionezul: so 2.6.10 doesn't build with gcc-4.007:13
zulnope07:13
T-Bonehow suprising :P07:13
=== fabbione isn't
T-Boneneither am i, just being sarcastic ;}07:13
zulsure sure07:14
fabbioneT-Bone: i could understand that... you are french :P07:14
T-Bonefabbione: and? Aren't you italian? :)07:14
fabbioneyes i am07:14
T-Bonewhat so different about us then? :)07:14
fabbionethat you are french and i am not?07:15
T-Bonethe way we cook spaghettis? :)07:15
fabbioneno.. you don't cook spaghettis07:15
T-BoneLOL07:15
T-Bonehere we go =)07:15
fabbione:)07:15
=== T-Bone must schedule yet another Italian trip for next summer. That country is probably the one I'd want to live in, should I have to leave .fr ;]
zulfabbione: dies in drivers/acpi07:16
T-Bonefabbione: that has to be a compliment! =] 07:17
zulT-Bone: why would you leave .fr because you are too french?07:17
zulhehe07:17
fabbioneT-Bone: i would never go back to live in italy.. why would you do that?07:17
T-Bonezul: no. I was hypothetising :)07:17
fabbionezul: ok07:17
zulah07:17
T-Bonefabbione: why wouldn't you?07:17
fabbioneT-Bone: because Italy is only a very nice place to have holidays07:18
T-BoneLOL07:18
fabbionethat's about it07:18
fabbioneworking there.. sucks07:18
T-Boneah07:18
fabbioneinternet there .. sucks07:18
T-Bonecan't tell07:18
fabbionegovernment.. questionable07:18
T-Bonelol07:18
zul bersecloni?07:19
fabbioneall the rest != some resturant = the sucks07:19
fabbioneberlusconi07:19
T-Boneyet, food is cool, weather is cool, ragazza cool, monuments cool, landscape cool... ;)07:19
zullazio cool ;)07:19
fabbioneT-Bone: aren't you married?07:19
fabbionezul: ahahha07:19
T-Bonefabbione: hell no!07:19
T-Bone;)07:19
fabbioneT-Bone: if you really want to get laid to death you should go and visit siciliy07:20
fabbionejust remember to get a fake id before going there07:20
T-Bonei'm 24 dude. I'm not gonna emprison myself while I'm at the peak of my sex appeal ;)07:20
zulnot going to touch it..07:20
T-Bonei went to sicily ;)07:20
fabbioneotherwise one of these hot chicks might show up at your door in france with a mini T-Bone07:20
T-BoneLOL07:20
fabbionedude... 24?07:21
fabbionehell you are kid07:21
T-Bonefabbione: that's what they say in movies, is that so true?07:21
zulyou are a young'un t-bone07:21
fabbioneT-Bone: i lived in sicily for 4 years...07:21
T-Bonefabbione: sure. I'm trying to grow chest hair. Ask lamont-away =)07:21
fabbionewell it is true in certain parts of siciliy07:21
fabbioneahahahaha07:21
T-Bonei guess this might be true in certain parts of Corsica as well :)07:22
=== ..[topic/#ubuntu-kernel:fabbione] : Ubuntu kernel development discussion | http://www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/KernelTeam | http://people.u.c/~lamont/Archives/kernel-team@ubuntu.com--2005/ stable: kernel-debian--pre34--2.6.10 playground: kernel-debian--experimental--2.6.10 | There are no kernel bugs.. only broken hardware | T-Bone: I'm trying to grow chest hair.
zulhah07:22
fabbionewell corsica is france territory and i have never been there07:22
T-Bonefabbione: you're late on topic. Lamont has put that one in the very early days of #u-kernel ;] 07:23
T-Bonefabbione: never been to france?07:23
fabbioneyeah but i wasn't here07:23
T-Boneah ok :)07:23
fabbioneT-Bone: oh yeah.. i have been to france several times07:23
T-Boneah!07:23
fabbionespecially in Paris07:23
fabbionethat's just because the best airshow in EU is/was there07:24
T-Bonesaid to be the most beautiful city in the world...07:24
zuli been to paris once07:24
fabbioneT-Bone: bullshit.. Rome > Paris07:24
T-Boneairshow?07:24
T-Bonefabbione: lol, no way :)07:24
fabbioneT-Bone: yeah.. Le Bourget07:24
T-Bonefabbione: you don't have the Eiffel tower in Rome ;)07:24
fabbione(sorry for the spelling)07:24
T-Bonefabbione: ah! I see07:24
T-Bonespelling is correct btw :)07:24
fabbioneT-Bone: you don't have the colosseum in Paris07:24
T-Bonefabbione: right. we don't collect ruins ;)07:25
=== T-Bone ducks!
fabbioneT-Bone: that's why it is still up and rocking after 2000 years....07:25
fabbioneehhe07:25
fabbioneanyway let's cut the speech france <-> italy here07:25
fabbioneotherwise i will get T-Bone to commit suicide for being born there07:26
T-BoneLOL07:26
T-Bonein your widest dreams... =)07:26
T-Bone+l07:26
fabbioneT-Bone: ok.. listen to this story as a starter07:26
fabbioneyou are probably too young to remember07:27
T-Bone?07:27
fabbioneyou know that Italy and France always fight for who has the best wine?07:27
fabbioneit's kinda of a friendly war ...07:27
fabbionebut you can smell it07:27
T-Bonefabbione: I don't. The answer is obvious. I wasn't aware there was a debate 8)07:27
=== T-Bone laughs like evil =]
fabbionewell we always accused France to steal Italian wine, mix it with some local flavour and sell it with a different name07:28
fabbioneFrance of course always negated that07:28
T-Boneberk07:28
T-Boneshould some people do that in France, that's not wine they're selling :P07:28
zullocal flavour would be anti-freeze07:28
fabbioneall of a sudden, in Italy, they found a big amount of poison in italian wine07:29
fabbionedue to some kinda of infection...07:29
fabbioneprobably generated by some chemical shit07:29
T-Bonefabbione: it is obvious some producers sell something that should barely be called cat piss. What's even more unfortunate is that there are people buying it as "French wine" :P07:29
fabbionewell.. of course we closed down the selling of wine07:29
T-Bonefabbione: no kidding?07:29
fabbionenow.. how come some of the major France wine producers did the same? :)07:30
fabbioneT-Bone: no i am really serious07:30
fabbionei am not kidding07:30
T-Bonewow07:30
fabbioneoh as a side note07:30
T-Bonelooks pretty much unbelievable to me07:30
fabbionethe part of italy that was damaged07:30
T-Boneat least for the "Grands Crus"07:30
fabbionewas the north-west.. close to the french border line07:30
T-BonePiemont?07:31
fabbionenow.. really *CASUALLY*07:31
fabbioneall the southern-east french wine were not distributed07:31
fabbioneyeah Piemonte07:31
fabbione;)07:31
T-Bonegood wine in Piemonte, that's for sure :)07:31
fabbioneoh.. of course.. France did NEVER import wine from italy....07:31
T-Boneheh07:31
fabbioneanyway07:32
fabbionei think it's time to go and help my wife07:32
fabbioneand get some food07:32
fabbionecya tomorrow guys07:32
T-Bonefabbione: well i don't know much about that story, but the best wines in France aren't southern-east ones. Bordeaux and Bourgognes are respectively southern west and middle-east, so to speak07:32
T-Bonefabbione: heh, cya. I'm not done with you yet ;)07:32
fabbioneT-Bone: well still pretty close to france :)07:33
fabbioneT-Bone: next one will be italian kitchen vs french cousine07:33
fabbione:P07:33
T-BoneLOL07:33
zulfrench football vs italian football?07:37
T-Bonelol07:38
T-Bonei don't like football, i'd be a bad advocate :)07:38
T-BoneOTOH, french rugby vs italian rugby would prove interesting... 8)07:39
zuli dont really pay attention to rugby anymore07:41
zulfabbione: there is alot of warnings like this include/linux/skbuff.h:1017: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'csum_and_copy_from_user' differ in signedness07:45
zul that should probably be fixed as well07:45
=== lamont_r [~lamont@m010f36d0.tmodns.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
lamont_rWARNING! ABI check override for hppa has been detected, and there were changes!09:22
lamont_rwoot!09:22
T-Bonelol09:26
lamont_rT-Bone: that means that my check changes worked....09:27
T-Boneindeed09:27
lamont_rfabbione: actually, I have another quesion about the abi check....09:28
lamont_rnormal use case is going to be that the user installs the new kernel and then doesn't reboot...09:28
lamont_rhence adding symbols should mean that the new modules won't load in the old kernel, no?09:28
lamont_r:q09:29
=== lamont_r needs focus_mode: eyes
zulwohoo...helium balloons09:40
lamont_rzul: get a real job, slacker09:41
zuli tell you i work for the government..09:42
lamont_rzactly! :0-)09:42
T-Bonelol09:42
zulhowever i wouldnt mind being paid to work on ubuntu full time :)09:42
lamont_rCONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM committed.  I feel so dirty09:43
T-Bonelamont_r: i like you very much, you know? Especially when you're dirty ;)09:43
zulok...take it to #ubuntuhppaorgy09:43
lamont_rwhat better way to find the 3rd user, eh?09:43
T-Bonelol09:44
T-Bonelamont_r: i've finished reviewing my howto, and will advertise it soon09:44
lamont_rmjg59: why does the kernel think ACPI says I have no batteries?09:45
lamont_rT-Bone: and you fixed your /boot vs / issue?09:45
T-Bonelamont_r: I can't tell. I'll tell you in next upload09:45
T-Bones/upload/upgrade/09:45
T-Bonelamont_r: all i can say is that it doesn't work within the chroot, that's for sure09:46
T-Bonewhich brings us the question of "how is it supposed to work in the (yet hypothetical) installer"09:46
lamont_rgrep link_in /etc/kernel-img.conf 09:47
lamont_rlink_in_boot = yes09:47
lamont_rhave that?09:47
T-Boneyes09:47
T-Bonelink_in_boot = Yes09:47
=== jbailey [~jbailey@CPE000ded9d787c-CM014260028338.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
zulhey jbailey 09:52
jbaileyHeya Chuck09:52
zulhow is it going?09:52
T-Bonelamont_r: is there any way to educate popcon about an http proxy?09:53
lamont_rhttp_proxy=?09:53
jbaileyzul: Good!  I got a place. =)09:53
T-Bonelamont_r: in popularity-contest.conf?09:53
lamont_rdunno09:53
T-Boneah09:53
zuljbailey: oh yeah wehre?09:53
T-Bonebecause i can't get it to work behind a proxy, you see...09:53
jbaileyzul: In the plateau/09:54
zulcool09:55
T-Bonejbailey: dude, i've started reading "WYFL", it's fuckin amusing! ;)09:55
T-Bonejbailey: i'm learning a handful of useful expressions ;)09:55
zullater10:03
lamont_rWYFL?10:06
=== lamont_r saw a t-shirt this past weekend that simply said 'WTFWJD?'
T-BoneWatch Your Fucking Language10:07
T-Bonesubtitled "How to swear effectively, explained in explicit detail and enhanced by numerous examples taken from everyday life"10:07
lamont_rURL?10:08
T-Bonelamont_r: btw, seen what I said in #parisc? I wonder how bad it would be to run a debian 2.6.8 kernel on Ubuntu for the time being?10:08
T-Bonelamont_r: that's a fuckin book! ;)10:08
T-Bonelamont_r: amazon.com ;)10:08
lamont_rheh10:08
lamont_rT-Bone: probably no worse than any other.10:09
T-Bonelamont_r: ok. I guess that i'll do that then, because the j6k don't have GSP and i don't feel like going to school every 4 days or so to power cycle them10:09
lamont_rT-Bone: alternatively, figure out what we broke in 2.6.10SMP10:09
T-Bonelamont_r: btw, we're down to 2 builders until friday, since one of them died :P10:09
lamont_rxorg builds just fine on a UP kernel.10:09
T-Bonelamont_r: everything built fine10:10
T-Bonelamont_r: i'm almost certain that's the cache_grow panic that stroke10:10
T-Bonelamont_r: unfortunately that box is headless10:10
lamont_rxorg build died twice on 2.6.10-33.1-hppa64-smp10:10
lamont_rT-Bone: crossover serial cables, dude.10:10
T-Bonelamont_r: that's what's there. Except minicom isn't always running on the other end of the cable :P10:11
T-Bonelamont_r: i've been building xorg on 2.6.12 64bit smp10:11
lamont_rwell, yeah10:11
=== T-Bone does a test install of bastardized kernel on ubuntu to check how it behaves
T-Bonelamont_r: unfortunately, as i kept bashing on #parisc, our kernel is in a very awful state since 2.6.8.1 :(10:14
lamont_rT-Bone: modulo the "expect bug"10:15
T-Bonelamont_r: alas10:16
=== lamont_r thinks maybe -34 with discontigmem will make it die less often...
T-Bonelamont_r: all in all i can keep the buildd setup on the A500 to build sensitive packages, unless you manage to get the A500 in DC, and that one to build these10:19
T-Bonelamont_r: install procedure advertised on #parisc and linked on the website ;)10:20
lamont_rjust in time for the abi event.  cool. :=(10:21
T-Bonewho cares, they all know :)10:21
lamont_ryeah10:21
T-Bonei haven't m-l'd it yet :)10:21
lamont_rwell, if you do, include the fact that -34 will have abi breakage, so they'll need to reboot after they install10:22
lamont_r(hppa, for our listeners here)10:22
T-Bonei won't m-l anything before we get the archive in the right place and -34 in it10:22
=== lamont_r likes that plan
T-Bonei knew you would :)10:22
T-Bonek so ubuntu seems to behave well with debian 2.6.8.210:23
T-Bones/.2/-2/10:23
lamont_rcoolnesss - that has all of kyle's backport of 2.6.12?10:24
T-Boneno clue10:24
T-Bonestrange thing is that we have a -5 in universe, but it doesn't build. I just asked kylem about that in #parisc10:25
T-Bonelamont_r: it dies with "depmod: ELF file /build/buildd/kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa-2.6.8/install-32-smp/debian/tmp-image/lib/modules/2.6.8-1-32-smp/kernel/drivers/net/hamachi.ko not for this architecture"10:25
lamont_rT-Bone: you mean 2.6.8-2-32_2.6.8-5?10:26
T-Bonetons of messages like this10:26
T-Bonekernel-image-2.6.8-hppa_2.6.8-510:26
lamont_r64 vs 32 bit modutils issues10:26
T-Bonehow comes we can't build it?10:26
T-Boneor should i say, how comes it builds fine in Debian?10:26
=== lamont_r tries to remember what that bug was
T-Bone(i suppose it does)10:26
lamont_runame hack in the kernel returned the wrong thing the last time10:27
T-Bonehuhu10:27
T-Bonegah i hate the idea of bastardizing the Ubuntu setup on the builders :P10:29
T-Boneat least if i could have installed kernel packages from universe it'd have been almost acceptable :P10:29
T-Bonelamont_r: i'll let the machine run Ubuntu with debian kernel for a while just to make sure. Seems to work fine in any case10:38
T-Bonelamont_r: i'll add some 200 more signed changes a bit later. Time for me to get some food10:44

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!