[12:55] <lamont> building #4/4 for the arch-all tst
[12:55] <lamont> test
[01:28] <zul> again?
[01:30] <lamont> doesn't seem to be there yet, or is it?
[01:31] <zul> nope
[01:32] <zul> makes me nervous :)
[01:37] <lamont> well, it's released now, at least...
[01:38] <lamont> arch-dep build done, working on arch-indep now
[01:38] <lamont> finally
[01:54] <zul> hmm?
[01:55] <zul> reiserfs4 has been released?
[01:56] <lamont> that's what the guy who asked how hard it would be to make a hoary install CD supporting it said...
[01:56] <zul> ok he might be on crack..
[01:57] <zul> oh...well according to their website.
[01:58] <zul> it has been released but still hasnt hit linus's tree and he is on vacation :)
[02:00] <dilinger> wait
[02:00] <dilinger> people *want* reiser4?
[02:00] <zul> apparently
[02:00] <dilinger> you'd think they would've learned their lesson w/ reiser3..
[02:01] <zul> *cough* https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10506
[02:02] <dilinger> heh
[02:03] <dilinger> The Great Ubuntuists respond: "you don't really want this.  you really really don't want this."
[02:03] <crimsun> "and because you really really don't want it, you won't get it" =)
[02:14] <infinity> dilinger : The only lesson users seem to learn is "a new upstream version number will surely fix everything!"
[02:14] <zul> works for me :)
[02:18] <dilinger> i like how he says it's supported by hans reiser
[02:18] <dilinger> as if that's a mark of quality one would want to strive towards
[02:18] <infinity> Sure, if we pay a support contract to him.
[02:19] <zul> dilinger: wheres this?
[02:19] <dilinger> These patches apply cleanly, they are supported by Hans Reiser & company
[02:20] <zul> meh..
[02:20] <zul> well...time to go spend time with my wife...bbl
[02:21] <crimsun> cya
[02:23] <infinity> Right from the horse's mouth:
[02:23] <infinity> "We must caution that just as Linux 2.6 is not yet as stable as Linux 2.4, it will also be some substantial time before V4 is as stable as V3."
[02:23] <infinity> If they claim reiser4 is less stable than reiser3, I'm frightened.
[02:36] <lamont> lol
[02:36] <lamont> Processing blk_stop_queue
[03:25] <lamont> arch:all adds about 2.5 hours to the build process, before it dies because brilliance here forgot to add the build-dep.
[03:26] <lamont> anybody home? (/me is looking for someone who was at the keysigning in UDU)
[04:52] <zul> fabbione: merge if you wish, new rt2500, rt2400, squashfs, and some bugfixes
[04:56] <dilinger> right
[04:56] <dilinger> keysigning
[04:56] <dilinger> i should do that now
[05:14] <zul> grr...some poeple piss me off
[05:43] <fabbione> morning
[05:43] <zul> hey fabbione 
[05:44] <zul> how goes it?
[05:45] <fabbione> just woke up
[05:45] <zul> nifty
[05:45] <zul> im just about to go to bed :)
[05:45] <fabbione> why did you split the rt2x00 driver?
[05:45] <zul> because i was asked to by a user...
[05:46] <zul> against my better judgement
[05:46] <fabbione> but is there a tech reason for it?
[05:46] <zul> no
[05:46] <fabbione> lamont: are you still awake?
[05:47] <zul> night
[05:48] <zul> the heat is starting to get to me
[05:48] <fabbione> night zul
[09:10] <Drako60> anyone awake?
[09:11] <fabbione> yes
[09:11] <Drako60> i'm curious as to why initrd seems to be loading all my modules and not /etc/modules
[09:12] <fabbione> Drako60: this is not a channel where we do general support. only kernel development related topics
[09:12] <fabbione> you can ask in #ubuntu
[09:13] <Drako60> ok someone suggested i ask here a few days ago
[09:13] <fabbione> initrd loads all the modules that it believes to be required to boot the system
[09:13] <fabbione> etd/modules is parsed at a later stage
[09:14] <fabbione> (short answer)
[09:45] <jbailey> Drako60: If you need to add stuff to that list, use /etc/mkinitrd/modules
[09:45] <jbailey> Drako60: You then need to regenerate your initrd, though.
[10:26] <fabbione> this documentation build thingy is a total fuckage
[10:32] <fabbione> ahhhhh
[10:32] <fabbione> got it
[10:35] <Lathiat> heh
[10:35] <Lathiat> wheres my kernel! ;)
[10:36] <fabbione> i am waiting ppc to finish the build
[10:36] <fabbione> and i will be able to upload
[10:36] <Lathiat> what machines do you have backing the ppc builds on buildd?
[10:38] <fabbione> only one porting machine and 3 buildds
[10:39] <Lathiat> porting machine?
[10:39] <fabbione> well i need a machine where i can test build the kernel
[10:39] <fabbione> that one is called a port machine
[10:39] <Lathiat> right
[10:39] <Lathiat> and then 3 that do the actual building into the archives?
[10:39] <fabbione> right
[10:39] <Lathiat> what kinda machines?
[10:42] <fabbione> can't remember
[10:42] <fabbione> g5 i think
[10:52] <jbailey> cc: Hey!
[10:52] <jbailey> cc: You've come to visit us again, does this mean we did drag you over to the dark side? =)
[10:55] <Mithrandir> hiya jeff
[10:58] <jbailey> Heya Tollef.
[11:00] <jbailey> X2?
[11:00] <Mithrandir> dualcore AMD CPU
[11:01] <jbailey> *lol*
[11:02] <Mithrandir> I wonder when we'll see x40-style laptops with them.  mmm..
[11:02] <jbailey> Hopeflly soon.
[11:02] <jbailey> That way the old amd64 laptops will be driven down in price even further.
[11:03] <cc> jbailey: i'm usually idling here ;-)
[11:03] <Mithrandir> the current set of amd64 laptops are "media center" laptops.
[11:03] <Mithrandir> hi cc
[11:03] <cc> but no, haven't been dragged, per se
[11:03] <cc> hi Mithrandir 
[11:28] <fabbione> humpf
[11:28] <fabbione> i did something half stupid
[11:30] <fabbione> jeee too many branches!
[11:54] <horms> yes
[12:15] <fabbione> yeah i got lost in branching the release and tags :)
[12:17] <thom> i may as well accept my fate...
[12:18] <fabbione> UHAAAA
[12:18] <fabbione> yay
[12:18] <fabbione> welcome dude
[12:20] <fabbione> and here is the second one
[12:20] <chmj> :P 
[02:04] <zul> hey
[02:40] <lamont> fabbione: testbuild finished at 0251 my time... 
[02:40] <lamont> doing the dance now
[02:46] <fabbione> hey lamont 
[02:46] <fabbione> lamont: meh i already uploaded 92-1.1 with a fix
[02:47] <fabbione> i didn't find anything here in the logs...
[02:49] <lamont> fabbione: great - saves me the merge time. :0)
[02:49] <fabbione> eheh
[02:51] <lamont> committed kernel-team@ubuntu.com--2005/kernel-debian--pre1--2.6.11.91--patch-39
[02:52] <lamont> A  patches/documentation_docbook-net.dpatch
[02:52] <lamont> fabbione: the penultimate test build was missing the build-depend on docbook-xml
[02:53] <fabbione> lamont: the real fix was adding xmlto as build-dep
[02:53] <fabbione> i did purge docbook-xml
[02:53] <lamont> fabbione: even better
[02:53] <fabbione> and removed the default gw
[02:53] <fabbione> it was asking for xmlto
[02:53] <fabbione> added that one
[02:54] <fabbione> btw
[02:54] <fabbione> FYI
[02:54] <lamont> kewlness
[02:54] <fabbione> thom is getting the "welcome to kernel team bug that kills my debian/ dir"
[02:54] <fabbione> ahah
[02:54] <fabbione> now.. zul took 2 days to figure it out
[02:54] <thom> heh
[02:55] <fabbione> thom: i can give you an hint
[02:55] <zul> you are all bastards
[02:55] <fabbione> grabbing the debian/ dir from baz is not enough
[02:55] <fabbione> zul: this is so true!
[02:55] <lamont> thom: zgrep ^diff linux-source_<oldversion>.diff.gz
[02:55] <zul> i know...its obvious
[02:56] <zul> and once now that you all know that you are bastards...im happier
[02:56] <fabbione> thom: who sais that debian/ is the only thing contained in the diff.gz :)
[02:57] <lamont> thom: s/^diff/^---/
[02:58] <zul> oh...so you help thom out right away :P
[02:58] <lamont> zul: I was sleeping while you were working on it.
[02:58] <zul> hehe
[02:59] <fabbione> anyway i am off
[02:59] <fabbione> i will be back tomorrow
[02:59] <fabbione> i still don't feel super 100%
[02:59] <fabbione> and i am supposed to be spending time with my wife today
[03:00] <fabbione> it's her bday
[03:00] <lamont> fabbione: you better go then.
[03:00] <fabbione> yeah
[03:00] <zul> bbl...i have to run errands today
[03:00] <fabbione> lamont: how are the buildd going on kernel?
[03:00] <fabbione> amd64 is done
[03:00] <fabbione> i am more worried about i386
[03:01] <lamont> i386 is building the last flavor
[03:01] <mvirkkil> zul: Just popped in to say thanks for the hollywood+/dxr3 support :-) Haven't tried it yet though.
[03:05] <Drako60> hmm i wish i could figure this problem out
[03:05] <fabbione> mvirkkil: difficult to try.. it's not in the archive yet :)
[03:05] <fabbione> i am off
[03:06] <fabbione> cya guys
[03:10] <mvirkkil> fabbione: I just read that zul had marked the bug as fixed in bugzilla. 
[03:11] <zul> when the next upload goes through
[03:12] <mvirkkil> Not familiar with the process. Any etA?
[03:12] <zul> today i think not 100% sure
[03:13] <mvirkkil> Cool. I was thinking along the lines of weeks :-)
[03:13] <zul> nope
[03:13] <mvirkkil> Must say that that was one of the quickest fixes for an rfe I've filed.
[03:14] <zul> i was home at the time
[03:15] <Drako60> can i ask a question no one in #Ubuntu seems to be able to clarify this for me
[03:16] <thom> grah, you guys all suck :-) that's a truely silly patch 
[03:17] <lamont> thom: yeah
[03:17] <lamont> Drako60: go ahead and ask another question....
[03:18] <fabbione> now.. this is scary.. my wife and i were supposed to go shopping.. she decided to go to sleep
[03:18] <chmj> hahaha
[03:19] <Drako60> ok well i get an error from Nforce3-250 durring boot saying BIOS didn't set cable bits correctly, and i can't figure out where this error is coming from other then related to DMA, which has lead me to believe its A. the motherboard. B the bios. or C. the module being loaded
[03:20] <fabbione> or simply a combination
[03:21] <fabbione> or the IDE cable is not the correct one (mostlikely)
[03:21] <thom> hrm, we should totally teach dp-e-p to build hardlinked trees, too
[03:21] <fabbione> i am not sure you can
[03:22] <fabbione> specially because you can have source in  partion A and /tmp on B
[03:22] <fabbione> that will break hardlinks
[03:22] <zul> fabbione: wll it is her bday
[03:22] <Mithrandir> cp -al should work fine.
[03:22] <fabbione> zul: ???
[03:23] <zul> gah...well it is your wife's birthday
[03:23] <fabbione> yeah but there are NO women in this world that can resist to shopping
[03:23] <thom> fabbione: i don't think that's a particular problem; you could just make dpep build the tree in the same parent dir if it turns out to be a problem
[03:24] <zul> fabbione: i think you found one 
[03:24] <Drako60> ok thanks fabbione thats what i was thinking but i wasn't sure, and i wanted to know if i could check in what order initrd was loading the modules, i don't know if lsmod shows the order loaded or not
[03:24] <fabbione> zul: nah...
[03:24] <fabbione> Drako60: reverse order.. yes it does
[03:24] <fabbione> top is the most recent
[03:24] <fabbione> but it has nothing to do with the modules
[03:28] <Drako60> well i'll deal with the cables tomorrow, atleast that will narrow the issue down
[03:36] <fabbione> baz commit -s'Update amd64/ia64/sparc abi files'
[03:37] <fabbione> YAY
[03:37] <fabbione> first set of abi files...
[03:56] <fabbione> yay
[03:57] <fabbione> i386 successful
[03:57] <chmj> :-) 
[03:58] <Lathiat> woo
[03:58] <zul> meh...console_macros.h changed
[03:59] <zul> or doesnt exist anymore
[03:59] <fabbione> zul: ah no i rememeber.. the rt2500 doesn't build on ppc anymore
[03:59] <fabbione> the one before the split did
[03:59] <zul> how come?
[03:59] <fabbione> the last one doesn't
[03:59] <fabbione> different code?
[03:59] <zul> probably
[04:00] <fabbione> it was ranting about some endian things
[04:00] <fabbione> + other stuff
[04:00] <zul> frig..
[04:00] <thom> bonus, skge actually compiles ;-)
[04:01] <fabbione> thom: on all 6 arches?
[04:01] <thom> just amd64-generic so far
[04:01] <fabbione> thom: there might be light at the end of the tunnel :)
[04:01] <thom> i just want to test it first :-)
[04:06] <fabbione> cya tomorrow guys
[04:07] <zul> todles
[04:44] <thom> guys, can you have a look at http://people.ubuntu.com/~thom/arch/thom@ubuntu.com--fandango/ kernel-debian--pre1,2--2.6.11.92--patch-2
[04:44] <thom> and check i've not done anything *stoooopid*
[05:02] <chmj> did you just remove that patch ?
[05:08] <dilinger> thom: like, UHF stupid?
[05:29] <thom> uhf?
[05:38] <dilinger> it's a movie.  i'm guessing that's a no
[06:22] <lamont> dilinger: funny movie, too
[06:24] <dilinger> it and family guy are the only dvds i own (uhf was $5 in some bargain bin.  i couldn't pass it up)
[07:18] <zul> doh...i forgot about the cc today..
[07:25] <zul> thom: did you get somet to check your patch?
[07:25] <zul> real funny..weird al and michael richards
[10:10] <zul> ok i had enough of oprah