[12:38] <jbailey> lamont: ping when you're back.
[02:03] <jbailey> The glibc is on chinstrap in my homedir.  Builds here.  The only thing you need is a current breezy chroot and gcc-3.4 from Debian.
[02:04] <jbailey> I'll check my mail tomorrow sometime, and then I'll be online Sunday evening.
=== jbailey heads off.
[06:13] <svenl> doko: well, all tests failed again, but the package built, except for libgcc1 and co, it seems.
[06:14] <svenl> doko: correction, some tests failed.
[06:16] <svenl> doko: i guess the 64bit tests failed, and that is the problem, message is -m64 not supported in this configuration.
[06:17] <svenl> oh well.
=== ogra [~ogra@p5089E62A.dip.t-dialin.net]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
[06:06] <lamont> WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed
[06:06] <lamont> This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
[06:06] <lamont>   apt dpkg dselect (due to dpkg) sysvinit initscripts (due to sysvinit)
=== lamont smacks jbailey and doko
[06:07] <lamont> I wonder if I can just force dpkg to do the install and tweak /var/lib/dpkg/status to lie about the version number
[06:07] <lamont> well, off to get out of trouble with the wife for a few hours
[06:08] <doko> ?
[06:11] <lamont> trying to install the debian gcc-3.4 bits to build the glibc jbailey has for me.
[06:11] <lamont> downgrades libgcc1, causing all those packages to be selected for removal.  -> bummer
[06:11] <lamont> but must run for a bit - was just going to start the first step before I ran away.
[06:12] <lamont> the debian version is newer than hoary?
[06:13] <lamont> no.  hoary had libgcc1=4.0-0pre6ubuntu7
[06:13] <lamont> grumble
[06:14] <lamont> anyway, I need a working set of packages to build the glibc bits with.  I'll let you two ponder that until I get back in a few hours.
[06:14] <svenl> lamont: :)
[06:14] <svenl> lamont: i had also trouble with that.
[09:15] <svenl> doko: you there ? 
[09:15] <svenl> doko: something funny happened.
[09:16] <doko> svenl: really funny?
[09:16] <svenl> doko: some of the tests failed, but not all, the package build a couple of .debs (most of them i think, including lib64stdc++ and gcc) but no trace of any libgcc1 or libgcc1_64.
[09:16] <svenl> doko: yep.
[09:17] <doko> find build -name libgcc1_* ?
[09:17] <svenl> doko: how do you come clear with this huge build log ?
[09:17] <svenl> doko: doesn't find anything such.
[09:18] <svenl> there are a couple libgcc.a and libgcc_s.so in build/gcc though.
[09:18] <doko> sorry, find build -name libgcc_* ?
[09:19] <svenl> $ find build -name libgcc\*
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/libgcc
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/libgcc/nof/libgcc.map
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/libgcc/libgcc.map
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/nof/libgcc.a
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/nof/libgcc_eh.a
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/libgcc.a
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/libgcc_eh.a
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/libgcc_s.so.1.backup
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/libgcc_s.so.1
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/libgcc_s_nof.so.1.backup
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/libgcc_s_nof.so.1
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/libgcc_s_nof.so
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/libgcc.mk
[09:19] <svenl> build/gcc/libgcc_s.so
[09:20] <doko> hmm, no 64bit libgcc ...
[09:21] <doko> or is this 4.0 for experimental?
[09:21] <svenl> the fun thing is that not even the 32bit libgcc did build.
[09:21] <svenl> no, the ubuntu gcc-3.4
[09:29] <svenl> doko: any hint on what i could be looking at there ?
[09:33] <doko> hmm, no currently not.
[09:34] <svenl> can i try building the libgcc stuff without rebuilding the whole stuff ? To get a smaller log or something.
[09:35] <doko> ugh, you may want to look at gcc/Makefile, where it builds libgcc, but if the compiler isn't configured for 64bit, then that won't help at all ...
[09:36] <svenl> doko: what i don't understand is why : 1) the 32bit libgcc didn't build, or 2) why the whole lot of other .debs where built.
[09:38] <doko> and the lib64stdc++6 does contain a shared lib?
[09:38] <svenl> nope, its empty.
[09:39] <svenl> and there is no non-64bit libstdc++ now that i look at it.
[09:39] <svenl> strange.