/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2005/05/28/#ubuntu-toolchain.txt

=== daniels [~daniels@amnesiac.heapspace.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
lamontsigh.  that took _WAY_ too long03:32
danielsfabbione: which patch?04:06
danielsoh, I see04:07
danielsfabbione: got it04:07
jbaileydoko: Around?04:47
=== doko [~doko___@dsl-082-082-200-046.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
fabbionemorning06:09
fabbionedaniels: ping?06:09
danielspong06:10
fabbionedaniels: did you see my patch on people?06:10
danielsyeah, already merged it06:11
fabbionethanks06:11
fabbionei am uploading -15 right now06:11
danielsno worries06:11
daniels-15 of what?06:11
fabbioneas soon as i get the accepted you are free to go for -16 :)06:11
fabbionexorg06:11
danielsoh, for sparc06:11
fabbioneyes06:11
danielsphew06:11
fabbioneif you upload -16 before, the -15 bins will be rejected06:12
danielssure06:12
fabbionefinally i can start buildd again :)06:13
fabbionehttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/18/vibrating_knickers/06:29
fabbioneAHAHHAHAHA06:29
fabbionedaniels: ok you can go anytime06:56
fabbione-15 has been accepted06:56
danielscool06:56
fabbionethanks dude06:58
lamont-awayfabbione: are you uploading binaries that are non-virgin???  you bad man you.06:59
fabbionelamont-away: yeah it's cheating on a package :)07:01
fabbionearen't you supposed to be sleeping?07:01
lamont-awayyeah - came out to check on the buildd, and change the laundry07:01
=== lamont-away notes that his local archive has xorg_6.8.2-15hppa2 in it. :-)
lamont-awayanyway, g'night again07:02
fabbionebtw kernel: i need updated chroots on concordia and davis otherwise i can't test build07:02
lamont-awayyeah - saw that in -kernel.07:02
fabbionelamont-away: too lazy to change the version07:02
fabbionespecially because -16 with the fix will hit archive soon07:02
fabbionelamont-away: before you go... xorg gcc -> buildd?07:03
=== lamont-away bets it was the same fix that he gave daniels earlier in the week.
fabbioneis there anything else i need to take care of?07:03
fabbionelamont-away: i doubt... the fix was sparc specific07:03
danielslamont-away: uhm no, it was a sunffb-specific fix :P07:03
fabbionesunffb driver compilation options07:03
danielsi didn't know what -mv8 was before I started on -1507:03
danielsand I still don't07:03
danielsunless it specifies the particular sparc revision or some shit07:04
lamont-awayprior to unleashing the buildd: 1) cxxapps.txt -> @no_auto_build, 2) fresh versions of gcc-4.0, gcc-defaults, dpkg, xorg (and their build-deps, of course).07:04
fabbionei think it's some gcc optimization flag07:04
lamont-awayah, ok07:04
fabbionelamont-away: yeps.. all of that it's already in place07:04
lamont-awaythen you're _go_ for sparc buildd07:04
fabbionecoolness07:04
lamont-awayonce those are in the archive, that is.07:04
fabbionethey are07:04
fabbionei did build all of them manually07:04
lamont-awayyeah07:05
fabbioneyup07:05
=== fabbione unleashes buildd on breezy
fabbionegood night lamont :)07:05
=== lamont-away has 30 failed builds sitting in his hppa buildd mailbox
fabbioneyeah i wonder how many i will get here07:05
lamont-awaysome of those are hppa specific (console-tools, ubuntu-meta)  But a bunch of them are /usr/include/X11 or gcc-4.0 or such07:06
fabbione+ i still have some old craft to cleanup07:06
lamont-away232 packages built, 151 of them uploaded... damn straws07:06
fabbionei guess i am going to hit some build-deps madness...07:08
lamont-awayoh yeah, big time.07:08
fabbioneehhehe07:08
lamont-awaynot to mention lots of NEW packages, depending on how you have your overrides set up...07:08
fabbionei didn't setup overrides07:09
lamont-awaythere are still a few packages in universe that need to move to main to fix the archive.07:09
fabbioneoh07:09
fabbionewell i don't mix universe/main anymore07:09
fabbioneafter ports has been up07:09
lamont-awayis in scrollback from doko just before he left.07:09
lamont-awaythat's good07:09
fabbioneso the ogre model is complete again07:09
fabbionenow the local pkg cache is down to 2 hours07:09
=== lamont-away cheers
fabbioneso possiblities to hit a mix are very very very low07:10
lamont-awayanyrate, time to sleep again.  g'night07:11
fabbionenight lamont07:11
fabbionedaniels: btw.. elmo mentioned that xtrans had some .c files in /usr/include/X1107:14
fabbionedunno if you fixed that already07:14
danielsit's not fixable07:14
danielsthat's how xtrans works07:14
fabbioneeh?07:14
danielsyou #define a bunch of crap and then #include the .c files07:15
danielsit's utterly, utterly disgusting07:15
fabbioneJEEEEE07:15
danielsnow you see why I have such a deep-seated hate for xtrans07:15
=== fabbione pukes
fabbionecan't we move the .c files somewhere like /usr/share/ ?07:15
fabbionejust for the goddam sake of it?07:15
danielswe've already had that argument upstream, the consensus was that we'd put it in /usr/include and try to kill xtrans07:16
fabbioneBRRRRRRR07:16
fabbionewe need to get an #u-x chan or something07:17
danielsthis is the sort of shit I have to deal with upstream as well as downstream :P07:17
fabbionedaniels: you are d00m3d07:18
danielsindeed07:19
fabbioneomg! doko! another gcc-3* full set upload?07:20
fabbionei wonder if i will ever get to the point to actually build something else than toolchain07:21
dokomorning all07:34
fabbionehey doko07:34
=== gollum [~root@218-162-217-166.dynamic.hinet.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== gollum [~root@218-162-217-166.dynamic.hinet.net] has left #ubuntu-toolchain ["less]
fabbioneinfinity: ping?07:43
=== cartman [foobar@cartman.developer.konversation] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== doko starts to hate the change to DEB_*_GNU_SYSTEM
=== Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
Kamiondoko: all those libraries are still in NEW - I'm leaving them to elmo12:16
dokohmm, getting all these renamed libraries into the archives is really suboptimal :-(12:19
dokoKamion: the debconf build needs kdebindings fixing for amd64 from Riddell12:26
cartmankoffice will need http://janeway.no-ip.org/~cartman/filters_gcc4.patch btw12:27
cartmanjust in case12:27
=== Riddell is working on kdebindings just now
Riddellmight take a few hours12:29
Riddellcartman: which version of koffice is that against?12:29
cartmanhead12:29
cartmanbut filters rarely changed12:29
cartmanshould apply cleanly12:30
Riddellcartman: have you sent it back to the koffice developers?12:30
cartmanRiddell: trying now, psn resisting ;)12:30
Riddellcartman: is that compiled on 64 bbit or 32 bit?12:31
cartmanRiddell: only errors on amd64+gcc412:31
Riddellcartman: ah, then you'll be adding errors to x86 :)12:31
cartmanhmm no12:32
cartmansimilar fix went into kmail last week12:32
cartman:/12:32
cartmanshould be safe12:32
cartmanyou cast it to long before casting to something else to preserve precision12:32
Kamiondoko: debconf hasn't built for ages anyway :(12:32
Riddellcartman: ok, maybe you're right12:33
cartmanRiddell: I will wait for dfaure to be sure12:33
Riddellhe's the man12:33
cartmanyep12:33
Riddellout->fScratch = ((int)(long)in & 1);   is there really no better way?  just looks ugly12:36
cartmanwell I stole the solution from kmail where they were casting int* to int12:37
Kamionerm. what's the type of 'in'?01:08
fabbioneehy Kamion 01:09
fabbioneKamion: do you still have katie suppah p0w3r? :)01:09
cartmanKamion: const char* I think01:10
Kamioncartman: EWWWW. so you're basically working around crappy typing elsewhere.01:10
Kamionfabbione: yes ...?01:10
cartmanKamion: its msword/mswrite filters, what do you expect? honest :)01:10
fabbioneKamion: just for curiosity... what is the status of knetworkconf 0.6.1-3ubuntu4 (hoary-updates)?01:11
Kamionfabbione: same as it was when the last two people asked about it :P01:11
Kamionfabbione: source is in the archive, but I don't think hoary-updates is building ...01:11
fabbioneKamion: i am asking becuase i could see the source and the sparc buildd got it in needs-build, but it was not taking it01:11
fabbioneah ok, but it is safe for me to upload it?01:12
fabbionesparc did built it fine01:12
KamionI'm assuming it's turned off in w-b or something, I'm not actually sure01:12
fabbioneok, don't worry01:12
KamionI don't know if it's safe or not - it probably is, but that's an elmo question01:12
fabbioneok, i will just keep it stand-by somewhere01:12
fabbionethanks a lot01:12
Kamionit might get rejected by the C++ transition check in jennifer01:13
fabbioneuh right...01:13
=== fabbione checks
Kamionwhich isn't distribution-guarded01:13
fabbioneno it's banned as c++apps in buildd.conf01:13
fabbionei forgot that kde is all c++ 01:13
fabbioneor almost :)01:14
fabbioneso yeah.. it can be built, but it's not since @no_auto_build is not distro aware01:14
fabbioneand the filter is applied 01:14
Kamionah, buildd.conf, ok01:23
fabbioneyeah it was the simplest solution to filter apps01:24
fabbionei just forgot to look there before asking :)01:24
Riddellkdebindings doesn't want to compile01:38
Riddellit gets stuck on sipqtpart0.cpp and sits there chewing up CPU cycles forever01:39
dokoRiddell: try to lower the optimization for that file01:39
Riddelldoko: that did it01:42
Kamionelmo: I NEWed dbus_0.33-0ubuntu3, openh323_1.15.3-2ubuntu2, libtunepimp_0.3.0-2ubuntu7 for c2 changes01:42
Riddellnot sure how to lower the optimisation other by hand though01:42
dokoRiddell: please save the preprocessed file, and put it in a bug report, need the architecture and command line options as well01:45
=== Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
\shmorning02:56
=== Seveaz [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
lamontjbailey:  g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../grove -g --pipe -O3 -ffunction-sections -D_REENTRANT -MT GroveApp.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/GroveApp.Tpo -c GroveApp.cxx  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/GroveApp.o03:48
lamont/usr/include/OpenSP/RangeMap.cxx: In member function 'unsigned int OpenSP::RangeMap<From, To>::inverseMap(To, From&, OpenSP::ISet<OpenSP::WideChar>&, OpenSP::WideChar&) const':03:48
lamont/usr/include/OpenSP/RangeMap.cxx:50: error: 'wideCharMax' was not declared in this scope03:48
lamontwanna fix openjade?03:48
=== lamont should learn C++ better sometime
dokolamont: hi03:53
dokoI'm looking at it03:53
lamontthansk03:54
dokolamont: kdebase needs some love, the deps are in main now03:54
=== lamont kicks kdebase, unixodbc/ppc and libgnomeuimm2.6/*64
dokolamont: openjade did build on all archs ...03:56
lamontthat's from hppa - haven't double checked to make sure it dies on i38603:57
lamontruby1.8. otoh is another dpkg victim03:57
=== doko would like to play hang-man ... ;)
lamontruby1.8 => #1104004:00
dokoit's ok, if you see the breakage, but there's silent breakage as well. hmm, maybe it's better to just revert this change until Debian switches to the new dpkg as well04:09
lamontinteresting idea04:10
fabbionehey lamont04:13
fabbionelamont: it would be interesting to implement @no_auto_build per distro04:15
lamontfabbione: heh04:15
fabbionetoday digging in the w-b database i noticed a knetworkconf (hoary-updates) not taken for build04:15
fabbionebecause it's banned in breezy04:15
lamontit would also be good to to make SIGHUP re-read it04:15
fabbionehm?04:16
fabbioneyeah04:16
=== fabbione kicks gcc test suite
fabbioneit's too slow!04:18
fabbionedoko: you must do something about it04:18
lamontdoko: might be that doing a breezy-test world with dpkg changed might be the right answer.04:19
dokoifeq arch=sparc and bbuilder=fabbione, then fail. exit 004:19
dokothat's fast!04:19
dokofabbione: did I tell you that I need another 3.4?04:19
fabbionedoko: i am still building gcc-3.304:20
fabbioneso i don't really care04:20
fabbionedoko: did you fix that problem with libvtest thing?04:20
fabbionedoko: so if you upload the new gcc-3.4 now it's ok04:20
dokowell, 3.3 does have interesting libc dependencies now ...04:20
fabbionei am still building 3.304:21
fabbionebut i care more about 3.404:21
dokofabbione: I don't know, I built it, and I don't see the failure04:21
fabbionesince we build the kernel with 3.404:21
fabbionedoko: bah you suck :P04:21
fabbionei told you.. the target is not called 04:21
fabbionecome on dude...04:21
fabbioneyou can manage :)04:21
=== fabbione whispers to doko: "FIX IT!"
fabbionedoko: i will see if it happens again with the next build04:23
fabbioneif so i will put our buildd chroot somewhere so you can look at it04:23
dokofix ruby1.8 while you're waiting ;-)04:24
fabbionedoko: are you going to do cleaning in my house in the meanwhile?04:24
dokolamont: could you remove the Dep-Wait for xerces25 and xerces26?04:24
lamontdoko: sorry sure04:24
lamontdone04:25
dokofabbione: hmm ...04:25
=== lamont hopes the new 3.4 actually builds on ppa
fabbionedoko: trust me.. you will be more happy fixing ruby1.8 too :)04:26
fabbione+ i hate c++04:26
fabbionewith all myself04:26
\shjesus04:27
\shkdelibs4c2 is in04:27
lamont\sh: that was doko et. al., not jesus04:27
fabbionedoko has short hair...04:27
\shwhen doko uploaded it, he's jesus ;)04:27
doko\sh, call me as you like it ;-)04:27
\shfabbione: and? in africa, jesus has a dark skin colour04:28
dokonaa, Kamion did give it some love ...04:28
fabbionedoko drinks beer... jesus doesn't04:28
fabbioneor didn't...04:28
fabbionedepends how you want to see it :)04:28
lamontfabbione: wine, beer, what's the diff?04:28
fabbionejesus was more for wine...04:29
\shfabbione: we can't be sure04:29
\shjesus had something with maria magdalena04:29
fabbionelamont: beer is like so... german.. wine is more italian :)04:29
lamontwell, if the books are to be believed, he was of jewish descent...04:29
dokoRiddell, amu: kdebase fails ...04:29
dokokate.la.o(.text+0xe): In function `main':04:29
dokocollect2: ld returned 1 exit status04:29
dokomake[4] : *** [kate]  Error 104:29
\shthe life, the universe and the rest04:30
fabbioneanyway... time to go and do some cleaning04:30
\shlet me finished libchasen04:30
lamont /build/buildd/kdebase-3.4.0/obj-i386-linux-gnu/kate/app/kate.la.cpp:2: undefined reference to `kdemain'04:30
\sh-ed04:30
lamontdoko: you forgot that line04:30
dokoyes, xchat did grab it04:31
lamontyeah04:31
dokofabbione: one idea ...04:31
fabbionedoko: ?04:31
lamonthppa's uploader is only 86 packages behind...  sigh.04:31
dokoare there dangling symlinks in /usr/lib/gcc/3.4.4/sparc*/64/04:31
dokoor in  /usr/lib/gcc/3.4.4/sparc*/04:32
dokoto libgcc*04:32
fabbionedoko: i dunno...04:32
fabbioneand i can't really check04:32
dokofabbione, look and you will see ...04:32
fabbionedo you want me to look if the build fails?04:32
dokoit's a small miracle ;)04:32
fabbioneone moment04:33
dokohmm, no, that can't be the reason, we don't use the stage1 compiler at this point04:33
dokojust found out, why gcc-3.4 -m32 is broken on amd64, jbailey could be interested ...04:34
dokolamont: could you make sure, that all the buildd's get the current state of the archive, so that I could start uploading cxxapps from main?04:35
fabbioneare all libs builded?04:35
fabbionedoko: you should still be sure that the apps build-dep on a proper version of the libs04:35
dokofabbione: no, in this case we have to touch all 700 cxxapps packages.04:36
fabbionedoko: dude.. that will make another breezy debootstrap impossible04:36
fabbionedoko: you need to change the apps to versioned build-dep04:36
dokofabbione: why will it be impossible?04:37
dokoapps which get synced from Debian don't have changed build-deps either04:38
fabbionebecause you can build packages on top of old libs if you are not extremely carefull04:38
dokoI did always think, that the hppa and sparc buildd admins are careful, but I can be wrong ;-)04:38
lamontdoko: you can upload cxxapps, but they won't get built until we change @no_auto_build... :-)04:38
fabbionedoko: it's not just hppa and sparc..04:39
fabbionei think not changing the build-deps is just wrong04:39
dokolamont: elmo told me that I could upload anyway04:39
lamontfabbione: they build-dep on foo-dev, which is unchanged...04:39
dokofabbione: what do you make in case of the synced apps?04:39
lamontISTR doko saying they might just work...04:39
fabbioneusr/lib/gcc/sparc-linux/3.4.4 # ls -lR04:40
fabbioneno dangling symlinks04:40
lamontfabbione: it can be handled as an archive event... painful, but it works...04:40
fabbionehmmm04:40
fabbioneok04:40
dokolamont: archive event?04:41
lamontdoko: what we're doing.04:42
fabbioneprobably i am just too much of a purist04:42
lamontdraw a line, and make sure that nothing on the right side needs anything that wasn't fixed on the left side.04:42
dokofabbione: we'll get these build-deps, when Debian is doing the transition04:42
fabbionegiven that sparc was out of hoary thanks to gcc-4.0 unversioned build-deps....04:42
lamontnote that archive events are, by definition, a royal pain in the tail for any buildd admin04:42
fabbionelamont: oh yeah.. i agree04:43
fabbionei need to go.. doko: last offer to come and clean my house in exchange of kernel upload with mISDN04:44
fabbione(our kernel is really free like in beer ;))04:44
=== lamont cries. b180 took xorg
fabbioneb180?04:44
fabbioneis the slowest one?04:44
dokoslow hppa ...04:44
lamont180MHz 32-bit UP hppa04:44
fabbioneamen04:44
lamontwell, there's only 2 of them,.04:44
dokoheh, and it fails ...04:45
fabbionelamont: why don't you add it to @no_auto_build ?04:45
lamontI just did04:45
fabbionea bit too late i guess :)04:45
fabbionelamont: you can still share the ccache between the 2 buildds04:45
lamontit had never built it (since it _was_ in n-a-b), so it didn't show up when I added all the really long build-time stuff to n-a-b04:45
fabbioneit will be less painful when packages hit the slow one04:45
lamontfabbione: yeah, but that's so much like work04:46
lamontand disk I/O isn't exactly the fastest here...04:46
fabbioneuh why?04:46
fabbioneNFS my friend04:46
lamontwell, for starters, the machines are 2-switches away from each other04:46
fabbionethat's what i use here to share ccache all over04:46
lamontNot a File System04:46
fabbionelamont: OCFS2 with the next kernel upload :)04:46
lamontOCFS2?04:47
fabbioneOracle Cluster Filesystem204:47
fabbionemy wife is so going to kill me if i don't go and clean04:47
fabbionehttp://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/Screenshot.png04:47
dokolamont: does openoffice.org build?04:48
lamonton hppa? no04:48
fabbioneme must go now04:48
fabbionecya later04:48
dokolamont: i386 and powerpc04:48
lamontit's in the @no_auto_build list04:49
lamontso it's not going to even try anywhere04:49
\shhmmm...04:49
lamontommmmm04:50
\shi was just informed, that I'm now have a new portable 160gb usb2 hd04:50
\shit's ready to pick up04:50
\shstrange thing is, i've never ordered one04:50
\shand I don't have to pay it04:51
\shweired04:51
dokolamont: are you able to change the @no_auto_build lists?04:51
lamontare we ready for me to?04:51
lamontand note that when I do, it'll be 'empty the list' on each buildd as it's done... I'm not going to do it one package at a time04:52
dokolamont: all cxxapps in main but KDE. but we can enable KDE as well, it will just fail, because kdebase isn't installable.04:52
dokoyes, let's wait for kdebase, then we can do it04:52
=== lamont adds cxxlibs to his package list for his local mirror, and starts a sync, cringing
lamontopenjade is an hppa-specific issue.  sihg04:55
\shhmm04:56
\shthink i will setup an ubuntu mirror04:56
dokolamont: could you report it upstream?05:01
=== jbailey [~jbailey@CPE000ded9d787c-CM014260028338.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
lamontdoko: will do, although I want to investigate it a bit first...05:02
dokojbailey: just noticed that gcc-3.4 -m32 didn't work05:03
\shdoko: u reviewed some of those debdiff outputs?05:04
jbaileydoko: For which arch?05:04
jbailey(I'm lagging a bit at the moment, I updated to the new X and it won't start.  I'm just poking it a bit)05:05
doko\sh, ok, will do05:05
dokojbailey: -m32 ...05:06
jbaileydoko: I think it worked fine for me the other day on amd64.  It may have been sparc, though.05:06
\shdoko: i saw some u reviewed :) u r working too much i think ;)05:07
dokohmm, the 32bit libgcc symlinks are dangling links05:07
jbaileydoko: I'll take a look in a moment then.  05:09
=== jbailey kicks his computer.
=== Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
Riddelldoko: I think kdebase just needs visibility turned off, checking now05:17
=== lamont heads to town for a while
dokoRiddell, yes, I did see this as well ... hope, that not every KDE packages has this check ...05:27
jbaileyAh, lovely.  got X again.05:27
jbailey*bounce*05:27
=== jbailey [~jbailey@CPE000ded9d787c-CM014260028338.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
jbaileymps05:29
Riddelldoko: compiles now, should I upload?05:29
jbaileydoko: Now that I'm actually paying attention.. =)05:31
jbaileydoko: I have 3 questions:05:31
jbailey1) What was that about -m32?05:31
jbailey2) I've confirmed that glibc builds with -g2 on ppc at least, so I'll set that for the next upload.05:32
jbailey3) What would be good timing for me to do the i386/amd64 biarch stuff so that I don't interfere with you.05:32
\shRiddell: that means we will have a running kdebase at least today? ,-)05:33
Riddell\sh: it means we should have a compiling kdebase 05:33
Riddellrunning is a different matter05:33
=== Riddell awaits doko's command to upload
dokoRiddell: please do05:44
dokojbailey: 1) dangling symlinks05:45
doko2) now ;) get the 0ubuntu2, that I did upload some minutes ago05:45
dokono, this was 3) ;)05:45
jbaileyDoes #3 also solve #1? =)05:46
dokoyes05:46
jbaileyExcellent! =)05:47
Riddelldoko: that file that I said didn't compile did finish after two hours.  I innocently gave up hope after 1 hour05:47
jbaileydoko: Do you have brainspace for me to ask you about biarch setups and ppc64?05:47
Riddellkdebase_3.4.0-0ubuntu21_source.changes ACCEPTED05:54
jbaileyfabbione: If you're bored at some point, I had asked the main Splack guy about his throughts on requiring v9 or newer for a Sparc distro.  He says that he gots alot of requests for support from classparcs.05:56
jbaileyfabbione: I Don't know if that's a good reason to support them, or a good reason to run screaming. =)05:57
fabbionejbailey: the latter :)05:57
fabbionejbailey: btw xorg did build fine with your fix05:57
jbaileyfabbione: Yay!06:02
jbaileyfabbione: Any other crazy blockers?06:02
fabbionejbailey: not right now.. util-linux did build as well06:03
dokoRiddell: anyway, having the preprocessed source would be very useful06:11
dokojbailey, yes, why not06:12
Riddelldoko: it's a 9MB file06:13
jbaileydoko: Right now our bi-arch configs, i386, sparc, and s390 all succesfully build a biarch setup on a 32 bit kernel.06:13
RiddellKDE bindings is a bit crazy06:13
dokoRiddell: doesn't matter06:14
\shRiddell: do u want to disable the python qt/kde bindings in kdebindings?06:14
dokoyes, do they? I did assume that the buildd's for s390 and sparc are 64bit06:15
jbaileydoko: From looking at the logs, it looks like ppc is trying to actually run a built ppc64 binary.  Is that something in our packaging, or is that something upstream that needs to be poked?06:15
Riddell\sh: arn't they already apart from qt-dcop?06:15
fabbionedoko: nope.. sparc userland is almost all at 32bit06:15
fabbioneand it doesn't matter what kernel are you running to build06:15
\shRiddell: i don't know...they're only disabled (in the last source tree i saw) I wanted to use the normal upstream packages...06:16
Riddell\sh: "do u want to disable" "they're only disabled" which are they?06:17
dokothat should be coded in gcc/config.ml (guessing if the compiler works)06:17
\shRiddell: I saw u complaining about python-qt sip things...I just wondered if they're enabled again06:18
dokoconfig-ml.in in the toplevel directory06:18
Riddell\sh: right.  I suspect they're compiled and then no package is made of them06:19
Riddellwhich is a bit silly06:19
\shRiddell: so remove them from configure.in and makefile.am ;)06:20
\shI will come to python-sip4-qt and kde stuff later this day 06:20
\shpatches are already there for pkde06:21
Riddellgreat06:21
\shi don't like this "copy upstream packages into kdebindings"06:22
=== waldi [~waldi@waldi.developer.debian] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
jbaileyHeya Bastian.06:30
waldihi06:30
fabbionehey waldi06:31
=== fabbione goes back cleaning
dokowaldi: moin06:32
jbaileydoko: When should we do the binutils update?06:37
doko2.16.1 will be released next week. I didn't had a chance yet for testing on ia64 with glibc 2.3.506:41
jbaileydoko: Do you mean with the new bintuils or in general?06:42
jbaileyia64 with glibc 2.3.5 in general is working fine.06:42
jbaileyI can give you access to my box with the breezy chroot if you'd like,.06:42
dokowith 2.16, I see one regression in the binuitls testsuite (on unstable)06:44
jbaileyAh, drow message about releasing 2.16.1 I had missed it.  Cool.06:44
=== waldi [~waldi@waldi.developer.debian] has left #ubuntu-toolchain []
dokojbailey: no need, just build the package from experimental in this chroot06:44
jbaileydoing06:44
jbaileyFeh, getting false testsuite failures because it's failing to spawn and such.07:00
jbaileyLemme boot the box, there's some d-i build processes lying around probably tying up resources.07:02
fabbionedoko: can i push you a clean breezy chroot somewhere, so you can test a gcc build?07:03
Kamionhm, not a good time for a debootstrap upload - aptitude needs to be rebuilt first07:04
fabbioneuh?07:04
Kamiondepends on libsigc++*c10207:05
fabbioneKamion: i have a diff for the buildd variant07:05
fabbionebut i am waiting for the last c++ stuff to complete the transition07:05
fabbioneor do you test that one too?07:05
Kamionmail it to me and I'll do it in one upload when everything else is done?07:05
fabbioneKamion: sure.. buildd isn't that important and can be done "anytime"07:06
Kamionbut if you turn out to be in a hurry for it, then feel free07:07
dokofabbione: ok07:07
fabbioneno no.. it's no hurry07:07
Kamionthe main scripts just need unusual handling07:07
dokoKamion: mvo told me that he did test apt and aptitude on all four archs, so maybe I'll just build it07:08
dokoRiddell: "Bash 3.0-14ubuntu1 hangs on amd64 after any command taking up 99% CPU cycles", I cannot reproduce this behaviour, the testsuite looks ok  as well07:15
Riddelldoko: hmm, it's definatly very reproducable on amu's machine07:16
Riddelldoko: old chroot and fresh one07:16
dokolamont: ^^^ maybe do not update the buildd's while we are working this out07:17
fabbioneoh great07:38
fabbionedoko: gcc-3.3 fails too07:38
fabbionemv debian/tmp/usr/lib64/lib*c++*.{a,so} debian/tmp/usr/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-linux-gnu/3.07:38
fabbione3.6/64/.07:38
fabbionemv: when moving multiple files, last argument must be a directory07:39
fabbioneTry `mv --help' for more information.07:39
fabbionemake[1] : *** [stamps/08-binary-stamp-libstdcxx-dev]  Error 107:39
fabbionebtw.. it did start building gcc-3.407:39
fabbioneshould i stop it?07:39
fabbionethis is weird07:42
fabbionegcc-3.3 did create the debs and failed?07:42
fabbioneoh yeah.. it was building the debs when it failed07:44
dokohmm, why is the target directory not present ... strange07:44
fabbionedoko: i have almost done with the chroot :)07:45
jbaileyMmm.  It's not harmful to have packages in debian/control that are never built, is it?07:57
fabbionejbailey: given that you don't create the deb...07:59
lamontjbailey: not unless they ever were built07:59
lamontI think...07:59
lamontanyway, really running off now07:59
fabbionelater lamont08:00
jbailey'bye lamont08:00
jbailey'k thanks.08:00
dokojbailey: no, that's ok08:01
jbaileyI'm trying to reduce what I have to do to enable ppc64 in my build. =)08:02
dokodebian/rules.defs: look for biarch08:04
jbaileySorry, still on glibc.08:05
doko;)08:05
fabbioneguys when do you think i can start working on a ppc64 kernel?08:12
fabbioneto do that i need the toolchain in place08:12
fabbioneand breezy-ppc64 chroot is borked afaik08:12
danielsnight folks08:12
fabbioneconfigure: WARNING: I have to compile Test.class from scratch08:13
fabbionechecking if java works... configure: error: The Java VM java failed (see config.log, 08:13
fabbionecheck the CLASSPATH?)08:13
fabbionedb4.2 08:13
fabbionenight kid08:13
fabbione../dist/configure: line 21554: 28092 Bus error               $JAVA $JAVAFLAGS $TEST08:14
fabbioneinteresting :)08:14
jbaileyg'n Daniel.08:14
jbaileyfabbione: The ppc64 toolchain is blocked on the fact that it wants a ppc64 kernel to build.08:15
jbaileyI'm trying to convince it otherwise.08:15
jbaileydoko: Was it an ld failure?08:24
jbaileyI see on unepxcted, but schwab posting something to the binutils list that I Can try.08:25
jbaileyhttp://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00601.html08:25
dokojbailey: yes, that's the regression I did see08:28
=== fabbione goes off line for the evening...
dokook, submitted #11050 for the dpkg behaviour09:33
=== fabbione goes off line for real
dokolamont: where can I find the icu build? it's marked as uploaded, but not installed09:44
jbaileyWow.  The binutils patch system *doesn't fail* if a patch fails to apply.09:52
dokocould be dpkg-breakage? ;-) sorry, couldn't resist09:53
=== cartman [foobar@cartman.developer.konversation] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
jbaileyIf only/  I confirmed it with debian/rules patch =(09:54
jbaileySo doing the ia64 test.09:54
jbailey+re09:54
jbaileyI'm leaving in a moment, too, so I'll let you know how it goes later.09:55
jbaileyI'm also building a ppc64 glibc.09:55
elmojbailey: err, it so does?09:55
jbaileyIt didn't for me.  A lovely bit in debian/patched/123_ldwhatever_I_called it09:57
jbaileythat nicely logged that the patch hadn't applied.09:58
jbaileyAnd it merrily carried on.09:58
jbaileyAnyhow, Angie's poking me to go, back in a few hours.09:58
elmowell, new dpatch might not, but new dpatch grew crackful maintainers :(10:00
dokoelmo: packages from cxxapps cannot be built, even if I upload them signed with my key?10:05
elmodoko: I didn't restrict building of apps, that's lamont10:10
elmoI only restricted source uploads10:10
elmowell, you CERTAINLY can't upload binaries, signed by your key10:11
doko;)10:11
dokowhere's icu currently stuck, is it buildd or new?10:12
elmo       icu | 2.1-2ubuntu1 | breezy/universe | source, amd64, ia64, powerpc10:12
elmoREJECT10:13
elmoRejected: icu-doc_2.1-2ubuntu1_all.deb: old version (2.8-4) in breezy >= new version (2.1-2ubuntu1) targeted at breezy.10:13
elmoRejected: icu-doc_2.1-2ubuntu1_all.deb: old version (2.8-4) in hoary >= new version (2.1-2ubuntu1) targeted at breezy.10:13
dokohmm, where can I see this?10:15
elmoyou can't10:15
elmothe queue/REPORT stuff is not visible because it contains security uploads too10:16
elmokamion/mdz can see it.  and lamont gets the REJECT mails10:16
dokohmm, well, something we should talk about10:17
dokoanything else rejected from the cxx stuff?10:18
elmoI've no idea, I'm not trawling through all the possible rejects :P10:18
elmoas I said, the buildd admin gets the emails ...10:19
=== cartman [foobar@cartman.developer.konversation] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!