[12:54] <zul> fabbione: i got some janitoral and gcc4 fixes in my tree sync whenever
[12:54] <fabbione> zul: yo
[12:55] <fabbione> ok
[12:55] <fabbione> probably tomorrow when i will wake up
[12:55] <fabbione> i am still around because i don't feel very good
[12:55] <fabbione> and i couldn't sleep
[12:55] <zul> sure...ill be around by tomorrow is a holiday in ontario so ill be around off and on
[12:55] <fabbione> ok :)
[12:55] <zul> started your period? ;)
[12:56] <fabbione> kinda
[12:56] <zul> must...go..watch...star wars...tomorrow
[12:56] <zul> heh
[12:56] <fabbione> i just come back from it
[12:56] <fabbione> the movies was good but i didn't enjoy
[12:56] <fabbione> because i started to feel bad at the cinema
[12:56] <zul> too much popcorn i bet..
[12:56] <fabbione> no
[12:57] <fabbione> i couldn't even touch popcorn that i felt to throw up
[12:57] <zul> yuck..
[12:58] <fabbione> getting cramps at the cinema was no fun :(
[12:59] <zul> meh...episode 2 is on the telly in about 2 minutes
[12:59] <fabbione> yeah i have the DVD's of all the others
[12:59] <fabbione> there are already torrents of SW3
[12:59] <fabbione> but not DVD quality yet
[01:00] <zul> im downloading asterix conquers america right now ;)
[01:00] <fabbione> ehhehe
[01:00] <fabbione> i am getting SW Revelation
[01:01] <zul> hehe
[01:01] <zul> bbl
[01:01] <fabbione> yeah i am off too
[01:01] <fabbione> i need to try to get some sleep
[01:01] <fabbione> tomorrow i will start my danish course
[01:01] <zul> codine helps :)
[01:01] <zul> i use to know some danish swear words
[01:01] <fabbione> cya
[01:01] <fabbione> i don't even know these ones
[01:01] <fabbione> :)
[01:02] <fabbione> never cared to learn
[01:02] <fabbione> ahhaa
[01:02] <zul> i can swear in 5 different languages ;) its a special talent i have
[01:02] <fabbione> hehhehe
[01:02] <fabbione> anyway
[01:02] <fabbione> cya tomorrow
[01:02] <fabbione> have fun
[01:03] <zul> c ya
[06:57] <fabbione> morning
[09:24] <fabbione> zul: i can't access your baz repo...
[09:43] <fabbione> hi chmj 
[09:43] <chmj> hi fabbione 
[09:43] <fabbione> chmj: any status update for the automatic external drivers tracking?
[09:44] <chmj> fabbione: not yet, still have drafty code  
[09:46] <fabbione> ok
[09:46] <fabbione> you know that there is already some code written, don't you?
[09:46] <fabbione> you can reuse a big portion from debian/watch
[09:48] <chmj> yes, I copied some of it 
[09:52] <fabbione> ok
[11:58] <mjg59> fabbione: I need to send you acpi-bk and an ide resume patch
[11:58] <fabbione> mjg59: and what are you waiting for?
[11:58] <fabbione> :)
[11:59] <fabbione> i might be able to upload today if i have the time
[11:59] <fabbione> no actually
[11:59] <fabbione> i won't even make it in time for a build orgy today
[12:00] <mjg59> fabbione: Yeah, depends how busy I am later on
[12:01] <mjg59> fabbione: BTW, when we get it, the generic ACPI hotkey driver needs to be *off*
[12:01] <mjg59> It fucks up all the other hotkey drivers
[12:02] <fabbione> ok.. 
[12:02] <fabbione> i hope i can remember :)
[12:02] <mjg59> I'll mention it in the mail
[12:02] <fabbione> ok
[12:02] <fabbione> time to get some lunch
[12:04] <chmj> hmm, me to 
[12:46] <pitti> Hi
[01:06] <fabbione> bah
[01:06] <fabbione> I HATE EXTERNAL DRIVERS
[01:07] <pitti> btw, did you hear about any problems with the prism2 driver in 2.6.12?
[01:07] <fabbione> nope
[01:07] <pitti> they just crash on 2.6.12 for me
[01:08] <fabbione> fun
[01:08] <pitti> ok, I'll file a report
[01:08] <fabbione> are they external?
[01:08] <pitti> yes
[01:08] <pitti> linux-wlan-ng
[01:09] <fabbione> sec...
[01:09] <fabbione> did you try the hostap drivers instead?
[01:09] <chmj> fabbione: why is that? :P 
[01:13] <pitti> fabbione: I need the prism2 USB drivers, they are only provided by l-w-n
[01:14] <fabbione> pitti: better you go upstream directly
[01:14] <fabbione> i can only wait for them to release a new version
[01:14] <fabbione> wlan-ng-prism2-usb | 0.2.1-pre26                | ok     | 12/04/2005   | http://linux-wlan.org/
[01:14] <pitti> fabbione: ok; they work fine in 2.6.10, so 2.6.12 has a newer version?
[01:14] <fabbione> that's the version we are using now
[01:14] <fabbione> probably
[01:14] <fabbione> yes
[01:14] <pitti> ok
[01:14] <fabbione> it has been updated the 12/04/2005
[03:14] <mjg59> fabbione: Patches mailed
[04:35] <zul> hey
[04:37] <zul> fabbione: my internet connection went down last night
[04:38] <zul> its back up now
[05:00] <fabbione> mjg59: ok, got them...
[05:00] <fabbione> zul: ok thanks :)
[05:00] <fabbione> mjg59: but does it make any sense to push these patches in 2.6.12rc4?
[05:00] <fabbione> aren't they supposed to go upstream anyway?
[05:02] <fabbione> bah we can't upload crap anyway
[05:02] <fabbione> that is kind of sucky
[05:04] <mjg59> fabbione: They're unlikely to end up in 2.6.12
[05:04] <fabbione> mjg59: ok
[05:04] <mjg59> But we need the ide-sleep one for some machines, and that requires the acpi/device binding stuff in the bk patch
[05:04] <lamont> fabbione: the kernel is a C++ app???
[05:04] <lamont> say it isn't so...
[05:05] <fabbione> no, but it needs a working dpkg
[05:05] <fabbione> and that's not the case since it was still banned from the buildd as 4 hours ago
[05:05] <fabbione> -> no new dpkg on porting boxes -> me can't test shit
[05:05] <fabbione> so no upload
[05:09] <fabbione> zul: where did you steal the msleep patch?
[05:09] <zul> fabbione: i did that patch
[05:10] <fabbione> zul: did you send it upstream?
[05:10] <zul> not yet...i was going to send it to kj 
[05:11] <zul> i wanted your opinnon first
[05:11] <fabbione> what's the use case?
[05:11] <fabbione> do they fix something?
[05:12] <zul> nah...kj has a big assed list of things to look out for and the patches i did was on the list
[05:13] <fabbione> zul: btw i did fix the kernel-package problem
[05:13] <fabbione> it was an inconsistency between k-p and dpkg
[05:13] <zul> hah...i knew i was not on crack :)
[05:14] <fabbione> well just upgrade and it should work
[05:14] <fabbione> at least.. it does here
[05:14] <zul> i went back to hoary so it works fine here
[06:08] <zul> right im off to see star wars
[06:10] <fabbione> zul: enjoy
[06:10] <fabbione> may the force be with you
[06:10] <zul> yes my master
[06:11] <fabbione> eheh
[06:59] <fabbione> mjg59: how urgents are these 2 patches? can they wait an upload in the middle?
[07:27] <fabbione> hey thom
[07:28] <thom> hi
[07:29] <fabbione> thom: i have some hoary crack for you :)
[07:29] <thom> i have plenty of my own, thanks
[07:31] <fabbione> well.. a bit more will keep you more busy :P
[07:31] <thom> swap you for mozilla/firefox
[07:32] <fabbione> bah boring
[07:32] <fabbione> it's only 30MB of source code
[07:32] <thom> yes, entirely boring
[07:32] <thom> twice
[07:33] <fabbione> 46776 -rw-r--r--   1 fabbione src 47845355 2005-05-08 08:12 linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.11.92.orig.tar.gz
[07:33] <fabbione> oh come on
[07:33] <fabbione> one kernel is 47MB :)
[07:33] <thom> yeah, but you only have to fix the vuln once
[07:33] <thom> moz and ffox are differnet code bases
[07:33] <fabbione> yeah..
[07:34] <thom> (and i do mean _different_)
[07:34] <fabbione> i know.. i have been looking at it once... but i can't remember why
[07:34] <fabbione> i removed that horror from my mind very fast
[07:34] <fabbione> s/fast/quickly
[07:35] <thom> heh
[07:35] <fabbione> yay for ia64!
[07:35] <fabbione> it doesn't build OCFS2
[07:36] <fabbione> speaking of which i should try a build on sparc, even if it is pointless
[11:04] <zul> so that was an ok movie
[11:16] <mdz> is there a timeline for moving to 2.6.12 as default in breezy?
[11:16] <mdz> I'd like for the breezy daily live CDs to be built with 2.6.12 when we start to build them, in order to experiment with unionfs and squashfs
[11:17] <zul> not sure yet..
[11:17] <Mithrandir> mdz: I think "soon", but I don't have a definitive date.
[11:17] <Mithrandir> and fabio is most likely asleep.
[11:20] <lamont> mdz: we're not doing abi versioning during the RC's right now...  so moving 2.6.12 to main and making it the default now either exposes some abi b0rkage, or makes us start tracking them...
[11:20] <mdz> don't we have an automated ABI checker now?
[11:21] <lamont> yeah.
[11:21] <lamont> do you really want the first version of 2.6.12 to be ABI version number 33?
[11:21] <mdz> the number is not important to me
[11:21] <mdz> I just want to know your intentions so that I can plan development accordingly
[11:22] <lamont> ok.  we've been ignoring abi breakage in the rc's because we don't want to put an RC into main, and that helps discourage things...
[11:22] <mdz> so you're waiting for 2.6.12 final upstream?
[11:22] <lamont> that's been my understanding - fabbione would be a better person to ping, truthfully