=== mxpxpod [~bryan@mxpxpod.user]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[05:40] <fabbione> morning
[05:40] <fabbione> lamont: whoo
[06:17] <mx|gone> fabbione: have there been any reports of problems with 2.6.12 and wlan-ng/prism2?
[06:20] <mx|gone> using the ubuntu patch for wlan-ng on -rc4 and -rc5 (and also the -rc4 images from ubuntu) when I plug in my usb adapter, ifconfig freezes when run
[06:20] <fabbione> mx|gone: i heard somebody talking about it but no idea
[06:20] <fabbione> the driver is the latest from upstream
[06:20] <mx|gone> hrmm
[06:21] <mx|gone> ok, at least I'm not the only one :)
[06:21] <mx|gone> you guys should also check out benh's latest patches for cpufreq on ppc from the linuxppc-dev mailing list
[06:22] <mx|gone> they update the cpufreq table to work with cpufreq from -rc5
[06:23] <fabbione> we already have it
[06:23] <fabbione> he pushed the patches to us before upstream
[06:24] <mx|gone> ok
[06:24] <mx|gone> I didn't see them in the latest linux-source-2.6.12
[06:25] <fabbione> mx|gone: dude. i can't upload the kernel once a day for a patch
[06:25] <fabbione> i have to queue up things
[06:25] <mx|gone> ah, gotcha... my bad
[06:25] <fabbione> and it's not in the archive yet
[06:25] <mx|gone> sorry, not trying to give you a hard time
[06:26] <fabbione> it's not hard... it's just not possible to upload a kernel for every patch we get
[06:26] <fabbione> we need to batch
[06:26] <mx|gone> right, I understand
[06:26] <fabbione> and if i say we have it and it's not in the archive, it will be the next release
[06:26] <fabbione> or soon
[06:32] <mx|gone> fabbione: one more question and I'll leave you be... have you heard anything about problems with pbbuttonsd and 2.6.12?
[06:33] <fabbione> nope
[06:34] <fabbione> but take into account that .12 is not .12 final
[06:34] <fabbione> so there are glitches and bugs
[06:34] <fabbione> it's 12rc5 atm
[06:34] <fabbione> so it's a bit early to get worried about little details
[06:34] <mx|gone> right, I realize that :)
=== |zzzzz [~opera@ppp2B95.dsl.pacific.net.au]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[06:34] <mx|gone> I'm just seeing if anyone else sees what I see
[06:35] <mx|gone> fabbione: btw, I think the ubuntu-kernel team does a great job
[06:35] <fabbione> mx|gone: clearly the best place to ask is either #ubuntu or ubuntu-user mailing list
[06:35] <fabbione> i don't get to see all irc logs for everybody
[06:35] <fabbione> and i much rather prefer to have a detailed bug report on bugzilla
[06:35] <fabbione> than on irc
[06:35] <fabbione> simply because i am not always around
[06:36] <mx|gone> right
[06:36] <mx|gone> ok, time for bed for me :)
[06:36] <fabbione> night
=== Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== horms [~horms@YahooBB219184134048.bbtec.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== horms [~horms@YahooBB219184134048.bbtec.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== horms [~horms@YahooBB219184134048.bbtec.net]  has left #ubuntu-kernel [] 
[03:03] <jbailey> fabbione: gcc-3.4 seems to work now for a ppc64 biarch setup.  Your turn! =)
[04:11] <mjg59> fabbione: Removable IDE is still broken - there was a discussion about this on lkml recently, I'll try to dig it out
[04:11] <mjg59> The issue is that ide_unregister is being called twice
[04:15] <mjg59> fabbione: Also, could you apply the patch from http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/12863/match=hotkey ?
[04:16] <mjg59> (Sorry, no kernel tree here...)
=== doko_ [~doko___@dsl-084-059-049-125.arcor-ip.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== chmj [~d3vic3@196.11.5.150]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== zul [~chuck@CPE0006258ec6c2-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[05:29] <zul> hey
[05:39] <fabbione> jbailey: yup... tuesday or wend, i will start working on them
[05:39] <fabbione> hey zul
[05:39] <zul> hey fabbione how goes it?
[05:40] <fabbione> mjg59: i think i can.. we need to check what applies where, becuase i saw a big set of acpi patches going upstream right today
[05:40] <fabbione> zul: not too bad.. i just broke my back to carry my 2 m68k back home
[05:40] <mjg59> fabbione: Cool, thanks
[05:41] <zul> nifty have you heard of using a cart
[05:41] <fabbione> mjg59: does need to go on top of the other? or replace it?
[05:41] <mjg59> Needs to go on top of the acpi-bk patch
[05:41] <fabbione> mjg59: ok, but it replace the ide sleep or is on top of that?
[05:42] <mjg59> No, it's entirely unreated to that
[05:42] <fabbione> oh ok
[05:42] <mjg59> This just unbreaks the hotkey drivers
[05:42] <fabbione> mjg59: ok.. do we need to enable the option you told me to put =n ?
[05:43] <mjg59> You might as well, but make it m
[05:43] <fabbione> yeah.. i don't compile anything in that can be modular
[05:46] <zul> hmmm...it seems that i compiled a kernel with gcc4
[05:46] <fabbione> zul: it compiles...
[05:46] <fabbione> but it's miscompiled...
[05:46] <zul> ok..
[05:47] <fabbione> so it might not really work as it should
[05:47] <fabbione> at least that's the last i heard from the toolchain guys
[05:47] <zul> hmmm..
[05:47] <zul> well when i was compiling there was asome assembler errors i think
[05:47] <fabbione> an error would cause a failure
[05:48] <zul> or warnings dont remember which
[05:51] <zul> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/26/11/index.html
[05:58] <zul> hmmm...lets see what i can do with lkcd
=== Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== jwwwb [~jwb@dsl081-060-184.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[09:54] <jwwwb> ahoy
[09:55] <jwwwb> whatever is presently in linux-source-2.6.12 doesn't build on i386
[09:56] <jwwwb> first it complains about the abiname, then it doesn't find the patchlist (00list)
=== jwwwb [~jwb@dsl081-060-184.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net]  has left #ubuntu-kernel [] 
[10:46] <mx|gone> how do you guys generate the wlan/prism2 patch?
[11:01] <zul> grabbed the latest from wlan-ng and created a patch why?
[11:01] <mx|gone> zul: I was going to try making a patch of the devel stuff to see if it solves some of the problems I've been having with 2.6.12
[11:01] <mx|gone> but I'm not sure if you guys have a script or not
[11:01] <zul> okie dokie
[11:04] <mx|gone> since it looks like a ton of work
[11:04] <zul> it wasnt that hard to do
[11:05] <mx|gone> really?
[11:05] <zul> really..
[11:05] <mx|gone> hmm
[11:09] <mx|gone> thanks zul 
[11:34] <mx|gone> zul: how did you do the p80211metadef.h?