=== ivoks [~ivoks@lns01-1214.dsl.iskon.hr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:08] ? [12:12] dholbach see addicted to making new packages :-) [12:14] <\sh> hehe [12:14] s/see/seems [12:18] :) [12:22] good nicht all [12:22] night [12:22] argh [12:22] night [12:22] <\sh> cu DanielN === DanielN [~KodiaK@162.23.4.126] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:24] hm... [12:24] lots of new goodies in breezy :) [12:29] <\sh> now it goes...python-kde3 is coming...can u here it? [12:31] I like reading the english mistakes of german people [12:31] it helps me understand the german pronounciation :-) [12:32] <\sh> yeahme to [12:32] <\sh> hear ;) [12:32] i love users [12:32] :) [12:32] <\sh> i'm thinking to fast , faster then I can move my fingers ;) [12:32] that and ogra always saying "then" when he means "then" [12:32] one of them sent me a translation for smeg and another actually wrote the translation code for me [12:32] quite many germans people do the same mistake [12:33] the code to generate pot files and compile conversions and etc [12:33] Amaranth, yes, I'm managing a project at this time [12:33] I'm the user/developer wanting to push the project further :-) [12:33] Amaranth, gettext? [12:33] don't suppose any of you know how to deal with translations and .desktop files [12:34] xgettext, yeah [12:34] <\sh> shermann@shermann-laptop:~/downloads$ w [12:34] <\sh> 00:34:04 up 9:34, 4 users, load average: 7,11, 4,72, 3,35 [12:34] <\sh> hmmm [12:34] i mean, i know you do Name[de] =whatever but is there a way to use gettext and etc to generate that for you? [12:34] <\sh> my laptop is melting ;) [12:34] not that I know [12:35] \sh, try as I do, place an usb fan towards it :-) [12:35] ok, i'll just have to take patches against the .desktop files [12:35] (a usb...) [12:35] <\sh> herve: hahaha :) [12:35] <\sh> an usb is correct ;) [12:35] <\sh> herve: there is no place anymore for an usb fan :) [12:35] no, "u" sounds like a consomn (?) [12:35] so "a" is needed [12:36] unless you pronounce it as "ou" of course :-) [12:37] <\sh> i thought [uiao] needs an "an" ;) [12:37] <\sh> think i need another holiday in an anglosaxxon country ;) [12:38] it depends on how the pronounciation of the word begins [12:38] pronouncing "i" is a mess in english === lamont [~lamont@mix.mmjgroup.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:38] there are like three ways to pronounce it [12:38] quantlib looks to be a dpkg-architecture victim [12:38] depending on the origin of the word, etc. [12:39] hi lamont [12:39] <\sh> herve: so it's an ubuntu linux, but a usb fan? [12:39] I think so [12:39] it's "oubountou", not "ioubountou" [12:40] one could argue an USB, or a USB... [12:40] but my english skills are melting like ice [12:40] <\sh> or an universal serial bus ;) [12:40] but given that USB is generally pronounced by stating the 3 letters, and the named letter U doesn't start with a vowel..... [12:40] \sh, no, "iouniversal" ;() [12:40] herve: an universe [12:41] you teach me that one [12:41] <\sh> i pronounce it "younevercal" ,-) [12:41] junivers [12:41] no, sounds strange to me [12:42] <\sh> 7topic MOTU english lessons, please join and listen === lamont shrugs. note that american is not english, either [12:42] \sh, python-kde3 still hasn't reach my mailbox [12:43] <\sh> herve: it compiles :) [12:43] repeat after me, "the cat is driving the car" [12:43] \sh, at yours or the buildd? I mean I have not seen any announce on breezy-changes [12:43] <\sh> "the car is catching the cat" [12:43] <\sh> herve: at mine [12:44] that's why I can't hear it then [12:44] we're too far away from each other! [12:44] <\sh> herve: not too far away ..:) [12:44] well, like 10 hours of train [12:44] and something like 800 km for a bird [12:45] for a european swallow (?) I mean [12:45] not carrying any coconut [12:47] <\sh> hmm...coconut [12:52] <\sh> g'night gentlemen...\sh is off to bed [12:52] night [12:52] night [12:53] I won't be long either [12:53] just by the time I file another dozen bugs :-) [12:58] night itou [01:14] is the new X safe? [01:16] who broke my GUI? ;) [01:16] fess up [01:18] you GUI? [01:18] your [01:19] yes, the one installed on my computer [01:19] hence is is *mine* [01:19] muwaahahahaha [01:20] um, anyway...carry on [01:53] Amaranth: works for me [01:54] most working breezy xorg to date [01:54] tseng: good, because i already upgraded [01:55] heh [01:59] hi [01:59] hi ajmitch [02:10] where should I report 'universe' bugs in breezy? [02:11] https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/ ? or is there somewhere separate? [02:12] launchpad.ubuntu.com/malone [02:12] wow, really? [02:14] how would I know to use that site instead of the regular bugzilla? is there a webpage somewhere? or how? [02:14] dooglus: would I tell you a lie? :) [02:15] have a look in the channel topic [02:17] ajmitch: I believe you, but if I hadn't stumbled upon this channel (and it does have quite an odd name) then I would have submitted the bug to bugzilla.u.c... and it wouldn't have told me not to [02:18] yes, and it's listed on the wiki as well, I believe [02:18] what about bugs in main for breezy? where do they go? [02:18] bugzilla [02:18] and bugs in main for hoary? [02:18] bugzilla [02:19] is there a field that I can use to speficy whether the bug shows up in hoary or breezy? [02:19] probably write in the comment [02:20] ajmitch: ok, fine. thanks. [02:21] I just noticed. if I go to bugzilla and try to 'add a bug', it offers a link to launchpad for 'ubuntu universe' bugs... [02:21] however, it's right at the end, and the 3rd link was to bugzilla, and that's apparently for "any issues with anything distributed as part of Ubuntu". [02:22] perhaps that message should be clearer - is 'universe' part of ubuntu or not? it's not clear. [02:23] perhaps you could file a bug about it in bugzilla? :) [02:30] heh, funny you should say that... [02:30] https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11488 === doko [~doko___@dsl-082-082-201-086.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === jaldhar [~jaldhar@pcp09354467pcs.jersyc01.nj.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [02:50] ajmitch: does launchpad work? [02:50] I just tried using it to report a bug and got a 'system error' [02:53] "Big bugs have little bugs upon their backs to bite 'em; [02:53] Little bugs have smaller bugs, and so on, ad infinitum." [02:58] oh yeah, malone was broken last time i tried [02:59] ugh. [03:25] malone has issues [04:04] hi [04:10] does anyone have and adm8211 based card? [04:11] i want to see if it has sysfs support? === rem__ [~rem@adsl-249-172-zh2.tiscali.ch] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:42] asedriveiiie needs gcc-4.0 liove [05:42] love, even [05:42] and kxl needs xorg love [05:43] hk-classes: g++-4.0 love [05:44] raidutils, schooltool: g++-4.0 [05:44] giblib: xorg [05:44] libast: gcc-4.0 [05:45] allegro4: gcc-4.0 [05:52] db2: gcc-4.0 [05:57] g'night all === JDahl [~qwerty@ca-stmnca-cuda4-gen2m1-135.vnnyca.adelphia.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === robitaille [~robitaill@d154-5-117-228.bchsia.telus.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [08:28] <\sh> morning [08:31] <\sh> python-kde3 upload now === ivoks [~ivoks@lns01-1523.dsl.iskon.hr] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Danten [~danten@h50n8c1o1049.bredband.skanova.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:46] <\sh> Riddell: ping [10:09] pong :) [10:11] <\sh> lol [10:16] Mithrandir: ping [10:16] ivoks: yes? [10:16] Mithrandir: i have two requests :) [10:17] Mithrandir: mpich and lam4-dev [10:17] done [10:17] thank you [10:17] np [10:18] it's great to be member of this great team [10:19] if I can do anything for you guys, just ask [10:19] <\sh> http://photos.shermann.blogweb.de/main.php/v/shermannpics/events/ish_buddies_20050602/?g2_navId=x6e802011 [10:19] <\sh> the best cable tv engineers in cologne, germany :) [10:29] <\sh> strike [10:29] <\sh> http://people.ubuntu.com/~lamont/buildLogs/p/python-kde3/3.11.4+snapshot20050316-0ubuntu2/ [10:29] <\sh> Riddell: u can test python-kde3 ;) === SquishyWaffle [~gtaylor@24-158-64-173.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:08] ajmitch: ping [11:09] ajmitch: BIG PING :) [11:09] ajmitch: < fabbione> ivoks: the patch isn't extremely bad.. if you can get people to work on userland, i can consider patching the kernel [11:10] ivoks: waz dat fir> [11:10] for [11:10] Greetings, I just stumbled my way through creating my first package :) [11:11] Lathiat: layer7 filtering [11:11] ivoks: specifics? [11:11] Lathiat: firewall that would filter traffic based on protocol, not ports [11:12] ivoks: sounds cpu intensive :) [11:12] Lathiat: so you would say, HTTP OK, FTP NOTOK [11:12] Lathiat: it isn't that much... [11:12] i filter 300 computers with that... [11:12] ivoks: but does it do it on like every packet [11:12] ivoks: or like start of connection [11:12] Lathiat: http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/technicaldetails [11:13] it checks only first package [11:13] packet :) [11:13] ivoks: ah, sounds cool [11:14] ivoks: but i mean like, a bit of data needs to pass for these things, does it just rudely reset it if none of it matches? [11:14] Lathiat: it isn't that cpu intensive [11:14] it's quite nice [11:14] ivoks: or does it just listen to both sides before passing any data [11:14] ivoks: because assumedly one side will send something first [11:14] ? [11:15] Lathiat: you define will you be allowed to establish connection [11:15] so.. it's posibble to ban all incoming HTTP requests [11:15] but you will be able to establish any HTTP connection outside [11:15] like normal netfilter [11:16] <\sh> ivoks: this is not new [11:16] acctually, this is just a appendix for netfilter :) [11:16] \sh: of course it's not new :) [11:16] \sh: but tell me, how would you ban any HTTP request on local maching from outside? [11:17] <\sh> ivoks: securecomputing sidewinder [11:17] you can't do that with netfilter the way it is now [11:17] lol [11:18] <\sh> ivoks: no joke...most of beautiful things of securecomputing is in there :) [11:19] \sh: but you aren't telling me that everyone should buy sidewinder, aren't you? :) [11:19] <\sh> ivoks: and I'm trained on it [11:19] and it isn't free [11:19] :) [11:20] so, it's uselss to us [11:20] like UNIX :)( [11:21] <\sh> ivoks: the problem is, in a company I can't come with a solution for highsec and tell them: "hey, use this one, it's free, nobody give u a garanty or warranty, but it's working" [11:23] \sh: i'm not telling about company [11:23] \sh: i'm talking about home users [11:23] <\sh> ivoks: does a home user need really layer7 filtering? [11:23] \sh: i would say, yes [11:24] <\sh> does a homeuser knows what layer7 filtering is? [11:24] he doesn't need to know that he's using that [11:24] home user wants "i want HTTP" "I want P2P [11:24] <\sh> so we should make the same mistake like ms? [11:24] but i don't want "that an that" [11:24] ? [11:25] <\sh> telling the user that he can secure himself, without a clue what he's doing? [11:25] \sh: not without a clue [11:25] <\sh> ivoks: most normal home users haven't any clue...this is the pitfall in MS thinking [11:25] but home user doesn't want to know anything about iptables [11:26] <\sh> ivoks: no, they want to have things like firestarter, or "personal firewalls" [11:26] he just wants to work [11:26] right [11:26] <\sh> so a normal iptables packet filter does it for u. most propably he's using the packetfilter on his dsl router [11:26] <\sh> he doesn't need layer7 filtering [11:26] <\sh> but [11:26] \sh: normal netfilter does not do it right [11:27] you can't block fasttrack and allow http with netfilter [11:27] without going to layer 7 [11:27] they use same ports (80) [11:27] <\sh> a enterprise edition of * Linux for ISPs or SOHOs they need layer7 and more :) [11:28] <\sh> whatever fasttrack is ;) [11:28] \sh: p2p network [11:28] <\sh> hmm........ [11:28] one of most popular.. [11:29] at least, it was :) [11:29] <\sh> so the return port is 80? [11:29] ajmitch: ping [11:29] \sh: yes [11:29] <\sh> ivoks: so it's different... [11:29] \sh: http://www.kazaa.com/us/index.htm [11:29] <\sh> http -> questioning port == 80 [11:30] <\sh> http -> answering port > 1024 [11:30] <\sh> fasttrack -> questioning port => ? [11:30] <\sh> fastrack -> answering port == 80? [11:30] yes [11:30] <\sh> for what layer7 then? [11:31] <\sh> filter incoming port of 80 and block it [11:31] <\sh> or accept it [11:31] ah... [11:31] did you ever fight against p2p in your backyard? :) [11:31] <\sh> it makes more sense, if u have a httpd running on your side, and u want to filter the incoming requests [11:31] <\sh> ivoks: no... [11:32] \sh: i did... closing ports is useless [11:32] <\sh> ivoks: why? if u want to use fasttrack open port 80 incoming, if not, close it [11:32] but it connects to other computers on port 80 [11:33] and you can deny outgoing traffic to 80 [11:33] <\sh> ivoks: thats outgoing [11:33] s/can/can't/ [11:34] \sh: i started disscusion on ubuntu-devel, so I would appriciate any comments or sugestions [11:34] <\sh> ivoks: of course u can :) install squid on one special machine, open port 8080 for all users, configure filter for fasttrack detection and deny all requests of this filter [11:34] <\sh> the rest can go out, open outgoing connections from squid server to port 80 outside [11:35] and what about other networks? [11:35] that don't have same port all the time [11:35] for example, winmx [11:35] there is no way to filter it [11:35] <\sh> ivoks: as I said, a firewall is not a software solution, it's a concept. [11:35] \sh: i agree [11:36] \sh: but you can't have squids on local machines [11:36] well... [11:36] <\sh> if u say: no p2p block all p2p ports..if one p2p network using common ports e.g. http, u need to filter on application level [11:36] i have to go now [11:36] <\sh> but this is not for homeusers [11:36] topic is on ubundu-devel, please, comment there [11:36] <\sh> if homeuser wants to have p2p -> open it, if not, close it [11:37] \sh: problem is... [11:37] \sh: does user know on what port p2p works? [11:37] wouldn't it be easier "open p2p" "close p2p"? [11:38] i think that is much better then "open 80, 4111, 2345, 1234, but close 1234 and 452" [11:38] s/452/4551/ :) [11:39] i really have to go now... [11:39] see you === SquishyWaffle [~gtaylor@24-158-64-173.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com] has left #ubuntu-motu [] === DanielN [~kodiak@80-218-243-68.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:49] morning === zorglub [~zorglub@wahe.diwi.org] has left #ubuntu-motu [] [11:51] Which laptops work better in ubuntu? HP or Dell or both? [11:58] <\sh> most of the things from HP is working nicely with ubuntu...but the irda port and the sd card reader is not working as expected. [11:59] <\sh> for irda there is a solution with a separate piece of software, but the sd card reader will be difficult === Lathiat [~lathiat@202.92.213.227] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:01] DanielN: morning [12:03] <\sh> doko: u addicted package machine ;) === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:11] mhm [12:11] i'll try kubuntu now... never done that before :) === terrex [~terrex@84-122-69-8.onocable.ono.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:30] DanielN: fix your outstanding C++ packages first ;-) === susus [~sz@p5089F95E.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:36] hi [12:41] <\sh> argl [12:41] <\sh> 500kg in less then 15 minutes [12:41] <\sh> and what i'm doing now with 1000 music cds...i don't have place for it in my new flat [12:48] \sh: oh man my mom moved my stuff around at her house [12:48] \sh: dumped all my cds [12:49] all out of order and stuff [12:49] <\sh> well..in this case, it wasn't my mom, it was my exwife who chased me out ;) [12:51] heh [12:51] i dont have any of those, luckily === koke [~koke@adsl229-164.unizar.es] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Lathiat [~lathiat@gasp.bur.st] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:01] <\sh> hehe === plugwash [plugwash@p10link.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === herzi [~herzi@c172202.adsl.hansenet.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu === herve [~hcauwelie@ip-3.net-81-220-179.nice.rev.numericable.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:33] morning [01:33] hi [01:40] <\sh> hey herve === herzi [~herzi@c172202.adsl.hansenet.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:50] <\sh> herve: python-kde3 just reached your inbox ;) [01:50] haven't read it yet :-) [01:56] oooh @ "Hide Read Messages" [01:56] perfect for breezy-changes === Mithrandir notes that's default for gnus already. [02:00] hey, I need to read again the announces sometimes [02:00] and TB is smart enough to point me to the first unread messag [02:00] herve: you can unhide it, obviously [02:01] i can actually have a huge ammount of mail and find stuff now, thanks to beagle magic [02:01] suprisingly i dont use it enough [02:01] I need to make beagle talk to my imap server. [02:02] <\sh> Mithrandir: the search of kmail is good enough :) [02:03] hi folks [02:03] hi siretart [02:04] \sh: that would imply installing kmail. And if it doesn't index, you lose. [02:05] <\sh> Mithrandir: well..indexing is done by cyrus imapd...thats enough ;) [02:05] : tfheen@vawad ~ > du -sh ~/Maildir [02:05] 7,0G /home/tfheen/Maildir [02:05] there's _no way_ I'm letting cyrus close to my mail. :-) [02:05] hah wow [02:05] 122M .maildir [02:06] <\sh> for my new imap spool...i'm on 288MB [02:06] tseng: that's my inboxes (which means all spam, lists, etc filtered away) for 2004. :P [02:06] mine is 2.8G and curier-imap-ssl+kmail works just fine. [02:07] Mithrandir: ah, i /dev/null spam over a certain threshold [02:07] Mithrandir: so i only get about the bottom 3rd of it [02:07] tseng: I refuse anything getting > 10 as the SA score. [02:07] i think mine is 7 or 8 [02:07] which still accounts for somewhere in the range of 30MB/month. [02:08] <\sh> i still have to include my old archive [02:08] i need to fiddle with something, im starting to get a few mails a day to my inbox [02:08] and yes I retrain it every week or 2 [02:08] on uncaught. [02:08] ho no, not "I have the biggest one" again :-) [02:09] herve: i see your schwartz is as big as mine? [02:09] I refuse to answer! [02:10] watch the movie. [02:11] <\sh> your "schwartz" ? [02:11] spaceballs [02:11] <\sh> sad, i saw it only in german [02:11] hm [02:11] i imagine that takes alot out of it [02:12] <\sh> well..i could imagine what the meaning is [02:13] <\sh> ah [02:14] <\sh> "may the schwartz be with you" -> "Mge der Saft mit dir sein" ;) [02:14] <\sh> http://dict.leo.org/cgi-bin/dict/urlexp/20030328015533 [02:14] Saft = juice? [02:14] iirc. [02:14] <\sh> yeah [02:14] <\sh> it's a bad translation [02:14] wow. [02:16] <\sh> i think the word "schwartz" comes from the jewish language (jiddish) === siretart is looking at https://www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/MOTUToReview [02:21] there is a lot outdated stuff there, I cleaned a few things up, but still.. [02:22] ah herve, i should remind you, as you said ;) [02:22] does anyone know LorenzoHernandezGarciaHierro? === |QuaD-_ [~QuaD@pcp0011386062pcs.ebrnsw01.nj.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [02:25] DanielN: C++ ping again? [02:27] siretart, he's trulux, no? [02:27] DanielN, sure! [02:28] herve: ? [02:29] ah [02:29] doko: i'm learning right now.. but i have a bit time tonight maybe [02:29] trulux: I've seen your selinux packages on https://www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/MOTUToReview. are they still for reviewing? [02:30] siretart: I think so [02:30] siretart: ask pitti [02:30] hm. okay [02:34] <\sh> yes...the first "it works now" messages are coming for python-kde3 ;) [02:35] DanielN, so "when" is to be reviewed, [02:35] ? [02:35] yeah [02:54] DanielN, can you tell about the debian package on the author's page? [02:55] herve: nothing to tell.. i began from scratch [02:56] you didn't see it? [02:57] no i didn't.. i saw that there's a binary deb.. but the source i didn't saw, until ivoks has tell me yesterday [02:57] anyway, I have a problem [02:57] dpkg-source: error: file when_1.0.23.orig.tar.gz has size 30420 instead of expected 30418 [02:58] hmm [02:58] no idea [02:59] ok. ToReview cleaned up a bit === herve lost [03:01] siretart, how this page differs from MOTUNewPackages? [03:01] herve: ToReview are updated packages from existing one. NEW packages don't have hit either debian nor ubuntu [03:03] hmm ok [03:11] DanielN, but you checked what the author has set up for packaging? === ivoks [~ivoks@lns01-1523.dsl.iskon.hr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:14] hi [03:14] hi [03:15] <\sh> doko: u will do the transition again for debian? :) [03:16] herve: ??? [03:16] DanielN, the debian_stuff directory [03:16] herve: he didn't removed it? :) === Danten [~danten@h140n7c1o1049.bredband.skanova.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:21] I can guess from a comment you're a german speaking swiss :-) === thesaltydog [~pippo@62.211.45.42] has joined #ubuntu-motu === shawarma [~sh@3E6B503C.rev.stofanet.dk] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:24] Hi! I'm a bit confused by the procedures for becoming a master of the universe... I have created a package, so there's no point in putting it into the UniverseCandidates as it's already made... What am I supposed to do? [03:25] <\sh> if it's a new package (not in debian neither in ubuntu: MOTUNewPackages) [03:25] <\sh> for becoming a MOTU u have to go the steps of "Ubuntu Member" -> "MOTU" [03:25] \sh: Ok. What if it was already in Debian (it's not, but the next package might be) [03:26] shawarma, MOTU is a special status you don't need to maintain packages [03:26] \sh, you forgot a step :-) [03:26] <\sh> install ubuntu? [03:26] <\sh> oh now [03:26] <\sh> -w [03:26] herve [03:26] shawarma, it would be better if it enters Debian first [03:26] <\sh> create a wiki page..without a wiki page u won't become a member ;) [03:26] i deleted debian_stuff [03:26] \sh, maintainer != motu [03:26] as ivoks said to me [03:27] DanielN, what? no leave it :-) [03:27] :> [03:27] you're supposed to be less instrusive as possible in the upstream package === herve kicks ivoks! [03:27] herve: come on [03:27] <\sh> herve: he asked: [15:24] Hi! I'm a bit confused by the procedures for becoming a master of the universe. [03:27] that debian_stuff is for debian package [03:27] I have to say that I'm not less confused now.. :-) [03:28] shawarma: fist, you have to create your own wiki page [03:28] I thought Masters of the universe was the group of maintainers of the universe. [03:28] ivoks: Done. [03:28] <\sh> shawarma: motus doesn't maintain packages...we r giving love to the packages ;) [03:28] shawarma: then you have to apply for a Ubuntu Member [03:28] <\sh> but a motu could be a package maintainer [03:28] shawarma: But in order to become that I have to have done stuff, but I can't do stuff before I'm a member... Or? [03:28] ivoks: That was for you.. [03:29] <\sh> shawarma: u can ask for reviewing and sponsored upload :) [03:29] <\sh> shawarma: u can prepare your wiki page [03:29] to become ubuntu member, you have to something for community [03:29] <\sh> write documentation whatever ubuntu related for the community [03:29] ivoks, it's harmless to leave it, and I don't like the idea of removing stuff in upstream packages [03:29] \sh: 2 questions: What do you mean by "giving love"? Who do I ask for sponsorship? [03:29] herve: well... ok [03:30] no sponsorship here [03:30] <\sh> shawarma: wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTUNewPackages [03:30] everybody will help you [03:30] damn.. [03:30] hdf5 needs a lot of patching :( [03:30] <\sh> shawarma: we will review the packages and deciding then if it goes into the repos e.g. [03:30] <\sh> ivoks: hahaha u have it ;) [03:30] mine still didn't :) [03:31] warning: the address of 'H5G_init_interface', will always evaluate as 'true' [03:31] <\sh> ivoks: check the rules file [03:31] i get like hunderts of these and a like :) [03:31] <\sh> the package name depends on the rules and version of changelog [03:31] \sh: package is ok... [03:31] <\sh> its a mess [03:31] source isn't nice for g++4 [03:31] or gcc4 [03:32] <\sh> ivoks: u checked the other page? with the debian bug reports? [03:32] warning: ISO C90 does not support 'long long' [03:32] \sh: nope :) [03:32] <\sh> huahuahua [03:32] <\sh> ivoks: this will be your masterpiece [03:32] funny thing is... [03:32] it compiles :) [03:32] <\sh> warnings ;) [03:32] just with 1000^7 warnings :) [03:33] Ok. Now it's added to MOTUNewPackages... so now I just wait? [03:33] herve: what about when now? [03:34] typedef unsigned long long hsize_t; [03:34] someone was drunk when doing this :) [03:34] <\sh> shawarma: sad but true [03:34] \sh: It's only sad if the wait is long.. [03:34] <\sh> shawarma: right now we're in a cxx transition and it takes all our power [03:34] shawarma: it is [03:34] <\sh> shawarma: well...check d.b.o/wnpp ;) [03:34] shawarma: now we are totally occupied with cxx [03:35] <\sh> u will find packages waiting for >1 year..but we're faster [03:35] \sh: I'd imagine. Debian is not the fastest organization in the world. :-) [03:35] Daniel, continuing the review [03:35] <\sh> shawarma: imagine we're only 20 ppl [03:35] <\sh> 20? [03:35] warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type [03:36] man... [03:36] :((( [03:36] <\sh> ogra: recruiting ;) [03:36] it's 4MB gizped messed source... [03:36] ivoks, want an aspirin? :-) [03:37] Can you explain this MOTU thing again? You are just the guys with upload privileges, or what? Or how do you differ from the package maintainers? [03:38] \sh: there is new debian hdf5 [03:38] \sh: should i use that one? :) [03:39] shawarma, yes we upload packages but that's only a part of it [03:39] ivoks, I'd like a sync, yes [03:39] shawarma, we upload because we fix packages and sync with debian [03:39] <\sh> ivoks: sure [03:39] <\sh> sync it, if it's not already [03:39] ah, no new things in -3 [03:40] shawarma, the motus also approve new packages and new colleagues [03:40] only fixes in debian/* [03:40] damn... :( [03:40] ivoks, still, sync it please [03:40] herve: sure [03:40] i was hoping for some patches :) [03:40] like debian would care for gcc 4 for now ;-) [03:41] but check upstream too [03:41] you can sync a new one with -0ubuntu1 as the revision [03:41] i know [03:41] i did that with wifi-radar [03:41] herve: Ok... I just got confused because on the MOTURecruitment page it says that if you want to become a MOTU, you go to the MaintainerCandidates page, and on the MOTU page it says to go to MOTURecruitment if you want to be a maintainer. I assumed MOTU == maintainer. [03:42] wich still isn't uploaded :) [03:42] shawarma, I know it's a mess, I felt the same :-) [03:43] hm. mesa is challenging :) [03:43] herve: So I'm still not totally sure.. I guess I just want to be a regular maintainer (don't have time for all the stuff you guys apparantly do).. Where is that process outlined? [03:44] herve: Sorry to bother you with all my stupid questions when you're so busy, I'm just very eager to get started on helping out. [03:44] yes, there is new version [03:45] <\sh> shawarma: follow the DD way [03:45] \sh: Become Debian Developer first? [03:45] <\sh> or put the package on MOTUNewPackages and ask for review + upload [03:45] <\sh> shawarma: this is for us the best way...get the package inside debian, we sync [03:45] shawarma, ask yourself two questions: what have you done for ubuntu so far, and what do you want to do as a maintaner? [03:45] \sh: Stupid question: Where to as for review + upload? [03:46] <\sh> shawarma: here? :) [03:46] shawarma, you have to prove you're a valued member and you will bring help to the universe [03:46] shawarma: you can start with porting hdf5 :) [03:46] if it's just for making a package entering ubuntu, it's not worth the effort [03:46] <\sh> rotfl [03:47] \sh: I've tried to become a Debian Developer for ages, but I need signatures and stuff, and there aren't a lot of DD's around here to sign my key.. [03:47] <\sh> shawarma: there is another possibility [03:47] shawarma: well, you need signatuers here too [03:47] <\sh> shawarma: u can send at least your passport copy or whatever to them [03:47] shawarma: but not only from ubuntu or debian developers [03:47] shawarma: what package are you talking about? why do I think it should be in ubuntu? [03:48] lbtouch. it's a driver for a touchscreen found on Fujitsu Lifebooks. [03:48] It should be in Ubuntu because I need the package and other people probably need it as well. [03:49] oh, god, no... [03:49] shawarma: ah, sounds great. [03:49] debian patch for hdf5 has... [03:49] 96000 lines :( [03:49] jesus... [03:49] ivoks: Really? who can sign it besides them? [03:50] shawarma: I think it would very helpfull if there was a MOTU or ubuntu developer who could test your package [03:50] siretart: Sure would. It's listed on the NewPackages page. [03:51] It generates one of those -source-packages usable with the module-assistant. [03:51] <\sh> siretart: it could go with the laptop testing [03:51] \sh: great idea! [03:51] lol! i can't belive it [03:51] source has comment like: /* Define if `dev_t' is a scalar */ [03:52] <\sh> shawarma: your package is on MOTUNewPackages? [03:52] and debian maintainter fix it into: [03:52] \sh: Yup. [03:52] /* Define if \`dev_t' is a scalar */ [03:52] what's with the \? :)))) [03:52] it's comment, doesn't get parsed :) [03:53] ivoks: *G* [03:54] <\sh> shawarma: i see what i can do [03:54] \sh: You can search for lbtouch. [03:54] \sh: That'd be great! [03:55] \sh: there's no rush, I just want to be sure that I've done everything right and someone will look at it eventually. [03:55] \sh: If adding it to MOTUNewPackages should be sufficient, I'll just wait. [03:55] <\sh> shawarma: right now, we have a project with laptop testing..i think we will find one with a lifebook [03:56] \sh: Ok. to make it work 100%, you need an X-driver, which I'm going to package later today. [03:58] <\sh> hehe...we need this as well [03:59] ok, i'll need weeks for hdf5 [03:59] and C/C++ bibles [04:00] and a couple of gurus :-) [04:00] 100, to be specific :) [04:00] this is a mess [04:00] i'm thinking about doing debian/* from start [04:02] http://hdf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/HDF5/release/platforms5.html [04:02] hm... [04:02] !!! :))) !!!! [04:02] gcc 3.2.3, 3.3.6, 3.4.4, 4.0.0 [04:03] <\sh> ivoks: sync it from debian [04:03] \sh: we have latest debian in [04:03] but upstream has new one [04:03] wich compiles with 4.0 [04:04] at least, they say it does [04:04] <\sh> ivoks: uupdate is your friend :) [04:04] uupdate? [04:04] <\sh> man uupdate :) comes together with uscan [04:04] doing that allready :) [04:06] i should do uupdate on allready debianized source? [04:07] <\sh> ivoks: the upstream has debian/ ? [04:08] no [04:08] <\sh> so [04:08] <\sh> u do this [04:08] <\sh> download upstream package [04:08] <\sh> (put it where your .dsc files are) [04:09] <\sh> then enter debianized old sourcetree [04:09] and uupdate [04:09] too many rejects :( [04:09] <\sh> uupdate -v ../ [04:09] <\sh> ivoks: resolv them [04:09] when i say many, i don't think 10 or 20 :) [04:09] <\sh> if u do, u don't have to make a source upload [04:12] ivoks, you may contact the maintainer for common work [04:12] he's a nice french guy ;-) [04:13] :) [04:15] # Be optimistic about future versions of gcc.. :-) - QAK - 2003/10/20 [04:15] nice :) [04:18] ivoks, "#301418: hdf5: Please update to version 1.6.4" [04:18] :-) [04:18] :) [04:19] herve: you found some misstakes in when? [04:19] then we will wait :) [04:19] DanielN, ha yes, but nothing serious [04:19] more like cleanups [04:19] cool [04:19] ivoks, I'm quite serious about contacting the DD [04:20] herve: i know [04:21] josselin? is he/she male of female? :) [04:21] male [04:21] <\sh> does it matter? [04:21] quite rare name, yes [04:21] \sh, for ivoks, probably :-) [04:22] :) [04:22] <\sh> i had this yesterday on #ubuntu-de [04:23] <\sh> there is a girl :) and the first person who didn't know it, tried to "flirt" with her *eg* [04:23] ok, I made my duty, 3 new packages reviewed [04:23] wow [04:23] when? :) [04:23] <\sh> which ones? [04:24] \sh, by the way, remind me if "leiber" is male or female [04:24] I quite never remember [04:24] ivoks, when plus the two first in the list === herve <- hungry! [04:24] <\sh> leiber? die leiber? the bodies? ;) [04:25] herve: what about the orig.tar.gz size? could i do anything here? [04:25] Daniel, I'll inspect it [04:25] ok [04:26] \sh, ouch! liebe? [04:26] hm.. [04:27] 1.6.4 goes really nice with gcc4 [04:28] <\sh> herve: love? die liebe :) [04:28] dear, I meant [04:28] and not deer, with your accent :-p [04:29] <\sh> dear has no "male or female" it's an adjective [04:29] <\sh> it's more "the" dear ;) [04:29] <\sh> Dear Woman, Dear Man [04:29] hmm... [04:30] <\sh> dear == lieb, teuer [04:30] I once was told to use "lieber" and not "liebe" [04:30] because it was for men [04:30] <\sh> thats different from dear :) [04:30] <\sh> Lieber Herve [04:30] <\sh> male [04:30] ok, got to go.. [04:30] see you [04:30] <\sh> Liebe Susu [04:30] <\sh> female [04:30] bye [04:30] <\sh> cu ivoks [04:30] ok, I'll try to remember [04:30] bye ivoks [04:31] herve: -r is for males, and -e is for females [04:31] german is hard :-/ [04:31] <\sh> ivoks: well [04:31] <\sh> ivoks: das liebe tier [04:31] <\sh> tier is "it" [04:31] that's middle [04:32] <\sh> ivoks: right..:) [04:32] ivoks [04:32] das [04:32] <\sh> and it's not "dear" ;) [04:32] joss is online on freenode ;-) [04:32] der das die [04:32] herve: i've send email allready [04:32] <\sh> Dear == as introduction in a letter is different [04:33] Liebe Susu is start of a letter, right? [04:33] <\sh> yeah [04:33] das liebe tier is like... loving animal [04:33] or dear animal [04:33] <\sh> right [04:33] <\sh> no [04:33] dear like loving [04:33] not like start of a letter [04:34] <\sh> my beloved animal [04:34] right [04:34] it doesn't have to be my [04:34] or? [04:34] <\sh> my dear darling == mein teurer schatz :) [04:34] DanielN, your orig.tar.gz is ok, I'd just say to "debuild -S" again [04:34] \sh, I didn't want to be _that_ personal :-) [04:35] <\sh> 7topic german lesson for free ;) [04:35] <\sh> herve: hehehe [04:35] \sh: ja, mein, aber in das liebe tier, er ist keine mine [04:35] <\sh> herve: is it a friend, or just a formal letter? [04:35] mein, not mine :) [04:35] \sh, just to show off my german abilities [04:35] es ist, nicht er ist [04:35] (which turned out to be a failure, as you can guess) [04:35] an, my deutch sucks... it's been a while :) [04:36] herve: i've fixed your issues... [04:36] "your"? [04:36] DanielN: they were your issues :) [04:37] ivoks: thanks ;) [04:37] herve: without the error about the orig size [04:37] hehe, [04:37] bye for real now [04:37] ivoks, you stole me the words :-) [04:37] bye ivoks [04:37] ++ [04:37] hi (for real) [04:37] DanielN, I'll approve it then [04:38] herve: ok [04:38] :) === Micksa [~mslade@203-217-18-166.perm.iinet.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Micksa looks at /topic === Micksa wonders if he's allowed in here [04:47] Micksa: hi! why do you think you were not allowed here? [04:47] well I sorta read "Masters of the Universe" as "elite" [04:47] <\sh> damn [04:47] then I realised which universe it's about :) [04:48] <\sh> need to go to office.. === Micksa avoids making He-Man jokes [04:48] <\sh> some radio services are not working :( [04:48] (which I'm sure haven't been done yet) [04:49] ;) [04:50] I gotta get my GPG key signed [04:50] Micksa: great! :) [04:50] lifeless would be a good start, we live in the same suburb and I've known him for, like, 2 years no [04:50] now [04:50] but you know he would probably ask to see my license anyway [04:51] <\sh> fck...off i go [04:51] does anyone heard about pdumpfs-rsync? [04:51] it is not installable in hoary, and I'm trying to locate the debian package (from debian) [04:55] dammit, that joke was wasted on this channel :) [04:58] remind me, what's the difference between universe and the packages in debian? [04:59] they're modified to work on Ubuntu in the cases where ubuntu has switched to newer versions and such. [05:00] are there any packages in universe not in debian? [05:00] yes === herzi [~herzi@d080056.adsl.hansenet.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:02] is the modification generally automatic? [05:04] no [05:09] Micksa: modification is handwork. http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/ shows you the difference to the debian packages === Micksa doesn't envy this scott fellow [05:11] \sh: cool [05:11] Micksa: well, he has good scripts ;) [05:12] who did/does the majority of this handwork? [05:13] well, the motus handle the universe packages, the packages in main is up to the ubuntu developers [05:13] interessted in helping? ;) [05:14] sorta [05:15] great! then you are perfectly right in this channel :) [05:15] not RIGHT now :) [05:15] I have an assignment due, um [05:15] 3 days ago [05:15] and another one due in 2 days [05:16] and a job [05:16] :) [05:16] I am rather behind at the moment [05:16] blame a dead laptop === thoreauputic [~prospero@wolax8-151.dialup.optusnet.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:48] yeah, a new "ubuntu forks" thread starting on debian-devel! [05:48] link please. [05:50] more spoons! :) [05:50] lists.d.o doesn't list it yet === SEBest [~chatzilla@sebest.ovibes.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:52] tseng: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/06/msg00327.html [05:52] AFAIK we have a joint plan on that front already [05:52] hey, ubuntu is sooo evil! [05:53] people should google before they throw mud around [05:53] tseng ++ [05:53] erm doko posted it right there [05:54] i dont understand why binary compatibility between ubuntu and debian has any relevance [05:54] we ship all their packages every 6 months [05:55] tseng: because that affects the traffic and rants on *-user mailing lists === tseng ignores the uninformed. [05:55] I don't imagine if we get a FUD everytime ubuntu does something before debian... [05:56] I don't have the patience for those folks. [05:58] tseng: please, Joss is a moron and he's going to be shot down. [05:58] Mithrandir: rock on. [05:58] tseng: that is, I just sent him a mail asking him to fuck off and check his facts before posting FUD. [05:58] :) [05:59] (a bit more politely, but that was the essence of it) [05:59] ive just been sortof watching that spot in dismay since I started advocating that more MOTU work directly with Debian [05:59] malone is _still_ broken? [05:59] Mithrandir: thanks for your very appropriate answer [05:59] and I started seeing this silliness [05:59] Amaranth: eh, probably [06:00] it's been like that for about 3-4 days now :/ [06:00] well, its only a few more weeks until we are supposed to be replacing bugzilla [06:00] ha! [06:00] so anything that doesnt work you should be pretty actively telling bradb [06:00] there is a reason everyone uses bugzilla :) [06:00] yep.. [06:01] tseng: well, i'd file a bug but the bug reporter is down ;) [06:01] yeah he is in here sometimes [06:01] im sure he knows about major brokens, but in general. [06:02] well, the main bug page is down and when you file a bug you get an error, so i'd hope he knows [06:02] right [06:03] Joss is making it hard to follow the CoC... [06:05] siretart: heh, thats nothing. [06:15] hard to follow the CoC, heh... === AnHu [~anton@mnch-d9ba4ce0.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [06:22] hello, yesterday a new version of GRAMPS was released (2.0.3) GRAMPS 1.0.8 is in the reposity. Can someone update this? You can find the source code on http://sourceforge.net/projects/gramps [06:26] let me check [06:27] hmm... 2.0.1 had a build failure [06:27] AnHu, if I upgrade gramps further than debian does [06:27] I will be accused of ruining Debian's business model :-p [06:27] [06:28] OK ;-) But would make this job? [06:28] I'm looking at it [06:28] 1.0.8 you say? === herve fool [06:29] you're using hoary hedgehog? [06:34] yes [06:34] gramps won't receive any update unless there is a security alert [06:34] or a very serious bug [06:35] hoary has entered production stage now [06:35] it will be updated in breezy, when that releases [06:35] ok, that means, there won't be many updates for hoary [06:36] I had compiled it today, there aren't problems [06:36] no there wont [06:36] this is not the issue [06:36] ok [06:36] AnHu, if you already have it up for your system, that's the best I can do [06:38] ok no problem. [06:38] also, check with the backports team [06:39] maybe they did it, or they will be interested by your work [06:39] is there a project for actual hoary packages? Are this the backports? [06:39] yes [06:40] google will help you find them [06:40] more than me, I mean :-) [06:41] ok thanks [06:44] why do I make the assumption that everyone is living dangerously using breezy... [06:46] I even wonder if doko works for canonical... [06:46] herve: I do [06:47] hehe, you should be ashamed to work for a company working for debian ;-) === ozamosi [~ozamosi@cust-adsl-80-252-171-204-dynamic.areteadsl.se] has joined #ubuntu-motu [06:53] Ubuntu packages and Debian Sid package together make problems? I heard something about instability [06:53] its not a great idea [06:53] more inconsistancy than instability === MagnusR [~magru@as1-1-7.t.lk.bonet.se] has joined #ubuntu-motu [06:59] can someone give me a good backport server address? [06:59] Not too busy? [06:59] AnHu: the forums have a list of all of them [07:00] ok I will see on it. === siretart hates native packages for packages not debian native :/ [07:07] thanks I find it. Have you the irc channel of the backports team? === ivoks [~ivoks@lns01-1523.dsl.iskon.hr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:09] hm... [07:09] herve: that french guy... [07:09] hehe [07:09] yes I know :-) [07:09] did you saw his post on list?! [07:09] he plays the moron [07:09] he will hear me now... [07:09] this is too much... [07:10] easy [07:10] it's time to start showing some names on that list.. [07:10] remember the CoC [07:10] i know :) [07:10] don't wory [07:15] eh :) [07:16] hi ivoks my little reviewer ;) [07:18] so, debian is going for g++4 too? [07:19] hi DanielN [07:20] ivoks, obviously [07:20] I'm sure doko planned it months ago [07:22] yeah.. [07:22] that's not something you pop-up over night [07:25] ok, replyed... === AnHu [~anton@mnch-d9ba4ce0.pool.mediaWays.net] has left #ubuntu-motu [] [07:25] this is going in wrong direction [07:26] what to say... [07:26] i asked him does he wants patches for 4.0 [07:26] and does he want me to help him with new package [07:26] and now he talks that no one contacted DDs for cooperation [07:26] hehe :) [07:27] world is strange place :) [07:27] yeah, like I never send patches to a DD and he never merged them === herve gazes at dia [07:28] the point is MOTU would be more efficient if we cooperate with debian [07:28] cause our number is... SMALL :) [07:29] will Debian start using gcc4.0? I thought Debian was too conservative for that [07:30] JDahl: it will, but it will take some time... [07:30] debian isn't conservative [07:30] it's just too big :) [07:32] what's vancouver project? [07:36] vancouver proposal [07:37] basically don't hold back etch for non-main archs [07:38] the proposal sets criteria for archs for beeing released by the debian release team. for all other archs the porter teams would have to do releases for themselves === siretart just got a real shock [07:38] it was about time [07:39] the slapd upgrade in sarge didn't go well. it killed all data. had to restore backups.. [07:40] happend to me once [07:40] lol, once :) couple of times [07:40] but that wasn't sarge's problem [07:43] does anyone of you happen to have a breezy on amd64? [07:43] would please anyone of you try to build http://siretart.tauware.de/ubuntu-packages/mas/mas_0.6.2-2ubuntu1.dsc and tell me if it FTBFS? [07:44] sec... [07:45] do you have patch? [07:45] i don't have debdiff on amd64 [07:45] ivoks: I uploaded the debdiff [07:46] ivoks: and it is a native package :( [07:47] ? [07:47] mas_0.6.2-2.dsc [07:47] i have only this [07:47] ah, the rest is in the same directory: [07:47] http://siretart.tauware.de/ubuntu-packages/mas/ [07:47] is the source http://siretart.tauware.de/ubuntu-packages/mas/mas_0.6.2-2ubuntu1.tar.gz [07:48] ahaaa === mitsuhiko [~mitsuhiko@80.122.201.98] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:50] ivoks [07:50] you're the one from croatia, right? [07:51] siretart: -p4 man :)) [07:51] DanielN: yes [07:51] :) [07:51] AnteKaramatic? [07:51] yes [07:51] ok, i'm learning the names and put it togheter with the suitable irc nick :) [07:51] siretart: sorry, i don't have all build-deps [07:53] Mithrandir: ping [07:53] in breezy? [07:53] siretart: on this amd64 [07:53] it's not mine [07:54] ah, ok [07:59] any #ubuntu ops here? [07:59] we need one desperately [08:00] guy is k-lined :) [08:08] Seveas: look for an IRC op [08:08] lilo or someone === mitsuhiko is now known as mitsuhiko`listen [08:20] ah... time to go [08:22] uhh.... nice post [08:22] herve did you read it? [08:22] from eduard bloch [08:22] <\sh> jesus [08:23] <\sh> why did i subscribe to debian-devel? [08:23] <\sh> ah yes [08:23] <\sh> IVOKS ! [08:23] <\sh> ;) [08:23] <\sh> because of u i subscribed to it [08:24] :) [08:24] <\sh> ivoks: u read the thread about cxx transition for sarge+1? [08:24] why? i didn't told you to do that [08:24] \sh: yes [08:26] why? :) [08:26] ivoks, do I *really* need to follow the thread? [08:26] I usually get bored after the second or third answer :-) [08:27] :) [08:27] herve: well, it's a debian guy attacking debian :) [08:27] <\sh> ivoks: because it's boring ;) [08:28] <\sh> and annoying [08:28] <\sh> to grown up people [08:28] <\sh> one of the statements it's really near to reality: [08:28] <\sh> Eduard Bloch: [08:28] <\sh> Really? IMO it is exactly the lack of authority and strong top [08:28] <\sh> management that has lead us into the current situation. [08:29] <\sh> Source: Message-ID: <20050605181335.GA22200@debian> [08:29] yeah [08:29] that's the one i'm talking about :) [08:29] one of the reasons I don't want to be a DD anymore [08:29] I don't have time to lose into this [08:35] <\sh> hehe... === terrex [~terrex@84-122-69-8.onocable.ono.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === mitsuhiko`listen is now known as mitsuhiko [08:42] is there a g77-4.0? [08:43] <\sh> no [08:43] <\sh> what lib or app? [08:44] <\sh> i have a problem with the new upstream package of gnuradio ;) [08:44] how surprising :-) [08:44] <\sh> g77-3.4 is the one in the repos [08:44] why would someone be writing a radio app in fortran [08:44] <\sh> herve: but I red it's an upstream bug [08:45] <\sh> tseng: it's one part of the package...for frequency stuff ;) [08:45] <\sh> s/red/read/ (read in past tense) [08:46] ah === JanC [~janc@dD5764BD1.access.telenet.be] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Micksa [~mslade@203-217-18-166.perm.iinet.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu === mgalvin [~mgalvin@cpe-69-205-46-35.nycap.res.rr.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:11] hi all [09:12] <\sh> hi mgalvin [09:15] hi === sivang [~sivang@box79162.elkhouse.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Trab [~Trab@ip70-187-134-80.oc.oc.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:43] <\sh> gaga...this is the second time i help one debian devel ;) [09:44] <\sh> I'm good today === aisipos [~anton@dsl081-081-225.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:47] waah, the terror continues.. [09:48] <\sh> haaha [09:54] <\sh> which terror? === [Chameleon] [~Paul@000f660c9c52.click-network.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:57] <[Chameleon] > anyone available to consult with me on an error I'm getting compiling Mono 1.1.7 on Ubuntu/AMD64? === Seveaz [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:58] [Chameleon] : ask me -> [09:58] \sh: these paranoid threads on debian-devel [09:59] <\sh> siretart: yeah :) [09:59] <[Chameleon] > tseng: make[4] : Entering directory `/home/paul/mono/mono-1.1.7/mono/mini' [09:59] <[Chameleon] > ... [09:59] <[Chameleon] > mini-amd64.c: In function `merge_argument_class_from_type': [09:59] <[Chameleon] > mini-amd64.c:239: warning: `class2' might be used uninitialized in this function [10:00] <[Chameleon] > mini-amd64.c: In function `mono_arch_output_basic_block': [10:00] <[Chameleon] > mini-amd64.c:4915: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault [10:00] are you building from source? [10:00] <[Chameleon] > tseng: yes. [10:00] why? [10:00] <[Chameleon] > tseng: mono 1.1.7 is unavailable for AMD64 [10:00] <[Chameleon] > at least, I haven't found it [10:00] <[Chameleon] > tseng: I believe we talked over email about this [10:00] http://people.ubuntu.com/~lamont/buildLogs/m/mono/1.1.7-0ubuntu5/mono_1.1.7-0ubuntu5_20050528-2216-amd64-successful.gz [10:01] oh you are the backport guy. [10:02] so should at the ver least be building from the source packages [10:02] and not straight from the tarball [10:02] <[Chameleon] > I am [10:02] <[Chameleon] > hmm [10:02] <[Chameleon] > ok [10:03] apt-get source mono from breezy deb-src [10:03] but i think i mentioned before I in no way support that [10:04] <[Chameleon] > so the only way is to get the source from the breezy repo? [10:04] <[Chameleon] > I mean, obviously not the only way, but the best way? [10:04] i have no idea if that works or not [10:04] <[Chameleon] > :( [10:04] I have plenty of work to do getting things ready for the next release [10:05] w/o helping everyone who wants to build their own crack on the previous release [10:05] <[Chameleon] > tseng: sorry to bother you === blahrus [qfot@12-223-50-121.client.insightbb.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:05] np, sorry to bear bad news. [10:05] we just cant work backwards. === haggai [~halls@i-83-67-59-194.freedom2surf.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:05] <[Chameleon] > yeah [10:07] <[Chameleon] > tseng: so this log file you sent me showing success was under Breezy? [10:07] yes. [10:07] <[Chameleon] > tseng: is Breezy still a mine field or is it mostly usable at this point? [10:07] its usuable this week [10:07] <[Chameleon] > :> [10:07] I cant speak for next week :P [10:07] <[Chameleon] > yeah [10:08] <[Chameleon] > can you approximate when a beta might be available? [10:08] <[Chameleon] > Oct is release, right? [10:08] yes [10:08] so 3 or 4 months for fairly solid test builds I guess [10:08] <[Chameleon] > so, a beta might be available a month or two before? [10:08] <[Chameleon] > yeah [10:08] <[Chameleon] > hmm [10:16] <\sh> ok...time to go to bed [10:17] hehe \sh [10:17] I wondered wether you ever sleep :-) [10:18] <\sh> herve: did u know? I'm ogra's clone;) [10:19] <\sh> *yawn* I'm off [10:19] gn8 \sh [10:20] \sh, I'm more concerned about doko's sleep :-) [10:21] night by the way [10:23] hello [10:24] could anyone point me to mplayer packager? [10:24] package or maintaner? [10:24] packager [10:25] the person that actually makes the package we get [10:25] er... [10:25] I guess it's a debian folk [10:25] s/it/he [10:25] I've tried to contact the maitainer but he does not package mplayer [10:25] hrm... isn't mplayer a native package... folks? [10:25] (dpkg-deb -I ...) [10:25] anyway [10:26] I've got a patch for RTC support [10:26] and no idea who to send it to [10:26] so you should contact mplayer authors [10:26] herve: they don't care about mplayer.deb for ubuntu [10:27] hmm, you lost me [10:27] herve: I've created a trivial init.d script [10:27] you have a patch for mplayer, right? [10:27] no [10:27] mplayer needing init.d? [10:27] I've got a patch for the .deb [10:27] ha ok [10:27] herve: yup - for RTC [10:28] well, I can't really figure it out [10:28] but see with marillat@debian.org [10:28] I did [10:28] he has nothing to do with it ;-) [10:28] what did he say exactly? [10:29] > FYI You are listed in the package as a maintainer. [10:29] I know. Ubuntus are packaging my unofficial packages. [10:29] > is my message, rest is his reply [10:30] maybe you asked the wrong question. :-) [10:30] I've sent him the patch and asked if he would include it [10:30] we have made his packages entering Ubuntu [10:30] it's not like we did his job [10:30] he said he is not debian/ubuntu maintainer [10:30] erm... I'm puzzled [10:31] as am I ;] [10:31] let me inspect [10:31] (mplayer-custom is broken, mplayer-nogui is slow as hell (tm), so I build mplayer myself but the script could be included) [10:32] included with officially added unofficial debs [10:32] mplayer runs fine at mine [10:32] same for me [10:32] I wonder what happened in Christian's head [10:32] mplayer-custom dies on illegal instruction [10:33] those french debian developers... :-) === chris` [~chris@ACB4BE04.ipt.aol.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:33] I don't use -custom but -586 [10:33] other mplayers run fine but 50-80% slower than simple build of mplayerhq.he tarball [10:33] I've got k7 [10:33] k7 is not 586? [10:34] tseng: vector ops are different - right? [10:34] dunno. [10:34] why i asked :P [10:34] think so [10:34] (and mplayer is the only app I could think of that really use them on desktop) [10:35] amd has 3dnow, indek has sse [10:35] intel :) [10:35] zyga, send your patch at hcauwelier@oursours.net [10:36] I'll talk with marillat [10:36] herve: it's online at http://www.suxx.pl/mplayer [10:36] herve: It still needs to fail gracefuly [10:36] ok, noted [10:36] herve: now it works or keeps silent [10:37] but is it needed? [10:37] herve: who's email is that, yours? [10:37] yes, mine [10:37] herve: it makes syncing audio and video possible on my box (and all other boxes I use) [10:38] herve: otherwise audio slowly becomes out of sync [10:38] herve: mplayer barks about it [10:38] herve: just run from command line and see [10:38] herve: (set rtc to 64 for example) [10:39] yes but I mean [10:39] it affects the whole system [10:39] it could be useful for other needs [10:39] or gravely affects some applications [10:39] herve: I know none other but I welcome information [10:39] Sodele.. bin pennen n8 all :) [10:39] herve: this is maximum user settable frequency === chris` is now known as chris`sleep [10:40] I doubt that could break apps if it's higher === chris`sleep [~chris@ACB4BE04.ipt.aol.com] has left #ubuntu-motu ["Verlassend"] [10:41] I trust mplayer devs [10:41] If they tell me to switch it to 1024 I do [10:42] I use it for a few years and had no problems but then again this is a desktop - not a server [10:43] another clue [10:43] so you asked them or read to set this setting to 1024? [10:43] herve: mplayer prints this message: [10:43] (wait) [10:44] zyga: Is this a custom patch or is it included in the new mplayer version? [10:44] Linux RTC init error in ioctl (rtc_irqp_set 1024): Permission denied [10:44] Try adding "echo 1024 > /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq" to your system startup scripts. [10:44] mitsuhiko: that message has been in mplayer source code for a long time [10:45] mitsuhiko: the patch I speak of does not alter mplayer - just the package [10:45] zyga, I can't answer you know [10:46] mitsuhiko: it simply does that: adds echo 1024 > /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq [10:46] I'll ask Marillat why he pretends he's not the maintainer [10:46] zyga: I see. You want to include a init stract that does this line [10:46] herve: okay [10:46] mitsuhiko: exactly, It's online if anyone is interested [10:46] and I'll ask #u-d folks about setting it by default in ubuntu [10:47] thanks [10:48] can there occour a problem on some boxes? [10:48] by setting this to 1024? [10:48] mitsuhiko: I have no ide - it never happened to me [10:49] mitsuhiko: tested on amd64, i386 both intel and amd [10:49] i will try goole ;) [10:49] good idea [10:49] not tested on ppc due to ENOPPC [10:50] i bang my head on ENOPPC a bit [10:50] :-) [10:50] hey. I've found someting [10:50] mplayer can use 3 methods to sync video and audio [10:50] 1.) old internal usleep() [10:51] which is not the best one [10:51] 2.) RTC -> there you have to do echo 1024 > /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq [10:51] so hang on [10:51] 3.) run mplayer with -softsleep [10:51] you kids all want to make an initscript to set a sysctl? [10:52] ok. i've found the problem of method 2 [10:52] did you consider /etc/sysctl.conf? [10:53] tseng: :-> [10:53] some notebooks with speedstep will get problems when /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq is greater than 64 [10:53] i didnt say just throw it in there [10:53] tseng: as you might have noticed IANA debian/ubuntu developer [10:53] i mean document it so that users who want it can add the line [10:54] selflinux.org recommends method 3 [10:54] having sysctl settings in an init script seems very odd [10:54] to me at least. [10:54] softsleep will eat cpu [10:54] I did not know about laptop problems [10:55] I dont have any centrino cpus :/ [10:55] tseng, yes a init script for this small line is not the best idea [10:55] but me [10:55] I had no idea how to do that better ;-) === lsuactiafner [~noirrac@tpr-ip-nas-ov-1-p50.telkom-ipnet.co.za] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:55] zyga: Yes softsleep eats cpu power but on centrino notebooks it should be the best way [10:56] so can you guys document this somewhere? [10:56] and decide on a sane default [10:56] mitsuhiko: did you learn what kind of problems exactly? [10:57] tseng: I'm happy either way - I dont have centrinos and this is a very usefull addition [10:57] (for me personally) [10:57] zyga: if you understand german, here is the list: http://www.selflinux.org/selflinux-devel/html/mplayer05.html [10:57] mitsuhiko: a bit - I'll try [10:58] ok. bed calls, i will go [10:58] wish you a good night === mitsuhiko is now known as mitsuhiko`sleep [10:59] http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.selflinux.org%2Fselflinux-devel%2Fhtml%2Fmplayer05.html&langpair=de%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8 [10:59] what would I do without google? :P [10:59] you would try astalavista [10:59] ;-) [10:59] darn the relevant part is not translated [11:00] rofl [11:00] hey - it's beta ;-) [11:00] zyga, I sent a mail to marillat explaining the situation [11:00] as everything these days ;] [11:00] herve: great [11:04] zyga : while on the subject tell him to make a static 32bit binary compiled for athlon-4 so that ppl can play the wmv with the 32bit codec [11:04] on 64bit systems [11:05] lsuactiafner: I don't talk to him anymore - I'll wait for his reply to herve's mail [11:05] heh [11:06] he didnt respond to me so i just figured i was annoyhin him [11:07] lsuactiafner: build it yourself - it's not that difficult I guess [11:07] zyga : i did [11:07] problem is there are several thousand ppl out there unable to view wmv [11:08] im not sure that "problem" is relevant to ubuntu [11:08] we cant do much about proprietary codecs, much less on alternative architectures [11:08] I'd rather see that wmv is just a lucky trick [11:08] or wait untill someone cracks wmp for windows xp 64 [11:09] if it werent for w32codecs crack, people would actually be petitioning sites to use theora [11:10] tseng: I doubt it [11:10] ummm [11:10] jlj has wmv3 working on vlc [11:10] tseng: I could count people that understand what a codec is on one hand [11:10] i need to kick him in the pants and make him commit it to cvs [11:10] tseng : it is revelant to ubuntu, mplayer for 32bit systems i suppose cna play wmv with the correct codecs [11:11] on 64bit systems mplayer-amd64 cant play wmv even witht he correct codecs. [11:11] lsuactiafner: win32 codecs are probably illegal [11:11] probably? [11:11] definately [11:11] there is 0 distributability [11:11] yeh but i dont care if its legal [11:11] tseng: depending on your location [11:11] tseng: ;-) think china [11:11] tseng: think kuba [11:11] :> [11:12] i live in south-africa and my vice-president steals millions, proven in court and nothing is done about it [11:12] he doesnt even have the decency to leave his office [11:12] lsuactiafner: I +q'ed you in #ubuntu for talking about this stuff, don't do it here too. [11:12] no way the authorities will care if i opened up @ winxp cd factory [11:12] ubuntu does not like to be like your vice president [11:13] oh yes [11:13] just saying a 32bit binary is needed for ppl who want to break the law and live on the edge [11:13] static binary tho [11:14] most of those people don't _want_ to, they don't know [11:14] 2 or 3 people flipped when i said w32codecs was illegal [11:15] Amaranth: it could probably be made tiny bit more legal if someone had a legal windows copy [11:15] Amaranth: and the law permits him to break certain eula parts [11:15] well then you can go and talk to marillat [11:15] is there a way to disable a certain package by default in apt-get [11:16] Amaranth: *and* mplayer would distribute a program that would simply hack those libs [11:16] Amaranth: then it could be said that the user dit this himself [11:16] mplayer32 would be like mplayer64 just with static -vo libs totally seperate from the codecs [11:16] Amaranth: no redistribution [11:17] under ftp://ftp.puk.ac.za/outgoing/ there is a copy of mplayer32 static that several ppl have benifited from === Amaranth would rather have 64-bit native mplayer in ubuntu than 32-bit static that makes it easy to break the law [11:20] Amaranth++ [11:20] I don't have the courage to read what I missed [11:21] but just one thing [11:21] herve: im gripping my chair. [11:21] lsuactiafner, about 32-bit static on 64-bit architectures [11:21] lsuactiafner, I believe those 64-bit compiles were added by ubuntu developers [11:21] so you should ask on #u-d [11:21] Amaranth : i have both binaries installed so that i can play wmv also [11:22] tseng, sometimes you answer so strange expressions :-) [11:22] night all === [Chameleon] [~Paul@000f660c9c52.click-network.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu