| lamont | stage2/xgcc -Bstage2/ -B/usr/hppa-linux/bin/ -c -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall | 01:29 |
|---|---|---|
| lamont | +-Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -DHAVE_CONFIG_H | 01:29 |
| lamont | +-I. -Iada -I../../src/gcc -I../../src/gcc/ada -I../../src/gcc/../include | 01:29 |
| lamont | +-I../../src/gcc/../libcpp/include ../../src/gcc/ada/decl.c -o ada/decl.o | 01:29 |
| lamont | make[4] : *** [ada/decl.o] Segmentation fault | 01:29 |
| lamont | make[4] : *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... | 01:29 |
| === lamont grumbles at doko. (hppa)( | ||
| doko | we don't support hppa ;-? | 01:30 |
| lamont | feh | 01:31 |
| doko | lamont: I did hear rumors you would work for a company producing hppa stuff ... | 01:31 |
| lamont | -7ubuntu7 built just fine though... | 01:31 |
| doko | maybe fabbione did change the kernel ... | 01:32 |
| lamont | doko: not on the machine where it's building... same kernel | 01:34 |
| === lamont throws gcc-4.0 back in the ringer again, just for giggles | ||
| doko | ohh, looks like hppa is catching up | 01:35 |
| doko | starting a 4.0 build as well | 01:35 |
| lamont | yeah - I dragged home a nearly-current source archive friday.. it's been building since saturday | 01:36 |
| lamont | or friday night.. | 01:36 |
| lamont | Total 870 package(s) in state Installed. | 01:36 |
| lamont | Total 4295 package(s) in state Needs-Build. | 01:36 |
| lamont | still have a goodly distance to go | 01:36 |
| lamont | note also that ~lamont/buildLogs/Lists/breezy.all.hppa isn't really accurate, other than wrt needs-build and installed | 01:37 |
| lamont | er... needs-build could be any non-installed state, that is.. :-( | 01:37 |
| lamont | same is true for breezy.all.sparc: non-data-center architectures don't have w-b access, so installed is the only state that w-b accurately reflects | 01:38 |
| doko | hmm, packages.u.c doesn' list sparc ... | 01:38 |
| doko | fabbione: ^^^ | 01:38 |
| lamont | does it list hppa? | 01:38 |
| doko | no | 01:38 |
| doko | but ia64 | 01:38 |
| lamont | ia64 is probably way wrong | 01:38 |
| lamont | since it's split off to the same home as hppa/sparc... | 01:39 |
| lamont | guess it depends on the code running there.. | 01:39 |
| lamont | ~lamont/buildLogs/Lists/breezy.all.$ARCH is gospel for data-center architectures, and install-state-accurate for non-DC architectures | 01:39 |
| doko | E: Package gawk has no installation candidate | 01:50 |
| doko | E: Package libmpfr-dev has no installation candidate | 01:52 |
| doko | E: Package libart-2.0-dev has no installation candidate | 01:54 |
| doko | lamont: how do you build that? | 01:58 |
| doko | anyway, going to bed now | 02:04 |
| === doko [~doko___@dsl-082-082-200-209.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| lamont | doko: clearly I have missed uploading some stuff... | 03:59 |
| lamont | adding people.u.c/~lamont/ubuntu-hppa hoary main to sources.list may help | 04:00 |
| lamont | doko: if you're still short packages after adding the hoary repository, let me know - I'll see about making them exist | 04:36 |
| fabbione | morning | 06:07 |
| === desrt [~desrt@24.215.14.137] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| infinity | Afternoon. | 06:49 |
| desrt | word. | 07:02 |
| === chmj [~d3vic3@dumbledore.hbd.com] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| fabbione | doko: gcc-3.4 on ppc is SERIOUSLY broken | 10:23 |
| fabbione | it keeps segfaulting at very high ratio | 10:23 |
| === jbailey [~jbailey@CPE000ded9d787c-CM014260028338.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| doko | morning | 11:37 |
| doko | fabbione: which version did you use before? | 11:37 |
| fabbione | the one before the ppc64 changes | 11:38 |
| jbailey | Heya Matthias. | 11:40 |
| doko | hi, already, or still awake? :) | 11:42 |
| jbailey | Sort of both. It's humidity season in Toronto, so I will sleep like crap for the next 2 weeks before getting used to it. | 11:49 |
| jbailey | I watched the clock crawl from 4am to 5am and decided that I may as well work and nap mid-day | 11:49 |
| doko | fabbione: do you see the segfaults only when compiling kernels? | 12:17 |
| fabbione | doko: difficult to say.. i didn't build anything different | 12:23 |
| doko | and I only did build compilers ;) | 12:24 |
| fabbione | doko: gcc doesn't take 10 hours to build :) | 12:25 |
| === warthylog [~warthylog@port49.ds1-van.adsl.cybercity.dk] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| === Topic for #ubuntu-toolchain: GNU Compiler Collection, Glibc, Binutils, Linux-kernel-headers | GLIBC Todo: hppa, sparc NPTL, i386 biarch, C++ ABI change: 33/55 library packages in the archives | ||
| === Topic (#ubuntu-toolchain): set by doko at Thu May 19 00:40:28 2005 | ||
| === #ubuntu-toolchain [freenode-info] please register your nickname...don't forget to auto-identify! http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#nicksetup | ||
| === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| fabbione | doko: gcc-4 is still FTBFS here with that timeout thingy | 03:54 |
| fabbione | i will try to build it manually | 03:54 |
| === lamont__ [~lamont@15.238.7.7] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| === doko [~doko___@dsl-082-082-200-209.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| Mithrandir | I wonder if multiarch would make sense for doing ABI transitions like we're doing for gcc4. | 04:10 |
| jbailey | Mithrandir: taggart suggested that when I was chatting with him about it before. | 04:10 |
| Mithrandir | the only issue is we end up with a bloody long search path for ld at some point. | 04:11 |
| jbailey | fabbione: l? | 04:16 |
| fabbione | jbailey: i need to go out.. i will be back later | 04:41 |
| === fabbione & | ||
| jbailey | doko: There? | 05:26 |
| doko | yes | 05:27 |
| jbailey | doko: Are the multiarch patches applied to gcc-4? I'm pulling it down, but it'll be a couple minutes more | 05:27 |
| jbailey | ISTR there being stuff about multiarch in rules.defs | 05:28 |
| doko | multiarch-include.dpatch is included, but not applied | 05:30 |
| doko | no, no build support yet | 05:30 |
| Mithrandir | doko: would you care to pull in the changes from tfheen@idi.ntnu.no--2005/gcc-debian--multiarch--3.4 ? | 05:33 |
| jbailey | Mithrandir: It looks like the patch that's already included gets rid of lib64 support at the same time. | 05:34 |
| Mithrandir | well, lib64 is just a symlink on amd64, so. | 05:35 |
| jbailey | Oh, I see. i386/t-linux64 | 05:35 |
| doko | Mithrandir: ok | 05:37 |
| Mithrandir | doko: for both ubuntu and Debian or just Ubuntu? | 05:37 |
| jbailey | Mithrandir: I suspect that it shouldn't remove existing /lib32 /lib64 support, but just add the multilib directories. | 05:38 |
| doko | Mithrandir: it's the same archive | 05:38 |
| Mithrandir | jbailey: possibly, yes. | 05:38 |
| fabbione | jbailey: re | 05:51 |
| fabbione | i have only 10 minutes but i would love to spend them here for you :) | 05:51 |
| doko | fabbione: i386 kernel build did fail ... | 05:54 |
| fabbione | doko: read #u-k :) | 05:54 |
| fabbione | you are too slow | 05:54 |
| doko | so ppc64 does work now? | 05:55 |
| fabbione | doko: not in 1.2 | 05:55 |
| fabbione | doko: ocalm is FTBFS :) | 05:55 |
| doko | xorg "reorganization" ... | 05:56 |
| fabbione | doko: i know :) | 05:56 |
| fabbione | jbailey: where are you? | 05:56 |
| fabbione | doko: you will be able to use ppc64 tomorrow | 05:57 |
| fabbione | doko: or.... | 05:57 |
| jbailey | fabbione: Sorry, was in another window. | 05:57 |
| fabbione | doko: grab the latest 1.3 image from http://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/ | 05:57 |
| infinity | fabbione : Were you happy with that buildd result of linux-source on ppc, or did you still want me to build it on my machine? | 05:57 |
| fabbione | infinity: i didn't check them yet. i will have to | 05:57 |
| fabbione | infinity: i386 has a really weird FTBFS | 05:58 |
| fabbione | it wasn't there yesterday | 05:58 |
| fabbione | but it was building with the old gcc | 05:58 |
| fabbione | so i will need to investigate that too | 05:58 |
| fabbione | jbailey: what can i do for you? | 05:58 |
| jbailey | Mithrandir, doko: Would you consider a hack for now that added the multiarch includes now, but didn't touch /libFOO? | 05:59 |
| jbailey | fabbione: Erm. What was it about... bugger. | 05:59 |
| Mithrandir | jbailey: yes, sure. | 05:59 |
| Mithrandir | jbailey: also, we need to fix binutils. | 05:59 |
| fabbione | jbailey: dunno.. you pinged me before | 05:59 |
| jbailey | fabbione: Right, and trying to remember what the !@#$ it's for? | 06:00 |
| jbailey | Mithrandir: Even for just the include hack? | 06:00 |
| Mithrandir | jbailey: that's a start, yes. | 06:00 |
| infinity | fabbione : Alright, well I'll build it anyway, just for kicks. | 06:00 |
| fabbione | infinity: i am happy with the build. i think davis is the box having problems | 06:00 |
| infinity | Oh. Then I won't build it. :) | 06:01 |
| jbailey | Mithrandir: Sorry, EPARSE, I think. What needs hacking in binutils for adding the include hack? | 06:01 |
| elmo | fabbione: did you say you wanted me to not NEW ppc kernel? | 06:01 |
| fabbione | elmo: just wrote it in #u-d :) | 06:01 |
| jbailey | fabbione: Right! | 06:01 |
| jbailey | fabbione: I remember. make-kpkg lovel for initramfs. | 06:01 |
| Mithrandir | jbailey: no, but you need to fix binutils for looking for the libs in the right place. | 06:01 |
| === infinity -> bed. | ||
| fabbione | elmo: i386 is FTBFS so don't wait for it. i will fix it tomorrow | 06:01 |
| jbailey | fabbione: When can I book time with you on that? My perl is teh suck. | 06:01 |
| fabbione | elmo: given that it did build for me | 06:01 |
| fabbione | jbailey: tomorrow? | 06:02 |
| fabbione | jbailey: if you wake up early like today we will have plenty of time to work together | 06:02 |
| jbailey | Mithrandir: Right, except that I don't care about the libs right now. libs are already sufficiently handled with /lib{32,64,} | 06:02 |
| fabbione | jbailey: otherwise i can schedule a late evening session with you | 06:02 |
| jbailey | Mithrandir: But right now, it assumes a common set of headers for those, which is not true in a number of cases. | 06:02 |
| Mithrandir | jbailey: hm, ok, sure. | 06:02 |
| Mithrandir | jbailey: ack, go ahead. | 06:03 |
| jbailey | fabbione: 'kay. Probably near the end of your day then tomorrow? | 06:03 |
| fabbione | elmo: btw the source for 1.2 and 1.3 will be the same. only a few config tweaks to make ppc64 booting. | 06:03 |
| jbailey | fabbione: Your start-of-day is usually my hint that I should be asleep. =) | 06:03 |
| fabbione | jbailey: well today you woke up early and that was kind of ideal | 06:03 |
| jbailey | fabbione: I'm hoping not to repeat that. 5am doesn't agree with me. | 06:04 |
| fabbione | jbailey: ok. let's do this way | 06:04 |
| fabbione | if i don't see you around 9 UTC (that should be your 5 am) | 06:04 |
| jbailey | fabbione: My usual show-up time is 11GMT. Will you still be around? | 06:04 |
| fabbione | i will shift the working hours for the evening | 06:05 |
| fabbione | 11UTC is 1pm here so yes | 06:05 |
| jbailey | Cool. Wasn't sure, since you appear to start at 4UTC. =) | 06:05 |
| fabbione | i do start at 4UTC | 06:05 |
| jbailey | Sick&Wrong(tm) | 06:05 |
| fabbione | but i don't stop before 14 or so | 06:05 |
| fabbione | well it's 6am here | 06:05 |
| fabbione | i need to wake up to kick my wife out of the bed | 06:05 |
| fabbione | jbailey: so i guess from 1pm it's fine than | 06:07 |
| fabbione | let's just start on it as soon as you wake up | 06:07 |
| fabbione | so we don't need to end the day in 36 hours :) | 06:07 |
| jbailey | doko: Do you keep your source in something I can look at? From what's in gcc-4/debian/patches/multiarch-include.dpatch, it looks like all we need is the gcc/Makefile.in patch, and the gcc/cppdefault.c patch. | 06:07 |
| jbailey | fabbione: Cool, thanks. | 06:07 |
| fabbione | ok cya tomorrow than | 06:07 |
| fabbione | bye bye guys | 06:07 |
| jbailey | g'd evening Fabio! | 06:07 |
| doko | jbailey: svn.debian.org | 06:14 |
| jbailey | doko: Cool, I think I have access there. Is there an ubuntu branch? | 06:14 |
| doko | no | 06:14 |
| === lamont_r [~lamont@15.238.7.7] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| jbailey | doko: Have you imported Tollef's new change? | 06:19 |
| jbailey | doko: Or should I start from his patch? I think even editting what's in there now is probably fine. | 06:19 |
| doko | jbailey: no, not yet. better to start from his patch | 06:24 |
| jbailey | doko: Cool, thanks. | 06:24 |
| === rasmuson [~rasmuson@0x50c61bbe.kd4nxx10.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| === doko [~doko___@dsl-084-059-039-018.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| doko | lamont, lamont_r, infinity: please could you update dep-waits on the buildds from chinstrap:~doko/frozenapps.txt? | 07:14 |
| \sh | doko: streber ;) | 07:17 |
| fabbione | elmo: can you please dist-upgrade breezy and breezy-i386 on concordia? | 07:21 |
| fabbione | elmo: with the old gcc i can't reproduce the i386 FTBFS | 07:21 |
| elmo | eh, old? | 07:22 |
| elmo | I dist-upgraded both, this morning? | 07:22 |
| fabbione | dpkg -p kernel-package | 07:23 |
| fabbione | Version: 8.135ubuntu2 | 07:23 |
| fabbione | Filename: pool/main/k/kernel-package/kernel-package_8.132ubuntu2_all.deb | 07:23 |
| fabbione | either the version of the filename are bongs :) | 07:23 |
| fabbione | hmm gcc -v says it's ok... | 07:24 |
| fabbione | wtf | 07:24 |
| fabbione | elmo: nevermind... | 07:24 |
| fabbione | they are ok | 07:24 |
| === rasmuson [~rasmuson@0x50c61bbe.kd4nxx10.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk] has left #ubuntu-toolchain ["Client] | ||
| \sh | guys...fast question fast answer ;) | 08:18 |
| \sh | a new debian source package for libX with new name libX-123 (not the version) | 08:19 |
| \sh | ubuntu package is libX-111 (not the version) | 08:19 |
| \sh | do we need to put the "c2" in the packagename, or do we only sync with debian? | 08:19 |
| Kamion | should add c2 since Debian is using the old ABI; otherwise we become binary-incompatible with Debian in a painful way | 08:25 |
| doko | Kamion: why do you care at this point? this is a temporary thing. | 08:28 |
| Kamion | binary-incompatibility is bad, temporary or not | 08:29 |
| Kamion | it's not hard to add c2, and it doesn't cause problems | 08:29 |
| doko | well, ok, we would need to add a conflict with the old ubuntu c2 package as well, so, yes, one more modifictation | 08:31 |
| \sh | Kamion: so u want to have the c2 | 08:34 |
| Kamion | yes | 08:34 |
| \sh | ok :) small change | 08:34 |
| \sh | and C/R also to debian package?# | 08:35 |
| \sh | not only to old ubuntu package, but also to new debian package? | 08:35 |
| doko | \sh, you did say, there was no old ubuntu package? or old-ubuntu == old-debian? | 08:36 |
| \sh | ok again :) | 08:37 |
| \sh | Old ubuntu package: libcommoncpp2-1.0-1.0,13-5ubuntu1 | 08:37 |
| \sh | sorry | 08:37 |
| \sh | Old ubuntu package: libcommoncpp2-1.0c102-1.0.13-5ubuntu1 | 08:38 |
| \sh | New Debian package: libcommoncpp2-1.3-1.3.10-3 | 08:38 |
| \sh | so C/R adjustments to libcommoncpp2-1.0c102 (= 1.0.13-5ubuntu1) | 08:39 |
| Kamion | C/R? | 08:39 |
| doko | so new ubuntu will be libcommoncpp2-1.3c2 C/R against libcommoncpp2-1.0c102 and libcommoncpp2-1.3 | 08:39 |
| \sh | Conflicts/Replaces | 08:39 |
| \sh | doko: ok...now we have it :) | 08:39 |
| \sh | doko: for "libcommoncpp2-1.0-0, libcommoncpp2-1.0-0c102 (=1.3.10-1), libcommoncpp2-1.0-0c102 (= 1.0.13-5ubuntu1), libcommoncpp2-1.3" | 08:40 |
| \sh | can i say also "libcommoncpp2-1.0-0, libcommoncpp2-1.0-0c102 (>=1.3.10-1), libcommoncpp2-1.3" ? | 08:40 |
| \sh | forget it | 08:42 |
| \sh | different version | 08:42 |
| doko | just drop the version thing ... | 08:42 |
| \sh | ok...sorted out actually..thx guys :) | 08:42 |
| \sh | doko: if you have time, please have a look http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11542 so i can upload this lib | 08:50 |
| elmo | doko: what's this 32 gcj for? | 09:52 |
| doko | OOo2 runtime on amd64, we won't need it, when we have multiarch | 09:54 |
| elmo | hmm, are you splitting all libs out of ia32-libs? | 09:54 |
| doko | well, probably jbailes is splitting out glibc, not sure, what remains in there ... maybe ncurses? | 09:55 |
| elmo | X? :P | 09:55 |
| doko | wasn't that in ia32-libs-openoffice.org, or was this gtk? | 09:56 |
| jbailey | Should be ncurses and zlib, I think. | 09:56 |
| doko | no, I don't go any further at the moment | 09:56 |
| jbailey | Might be one other. I think they're largely there for LSB requirements. | 09:56 |
| elmo | well, yeah, okay, I mean, are you planning to split out all of ia32-libs-oo.o and ia32-libs | 09:56 |
| elmo | I'm just curious as to why we're doing even these? | 09:56 |
| Mithrandir | there's a bunch of gtk stuff in ia32-libs-gtk | 09:57 |
| doko | my original goal was to get rid of OOo.amd64 and build it natively on amd64 using gcc -m32 | 09:57 |
| Mithrandir | jbailey: the set of libraries in ia32-libs is based on "somebody wishlisted this", more or less. | 09:59 |
| jbailey | Right. I'm less worried about ia32-libs. amd64-libs is easy enough to get rid of completely. | 10:00 |
| Mithrandir | ok, good. | 10:02 |
| Mithrandir | amd64-libs felt like a gross hack to me. | 10:03 |
| Mithrandir | even grosser than ia32-libs | 10:03 |
| elmo | Mithrandir: now you know how we feel about multiarch | 10:03 |
| elmo | \o/ | 10:03 |
| Mithrandir | elmo: "not happy, but less bad than the alternatives" :-) | 10:03 |
| Mithrandir | elmo: apart from the "ew multiarch", do you have any thoughts on the binutils patch? http://arch.err.no/index.cgi/tfheen@idi.ntnu.no--2005/binutils--multiarch--0--patch-1?cmd=cs_new&file=debian/patches/124_multiarch.dpatch | 10:04 |
| Mithrandir | (hooaray for long urls) | 10:05 |
| elmo | what's it do? | 10:11 |
| elmo | the description of the patch could use some love | 10:11 |
| Mithrandir | makes ld look in lib/i386-linux in addition to lib | 10:11 |
| Mithrandir | hm, agreed. | 10:11 |
| jbailey | Mithrandir: I trust that it does it to whatever GNU triple it was configured with, right? | 10:13 |
| === lamont__ [~lamont@15.238.7.7] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| Mithrandir | jbailey: not triplet, but yes. Adding i386-linux every time would be quite silly. :-) | 10:14 |
| doko | Mithrandir: do you want i386-linux, not i486-linux-gnu (as the new dpkg will print it)? | 10:28 |
| === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| \sh | hmmm | 11:05 |
| === lamont__ [~lamont@15.238.7.7] has left #ubuntu-toolchain ["Client] | ||
| === lamont__ [~lamont@15.238.7.7] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| \sh | can someone check the buildd where /home/shermann/pbuilder/result/breezy/libbonobomm1.3-9c2_1.3.8-2.2ubuntu1_i386.deb is? | 11:06 |
| \sh | without the homedir stuff ;) | 11:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!