[12:02] <lamont> doko: if it does, it doesn't find it.
[12:03] <lamont> but the command is a naked 'gcj', not any long path to something local
[12:03] <lamont> so unless it's editing the path....
[12:04] <lamont> otoh, we're now past where the failure was, I expect... (logfile is 64KB beyond the size of ubuntu1's failure)
[12:10] <doko> hmm, can you restart the build with USE_NJOBS=1, if that's a SMP machine?
[12:11] <lamont> it is SMP, but it's running a uni-processor kernel
[12:13] <doko> strange
[12:13] <lamont> I
[12:14] <lamont> I'll give you a logfile once the build finishes
[12:24] <jbailey> doko: We should pick a DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS that means 'use -j1' and use it for both glibc and gcc.
[12:34] <lamont>  /build/buildd/gcc-4.0-4.0.0ds1/build/gcc/gcj -B/build/buildd/gcc-4.0-4.0.0ds1/build/gcc/ -B/usr/hppa-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/hppa-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/hppa-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/hppa-linux-gnu/sys-include -fclasspath= "" --encoding=UTF-8 -Wno-deprecated -g -O2 -c ../../../src/libjava/gnu/java/security/x509/ext/IssuerAlternativeNames.java -fPIC -o gnu/java/security/x509/ext/.libs/IssuerAlternativeNames.o
[12:34] <lamont> gcj: : No such file or directory
[12:45] <lamont> sigh.  failed anyway
[12:47] <lamont> doko: people.ubuntu.com/~lamont/toolchain/gcc-4.0_4.0.0ds1-9ubuntu2_20050620-1217.bz2   
[12:51] <lamont> and -9ubuntu1_20050619-0550.bz2
[06:11] <fabbione> morning
[10:59] <doko> fabbione: java not found -> clean up the chroots, there are alternatives laying around, which were not removed
[10:59] <fabbione> doko: ok
[11:06] <fabbione> doko: testing now with a clean chroot
[11:06] <fabbione> or better.. a rebootstrapped chroot
[11:21] <fabbione> doko: any objections if i fix ocaml FTBFS?
[11:22] <doko> no
[11:22] <doko> on i386 as well?
[11:22] <fabbione> doko: i am checking the reasons why it's FTBFS
[11:22] <fabbione> one of them is Xorg split
[11:23] <fabbione> yeah it's the same i see on sparc
[11:24] <fabbione> yeah it's the same everywhere
[11:35] <\sh> fabbione, ocaml with with gcc-4?
[11:35] <\sh> fabbione, you rock dude
[11:40] <fabbione> no
[11:40] <fabbione> gcc-3.4
[11:40] <fabbione> it's still FTBFS because of Xorg
[12:10] <fabbione> doko: thanks.. upgrading the chroot fixed
[12:13] <fabbione> jbailey: can you please take a look at the recent iptables FTBFS on all arches?
[12:13] <fabbione> the logs are full of "AHHHH L-K-H IS CRAP!"
[12:13] <fabbione> :P
[12:16] <doko> fabbione: he's on his way to ottawa
[12:16] <fabbione> doko: oh right
[12:17] <fabbione> well he will read the scroll back i guess
[01:12] <elmo> ok, so what am i meant to do about  overrides for  hoary-backports?
[01:35] <infinity> elmo : Merge any new packages from breezy into the hoary overrides, leave the rest alone?
[01:35] <infinity> elmo : s/hoary/hoary-backports/ of course.
[01:44] <jbailey> fabbione: Will do. =)
[01:44] <fabbione> jbailey: thanks mate
[01:45] <jbailey> fabbione: I Don't understand your email "any idea if we are safe with this?"
[01:45] <fabbione> jbailey: forget it sorry.. i found the thread on lkml
[01:46] <jbailey> 'kay.
[01:46] <jbailey> The kernel should probably grow a versioned dep on udev.
[01:46] <fabbione> exactly
[01:46] <fabbione> but the problem is Md that isn't happy with the latest udev upstream release
[01:46] <fabbione> so we might be in trouble
[01:46] <jbailey> In what sense?
[01:47] <jbailey> We're about to hit UVF aren't we?  What we have has to be good enough.
[01:47] <fabbione> jbailey: because 2.6.12 Depends: a version of udev that's not even in experimental
[01:47] <fabbione> that's the problem
[01:47] <jbailey> Oh?  I thought the update had happened already.
[01:47] <fabbione> nope
[01:47] <fabbione> i didn't uplaod .12 final as soon as i heard of this udev issue
[01:48] <doko> infinity, lamont: please throw poker3d to the buildd's again
[01:48] <jbailey> The change wasn't between -rc6 and -final, so I think the upload should be fine.  Just don't do linux-meta yet.
[01:48] <jbailey> I think the change was -rc4 ish, wasn't it?
[01:48] <fabbione> jbailey: i am not sure there were other changes after
[01:48] <fabbione> i will have to check with a machine here
[01:51] <elmo> infinity: hoary-backports now exists, enough for you to setup buildd stuff for it
[01:51] <elmo> +/lamont
[01:52] <jbailey> NAh, don't make poor lamont do that stuff. =)
[01:52] <jbailey> This pain should be ALL Adam's....
[01:53] <fabbione> i guess i won't build it for sparc...
[01:53] <jbailey> fabbione: What would be the point?  You have no release to backport to.
[01:54] <fabbione> well hoary was at least installable
[01:54] <fabbione> as server...
[01:54] <fabbione> so i still build -security for it
[01:58] <jbailey> Ah, neat.
[02:15] <zul> jbailey: where are you leaving ottawa?
[02:15] <jbailey> via the diefenbunker.
[02:16] <zul> hehe...they played dr. strangelove there once
[02:16] <zul> er...when even
[02:18] <jbailey> Ah, lovely.  I Was trying to guess what you meant.  I apparently guesssed wrong. =)
[02:18] <jbailey> Saturday morning.
[02:18] <zul> still too early for irc
[02:19] <jbailey> Dude.  I used measure that as before midnight. =)
[02:19] <jbailey> I think I'm getting old...
[02:19] <zul> you are
[02:20] <zul> i think i can head downtown on friday, i got to clean the house tomorrow and thrusday i have another itnerview
[02:20] <zul> crap..i cant spell
[02:27] <jbailey> Doesn't you work at a government job?
[02:27] <jbailey> I thought 3 hours lunches were required?
[02:29] <zul> jbailey: contract ended
[02:29] <jbailey> Ouch.
[02:30] <zul> yeah hence the lots of interviews
[02:31] <jbailey> Right, I thought it was just because you thought the contract might end some day.
[02:32] <zul> well it did ;)
[03:14] <lamont-away> elmo: is hoary-backports just another hoary-based suite (hoary + hoary-backports in the list)?
[03:15] <elmo> lamont: hum.  good question
[03:15] <lamont-away> and did we decide that -autotest gets the current -test config, and what are we doing with -test?
[03:16] <lamont-away> because once I know all that, I'll get those changes into the script, and push it everywhere, and you can have all those suites.
[03:19] <fabbione> morning lamont
[03:19] <elmo> lmaont, ok, give me a sec, I need to get this CC meeting finish
[03:19] <elmo> +ed
[03:19] <lamont-away> morning fabbione 
[03:19] <elmo> I'm doing far too much context switching
[03:19] <elmo> and handling it about as well as a Xeon
[03:20] <lamont-away> elmo: np.  I need to run out the door to get bonnie to school anyway - back on in about 60 min or so
[03:50] <fabbione> elmo/lamont/infinity: can you please kick back libgtk2-perl_1:1.090-1 on all arches and make sure that it will use the latest glib2.0 to build? (2.7.0a-0ubuntu2)
[03:53] <\sh> DOKO: YOU ROCK DUDE
[03:53] <\sh> no...FABBIONE ROCKS AS WELL ;)
[03:56] <fabbione> uh?
[03:57] <fabbione> \sh: what did you smoke today? since when doko rocks?
[03:57] <fabbione> :P
[03:57] <\sh> fabbione, ocaml :)
[03:57] <doko> \sh: don't drink before the evening, I know, it's hot
[03:57] <fabbione> dude i fix the crap doko leaves around and he rocks? ;)
[03:57] <\sh> doko, only coffee..no alc no drugs during the week ;)
[03:58] <fabbione> \sh: go and sit in a corner :P
[03:58] <doko> fabbione: xorg --> daniels
[03:58] <fabbione> doko: you uploaded ocaml as last :)
[03:58] <fabbione> you get to fix it ;)
[03:59] <fabbione> now i just started building xorg...
[04:00] <fabbione> wanna-bet that they will upload -33 before i get to upload the build?
[04:01] <doko> infinity, lamont, lamont-away: please throw poker3d to the buildd's again
[04:16] <doko> infinity, lamont: why does ginac not build? it's dep-wait, but the dep is there
[04:21] <lamont> main vs universe??
[04:22] <lamont> um, ginac_1.3.0-2 is successfully built for all 4 architectures, as of april.
[04:22] <lamont> or is there a newer one?
[04:31] <doko> lamont: yes
[04:32] <doko> 1.3.0-2ubuntu2, hmm, but I didn't get the ack for the upload
[04:32] <doko> u ginac_1.3.0-2ubuntu2.diff.gz upload.ubuntu.com Tue Jun 21 14:31:29 2005
[04:32] <doko> u ginac_1.3.0-2ubuntu2.dsc upload.ubuntu.com Tue Jun 21 14:31:30 2005
[04:32] <doko> u ginac_1.3.0-2ubuntu2_source.changes upload.ubuntu.com Tue Jun 21 14:31:30 2005s ginac_1.3.0-2ubuntu2_source.changes upload.ubuntu.com Tue Jun 21 14:31:30 2005
[04:38] <doko> "coordinate very closely with laminity" (elmo quote)
[04:39] <doko> lamont, infinity: please highlight laminity in your log
[04:39] <doko> hmm, sounds like calamity ... ;)
[04:48] <lamont> it's NFU --> waiting for release.
[04:49] <lamont> I'll do all 3 of them.
[04:51] <lamont> kicked
[04:52] <lamont> all of the blacklisted apps will require manual intervention before they next build
[04:52] <lamont> (just as an "oh by the way"
[04:52] <lamont> )
[04:54] <lamont> any elmo-sign lately?
[05:07] <doko> lamont: all packages given back
[05:09] <lamont> are those all 3 universe packages
[05:09] <lamont> ?
[05:11] <lamont> yep.
[05:11] <lamont> they should try just after :33
[05:31] <elmo> fabbione: can you please get 2.6.12 seeded?
[05:46] <lamont> doko: they'll try eventually... given-back things are delayed on their retries
[05:56] <lamont> elmo: -test and -autotest will use rockhopper?
[05:57] <elmo> yes
[05:57] <lamont> and I changed -test to -*test, so we can have lots of them. :-)
[05:58] <lamont> and I'll need to know once -cat is in w-b
[05:59] <lamont> does  breezy+1 have a name yet?
[06:01] <elmo> etch
[06:01] <elmo> oh, wait, that's not right
[06:01] <lamont> someone quotes file that
[06:43] <elmo> FABBIONE 
[06:44] <zul> i think he is having a break elmo
[06:44] <elmo> concordia is down again.  coincidence??? I DON'T THINK SO\
[06:44] <elmo> ;p
[06:45] <lamont> iz gtk bug
[07:02] <zul> hehe
[07:05] <elmo> lamont: do you need anything more from me for hoary-backports?
[07:06] <lamont> elmo: I don't think so - assuming it's basically the identical template as -updates
[07:06] <lamont> wow.  and english is my native tongue.  go figure.
[07:07] <lamont> and assuming that -autotest is identical in config to -test
[07:07] <lamont> then the only thing I have to pester you about is setup for logs@buildd.u.c
[07:08] <lamont> elmo: is there stuff for hoary-backports to build now, if I created it?  or can I build all them chroots in a few hours?
[07:11] <elmo> -backports exists enough for chroots
[07:11] <elmo> none of them are in w-b yet
[07:11] <elmo> rockhopper's stalled on overrides, I think
[07:11] <elmo> which I'll try and fake in a bit and get ready, but mdz's stressing over -backports, so don't stall that on the other 3
[07:17] <lamont> ok.
[07:17] <lamont> creating -backports is a simple matter of 'sudo build-chroot buildd hoary -backports' in ~buildd - but adding that to the config will result in bitchiness from buildd until w-b has it
[07:19] <lamont> hrm.. and speaking of overrides - /me tries to remember the process for getting libgcc2/hppa into main
[07:25] <lamont> elmo: hoary updates doesn't exist for ia64, fwiw
[07:25] <lamont> after a bit of thought, that doesn't surprise me terribly
[07:25] <elmo> yes, feature
[07:26] <fabbione> elmo: both Kamion and mdz were working on 2.6.12 seeded..
[07:26] <fabbione> and no.. i didn't even login on concordia today
[07:26] <fabbione> i am using davis as my test bitch
[07:26] <lamont> fabbione: so you have a cronjob, eh?????
[07:26] <fabbione> given that davis > concordia
[07:26] <fabbione> concordia is teh suck
[07:26] <fabbione> lamont: ahah
[07:41] <\sh> lamont: can u check this please: aqsis_0.9.1-2ubuntu1 on ia64 failed to build because he couldn't find the source?
[07:43] <\sh> forget it ...wrong one
[07:43] <lamont> \sh: uh, that's a long time ago...
[07:43] <fabbione> \sh: just say to give it back :)
[07:43] <lamont> and the current bits are good
[07:43] <\sh> yeah ;) 
[07:43] <lamont> fabbione: remind me to throw something at you sometime, eh?
[07:43] <\sh> i'm not be here...just fall asleep and got up :(
[07:43] <fabbione> lamont: sure :)
[07:43] <fabbione> speaking of which
[07:44] <fabbione> lamont: can you give back libglib-perl on all arches?
[07:44] <fabbione> lamont: now that the fixes glib2.0 is in the archive, it should build fine
[07:44] <fabbione> lamont: --give-back
[07:45] <fabbione> wanna-build -d breezy --give-back libglib-perl
[07:45] <fabbione> (arch all please)
[07:45] <lamont> I don't think --arch=all will do the right thing, will it?
[07:46] <lamont> in any case, given back
[07:46] <\sh> ah.is there a documentation for those commands?
[07:46] <lamont> apt-get install wanna-build
[07:46] <fabbione> lamont: we might need to ensure that glib2.0 will be the last one builded
[07:46] <lamont> fabbione: otherwise it'll fail again and I can retry it again?>
[07:47] <fabbione> lamont: exactly :)
[07:47] <lamont> np
[07:47] <fabbione> lamont: danke
[07:53] <lamont> doko: any chance of fixing that hppa regression in our gcc-4.0?
[07:53] <lamont> ahead of upstream, that is
[07:54] <doko> did you talk with tausq about it?
[07:55] <doko> should we go back to 3.4 for hppa?
[07:57] <lamont> elmo: how do you feel about flushing hppa .debs from the archive, for a full rebuild with 3.4?
[07:57] <lamont> haven't talked with tausq yet
[07:57] <elmo> lamont: *shrug*
[07:58] <lamont> will that tend to mirror well?
[07:58] <elmo> that's why it's on ports.u.c ;)
[07:58] <elmo> doesn't affect our main mirrors
[07:58] <lamont> that is, the mirrors use something that checks md5sums, yes?
[07:58] <lamont> ah, coolness.
[08:00] <lamont> gcc-3.4 will need binutils-hppa64 promoted to main, fwiw
[08:00] <lamont> doko: g++-3.4 will still get us to libstdc++6, yes?
[08:01] <doko> lamont: yes
[08:01] <lamont> sigh... much though it pains me, having a totally untrustworty archive is worse than having a less complete one...
[08:02] <lamont> doko: you want to upload a new gcc-defaults with hppa set to 3.4, or shall I?
[08:02] <doko> lamont: please do, then I won't have to fiddle with it ;)
[08:02] <lamont> doko: np./
[08:03] <doko> I'm away until 22:30 UTC
[08:03] <lamont> elmo: can you clone the hppa bits on ports.u.c somewhere for me, and then nuke them?
[08:03] <lamont> from ports, that is.
[08:03] <lamont> I've killed the uploader, and I'll get it building once I upload a new gcc-defaults and clean up the home archive.
[08:05] <lamont> on the bright side, I should have 2 A500's working on the problem sometime this week
[08:09] <lamont> hrm... guess I should send email to ubuntu-devel, eh?
[08:11] <lamont> on the down side, one of those A500's will be in my cube.
[09:23] <Riddell> doko: wv2-0.2.2 havn't been recompiled for new ABI
[09:30] <\sh> doko, I trying again gnuradio...there were some new things and fixes in CVS so I'm building cvs head now of new gnuradio-core