[12:24] <shawarma> How many employees are there? It seems everyone is a Canonical employee. :-)
[12:33] <lifeless> not that many ;0
[01:13] <Luciph3r> un po di Dylan Dog ... e poi forse .. nanna ? ... boo .. la dieta mi porta molta fame .. e poco sonno ... 8(
[01:13] <Luciph3r> a domani
[01:13] <mlh_> diffutils is both a project and a product.  that's not right is it?
[01:45] <morgs> mlh_: that behaviour is acceptable generally - there was a time when we thought every product should be part of a project, even if only a trivial one like that.
[01:45] <morgs> In practice, projects should be used to group products together.
[01:46] <morgs> There are probably quite a few products in the database where some cleanup is necessary...
[01:47] <mlh_> ok, it wasn't clear what is a project and what is a product.   but i don't think you should have two.  just delete my product registration  (and move links to lifeless's project)
[01:47] <mlh_> the project already has sub-products.  it's too confusing to have the diffutils product
[01:52] <morgs> mlh_: To clarify: you want the diffutils PROJECT deleted, and the diffutils PRODUCT linked to another PROJECT?
[01:57] <mlh_> up to you  or robert, but i'd suggest deleting the product diffutils.  (as project diffutils already has an associated product:  diff)
[02:07] <mlh_> jblack: you just missed me suggesting that launchpad product diffutils be deleted.  as there is a project diffutils, with an associated product diff.    Agree?
[02:07] <mlh_> just to be clear: one is a PROJECT.   the PRODUCT diffutils (one i registered) should be deleted
[02:08] <carlos> mlh_, a project does not have releases or translations, just a set of products
[02:08] <carlos> mlh_, so usually, is the project what should be removed
[02:08] <carlos> morgs, ?
[02:09] <jblack> mlh_: Which product has which data associated with it? 
[02:09] <mlh_> PROJECT diffutils has PRODUCT diff associated
[02:09] <mlh_> i suggest that PRODUCT diffutils should be deleted
[02:10] <jblack> mlh_: There's a prodcut diffutils and a product diff (associated with project diffutils) 
[02:10] <jblack> does either diffutils or diff have imports? rosetta, etc? 
[02:10] <mlh_> then i'm unclear on the concept :-)
[02:10] <jblack> mlh_: I'm just quoting you. 
[02:11] <mlh_> anyway up to you guys.  I found it surprising but then i'm a doap dilletante
[02:13] <jblack> Looks like neither product has an import
[02:13] <mlh_> "just quoting me"  -- yes, I see sorry.  
[02:13] <mlh_> yeah.  an import is what i went looking for originally.  there's a patch in diff3 cvs which is useful for tla/baz
[02:14] <mlh_> (which I can't find fwiw .. the gnu cvs seems to be empty.  but i swear i saw it there a month or so ago)
[02:15] <jblack> I'm looking it up in various places.
[02:16] <jblack> do you have the cvs/cvn info for it? 
[02:19] <mlh_> http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/diffutils
[02:20] <jblack> Let me get the products sorted out with ddaa, and we'll get it in the queue for import. sound good? 
[02:20] <jblack> (ddaa made one product, lifeless made the other, and they're both more authoritive on the namespace than I)
[02:22] <mlh_> _I_ registered the product diffutils.  And I'm still shown as lead maintainer, which is pretty comical.
[02:24] <jblack> Hmmm. Seems to be a UI gap. 
[02:24] <jblack> Lets move this
[02:30] <mpt> mlh_: Well, as long as we have products being registered by people other than the real maintainer, we have to give the maintainership to *someone* who has a Launchpad account, because we don't want to be spamming someone who isn't interested in Launchpad
[02:31] <jblack> ddaa is sorting it out
[02:36] <mlh_> mpt: yep.
[02:37] <mlh_> mpt: OT, I read your blog on ubuntu usability today. brilliant
[02:40] <jblack> mlh_: We're going to use the diffutils-diff product like you want. :) 
[02:54] <jblack> mlh_: Its in the process, but build is broken for it. 
[03:01] <mpt> mlh_: thanks
[08:08] <Luciph3r> ao ... si esce .. pizza !!!! 
[11:48] <jblack> I invited /win 9