[02:03] <doko> hope you don't fail on other things than sleeping ;)
[05:38] <fabbione> morning
[08:51] <jbailey> lamont__: Have I fixed all of the packages on the annoying-you list?
[08:54] <lamont__> dunno...
[08:54] <jbailey> ISTR iptables (fabio got that one) iputils, and strace.
[08:55] <jbailey> hfsplus I did already
[08:57] <lamont__> if you're really bored, moz-thunderbutt is failing with /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl3
[08:58] <lamont__> limiting mail to "incomplete type", I have:
[08:58] <lamont__>       144 Log for failed build of deco_3.9-1 (dist=breezy)
[08:58] <lamont__>      1250 Log for failed build of honeyd_1.0a-rc2-1 (dist=breezy)
[08:58] <lamont__>       222 Log for failed build of iputils_3:20020927-2 (dist=breezy)
[08:58] <lamont__>      1608 Log for failed build of iterm_0.5-3.1ubuntu1 (dist=breezy)
[08:58] <lamont__>       450 Log for failed build of kdrill_6.4-2 (dist=breezy)
[08:58] <lamont__>       434 Log for failed build of pyspeex_0.2-1ubuntu1 (dist=breezy)
[08:58] <lamont__>       857 Log for failed build of sam_4.3-18 (dist=breezy)
[08:58] <lamont__>       256 Log for failed build of strace_4.5.12-1 (dist=breezy)
[08:58] <lamont__>      6334 Log for failed build of ultrapossum-slapd_0.0.4+2.2.20sb3-1 (dist=bree
[08:58] <lamont__>       219 Log for failed build of umsdos_1.13-2.1 (dist=breezy)
[08:58] <lamont__>       525 Log for failed build of wacom-tools_0.6.6-8 (dist=breezy)
[08:58] <lamont__>      1431 Log for failed build of xcruise_0.30-4ubuntu1 (dist=breezy)
[08:58] <lamont__>      1435 Log for failed build of xmailbox_2.5-9 (dist=breezy)
[08:59] <lamont__> but several of those are universe
[09:01] <jbailey> I'm not bored so much as trying to make sure that I'm not forgetting things.
[09:02] <jbailey> Are those failing on hppa, or also likely to fail on a released arch during a rebuild?
[09:09] <lamont__> those are at least hppa, quite possibly other architectures
[09:09] <lamont__> I haven't tried rebuilding all of them....
[09:10] <jbailey> deco builds on ppc
[09:11] <jbailey> honeyd builds on ppc
[09:12] <lamont__> oh, and universe--> don't really care
[09:13] <jbailey> Iterm.c:35:28: error: X11/IntrinsicP.h: No such file or directory
[09:13] <jbailey> universe
[09:13] <lamont__> tty.c: In function `TtySet':
[09:13] <lamont__> tty.c:147: error: `TIOCGLTC' undeclared (first use in this function)
[09:13] <lamont__> iz deco/hppa
[09:14] <jbailey> Hmm.
[09:14] <lamont__> tty.c:148: error: `newchars' has an incomplete type
[09:15] <jbailey> TIOCGLTC isn't defined in the asm* for parisc
[09:15] <jbailey> Hmm, not for ia32 either, but is for alpha, ppc, ppc64, sparc and sparc64.
[09:17] <jbailey> lamont__: Is universe required for releasing?
[09:17] <lamont__> not precisly\
[09:19] <jbailey> Interesting.
[09:19] <jbailey> Your build env appears to be confused:
[09:19] <jbailey> #ifdef TIOCSLTC
[09:19] <jbailey>         ioctl (CHANNEL, TIOCGLTC, (char *) &oldchars);
[09:20] <jbailey> You should never get as far as seeing it undeclared.
[09:20] <jbailey> (That's 146, 147)
[09:20] <jbailey> No, I'm blind.
[09:21] <jbailey> In any event, the right solution for you for deco is to figure out why HAVE_TERMIO_H isn't set.
[09:22] <jbailey> kdrill is also X breakage
[09:23] <jbailey> pyspeex is a missing build-dep
[09:23] <jbailey> We're not really going to force a rebuild on universe and pitch FTBFSs are we?
[09:23] <jbailey> There's no way the MOTUs will get all of these done.
[09:24] <jbailey> sam is X header breakage.
[09:25] <jbailey> umdos is lkh brekage, but since it was removed from the kernel, do we care?
[09:25] <lamont__> we are going to do a breezy-autotest and file ftbfs bugs on everything... what happens from there is an mdz question, not me
[09:29] <jbailey> wacom-tools builds fine here.
[09:29] <jbailey> The others I'll assume are X failures.
[09:30] <jbailey> I'll declare the LaMont box to be empty now and move on
[09:48] <lamont__> jbailey: works for me, for now
[09:49] <jbailey> Why do I imagine you saying that in the same tone as "We'll get you next time, Gadget!"
[09:52] <jbailey> For Hoary, do we now set the distro to "hoary-updates" ?
[09:53] <lamont__> if it qualifies for hoary-updates
[09:53] <lamont__> same logic applies for -security and -backports...
[09:53] <lamont__> if it qualifies for any of the 3, then you use that.
[09:53] <lamont__> uploads to 'hoary' will be rejected by katie
[09:58] <jbailey> Cool, thanks.
[10:27] <lamont__> jbailey: 2.3.5? :-)
[10:27] <jbailey> Of course.  You know the backports people did it wrong.  If you're going to break the system, FINISH THE JOB DAMMIT
[10:43] <doko> lamont: are you caballero's buildd admin?
[10:45] <lamont__> yes
[10:45] <lamont__> ya, even
[10:49] <doko> then please fix it ...
[10:49] <doko> gcc-4.0 doesn't find the sources for the build
[10:49] <doko> strange ...