=== lukacu [~lukacu@cpe-212-18-59-221.cable.amis.net] has left #ubuntu-artwork [] === kafeine [~kori@212.39.73.142] has joined #ubuntu-artwork [01:08] hello [01:08] morning :-) [01:14] mm [01:15] for the icon breezy thingie [01:15] is there a list somewhere with the icons that arent yet done [01:15] aaaand where can i see some icons which are already in this to-be set [01:15] so i could make them more.. consistent? [01:18] http://andy.fitzsimon.com.au/humility-icons.tar.bz2 [01:18] this is what's being worked on for breezy :-) [01:19] thank you:) [01:23] no problem :-) === megabyte405 [~megabyte4@user-0cdvkq3.cable.mindspring.com] has joined #ubuntu-artwork [02:00] I made some new icons (for a few more info see mailing-list) :: http://www.mentalwarp.com/~fred/divers/humility-fred-contrib.zip === AndyFitz [~andy@220-245-97-227-qld-pppoe.tpgi.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === megabyte405 [~megabyte4@user-0cdvkq3.cable.mindspring.com] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === AndyFitz [~andy@220-245-97-227-qld-pppoe.tpgi.com.au] has left #ubuntu-artwork [] === megabyte405 [~megabyte4@user-0cdvkq3.cable.mindspring.com] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === MilesTeg [~chatzilla@p54A917DE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === morgo [~morgo@cust0753.qld01.dataco.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === Burgundavia [~corey@S0106000000cc07fc.gv.shawcable.net] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === Burgundavia [~corey@S0106000000cc07fc.gv.shawcable.net] has left #ubuntu-artwork ["This] === RQ [~rq@193.219.41.122] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === konki [~konki___@pool-71-111-171-19.ptldor.dsl-w.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === tvoss [~tvoss@p508E0ED6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-artwork [11:43] Hi all, is there already a package available for the Humility-Icon-Theme === PlanarPlatypus [~alucard@cpc2-cove3-5-0-cust220.brhm.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-artwork [11:45] tvoss, yes, i got it locally.... [11:46] ogra_ can you send by mail to t.voss"at"onlinehome.de [11:46] i'll upload it today, jst apt-get it then ;) [11:47] ogra_ hoary or breezy? [11:47] breezy... but for a icontheme that doesnt matter [11:47] they are interchangeable [11:49] http://andy.fitzsimon.com.au/humility-icons.tar.bz2 [11:49] or get them there ^ ;-) [11:50] Nafallo, thats not a package ;) === konki [~konki___@pool-71-111-171-19.ptldor.dsl-w.verizon.net] has left #ubuntu-artwork ["Leaving"] [11:51] ogra_: depends on your definition of package :-) [11:52] mine has a .deb in the end :) [11:52] :-) [11:52] (my definition as well as my package ;)) [11:53] ;) [11:54] it's useless as long as X doesn't work, anyways :D [11:55] ogra_, what will the name of the package be? [11:55] humility-icon-theme ? [11:55] great :) [11:56] i hope it will remain like that. [11:57] i'm pondering if i should put a gnome- in fromt... [11:57] btw are you guys responsible for the colour themes in Ubuntu? [11:57] front even [11:57] not yet [11:57] hmm... maybe not... if it works with KDE too. [11:57] hmm [11:57] but the colors will be a responsibility of the art team [11:58] I have a sugestion - don't keep the name of the package if you change it quite radically [11:58] for example, i liked the soft brown colours in Warthy much more then those in Hoary [11:59] so it wasn't very pleasing to find out that I can only have one of these themes at a time. [12:00] so I'd suggest that you name them distinctively so that the user could have both of them installed [12:01] (that's for the future, of course) === efbie [~fred@234-153.242.81.adsl.skynet.be] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === opi [~emil@oppeln-bronikowski.int.pl] has joined #ubuntu-artwork [01:57] wrt humility icon theme: An icon for a samba share is missing === ..[topic/#ubuntu-artwork:ogra] : Ubuntu Artwork Channel | wiki IconGuide up https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IconGuide | breezy icon theme sitting in NEW, install gnome-humility-icon-theme as soon as it hits the archive [02:16] ogra, so you've added "gnome-".. [02:16] yep, after talking to our KDE maintainer [02:17] KDE will need a) repackaging anyway b) wont use them [02:18] hm [02:18] i thought there's a common freedesktop format now :| [02:18] KDE uses other names for the icons, so they all will have to be renamed [02:18] weird.. [02:18] RQ, gnome uses gnome-fs-home.svg for example :) [02:19] ywah [02:19] nearly all icons have a prefix [02:19] but as i said - i thought they've agreed on that fd.org standard [02:20] sure... but if you look at KDE you'll find that it stores setings and theme data in .desktop files which is as wrong as having a gone- prefix on icons... i guess there is still a way to go for both [02:20] s/gone-/gnome- [02:21] yeah, well... [02:22] i wonder what that standard specifies then.. [02:22] i havent read it... i'm only the packaging bitch here :) *shrug* [02:24] ogra: almost entirely true ;-) [02:24] heh [02:25] ogra: care to review and upload libdc0 btw? it's on universeunmetdeps [02:25] ;-) === lukacu [~lukacu@cpe-212-18-59-221.cable.amis.net] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === googol65 [~googol65@dsl-217-199-71-116.berlikomm.net] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === hardcoded [~kori@212.39.73.142] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === ogra_ [~ogra@p5089DCD1.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === RQ [~rq@85.206.193.5] has joined #ubuntu-artwork === gothcat [gothcat@c-459571d5.07-44-73746f50.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se] has joined #ubuntu-artwork [07:29] gothcat: welcome :-) [07:29] hi every one :) === Nafallo introduces his girlfriend: gothcat :-) [07:29] hi [07:32] hey gothcat [07:37] ogra: hi :) [07:39] ogra: she've seen pictures of you ;-) [07:39] hehe [07:39] the nice ones i hope :) [07:42] mostly from mataro and udu :-) [07:45] ah.. === mpathy [~markus@p54A18C06.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-artwork [08:27] hi [08:36] hi :) [08:39] hello :D [08:52] hi! === lukacu [~lukacu@cpe-212-18-59-221.cable.amis.net] has left #ubuntu-artwork [] [09:26] [09:27] err [09:27] that was mm [09:27] anyway [09:27] anyone with an opinion on the wiki vs. groupware thing which was the main conversation on the mailing list? [09:28] yes [09:29] yes [09:30] IMHO the wiki is there and working, we should work with what we have now, and focus on producing artwork rather than discussing for years on a non-issue. If it really become impossible with the wiki, then we could look for an alternative... [09:30] but since i'm a maintainer and involved in X diffeent ubuntu teams that all do their work n the wiki i'm vers biased [09:30] very even [09:31] i agree with jane that we need something better to put the artwork stuff up, but i would perfer to work with this group like with every other in ubuntu [09:31] I don't actually think this team will want to diverge to much from the rest of the community. that will only lead to isolation. [09:33] then again, i think that artists in the common case aren't as used to wiki-based work as developers are, for example [09:33] additionally i know how overworked our administrators are and that nobody wants to be admin of php stuff in the team, so it would have to be on a vserver that is maintained by us [09:33] well, I'm not used to the wiki yet. that doesn't stop me from using it. [09:33] ogra++ [09:34] Nafallo++ :) [09:34] hm [09:35] I believe jane's mail told what ogra and I would love to see anyway :-). right ogra? [09:35] likely :) [09:36] since jane is my boss and holds the whip :) [09:36] hehe [09:36] :)) [09:37] no, seriously... my opiion is the above, but i know that its technically possible to have a vserver and run our own stuff... so lets see how a voting evolves :) [09:37] my stance is that it will be lot more easier to use some tool that is exclusively made for such kind of teamwork and project leading [09:38] kafeine: and that is? [09:38] and proper, anyway [09:39] mm, phpgroupware or something like it [09:39] or, as it was proposed, basecamp [09:39] well, that depends. the wiki would work for projectgoals, calendar, information and those kind of things. [09:39] basecamp wasn't F/OSS [09:40] i think what we need is a good revision control system to coordinate the collaborative artwork stuff (iconsets etc) and a good presentation platform (gallery, the art.gnome.org software etc) and coordinatig work should be done like in all other areas of ubuntu (IRC, wiki, mailinglist) [09:41] kafeine, whats the usecase of phpgroupware ? what do you need a calendar for ? [09:41] launchpad has personal calendars now. isn't that enough? [09:41] i really dont see the need for such stuff... as long as we are communicative [09:42] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Calendar suffice for most things that will need a calendar now. [09:43] plus the ical version ofcourse :-) [09:43] my own concern is the visual orientation of this team [09:43] only* [09:43] hmm, but does that need a groupware ? [09:44] and the fact that the people who work with the visual arts, are, well, used to visual tools [09:44] and a calendar? [09:44] not necesarilly, no [09:44] and i certainly havent really said anything about no calendar [09:44] but [09:44] hats the main usecase of phpgroupware, sharig calendars [09:44] thats even [09:45] in those systems, most entries are presented in a much more intuitive way [09:45] and show up where you expect them to be [09:45] as projects [09:45] people who work on projects [09:45] etc [09:45] hmm, depends how you define intuitive... [09:46] well, the wiki have things were you told them to be :-) [09:46] i certainly dont define intuitive as located somewhere in a pile of text in a page that looks exactly as the last one [09:46] but anyway, that's just me:) [09:46] i'll work with anything [09:46] and I love to find things were I left them :-) [09:47] i will go with the group decision.... :) [09:47] same here [09:47] mm [09:47] anyway, can someone put up a list with all the icons that need to be done [09:48] and all the icons that are done already, propositions for icons, etc [09:48] and posting some guidelines for the promo materials (posters, flyers, stickers) in near time would be nice, too [09:48] i think all mime types, all apps and folders wer the desired target [09:49] ogra: all apps in main and restricted I hope you mean? [09:49] i guess so [09:50] we'll need at least 16x16, 22x22, 24x24 and 48x48 bitmap versions and scalable svg versions... [09:50] that's a work of titans [09:51] and beware, you cant just scale down the svg and make a bitmap of it.... bitmaps need to be redone manually to work out the details [09:51] when was the meeting again? [09:51] efbie, AndyFitz has already done a lot [09:52] and yes, its a hell lot of work [09:52] ogra: yes i know, :) i did a bunch of icons too [09:52] but retouching pixel by pixel will be a _Huge_ work [09:53] yep [09:53] some things can be automated [09:53] but we want a awesome iconset, dont we ? [09:53] hehe [09:53] in my opinion it should impress the world as ubuntu itself does ;) [09:54] yep [09:54] it should make mac peope jealous [09:54] hehe [09:54] hard job:D [09:54] yep [09:54] but not impossible [09:55] and its not only icons :) [09:55] what a relief:D [09:55] splash, wallpaper etc [09:56] the hard thing is to make beautiful artwork that remains "professional" [09:57] gnome defaults look professional, but isn't that beautiful [09:58] have you seen what jimmac does ? a quality like that would be the greatest... [09:59] he did the gnome default years back... but does also custom sets for ximian/novell [09:59] yes it's really nice [10:00] and the custom sets *are* beautiful :) [10:03] mm [10:04] we need some more info on the various work that is to be done posted on the wiki [10:04] cause i have no experience with icon making and i'm all useless right now [10:05] yep. [10:05] I would especially like to have artistical guidelines from Andy [10:07] lets poke him if australia wakes up ;) [10:08] also keep in mind that sabdfl can overrule everything in ubuntu ;) so if he doesnt like it it might get dropped... [10:08] yep [10:09] it scares me a little [10:09] could we ask him an early review ? [10:09] (we had a really awful splashscreen short before the hoary release...he made the current one and dropped the ugly one...was a good decision) [10:09] oh i am late.. I have a opinion too *gg* [10:10] efbie, absolutely... he will want it... to see where it goes [10:10] ogra: spatial was a bad though ;-) [10:10] Nafallo, he knows that ;) [10:10] ogra: good :-) [10:10] well, shower for me and gothcat. bbl [10:11] mpathy, freedom of speech is here [10:11] as i must reinstall my system, do you think that it's a good idea to use breezy ? [10:11] kafeine: ..but I first have to read all the lines *g* [10:12] efbie, not really [10:12] ok [10:12] efbie, probably in a week or two.... X is currently a PITA [10:13] k [10:13] whats with this launchpad? its an ubuntu thing and have some nice tools.. but efbie you are right, its all secondary! [10:15] mpathy, launchpad is for collaborative: translating, code development bugtracking beyond distro borders and community management... i dont think there is something usable for artwork development (except management stuff probably) [10:16] its "sourceforge-next-generation" :) [10:17] what's lacking in the wiki is something to visualize thing [10:17] ogra: oh okay.. i looked over it only short time.. my problem with the wiki at ubuntu is, that its relatively unstructured.. [10:18] mpathy, its up to us to build a structure below our site.... [10:18] efbie: right! combined with some sort of upload area!? [10:19] mpathy, and i think some people of the docteam would disagree about the "unstructured" (i agree with you btw ;) ) [10:21] ogra: thx ;o) Its only because I want to keep the track, dont lost any information.. as long its all in the mailing list, its okay.. so because of that a central ubuntu-artwork news page would be good. [10:21] if there is a structure in the wiki it is far from being obvious... [10:21] heh [10:21] the docteam is small :) [10:22] the wiki is big.... [10:22] Wikipedia is even bigger and it works *gg* [10:22] okay thats another thing [10:22] mpathy, probably there are moin plugins we could get for the news stuff... [10:23] ogra: ehmm.. what wiki is the ubuntu wiki? [10:23] moin [10:23] moin moin= [10:23] oh okay [10:23] we had plone and zwiki before, [11:05] sad that noone tries some of these nice ruby-based wikis :o) [11:06] *shudder* ruby *shudder* [11:06] :) [11:07] ogra: hey! watch out ;) [11:07] hehe [11:08] lets guess: you are more the perl-guy, and your editor is emacs.. :) [11:08] nope [11:09] i'm the multi guy (C, perl, python (!!) a lot more...) an my editor is vim ;) [11:10] good editor choice.. :) ..but i never get good friend with C, perhaps the force isnt with me.. ;) [11:10] i was forced by ubuntu ;) [11:11] didnt touch much C before .... [11:13] apropos the force.. did you heard about "utnubu"? ..the empire strikes back *gg* [11:14] yeah, its a great thing [11:14] i was waiting for this quite some time already... so nobody cant blame us we wouldnt give back.... [11:15] since i think its the job of the debian maintainers to grab our patches themselves... [11:15] yes.. hope the padawan doesnt kill his master, like in star wars ;) [11:15] buit they always meant we'd have to send them every change we make [11:15] no, it wont... we never can manage this amount of packages.... [11:16] ubuntu has far less maintainers... [11:16] no i meant accidentally.. [11:16] :o) [11:17] that'd be very bad for us... we cant survive without debian.... [11:17] only if the maintainers would switch over to us... [11:17] because of the hype. but right now the most people think about ubuntu as the "desktop debian".. thats okay for me.. [11:18] many did [11:18] not for me... :) [11:18] its a perfect server OS as well... [11:18] the problem is to get this across to the people [11:19] since everybody is convinced ubuntu is only a desktop system [11:19] should produce a bit more server oriented news! :) [11:19] yep, we're working on it ;) [11:22] like "increased amount of BOFH excuses - fortunes" ;) [11:23] heh === plb [~plb@24.168.136.248] has joined #ubuntu-artwork [11:35] someone started working on these calendar images? [11:37] nope [11:37] not to my knowledge [11:38] what about a metacity theme ;] === ogra likes the current one.... but lternatives never hurt ;) [11:39] +a [11:39] heh [11:43] clearlooks is really nice, maybe a brown version would fit ? [11:44] ll [11:45] efbie: yes would be nice.. clearlooks is nice [11:45] omg.. e17 is so awesome fast.. [11:47] it took them 6 years to develop it... so this should be the least .... [11:47] hope ubuntu will be the first who gets it into his packages ;) [11:47] sadly he made themself incompatible with the rest of the world, so you'll need to write a lot of apps for it... [11:48] and it really crappy unstable for now... [11:48] e17 looks like the future, but now [11:48] nothing to give to users [11:49] efbie, e17 looks like a nice proof of concept thingie...but with their development speed you'll see the first stable release in about 5 years [11:49] yes its not even a beta.. but its amazing :) [11:50] sadly they work against freedesktop org... and they are no friends of it... [11:51] raster (the e17 dev) wrote a lengthy rant against freedesktop, QT and GTK last year.... [11:52] and i thought that linux was all about interoperability.... [11:52] ...not something that brings you many developers in to speed things up :( [11:52] lol [11:53] sure, you can run other apps on top... but its an additional ressource hog to have a WM that uses all its own stuff (libs etc) [11:53] but they also have some good concepts.. and some not so good.. like most time.. [11:54] nicer would have been if they had put these ideas and the work into gnome or kde to improve these [11:54] the other apps feels like they run at same speed.. [11:54] and those next gen things like cairo and luminocity, are these science-fiction, or are they likely to be in gnome before the next duke nukem ? [11:55] cairo is already in breezy.. the breezy firefox already renders its fonts with it [11:55] luminocity is not so different from the things that work even now on e17.. (as an non-programmers opinion *g*) [11:56] luminocity will be ready soon... and xgl looks promising [11:56] i saw demos of all of them at guadec this year [11:56] but have a look anyway: [11:56] http://livecd.debianitas.net/screenshots/prueba2.mpg [11:57] and they are all developed by paied people that spend much time on improving them [11:57] mpathy, i know the e17 movies :) [11:58] ogra: but thats new! 1-3 days old from a new live cd with a good working e17 [11:59] mpathy: looks quite nice :) [12:01] yep, it improved [12:01] lot of progress in the last weeks/months..