| === crimsun [~crimsun@rchp4.rochester.ibm.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === karlheg [~karlheg@host-250-237.resnet.pdx.edu] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === crimsun [~crimsun@rchp4.rochester.ibm.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === crimsun [~crimsun@66-188-220-125.dhcp.roch.mn.charter.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| fabbione | morning | 05:44 |
|---|---|---|
| === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === jbailey [~jbailey@modemcable139.249-203-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| fabbione | hey jbailey | 06:43 |
| jbailey | Heya Fabio | 06:44 |
| jbailey | I'm about to upload initramfs-tools 0.14 | 06:44 |
| fabbione | nice | 06:44 |
| jbailey | Just need to figure out why bzr doesn't feel like commiting. | 06:44 |
| fabbione | jbailey: did you hear anything about binutils to fix that link problem on sparc? | 06:44 |
| jbailey | No, but I haven't had a chance to dig in yet. | 06:44 |
| jbailey | Sorry about that. =( | 06:45 |
| fabbione | no need to be sorry please | 06:45 |
| fabbione | :) | 06:45 |
| fabbione | i was only asking... | 06:45 |
| fabbione | the situation still looks good | 06:46 |
| jbailey | Well, I feel bad that I haven't had a chance. | 06:46 |
| jbailey | Feeling a bit swamped. | 06:46 |
| fabbione | but the gnome pkgs starts to pile up | 06:46 |
| jbailey | bzr commit done. | 06:46 |
| jbailey | This version actually now detects IDE correctly on my box, SATA on another one, and LVM and Raid1. | 06:46 |
| fabbione | nice | 06:47 |
| fabbione | i hope i won't crash today | 06:47 |
| fabbione | and give it a shot | 06:47 |
| fabbione | i am so tired you have no idea | 06:48 |
| jbailey | Still no evms or cryptroot. | 06:48 |
| jbailey | I just don't have test scenarios for those, so it'll be a bitch. | 06:48 |
| fabbione | if you have md and lvm you also have evms | 06:48 |
| jbailey | I do? | 06:48 |
| jbailey | I'll ask you sometime when I'm awake. | 06:48 |
| jbailey | I promised mdz that I'd put out a call for testers today on what I have. | 06:49 |
| fabbione | as it stands now.. evms and lvm are "only" 2 interfaces towards device-mapper | 06:49 |
| fabbione | if you get one, somehow you get the other | 06:49 |
| jbailey | Ah, okay. | 06:49 |
| fabbione | but mdz can give you more details about evms | 06:49 |
| fabbione | he was the maintainer | 06:49 |
| jbailey | 'cept that he's insanely busy. | 06:49 |
| fabbione | well he can spend 2 minutes | 06:49 |
| fabbione | at least this is at kernel level.. | 06:50 |
| fabbione | if userland does something "weird" i dunno | 06:50 |
| fabbione | i was never able to make evms work in a decent way | 06:50 |
| jbailey | evms ate my partition table | 06:51 |
| jbailey | So I'm not inclined to try it again. | 06:51 |
| fabbione | ehhe | 06:52 |
| jbailey | Rejected: binary uploads are not allowed - please only upload source. | 06:58 |
| jbailey | Bah | 06:58 |
| jbailey | I must get that wrong like *half* the time. | 06:58 |
| fabbione | ehhehe | 06:59 |
| === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| fabbione | jbailey: when i am linking.. can i avoid to specify -m $emulation ? | 07:12 |
| fabbione | or is it somewhat mandatory? | 07:12 |
| jbailey | Mmm, I thought it was supposed to detect it from the module. | 07:12 |
| jbailey | I might be mistaken. | 07:12 |
| fabbione | what i mean is: | 07:12 |
| jbailey | It's been so long since I've used ld directly. | 07:12 |
| fabbione | ld -m elf_i386 -r -o $dest $modules | 07:12 |
| jbailey | Right. | 07:13 |
| fabbione | if i omit -m elf_i386, which one will be selected? | 07:13 |
| jbailey | I think you ought to be able to leave it out. | 07:13 |
| jbailey | It should be detected, so in this case elf_i386 | 07:13 |
| fabbione | i guess i need to try it | 07:13 |
| fabbione | yeah it works on i386 | 07:14 |
| jbailey | Sleep time. | 07:34 |
| === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === JaneW [~JaneW@wbs-146-168-164.telkomadsl.co.za] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === chmj [~chmj@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === horms [~horms@vagw.valinux.co.jp] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === doko [~doko___@dsl-084-059-067-130.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === jbailey [~jbailey@modemcable139.249-203-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === chmj [~chmj@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| jbailey | fabbione: Hey - did you get a chance to try the initramfs-tools stuff at all? | 02:24 |
| fabbione | no :( | 02:25 |
| === zul [~chuck@CPE0006258ec6c2-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| zul | heylo | 02:28 |
| fabbione | hey zul | 02:29 |
| zul | hey how is it going? | 02:29 |
| fabbione | as usual | 02:32 |
| zul | exciting | 02:34 |
| fabbione | what's exciting about it? | 02:35 |
| zul | i was being sarcastic | 02:46 |
| === lamont__ [~lamont@15.238.5.126] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| lamont__ | fabbione: rebooting now | 04:33 |
| fabbione | kw33l | 04:33 |
| lamont__ | well. that was painful | 04:36 |
| fabbione | so? | 04:36 |
| lamont__ | good news for doko... it's not 3.4 | 04:36 |
| fabbione | bad news for the ia64 porter :P | 04:36 |
| lamont__ | bad news for me: it's not 3.4 | 04:36 |
| lamont__ | yeppers | 04:36 |
| lamont__ | means I have to actually work on it. | 04:37 |
| fabbione | lamont__: the only thing i try to do is disable acpi on ia64 | 04:37 |
| lamont__ | ?? | 04:37 |
| fabbione | it's the only big ia64 chunk of code that's different from Debian | 04:37 |
| fabbione | sorry. "i would try to do".. | 04:37 |
| lamont__ | I should try booting with noacpi? or there's a kernel patch I should try removing? | 04:37 |
| fabbione | try booting with noacpi first | 04:37 |
| jbailey | W00t Got my drivers license. | 05:16 |
| jbailey | Angie has to wait until she gets better proof of residence. | 05:17 |
| jbailey | So stupid. | 05:17 |
| zul | its the same in ontario dude | 05:17 |
| jbailey | Umm, no. | 05:18 |
| jbailey | Her lease was good enough, and a bank statement was good enough for me. | 05:18 |
| zul | well..for health card i guess | 05:18 |
| jbailey | Well + old license. =) | 05:18 |
| jbailey | But here, I needed passport, ontario health card, ontario drivers license, and a current bill showing transactions only in quebec since I moved sent to this address. | 05:19 |
| jbailey | Andit has to be a bill from a 'respectable place' | 05:19 |
| zul | so pornos are out? :) | 05:19 |
| jbailey | The fact that she bought $3500 worth of appliances from Future Shop that got sent to the appartment that she leased isn't good enough. | 05:19 |
| jbailey | Nor is the confirmation from Hydro Quebec saying that her account is now open good enough. | 05:20 |
| jbailey | She had a visa bill with her, but the lady just said that it doesn't matter. The bank will send a statememnt anywhere. | 05:21 |
| jbailey | *my* visa bill was fine, though, since it has a u-haul on it, a bunch of gas stops along the 401 and a dozen or so transactions in montreal after that. | 05:21 |
| zul | lol...stupid quebec | 05:21 |
| jbailey | I thought it was a bit extreme. | 05:23 |
| jbailey | But I got mine for now, anyway. | 05:23 |
| jbailey | The Hydro bill is in her name, so when that gets sent, that'll be good enough. | 05:24 |
| zul | getting married in quebec is pretty extreme i hear as well | 05:28 |
| jbailey | Oh? | 05:34 |
| jbailey | What's the story there? | 05:34 |
| zul | i dont really remmeber unforuntately.. | 05:35 |
| jbailey | fabbione: ping? | 05:45 |
| jbailey | fabbione: any idea if this is going anywhere upstream: http://gaugusch.at/acpi-dsdt-initrd-patches/acpi-dsdt-initrd-v0.7d-2.6.12.patch | 05:45 |
| fabbione | jbailey: acpi -> mjg59 .. really... | 05:47 |
| jbailey | Hmm. This is more initramfs handling, but alright. =) | 05:48 |
| jbailey | mjg59_: *poke* ^^^ | 05:48 |
| jbailey | It looks like we need to apply either that one or this one: | 05:48 |
| jbailey | http://gaugusch.at/acpi-dsdt-initrd-patches/acpi-dsdt-initramfs-fix-2.6.10-cleanup.patch | 05:48 |
| mjg59_ | acpi upstream aren't keen on it | 05:52 |
| mjg59_ | If it's needed for initramfs, then push it | 05:53 |
| lamont__ | mjg59_: the ia64 issue is more basic... nothing from the kernel but timeout/machine-checks | 05:54 |
| mjg59_ | lamont__: Mm? | 05:54 |
| lamont__ | 2.6.10-5 boots fine and all, 2.6.12-current is not so happy. with or without 'noacpi' | 05:54 |
| lamont__ | so somewhere in there, I have issues to figure out. | 05:54 |
| mjg59_ | Can you revert the acpi patch? | 05:54 |
| lamont__ | could be a fun little bios interaction | 05:54 |
| mjg59_ | Hmm. Hang on - I seem to remember something that may be related. Hang on. | 05:55 |
| lamont__ | mjg59_: that's certainly on the list... | 05:55 |
| lamont__ | mjg59_: the "one console" issue? | 05:55 |
| jbailey | mjg59_: Do they have specific concerns that I should work with? Having it right in the filesystem is elegant in a number of ways. | 05:55 |
| mjg59_ | jbailey: "Vendors should fix their hardware" | 05:55 |
| jbailey | mjg59_: Not the least of which that you can swap dsdt's at boottime with a trivial hack to grub. | 05:55 |
| mjg59_ | lamont__: If it boots without that, can you grab the latest bleeding-edge ACPI patch and see if that's any better? | 05:56 |
| lamont__ | mjg59_: certainly. will probably pester you for where to grab said bleeding-edge razor | 05:57 |
| jbailey | fabbione: I have a really strong preference of the acpi-dsdt-initrd-v0.7d.... patch. It has the advantage that if someone does a custom kernel, they just won't get a DSDT. With the other one, if they run a stock kernel, the kernel can't load an initramfs with a DSDT in it. | 05:58 |
| jbailey | mjg59_, fabbione: What prep/testing do you need me to do in order to test it adequately for you to bless it? | 05:58 |
| fabbione | jbailey: are the 2 patches mutal exclusive? | 05:59 |
| fabbione | so it's either one or the other | 05:59 |
| jbailey | No | 05:59 |
| mjg59_ | jbailey: The initramfs one looks correct. Break your DSDT, boot with it, see if your machine breaks | 05:59 |
| mjg59_ | If so, I'm happy with it | 05:59 |
| jbailey | mjg59_: The one that just alters the read size to compensate for the DSDT hanging off the end? | 05:59 |
| mjg59_ | Hang on | 05:59 |
| === jbailey hangs | ||
| zul | ding dong the wicked witch...er.. | 06:00 |
| mjg59_ | jbailey: Ok. What's the precise issue? | 06:00 |
| jbailey | zul: Funny enough, there are bells rining outside. | 06:00 |
| zul | lol | 06:01 |
| jbailey | mjg59_: With an initramfs, using the traditional way of appending the DSDT to the initramfs causes a boot failure. The people at this web site are proposing two solutions. 1) (http://gaugusch.at/acpi-dsdt-initrd-patches/acpi-dsdt-initramfs-fix-2.6.10-cleanup.patch) makes the initramfs read function calculate the size of the initramfs without including the files so that it unpacks the initramfs correctly. The rest of th | 06:02 |
| jbailey | e sstem should go on to process the dsdt correctly. | 06:02 |
| mjg59_ | Yes. That looks clean enough. | 06:02 |
| jbailey | 2) http://gaugusch.at/acpi-dsdt-initrd-patches/acpi-dsdt-initrd-v0.7d-2.6.12.patch makes the initramfs system available earlier so that acpi can simply open the file off of the filesystem and read it in. | 06:02 |
| mjg59_ | Right. I've no preference. | 06:02 |
| mjg59_ | The first seems less invasive | 06:02 |
| jbailey | So here's the catch. | 06:03 |
| jbailey | 1) Means that if someone does a custom kernel, but includes a DSDT at the end, they won't have the patch, so the machine won't boot. | 06:03 |
| mjg59_ | Yes | 06:03 |
| jbailey | 2) Means that if someone does a custom kernel, and includes a DSDT in the initramfs, it simpy won't get read by anything. | 06:03 |
| mjg59_ | Well, either is fine with me. | 06:03 |
| jbailey | Have you seen either of these on upstream lists? I have a preference for #2 to reduce the support nightmare. | 06:04 |
| jbailey | But I suspect that #1, being less invasive, is more likely to get accepted. But that's entirely a guess. | 06:04 |
| mjg59_ | Neither is going to make it upstream while acpi upstream are hostile | 06:04 |
| jbailey | If neither will make it upstream, then I'll do #2 =) | 06:04 |
| === desrt [~desrt@dhcp-0-20-af-d2-7c-3.cpe.mountaincable.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| jbailey | fabbione: What sort of testing do you want me to do before I say "Please include this patch"? | 06:06 |
| fabbione | jbailey: it's enough it works for you.... | 06:07 |
| jbailey | 'kay | 06:08 |
| jbailey | I guess I need to figure out how to compile a kernel now. =) | 06:08 |
| fabbione | it looks to me we already have 2 | 06:08 |
| === jbailey blinks | ||
| jbailey | Oh? | 06:08 |
| === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === jbailey apt-get source's the kernel to check | ||
| mjg59_ | fabbione: I think we only have an earlier version of the patch that doesn't deal with initramfs | 06:10 |
| jbailey | Hmm, can I apt-get source the i386 kernel from a ppc? | 06:10 |
| === jbailey hops onto concordia | ||
| fabbione | jbailey: the kernel is only one | 06:11 |
| fabbione | there is only ONE source | 06:11 |
| zul | use the source luke | 06:11 |
| fabbione | mjg59_: well i have no issues to update it.. | 06:12 |
| jbailey | Ah, handy | 06:12 |
| === jbailey blinks. | ||
| jbailey | 26k source? | 06:12 |
| jbailey | Oh, that's linux-meta | 06:13 |
| jbailey | 47mb, much better | 06:13 |
| jbailey | Err.. Is i386 only at 2.6.12-3 ? | 06:15 |
| jbailey | That's all concordia seems to have in its chroot's apt sources | 06:15 |
| fabbione | jbailey: you can grab the sources from my home on concordia | 06:19 |
| fabbione | take 4.4 please | 06:20 |
| fabbione | 4.5 is the playground atm | 06:20 |
| jbailey | Hmm | 06:25 |
| fabbione | desrt: what kernel flavour do you use? | 06:25 |
| jbailey | I thought drivers-acpi-osl_attach-dsdt-to-initrd.dpatch | 06:25 |
| jbailey | was already upstream | 06:25 |
| lamont__ | hrm.. external-global-acpi_update.dpatch is pretty *&(^^%_ invasive | 06:26 |
| desrt | fabbione; 686-smp and powerpc64-smp | 06:26 |
| fabbione | desrt: ok.. i will make 686-smp for you to test | 06:26 |
| lamont__ | mjg59_: external-global-acpi_update* were the two you wanted me to pull? | 06:26 |
| desrt | fabbione; the hardware arrived today for our cluster :) | 06:27 |
| desrt | fabbione; so, as of tomorrow i'm gonna be running 5 boxes with powerpc64-smp :) | 06:27 |
| desrt | (and some time later about 12) | 06:28 |
| fabbione | desrt: cool! | 06:28 |
| fabbione | desrt: what kind of cluster are you going to run? | 06:28 |
| desrt | our own thing | 06:28 |
| fabbione | yeah.. i mean. HA or HP cluster? | 06:29 |
| fabbione | A=Availability | 06:29 |
| fabbione | P=Performance | 06:29 |
| mjg59_ | lamont__: Yeah | 06:31 |
| jbailey | Anyone have a SuSE kernel source handy? | 06:31 |
| jbailey | I'd love to see if they apply this other one, it's one of their folks that wrote it: | 06:31 |
| jbailey | http://gaugusch.at/acpi-dsdt-initrd-patches/acpi_dsdt_initrd_initramfs.patch | 06:32 |
| jbailey | http://gaugusch.at/acpi-dsdt-initrd-patches/initramfs-before-acpi.patch | 06:32 |
| fabbione | dpkg-deb: building package `linux-image-2.6.12-4-686-smp' in `../linux-image-2.6.12-4-686-smp_2.6.12-4.5_i386.deb'. | 06:35 |
| fabbione | and NO ABI breakage! | 06:35 |
| fabbione | (....yet) | 06:35 |
| jbailey | This too shall pass ;) | 06:35 |
| fabbione | desrt: http://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/ | 06:36 |
| fabbione | desrt: there are 3 linux-*-4.5*.deb | 06:37 |
| fabbione | can you test inotify with them? | 06:37 |
| fabbione | they include all the latest fixed | 06:37 |
| fabbione | fixes | 06:37 |
| fabbione | just rememeber that is NOT 4.5 final | 06:37 |
| fabbione | so you might have to upgrade it later | 06:37 |
| === lamont__ watches the whole *&%)_ world rebuild, curses acpi | ||
| === fabbione goes offline | ||
| === desrt downloading now | ||
| desrt | sorry for the delay. got busy for a moment | 06:50 |
| fabbione | desrt: no problem, take your time to test. | 06:52 |
| fabbione | i need to go out now | 06:52 |
| fabbione | i will bbl | 06:52 |
| fabbione | ps don't use SYSCALLS 289 and 290.. they are fake and unsecure atm | 06:53 |
| fabbione | i already have a better patch done.. | 06:53 |
| fabbione | but i need to know if it works for you now with the 291/292/293 | 06:53 |
| fabbione | in sync with * | 06:53 |
| fabbione | later | 06:53 |
| desrt | fabbione; problem is not fixed | 06:59 |
| desrt | :q | 07:00 |
| desrt | erp | 07:01 |
| desrt | fabbione; looking at your source package, nothing has changed | 07:26 |
| desrt | fabbione; (from looking at source) sys_inotify_rm_watch is still doing improper input validation and (from testing against your binary) i'm still getting the crash | 07:27 |
| desrt | from 2.6.13-rc3-git8: http://manic.desrt.ca/inotify.c | 07:35 |
| desrt | search for /* verify that this is indeed an inotify instance */ | 07:35 |
| === lamont__ adds external-drivers-ide_sleep to his list, since it's ftbfs without acpi... | ||
| fabbione | desrt: i didn't put any source there... | 07:52 |
| fabbione | did you take 4.5 ? | 07:52 |
| fabbione | or by mistake you took 4.4? | 07:52 |
| desrt | i took linux-source-diff that was in the group of them :) | 07:52 |
| fabbione | it's not the one to look at | 07:52 |
| desrt | ahh | 07:52 |
| desrt | well, in any case, the binary still exibits the crash :) | 07:52 |
| fabbione | /* verify that this is indeed an inotify instance */ | 07:52 |
| fabbione | this is there | 07:52 |
| desrt | uname -a shows Jul 27 | 07:52 |
| fabbione | twice | 07:52 |
| desrt | weird..... | 07:53 |
| fabbione | dpkg -l linux-image-2.6.12-4-686-smp | 07:53 |
| desrt | 2.6.12-4.5 | 07:53 |
| fabbione | yeah that's it | 07:53 |
| desrt | want me to send you a testcase? | 07:53 |
| fabbione | it's all the latest inotify | 07:53 |
| fabbione | desrt: did you change the syscalls to match the real ones? | 07:54 |
| desrt | yes | 07:54 |
| desrt | i'm using 293 now, i think | 07:54 |
| fabbione | well.. can you recheck please :) | 07:54 |
| desrt | you're using the same syscall numbers as the official 2.6.13, right? | 07:55 |
| fabbione | also.. did you check that it is fixed in git8? | 07:55 |
| fabbione | yes. right | 07:55 |
| desrt | no. i haven't. | 07:55 |
| fabbione | by running it... | 07:55 |
| fabbione | well that would be something to do :) | 07:55 |
| desrt | cool | 07:55 |
| desrt | 293 is, in fact, the right number | 07:55 |
| desrt | will test git | 07:56 |
| fabbione | thanks | 07:56 |
| zul | ohwee...i got business cards | 07:56 |
| desrt | man... it's times like this when i'm building a kernel that i wish i had a nice pentium D system | 08:01 |
| === crimsun [~crimsun@crimsun.silver.supporter.pdpc] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| desrt | crimsun; w3rd. | 08:02 |
| crimsun | 'lo desrt | 08:03 |
| === desrt plays a good beatles song to honour your presence | ||
| desrt | "nothing's gonna change my world....." | 08:04 |
| === doko [~doko___@dsl-084-059-085-139.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| desrt | fabbione; i get -EINVAL on that syscall on 2.6.13-rc3-git8 | 08:15 |
| desrt | and no crash | 08:15 |
| desrt | so 2.6.13-rc3: bad | 08:16 |
| desrt | so 2.6.13-rc3-git8: good | 08:16 |
| desrt | and 2.6.12-4.5: bad | 08:16 |
| fabbione | desrt: ok.. i will give you another kernel in a few minutes.. | 08:19 |
| desrt | :) | 08:19 |
| fabbione | it looks like not all the patches in git as commented as they should... | 08:19 |
| fabbione | desrt: it's building.. | 08:25 |
| fabbione | if this one still crash, i know exactly what it is | 08:26 |
| fabbione | but | 08:26 |
| fabbione | it's not going to be fun at all | 08:26 |
| === smurfix [~smurf@smurfix.developer.debian] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| fabbione | desrt; http://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/desrt/ <- | 08:34 |
| fabbione | i will be back in few minutes.. | 08:34 |
| fabbione | desrt: ? | 08:54 |
| desrt | fabbione; just installed and am rebooting now | 08:54 |
| fabbione | cool | 08:54 |
| desrt | Jul 27 18:25:09 UTC | 08:55 |
| desrt | no crash | 08:55 |
| fabbione | perfect | 08:55 |
| desrt | ship it! :) | 08:55 |
| fabbione | do you want to know what it was? | 08:55 |
| desrt | ya. for sure | 08:55 |
| fabbione | NEVER TRUST PATCH! | 08:56 |
| desrt | uhm... what happened? | 08:56 |
| fabbione | basically i was doing cg-mkpatch -r $id | patch -d $pathtokernel -p1 | 08:56 |
| fabbione | on all inotify commit | 08:56 |
| fabbione | no rejects | 08:56 |
| fabbione | no fuzzyness | 08:56 |
| fabbione | it ended with 2 different files | 08:56 |
| fabbione | (same base of course) | 08:57 |
| desrt | like what? | 08:57 |
| fabbione | there were diffs in the order of some hunks | 08:57 |
| fabbione | the final inotify.c was different | 08:58 |
| fabbione | @@ -990,6 +991,8 @@ | 08:59 |
| fabbione | filp = fget_light(fd, &fput_needed); | 08:59 |
| fabbione | if (unlikely(!filp)) | 08:59 |
| fabbione | return -EBADF; | 08:59 |
| fabbione | + dev = filp->private_data; | 08:59 |
| fabbione | + ret = inotify_ignore (dev, wd); | 08:59 |
| fabbione | 08:59 | |
| fabbione | /* verify that this is indeed an inotify instance */ | 08:59 |
| fabbione | if (unlikely(filp->f_op != &inotify_fops)) { | 08:59 |
| fabbione | @@ -997,9 +1000,6 @@ | 08:59 |
| fabbione | goto out; | 08:59 |
| fabbione | } | 08:59 |
| fabbione | 08:59 | |
| fabbione | - dev = filp->private_data; | 08:59 |
| fabbione | - ret = inotify_ignore(dev, wd); | 08:59 |
| fabbione | - | 08:59 |
| fabbione | something like this | 08:59 |
| desrt | er | 08:59 |
| desrt | that's the inverse of the patch you need :) | 08:59 |
| desrt | actually, it's just nonsense | 08:59 |
| fabbione | yes sorry.. | 08:59 |
| desrt | it's like "do it first, check later" :) | 09:00 |
| fabbione | i did it the wrong way | 09:00 |
| fabbione | but it still landed in the wrong order in the final inotify.c | 09:00 |
| fabbione | that's the point | 09:00 |
| desrt | nod. | 09:00 |
| desrt | well | 09:00 |
| desrt | it all seems to be working fine now | 09:00 |
| fabbione | never mind the direction of that patch | 09:00 |
| desrt | maybe the cg-mkpatch wasn't generating enough lines of context | 09:00 |
| desrt | so it just went blindly by linenumber and put it in the wrong place | 09:01 |
| fabbione | possibly | 09:01 |
| desrt | that'd also explain why it didn't mention any fuzz | 09:01 |
| fabbione | baz commit -s'Update inotify' | 09:03 |
| desrt | ok. so is this when a bug becomes PENDINGUPLOAD? | 09:03 |
| fabbione | M patches/sth-fs_inotify.dpatch | 09:03 |
| fabbione | M changelog | 09:03 |
| fabbione | yes | 09:03 |
| fabbione | but iirc you can't change from UPSTREAM to PENDINGUPLOAD directly | 09:03 |
| fabbione | so we will close it after we upload... | 09:04 |
| fabbione | not a big deal | 09:04 |
| desrt | nod. | 09:04 |
| fabbione | jbailey mjg59_: ping? | 09:04 |
| jbailey | pong | 09:04 |
| fabbione | otherwise you need to put it as ASSIGNED and than PENDINGUPLOAD | 09:04 |
| desrt | ya. evil bugzilla :P | 09:04 |
| fabbione | jbailey: remember i will be VAC from 1st of Aug | 09:04 |
| fabbione | infinity will take care of the kernel | 09:05 |
| fabbione | but i plan an upload for no later than friday | 09:05 |
| fabbione | so if there is something important or urgent, it has to be withing friday morning | 09:05 |
| fabbione | mjg59_: the above is valid also for ACPI | 09:05 |
| fabbione | because the 8th of Aug is Feature Freeze | 09:05 |
| fabbione | (or the 5th.. i can never remember) | 09:05 |
| zul | hmmm...i think im going to be busy this weekend ;) | 09:06 |
| fabbione | zul: no crack please.. only tested committs... | 09:06 |
| fabbione | we need to go very stable and very fast | 09:06 |
| zul | yep | 09:06 |
| fabbione | zul: specially.. test before commit | 09:06 |
| fabbione | or at least build | 09:06 |
| fabbione | i don't want to come back and have to cleanup a mess :) | 09:07 |
| zul | heh... | 09:07 |
| zul | all of my group has gone home for the day. and its only 3:13pm | 09:07 |
| zul | slackers | 09:08 |
| fabbione | ok | 09:21 |
| fabbione | time to stop | 09:21 |
| fabbione | it's only 9:20 pm | 09:21 |
| fabbione | and i started at 6am | 09:21 |
| desrt | :) | 09:22 |
| desrt | fabbione++ | 09:22 |
| fabbione | another 2 bug fixes done.. | 09:22 |
| fabbione | desrt: i might upload tomorrow.. | 09:22 |
| fabbione | or max friday | 09:22 |
| fabbione | you can use the temp kernel in the meanwhile | 09:22 |
| desrt | it's cool. it's not actually affecting me | 09:22 |
| desrt | i can just avoid passing an invalid fd to inotify :P | 09:23 |
| fabbione | uh no.. the other 2 bug fixes are ACPI and USB related | 09:23 |
| zul | i think we might have to close some more non-responsive user bugs tonight as well | 09:31 |
| fabbione | zul: go ahead | 09:33 |
| fabbione | KILL THEM ALL! | 09:33 |
| zul | users or bugs? | 09:33 |
| fabbione | users of course | 09:33 |
| Mithrandir | both, preferably | 09:33 |
| === fabbione switches to bastart mode | ||
| fabbione | Mithrandir: why so much blood? | 09:33 |
| fabbione | users are enough | 09:33 |
| fabbione | unresponsive user on bug -> CLOSE | 09:33 |
| fabbione | i need to buy another THX | 09:34 |
| fabbione | after i moved mine in the living room i miss to listen to music in a decent way | 09:34 |
| === fabbione goes offlinw | ||
| fabbione | there.. i can't even type anymore... | 09:42 |
| jbailey | <fabbione> unresponsive user on bug -> CLOSE | 09:49 |
| jbailey | <fabbione> i need to buy another THX | 09:49 |
| jbailey | buy another user? | 09:49 |
| jbailey | Dude, you don't PAY for those. | 09:49 |
| jbailey | They come free. =0 | 09:49 |
| jbailey | =) | 09:49 |
| === Mithrandir tickles the man with blue streaks in his hair. | ||
| lamont__ | Mithrandir: who went tropical-fish on us? | 10:01 |
| Mithrandir | lamont__: http://www.raspberryginger.com/jbailey/weblog/entries/photos/hpim2587.jpg | 10:02 |
| jbailey | Mithrandir: eh... =) | 10:02 |
| jbailey | Mithrandir: I'm *not* adding a highlight on "blue". That would be a bit too much. =) | 10:02 |
| lamont__ | jbailey: you need more elmers glue. | 10:02 |
| jbailey | lamont__: Err. Why? | 10:03 |
| Mithrandir | jbailey: looks nice, though | 10:03 |
| lamont__ | jbailey: no spikes. that's why. :-) | 10:03 |
| jbailey | Mithrandir: Thanks. What's fun is that 1) There are 10 of them, but most are buried, so they only poke out occasionally. 2) They're all on the side and the back, so I still look respectable if I tie my hair back. | 10:03 |
| jbailey | lamont: *lol* | 10:04 |
| jbailey | lamont__: The funny part is that they're extensions, so they're basically epoxied onto other hair near the roots. | 10:04 |
| lamont__ | heh | 10:04 |
| Mithrandir | jbailey: have you read citizen cyborg? I think you may find it interesting. | 10:05 |
| Mithrandir | s/may/might/ | 10:05 |
| jbailey | I haven't, I'll look for it. | 10:06 |
| lamont__ | fabbione: still awake | 10:29 |
| lamont__ | ? | 10:29 |
| fabbione | lamont__: not for more than 2 minutes | 10:51 |
| fabbione | i am crashing | 10:51 |
| fabbione | /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libXcursor.la: No such file or directory | 10:53 |
| fabbione | GREAT | 10:53 |
| fabbione | now what did reintroduce this... | 10:53 |
| fabbione | bah | 10:55 |
| fabbione | i am going to sleep | 10:55 |
| fabbione | good night | 10:55 |
| lamont__ | g'night fabbione | 11:00 |
| lamont__ | jbailey: ping | 11:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
