=== enrico [~enrico@enrico.developer.debian] has joined #ubuntu-doc === _venda [~sean@ndn-165-131-129.telkomadsl.co.za] has joined #ubuntu-doc === _venda_ [~sean@ndn-165-131-129.telkomadsl.co.za] has joined #ubuntu-doc === poningru_ [~poningru@pool-70-110-75-89.tampfl.fios.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc === enrico [~enrico@enrico.developer.debian] has joined #ubuntu-doc === enrico [~enrico@enrico.developer.debian] has joined #ubuntu-doc === poningru [~poningru@pool-70-110-66-164.tampfl.fios.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc === Mez [~Mez@cpc2-lich4-3-0-cust115.brhm.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc === highvoltage [~Jono@196.25.192.240] has joined #ubuntu-doc === poningru [~poningru@pool-70-110-69-243.tampfl.fios.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc === rob^ [~rob@rob-ubuntu.student.supporter.pdpc] has joined #ubuntu-doc === highvoltage [~Jono@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-doc === jeffsch [~jeffsch@fatwire-202-75.uniserve.ca] has left #Ubuntu-doc ["gotta] === highvolt1ge [~Jono@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-doc === jsgotangco [~PyconUser@202.57.71.236] has joined #ubuntu-doc === jdub [~jdub@home.waugh.id.au] has joined #ubuntu-doc [08:19] hello [08:22] venda: chill [08:23] morn jsgotangco [08:23] venda: im not in favor of railroading either [08:24] well then say so, don't beat around the bush [08:24] (i was actually non-existant in the meeting last night because of my connection [08:24] I saw that, I read the log [08:24] badly lagged [08:25] I did not see anything on the agenda worth meeting for [08:25] the main item seemed to be about localhelp [08:25] a discussion that was not even attempted properly on the list [08:26] and which it seems is being politically forced down everyones throats [08:26] The idea is good, it's just the way they are going about it that is ticking me off [08:26] i would worry more about the content rather than the front for now [08:26] our content is almost non-existant [08:27] at the moment [08:27] eactly [08:27] if Matthew wants to write and be a help he should do so on the current objectives [08:27] smae goes for Burgundavia [08:27] not derail current focus [08:28] rob^: has done great work [08:28] and mpt and Burgundavia can fork, but if they do then they should not defocus the teams [08:28] jeff and i are slowly builing the styleguide [08:29] and work on edubuntu is moving forward [08:29] it takes time [08:29] and focus [08:29] it does [08:29] I am very busy now and not paying attention [08:29] so I play catchup [08:30] but when I see this kind of negative political behaviour it makes me wonder [08:30] venda: i missed the meeting too; what's the 'localhelp' stuff you're concerned about? [08:30] See launch pad [08:31] launchpad? [08:31] https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/products/ubuntu-help [08:32] oh jeezz === highvoltage [~Jono@edison.tsf.org.za] has joined #ubuntu-doc [08:33] I don't mind the fact that they forked FAQ Guide. That is their choice. [08:33] I even think that the idea of the outline is good [08:33] I don't think it should be outside svn [08:34] I don't think it should position itself as the defacto for ubuntu-help [08:34] faqguide? i agree [08:34] I don't think it should impact on license [08:35] I don't think it should be defocusing the docteam from DocteamProjects [08:35] There is space for localhelp and faqguide in the distro === rob^ pokes head in [08:36] morn rob^ [08:36] hey venda [08:36] I take it you got the email? [08:36] hi venda [08:37] jdub: busy? [08:41] this is what has been discussed for ages; the document-as-front-page thing [08:42] jsgotangco: yeah [08:43] jdub: ok i just wanted to ask you what can you suggest on a conference presentation geared towards corporate adoption [08:43] jdub: no we have discussed that the structure should change [08:43] jdub: not that a document will replace it [08:44] jdub: we do not see it the way mpt and Burgundavia have put it [08:47] jdub: rob^ has indicated what we have in mind and I know that most of the team agrees with that approach [08:47] jdub: I like the locahelp outline, but I don't see it as the frontpage of help in Ubuntu [08:48] jdub: localhelp is jus one more document type from which users can read to get help [08:48] jdub: localhelp should share level 1 in the help system along with faqguide, quickguide, userguide etc [08:49] jdub: not take precedence over [08:49] jdub: in addition it should be an integral part of docteam work, not an external [08:50] jdub: the license issue. GPL is not a documentation licesne [08:50] GFDL is [08:51] As for the debian argument, I fail to see how debain will use ubuntu localhelp as the default for their own help :-) [08:52] Debian just uses their own or that of upstream [08:52] such as gnome [08:52] or kde [08:52] i'd rather do upstream work for that (which i plan in the future) [08:53] jsgotangco: I sometimes think of moving upstream altogether :-) [08:56] venda: the point of the document-as-front-page is to link to all the available documentation; but i'm not going to argue about the specifics [08:57] jsgotangco: (it's highly likely that GNOME will shift to this style of front page in the near future) [08:57] jsgotangco: (rather than just the ooky index) [08:58] jdub: i don't argue with that part of the front page really...yelp is what we have at the moment and the document as front page is the best workaround we currently have imo [08:59] i wouldn't describe it as a workaround (for the front page of a help browser - there are a lot of other issues that need to be fixed that are unrelated to that) [09:00] ah [09:04] jdub: we have not agreed that help should use the outline here [09:04] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LocalHelp?highlight=%28localhelp%29 [09:04] people do not agree that the outline here should be what is the front page [09:05] the number of topics in that outline is never ending [09:05] and topics are often inter-related [09:06] yeah i told them before its too long for a front page though [09:06] what they are trying too do is do a google type of categorization project [09:06] so why not just use google [09:06] jsgotangco, yes, as have I [09:07] the solution to rapid information retrieval is not another doc. It needs a technological soclution [09:07] our current work are books in structure, but it doesn't mean they should be written like books [09:07] search and idex [09:07] venda: you'll note that the proposal specifically raises search and index, and how it is related to the spec [09:08] jsgotangco: right, but that has to be solved differently (and the doc that contains the front page could actually contain the non-book documentation, too) [09:08] yes, but that is ok, its just that throwing one more document at an information organization and location problem is not the solution [09:09] jdub: how long do you think that outline is going to get [09:09] venda: perhaps not to a problem that you are making up [09:09] just off the top of my head I can add another 30 topic [09:09] but a crafted front page is a great way to introduce the help browser [09:09] which is the problem mpt is solving [09:10] [09:02] venda: perhaps not to a problem that you are making up [09:10] jdub: me and others in the team [09:10] I don't stand alone in feeling that this is not the way to go [09:10] you didn't define the problem, you just stated that another document is not a solution [09:10] dude we have done that in th epast a few times [09:10] the problem being solved is the not-entirely-user-worthy front page of yelp [09:11] and the last mesages have indicated what people think [09:12] jdub: you want to fix the problem then develop a proper help/documentation viewing system [09:12] jdub: don't throw another doc at it [09:12] this solves a small problem in a simple fashion in a small amount of time [09:12] the outline of that do is going to be huge [09:13] and regardless of the immediate problem, the help browser will need a crafted front page anyway [09:13] and who decides what does in that outline [09:13] how many cooks will keep that outline organized [09:13] everytime we change something in one of the docs, we are going to have to check the front page to make sure we are not breaking anything [09:13] what a pain [09:13] I give it a few months and the ouline there will be a mess [09:14] jdub: we have read and seen mpt's solution [09:14] jdub: we have given it considerable thjought [09:14] i don't imagine all of those entries will be on it, nor do i see more being added (it specifically notes that they will be removed) [09:14] jdub: it is a start in the direction we need, but it is not the solutiuon we need [09:15] it's a short term solution for a small problem [09:15] jdub: who will be the judge of that [09:15] jdub: an ugly hack that is not the solution, but just a bigger problem [09:16] okay, so, tell me what the front page of a help browser would be if it were not a crafted document [09:16] jdub: what is stopping developers from improving yelp itself [09:16] it is not stopping improvement of yelp [09:16] that was not the question [09:16] (in fact, it's pushing it along) [09:17] why do developers not develop more on the existing yelp [09:17] why do they not change it to solve the problems [09:17] " Until then, it should contain no more than about a dozen subtopics." [09:17] this is a change designed to solve a problem [09:17] fine with me [09:17] jdub: who decides the limits [09:17] who decides what is the toc and what is not [09:18] we do, based on what we perceive our users need [09:18] jdub: there is not limit [09:18] jdub: we don't even know what they need [09:18] some are usefully obvious, like "what's new in " [09:19] that's why we think critically, hypothesise, and make changes based on feedback [09:19] jdub, at the moment thats not whats happening [09:19] the current list is already based on what we know of our users [09:19] jdub: hmm, and al animals are equal but some are more equal than others [09:19] (note that i don't believe it's final) [09:20] welcome to user-centric software design [09:20] it's hard [09:20] there's no system [09:20] jdub: I would suggest you ask the users? [09:20] jdub: nobody has asked them [09:21] well, two answers to that: [09:21] *ahem* we do receive feedback on the list one way or another [09:21] a) users won't give immediately useful answers [09:21] jdub: mpt and Burgundavia with a bit of input from some doc people have sucked their thumbs and decided for the mass [09:21] b) what's there is inferred and analysed from existing users [09:21] venda, thats how I see it [09:21] right, and that's what needs to be done to move forward [09:21] then we iterate and improve [09:22] jdub: do perform user centric design you need to advertise to users and show them what you mean and request input [09:22] (my first thought is that the language could be clearer, which i'll have to suggest) [09:23] well, for a start, that will happen (to a degree) as soon as it lands [09:23] jdub: I must go now. But I have said what I think, if it counts, and I think others have also indictated disatisfaction with the approach to work method and the solution being presented. [09:23] secondly, this sort of thing can be tested without even landing the changes [09:24] but before you do user testing, you have to design something to test [09:24] right, but with input from a design team which is not happening [09:25] as far as i can see, mpt and corey are the design team [09:25] and i'm sure they'll accept feedback with good rationale [09:25] jdub: they forked FAQGUide and because people did not agree [09:25] jdub: they then just forced this approach [09:25] i don't believe that's the sum total of what this line of action means [09:25] jdub: its all in the lists and the logs [09:26] jdub: it does not have to be. But mpt and Burgundavia are very dictatorial over what happens [09:26] which is leaving people with a bad taste [09:26] defocuing the team [09:27] and fragmenting the effort [09:27] ah yes, dictatorial bad taste [09:27] if we did not have issues we would not be discusing them' [09:27] people, other than myself, have voiced concern [09:28] and they have been brushed off [09:28] i could understand Burgundavia's case but mpt just sprang up all of a sudden [09:28] the approach at present smacks of railroading [09:28] jsgotangco: we all see Burgundavia case [09:29] jsgotangco: we even agree with him in many points [09:29] but not the methodologies [09:29] but in the sapce of two days it was bagged and balled [09:29] taken as that is the way it will be [09:29] like it or love it [09:30] argue and we will cut you off at the knees [09:30] Oh and just to make sure we will do it all outside of the current structures [09:30] yes just like the crusades... [09:30] fuck all of you is written all over this [09:30] well my day in the real world must begin [09:31] later [09:31] *whew* [09:31] that dude has so much bile [09:32] yes [09:32] but there is a reason behind it [09:32] changes are good but we don't need a revolution [09:32] jsgotangco, agreed [09:33] sounds like everyones assuming the worst [09:33] hmm no not really [09:33] i really like to change the front page really [09:33] as would most people [09:33] but we'd like to be "in the know" at least of what's the master plan [09:33] but we feel like we are being forced into something we haven't discussed or agreed to [09:34] rob^: sure, but if you assume you're being forced, you're going to argue against it, everyone's going to get emotional, and no one's going to be focusing on settling problems :) [09:35] jdub, I would like to settle the problems, but I'd at least like some input into the settling [09:35] "I call again for people to focus on writing the docs and ignore the noise." <- totally the wrong strategy [09:36] well its august next week and a lot of docs still needs love... [09:37] rob^: stoffers? [09:38] jdub, yes [09:38] just read your mail [09:39] hmmm why did he cc mako he's on the list anyways [09:40] he feels strongly about it [09:40] Life at Kubuntu is much easier and not as [09:40] politically or religiously charged as ubuntu. [09:40] i hate it when he says that [09:41] it's needlessly and purposefully divisive [09:41] *sigh* [09:41] jdub: i agree [09:42] highvoltage: welcome to an ordinary day at #ubuntu-doc heh [09:45] jdub: what do you suggest for a conference Ubuntu presentation geared towards community and corporate types? Advocacy? Technology? [09:47] you've seen my ones? [09:47] hrm, wonder which are up now [09:48] http://people.ubuntu.com/~jdub/2005/ubuntu-on-the-desktop/ [09:48] seen that one? [09:48] jdub, that one is quite good, bit dated though [09:49] well.. now anyway === rob^ thinks he should go and eat now [09:49] jdub: i've seen those and plan to incorporate them [09:50] well mordernize it a bit [10:00] jdub: i sure wish i can still get a hold of the raw image used for the CD cover though it will help a lot with making paraphernalia... === rwabel [~rwabel@gw.ptr-80-238-205-70.customer.ch.netstream.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc === Mez [~Mez@cpc2-lich4-3-0-cust115.brhm.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc === jsgotangco [~jsg@202.57.71.236] has joined #ubuntu-doc === mdke wakes up and trawls through the flaming [11:25] oh great [11:26] welcome mr. barrister [11:27] this team is not a team at all [11:27] yeah we're better off with a steamroller i guess [11:28] the crazy thing is that this sort of problem is easy to resolve [11:28] we have two divisive factions, both of which aren't remotely interested in resolving matters through communication [11:29] please elaborate [11:29] its up to us stuck in the middle to try [11:29] erm [11:30] ok elaborate [11:30] after breakfast tho [11:30] duhh [11:31] im leaving in half an hour to try to catch up on the edubuntu meeting at 12utc [11:31] k [11:32] mdke, let's just start Ubuntu-legal [11:32] i'll be your paralegal [11:32] well rob^ is right that corey and matt haven't gone about this the right way, which is to look for team consensus. [11:32] however froud is way divisive too [11:33] his reaction is "let's not talk about this" [11:33] we need to figure out how to make a team here [11:34] having sane people would be a good start [11:34] well we have some ;) === jsgotangco lies down basking in the warmth of edubuntu [11:34] btw can i change the subject? [11:34] sure [11:34] launchpad group [11:34] nice idea [11:34] heh the WIKI team had one [11:35] what the heck why cant UDP [11:35] at least i said "Project" not "Team" [11:35] heh [11:35] however, the main purpose of a group would be ultimately to control permissions IMO, like to a baz or svn repo, i think the group should be limited to those with commit access [11:35] just an idea [11:36] all the people in the group? [11:36] well as i see it the whole purpose of launchpad groups is to deal with permissions to do stuff [11:37] ok you lost me [11:37] permissions to what [11:37] ok for example [11:37] if you want to translate in rosetta you can only make suggestions right? [11:37] unless you are a member of the translation group for a particular language [11:37] hmmm right [11:38] the same applies to other groups [11:38] (which reminds me i should make a translation group for ours) [11:38] ubuntu backporters get to upload to the backport repo, ubuntu gnome team get to work on gnome projects, etc etc [11:38] mdke, assuming our work is in launchpad? [11:39] jsgotangco, it might not be in launchpad, but it might easily one day be controlled by launchpad [11:39] e.g. commit access is granted by accession to the group in launchpad [11:39] i see that as the main reason for making a group [11:40] hmm but launchpad currently has only 2 access modes [11:40] member and admin [11:40] no, no [11:40] membership of a particular group gives certain rights [11:40] e.g. rosetta administrators can upload po files or whatever [11:40] ah alright i think i get your idea [11:40] bazaar developers can upload their patches [11:40] etc etc [11:41] MOTU can upload theirs, and close bugs or whatever [11:41] i _think_ that is the idea [11:41] well yes by design of launchpad it makes sense [11:41] hmm [11:41] btw [11:41] i got invited to do a talk on LinuxWorld Philippines [11:41] that's been distorted a bit recently by the creation of random reams like new user network [11:42] reams/teams [11:42] ahhh right [11:42] but i think that is the idea [11:42] it does make sense for uploading teams though [11:42] but then we have Ubuntu Members [11:42] yes [11:42] and eventually being in that team will also give certain rights === enrico [~enrico@enrico.developer.debian] has joined #ubuntu-doc [11:43] like email addresses or whatever else [11:43] i think the email address thing will be automated in launchpad once membership for a certain person is approved [11:43] anyway, just an idea for the future [11:43] yep [11:44] and will let members adjust their accounts accordingly [11:44] anyway the team is moderated so you can think about it [11:45] i can make anyone an admin if needed [11:45] it just happened i created the team [11:45] keep just you IMHO [11:45] ok [11:45] btw [11:45] how was your ceremony [11:46] it was ok [11:46] i'm now a lawyer [11:46] you should have celebrated by suing someone [11:46] *joke* [11:46] not a bad idea... [11:46] i can't practice though for another year [11:46] why so? [11:46] i need to do a year of training before I'm fully qualified [11:47] err doesn't make you technically unemployed as a lawyer [11:47] that [11:47] yes [11:47] i start my year of training in october [11:47] ooh launchpad has timezones for members now... [11:47] cool [11:47] yeah [11:47] hrmm [11:48] ubuntite? [11:48] Timezone: Europe/London [11:49] ok i gtg [11:49] have fun! [11:49] me too [11:49] see you later === enrico [~enrico@enrico.developer.debian] has joined #ubuntu-doc === enrico [~enrico@enrico.developer.debian] has joined #ubuntu-doc === ealden [~ealden@219.90.93.19] has joined #ubuntu-doc === jsgotangco [~jgotangco@info1-184.info.com.ph] has joined #ubuntu-doc === jjesse [~jjesse@mail.ftpb.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc [03:11] hey jjesse [03:13] hiya jsgotangco === enrico [~enrico@enrico.developer.debian] has joined #ubuntu-doc [03:20] enrico: long time no chat! [03:22] jsgotangco: eh. at the moment I'm busy reinstalling the home sevrer [03:24] hope everything is well with you [03:31] why do all the ubuntu servers take so $#@$#$$ long to load web pages for me [03:32] mmm [03:32] ask elmo i guess === mgalvin [~mgalvin@host-66-202-95-170.spr.choiceone.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc [03:45] greets mgalvin [03:48] hi jsgotangco [03:48] hi all [03:49] hiya mgalvin [04:01] hey jjesse [04:02] been busy past few days... rob^ went to town on the faqguide :) [04:02] rob^: kudos :) [04:03] hey KUDOS is the Kubuntu User Guide :) === Mez [~Mez@cpc2-lich4-3-0-cust115.brhm.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc === highvoltage [~Jono@edison.tsf.org.za] has joined #ubuntu-doc === mpt [~mpt@200-171-140-32.dsl.telesp.net.br] has joined #ubuntu-doc === enrico_ [~enrico@enrico.developer.debian] has joined #ubuntu-doc === Mez [~Mez@cpc2-lich4-3-0-cust115.brhm.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc === enrico [~enrico@enrico.developer.debian] has joined #ubuntu-doc === Seveaz [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-doc === rob^ pokes head in [06:58] hiya rob^ === rob^ [~rob@rob-ubuntu.student.supporter.pdpc] has joined #ubuntu-doc [07:25] ping mpt [07:26] rob^: pong [07:26] hey [07:27] I have been having a good look at your proposal for the yelp front page [07:27] I think what you have there are some pretty good ideas [07:27] cool [07:27] I have some comments on your proposal too, but not sure where to post them [07:28] If I put them on the wiki page itself, the comments would be larger than the original :-) [07:28] heh [07:28] I think the idea that help should be about "help" and less about books is a good one [07:28] mmm [07:30] the main problem I have is that of rail roading [07:30] rail roading? [07:30] not on your behalf [07:30] but on behalf of corey [07:31] I was recently the recipient of much of this myself and as such looked at your proposal with "cloudy eyes" [07:32] what you have is actually pretty good [07:33] I don't mean to jump on anyone's toes [07:33] no [07:33] I realise that [08:07] Hmm, I need to rply to that "Future direction thread" :-) [08:07] heh [08:07] originaly the FAQ was licenced under the GPL === highvoltage [~Jono@edison.tsf.org.za] has left #ubuntu-doc [] [08:08] the reason we have it as BY-SA and GFDL is that the original authors agreed to let us use it under that [08:08] ubuntuguide.org that is [08:10] I doubt they would have a problem if we wanted to also use it under the GPL [08:10] but yeah, group debate is needed [08:12] well, I'm off to bed [08:12] night mpt, thanks for the talk [08:18] g'night [08:21] <3 === mdke is happy [08:22] mdke: ? [08:24] was worried the team love was getting at a low ebb [08:24] glad you two are gonna get your heads together [08:24] We're a dysfunctional family, but full of love [08:24] heh [08:25] like the simpsons === mpt is surprised that "flame away I am full of love" returns only one google result [08:25] I thought Miguel had made it famous [08:26] ah, it's "You can now flame me, I am full of love" [08:28] http://everything2.com/?node_id=1084835 [08:31] not sure if it matters much since debian will accept the by-sa lic soon anyway, but i have no objects to moving the powerpc.ubuntuguide.org content that i wrote to use GPL, we would still need chua's consent as well though === Mez [~Mez@cpc2-lich4-3-0-cust115.brhm.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc [09:07] in regards to my email yesterday on previewing docs is there a way in Kubuntu that I can preview docs before i upload them to svn? === mpt [~mpt@200-171-140-32.dsl.telesp.net.br] has joined #ubuntu-doc [09:15] yay freenode [09:16] mgalvin: the importance of the GPL is that it lets beautifully-written help sentences be moved from the help into the actual GUI of the relevant software, vastly increasing their effectiveness. [09:30] mpt: I see the light :) like i said i have no objects to using the g GPL, i am really not that picky about it and if it will make the docs more useful then +2 === highvoltage [~Jono@196.25.192.240] has joined #ubuntu-doc === warthylog [~warthylog@port49.ds1-van.adsl.cybercity.dk] has joined #ubuntu-doc === Topic for #ubuntu-doc: Ubuntu Doc Team - general discussion - backlog at http://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/irclogs | Projects on http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DocteamProjects | This channel tries to follow the tradition of the #gnome-love channel on irc.gimp.net, all new comers and questions are welcomed, as long as you follow the Ubuntu community code of conduct @ http://www.ubuntulinux.org/community/conduct first. === Topic (#ubuntu-doc): set by mdke at Mon Jun 20 20:43:03 2005