[06:15] morning === doko [~doko___@dsl-084-059-075-088.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === doko [~doko___@dsl-084-059-075-088.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === chmj [~chmj@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain [11:24] doko: ping? [11:30] fabbione: pong [11:33] doko: how do i use gcc-snapshot? [11:33] should i just prefix my path with /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin ? [11:36] yes, that should do it. And the kernel build doesn't need any shared libs, so you don't need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH [11:36] ok [11:37] i am trying to reproduce the ice on ppc [11:48] doko: good news or bad news? [11:48] which one do you want first? [11:48] you can reproduce it, but you get a preprocessed source file? [11:50] doko: no.. after unionfs upgrade from this morning i cannot reproduce it anymore... [11:50] atleast on breezy-64 chroot [11:50] i am testing in the normal one [11:53] hmm, nice, or not nice? ;) [12:01] well it's nice because we can ship the driver [12:01] it's not nice because we don't know if it is a code change that fixed it or something in recent gcc [12:01] you did test with 3.4 or 4.0? [12:01] 3.4 [12:01] but i did do a normal test without using gcc-snapshot [12:01] so i guess it's the code in unionfs to be changed and doesn't trigger the ice anymore === lamont [~lamont@15.238.5.126] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === Seveaz [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === jbailey [~jbailey@modemcable139.249-203-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain [08:54] doko: Around> [09:03] jb-support: yes :-) [09:06] *lol* [09:06] Bah, you just want me to be nice to you ;) [09:06] I think I figured out how to morgue worked enough to find an old copy of gcc-3.4 anyway. [09:07] Yup, Just made a 64 bit binary that works, woohoo [09:09] Should I call the package libc6-amd64 ? [09:09] And the matching libc6-dev-amd64 [09:12] yes, sounds ok. although I hate the naming ... but it's consistent with the other ones [09:12] btw, the debian gcc-3.4 versions are still biarch, so these should work as well [09:12] Cool. [09:13] jbailey: will you sort it out tonight with infinity or lamont? [09:13] doko: I'm going to try to put together a glibc and gcc-3.4 package now that they can use. [09:17] ok, I uploaded a new 3.4 today, which FTBFS on i386. I'll send you a patch later today [09:29] Cool, thanks. [09:29] I'll also post the biarch glibc on people as soon as I have it. [09:31] ok, then maybe we can merge the changes into one gcc-3.4 upload, which laminity can use [09:31] *G*! [09:36] hmm, when do you plan the glibc uploads/builds? still Monday? === lamont ph3ars [09:43] doko: Subject to the availability of Lamont or Adam, that sounds right. [09:43] Unless one of them was bored this weekend. [09:44] doko: What I'd like to do is hand them .deb's and sources and say "Install these debs. Rebuild them with their matching sources. Stuff the new binaries into the archive" [09:44] That way it can be done at their convenience. [09:44] lamont: Assuming I've got the steps right, yes? [09:47] jabiley: yes, that sounds fine. do you prepare both biarch builds (i386 and amd64)? [09:56] jbailey: works for me. [09:56] I'm off to a birthday party at Renn Faire all day tomorrow, but we should be able to schedule something in... [09:57] is this just i386 we're doing funky bootstrapping stuff on, or is it more than just the one? [09:57] back in a fdew [10:03] lamont: Just i386 for this round. [10:03] The i386-libs has a whole pile of crack in it that I'm not sure what the right answer to it is. [10:03] Or even how much people on amd64 actually care about producing i386 binaries yet. [10:08] jbailey: grub needs it [10:09] jbailey: yeah, what doko said. grub is a 32-bit executable on amd64 [10:10] Ah, interesting. [10:13] Ouch: [10:13] checking build system type... i486-pc-linux-gnu [10:13] checking host system type... powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu === jbailey fixes the pasto [10:17] dude - that's serious multiarch [10:17] ahaha [10:19] ccache sucks [10:19] cache hit 296 [10:19] cache miss 12401 [10:19] that or kernel option hacking sucks [10:19] the latter [10:19] the latter makes the former suck [10:22] i agree [10:22] that's why i tend to build with -j200 [10:22] it scrolls faster and it looks that is compiling much more [10:31] jbailey: to your knowledge.. how difficult it is to setup a cross compiler? [10:32] fabbione: get Dan Kegel's crosstools [10:33] fabbione: I don't have any troubles, but Dan's crosstools are supposed to be quite nice. [10:33] doko: is it packaged? [10:33] no, and the current cross build support in binutils/gcc-4.0 is a bit broken [10:35] doko: Do you think Lamont would kill us if we built cross compilers for every arch on every arch? [10:36] jbailey: so the build deps are: amd64-libs-dev [i386] , i386-build-deps [amd64] ? [10:36] jbailey: he doesn't have that many machines ... [10:36] actually i am only curious to try to build sparc and m68k on i386 [10:38] but given that's broken i don't think i am going to spend time on it this night [10:39] you start feeling bored during your vacations from the first day? :-P [10:39] it's not even his first day yet. [10:39] Like a Heroin addict... =) [10:39] ahaha [10:39] MUST HACK [10:39] unfortunatly my evening has been ruined [10:40] so better to hack than do nothing [10:40] /msg fabbione I told you bringing out the goat would be a mistake. [10:40] ahahhaaha === warthylog [~warthylog@port49.ds1-van.adsl.cybercity.dk] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === Topic for #ubuntu-toolchain: GNU Compiler Collection, Glibc, Binutils, Linux-kernel-headers | GLIBC Todo: i386 biarch, C++ ABI change: completed in main, some universe work left === Topic (#ubuntu-toolchain): set by jbailey_ at Mon Jul 11 13:43:35 2005