[04:10] <lamont> vim is ftbfs... sys/time.h and time.h exist is the immediate cause
[05:15] <lamont> ./normal >normal.dist
[05:15] <lamont> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x00021050 ***
[05:15] <lamont> jbailey: iproute is still busted...
[05:38] <fabbione> morning
[06:34] <lamont> i386 0.910521
[06:34] <lamont> powerpc 0.904475
[06:34] <lamont> amd64 0.898227
[06:34] <lamont> ia64 0.894112
[06:34] <lamont> sparc 0.758345
[06:34] <lamont> hppa 0.732369
[06:34] <lamont> fabbione: closing in on you.. :)
[06:34] <fabbione> lamont: i know :(
[06:34] <fabbione> i have all of GNOME FTBFS
[06:35] <fabbione> and i still need to check the c++ abi transition in universe
[06:35] <fabbione> that means i have 600 pkgs still in not-for-us
[06:35] <lamont> 162 packages more to tie.. :-)
[06:35] <fabbione> and my second buildd died again!
[06:35] <fabbione> hell
[06:35] <fabbione> so it's hw problem...
[06:35] <fabbione> tested 3 kernels on it
[06:36] <lamont> yeah - hppa has it a bit easier on c++ transition - if I limit the buildd to just breezy packages, then it'll only build transitioned stuff...
[06:36] <fabbione> yeah i know
[06:36] <fabbione> i am pretty sure i did transition everything
[06:36] <fabbione> but i need to double check
[06:38] <fabbione> hey desrt
[06:38] <desrt> you're bad at taking vacation, dude :P
[06:38] <fabbione> no! i have a wife that forgets to turn off the alarm clock at 5:30!
[06:38] <fabbione> she can fall asleep again
[06:38] <fabbione> i can't
[06:42] <desrt> ah
[06:42] <desrt> and too early to start housework, i suppose
[06:43] <fabbione> she is sleeping.. i am not supposed to make noise :)
[06:43] <desrt> i see :)
[06:43] <desrt> irc is a good way to do that
[06:43] <desrt> have you seen the frogpad?
[06:44] <fabbione> frogpad?
[06:44] <desrt> one-handed keyboard
[06:44] <desrt> i'm thinking of buying one (or two)
[06:44] <fabbione> no i am actually completing a distupgrade on the first (slowest) of the 2 amigas i have
[06:45] <desrt> amiga?
[06:45] <desrt> what arch?
[06:45] <fabbione> but i am having some timeout issues with the mirror
[06:45] <fabbione> amiga = m68k
[06:45] <desrt> debian?
[06:45] <fabbione> yes
[06:46] <desrt> brb.  testing gdm changes
[06:50] <fabbione> AH CRAP
[06:50] <fabbione> one of the routers on the way is having pkt loss
[07:00] <desrt> there we go
[07:02] <fabbione> nope.. too much pkt loss
[07:03] <fabbione>  7  pos5-0.2488M.bynxg1.ip.tele.dk (80.63.80.101)  202.106 ms * *
[07:03] <fabbione> yeah
[07:06] <desrt> no.. not packet loss
[07:07] <desrt> that host just has a "one ping packet per ip per day" policy :)
[07:08] <fabbione> desrt: not to disappoint you, but remember that ppc is a processor born on top of m68k :)
[07:08] <fabbione> respect for the grandaddy of your machines ;)
[07:08] <desrt> boring :P
[07:08] <fabbione> it's fun...
[07:14] <fabbione> desrt: + there are some benefits in keeping these arches around
[07:14] <fabbione> because they are still used for a bunch of embedded devices
[07:14] <desrt> ah ya.. i suppose that's true
[07:15] <fabbione> if you remember.. not too long ago, NASA was searching 8086 on ebay to replace some parts for the shuttle :)
[07:15] <desrt> i don't remember that
[07:15] <desrt> that's cool, though :)
[07:15] <desrt> well.. i mean
[07:16] <fabbione> there are several reasons to use old processors
[07:16] <desrt> 8086 elss cool than m68k
[07:16] <desrt> but whatever :)
[07:16] <fabbione> they are very well known
[07:16] <fabbione> super tested
[07:18] <fabbione> actually m68k >> 8086 :)
[07:18] <fabbione> m68k has always been faster than 8086
[07:18] <fabbione> up to 68080 that was more or less a pentium 120 or 150 in terms of performances 
[07:58] <desrt> well ya
[07:58] <desrt> * > x86 in bang-per-mhz
[07:00] <doko> well, it builds the cross compiler as well
[07:01] <doko> lamont__, lamont, fabbione: you may not want to build the following uploads for sparc and hppa, until the i386/amd64 biarch integration is done
[07:04] <lamont__> doko: true.
[07:05] <lamont__> that does slow it down
[07:06] <jbailey> doko: there/
[07:06] <jbailey> ?
[07:06] <lamont__> jbailey: fwiw, iptables still hates hppa
[07:06] <doko> * lamont__ mutters about gcc-3.4 being 7 hours into its build on hppa
 well, it builds the cross compiler as well
 lamont__, lamont, fabbione: you may not want to build the following uploads for sparc and hppa, until the i386/amd64 biarch integration is done
[07:06] <doko> * lamont__ waits for the list...
[07:06] <doko> yes
[07:06] <jbailey> lamont__: Joy.  rsync'ing logs to somewhere I can see them yet?
[07:06] <lamont__> doko: the following gcc-3.4 uploads?
[07:06] <lamont__> jbailey: still blocked
[07:07] <jbailey> Yar.
[07:07] <doko> lamont__: yes
[07:07] <lamont__> elmo: logs@buildd.u.c ready for me yet?  eta?
[07:07] <lamont__> doko: will there be -4.0 uploads too?
[07:07] <doko> yes
[07:07] <lamont__> and should I just kill the 3.4 build?
[07:08] <lamont__> doko: so you're recommending not building gcc-* until you say so?
[07:08] <doko> depends on jbailey 
[07:08] <lamont__> what about glibc
[07:08] <doko> yep, maybe stop that as well
[07:09] <lamont__> jbailey:
[07:09] <lamont__> ./normal >normal.dist
[07:09] <lamont__> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x00021050 ***
[07:09] <lamont__> /bin/sh: line 1:  5737 Aborted                 ./normal >normal.dist
[07:09] <lamont__> :-(
[07:10] <jbailey> Is that iptables?
[07:10] <jbailey> (I don't know where ./normal might come from...)
[07:12] <lamont__> iptables
[07:12] <lamont__> do.
[07:12] <lamont__> iproute
[07:12] <lamont__> my bad. :-(
[07:13] <jbailey> And only dying on hppa? =(
[07:15] <lamont__> of course
[07:16] <lamont__> :-(
[07:16] <lamont__> the rest of the log is pretty uninteresting, if that helps...
[07:16] <jbailey> No, it'll mostly be feeding that address into gdb and figuring out what thedouble free is.
[07:16] <jbailey> Probably some define missing for you guys.
[07:17] <jbailey> BTW, libc6-{dev-}amd64 should be ready today.  It all worked well, except that it hardcoded /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64.
[08:24] <lamont__> jbailey: btw, any progress on palo?  I told bame I'd make it good, and then you wanted to play so I didn't do anything, and he should be back soon...
[11:02] <jbailey> Ugh,  INTERP on amd64 seems to be allowed to be either /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 or /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2