=== mdz [~mdz@ca-studio-bsr1o-251.vnnyca.adelphia.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[03:36] <infinity> lamont : Ignore my ppc64 stuff, BTW.  After some digging, it seems it was fixed in a different way in 2.6.12, but since we don't have a "real" 2.6.12 on any machines (davis is running a pre-release without the fixes), I assumed it was broken.  Yay.
[03:39] <lamont-away> woot
[03:39] <lamont-away> reminds me, I need to see how the builds went
[03:40] <infinity> This also means that, as soon as elmo is awake again, I'm going to push him to get shiny new kernels on davis and at least one buildd, with an eye to having ppc64 kernels on all the buildds within the week.
[03:40] <infinity> \o/
=== Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== lamont-away decides to spend his waiting-for-i386-to-build time watching a movie in the other room.  back in 1.5-2 hours or so.
=== mdz [~mdz@ca-studio-bsr1o-251.vnnyca.adelphia.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== crimsun [~crimsun@sh.nu]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== lamont glares at zul, drops the ide patches for -6.7
[05:48] <infinity> lamont : My amd64 machine appears ot love the -6.7 build you had on corcordia.
[05:49] <infinity> concordia, too.
[05:49] <lamont> thanks.
[05:49] <infinity> Likes it better than hoary's kernel, I'd say.
[05:49] <lamont> ia64 hung after finding the ide drive. no remote reset ability, so I'll have to finish that test up in the morning
[05:49] <infinity> And powernowd now works, which is nice.
[05:50] <infinity> If there's any hope of my laptop liking the i386 kernels, I'll be i heaven.
[05:50] <infinity> in heaven, too.
[05:50] <infinity> Right now, I can't suspend to ram OR disk.  My laptop's thpethul.
[05:50] <infinity> Thank god it's really fast, and boots faster than most people can resume.
=== lamont tries just commenting out the lba patch
[06:01] <lamont> infinity: i386 build is now working on the last linux-image deb, so it should be done semi-soon.. same directory on concordia
=== infinity waits.
[06:28] <fabbione> morning guys
[06:29] <fabbione> what did we break today?
[06:29] <fabbione> it's a wonderful rainy day in dk to break stuff :)
[06:30] <infinity> -6.7 seems to like my laptop at least as well as -6.6 did..
[06:32] <infinity> suspend/resume is still broken, but it was before, so that's not big deal.
[06:32] <infinity> I'll irritate mjg59 until he fixes it.
[06:36] <fabbione> did you already upload 6.7?
=== mdz [~mdz@ca-studio-bsr1o-251.vnnyca.adelphia.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[07:01] <lamont> fabbione: no.  and I have one ia64 test to do in the morning that may change what's there 
[07:01] <desrt> fabbione; http://manic.desrt.ca/cluster/
[07:01] <lamont> and no, I haven't actually committed what I just built on davis/concordia/halley
[07:01] <desrt> fabbione; gorecki is 2nd from the right when viewed from the front.  copacetic is far left :)
[07:02] <lamont> I added zul's stuff, and ia64 doesn't boot for me...  Sadly, no remot console, so I'll finish that up in the morning, and then we're good
[07:02] <fabbione> lamont: ok :) no rush.. i was just curious
[07:02] <lamont> good news was no abi change
[07:02] <fabbione> desrt: eheh looking :)
[07:03] <fabbione> lamont: what did zul add?
[07:03] <fabbione> are you sure it didn't pull in again the PRINTK thingy?
[07:04] <desrt> fabbione; and a question -- do you know of any way to get a per-filesystem dirty buffer count out of the kernel?
[07:04] <fabbione> desrt: hmm no...
[07:04] <lamont> fabbione: let me spew change log at you
[07:04] <fabbione> lamont: sure
[07:06] <fabbione> hmmm
[07:07] <fabbione> drivers-ide-disk_fixe_lba_handling.  ide-generica-all drivers-ide-pci-generic_allow_capture_unsuported.dpatch
[07:07] <fabbione> full of typos...
[07:08] <fabbione> but these patches look rather intrusive
[07:11] <lamont> fabbione: if you want to upload what's currently committed to the preX,7 branch, I'm good with that...
[07:12] <lamont> I'll even do the upload, if you tell me to...
[07:12] <lamont> fabbione: but I would _dearly_ love it if you could remember how you fixed librsvg2/sparc sometime soon...
=== lamont notices .orig files in the patches, too.  sihg
[07:14] <fabbione> lamont: please upload 6.7 with what is committed now to get ia64 booting again
[07:14] <lamont> fabbione: roger
[07:14] <fabbione> i don't like that many patches going in
[07:14] <fabbione> specially the IDE one from Fedora
[07:15] <fabbione> because Alan did push it, but i haven't see it mainline yet
[07:16] <fabbione> desrt: nice toys :)
[07:16] <fabbione> send me one :P
[07:16] <desrt> the best i can do is restore your shell account :P
[07:16] <lamont> fabbione: you want to do the rest of the baz dance, or shall I do it in several hours when I'm awake?
[07:16] <fabbione> desrt: the one i have access to is faster :P
[07:17] <desrt> jerk :P
[07:17] <desrt> how fast?
[07:17] <fabbione> lamont: i will be probably painting later
[07:17] <lamont> ok.
[07:17] <fabbione> lamont: i am only waiting for everybody to wake up before starting the works outside
[07:17] <fabbione> lamont: baz dance is 3 steps...
[07:17] <fabbione> merge pre into mainline
[07:17] <fabbione> branch mainline to tag
=== ..[topic/#ubuntu-kernel:lamont] :  Ubuntu kernel development discussion ONLY | http://www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/KernelTeam | There are no kernel bugs.. only broken hardware | http://people.u.c/~lamont/Archives/kernel-team@ubuntu.com--2005/ playground: kernel-debian--preX,8--2.6.12, once it's created - please do not commit to preX,7 kthxbye
[07:17] <fabbione> branch mainline to new pre
[07:18] <lamont> ok, ok, ok.  doing it now
[07:18] <fabbione> after that there is a neat startnewrelease target in debian/rules
[07:18] <lamont> note that baz hurts my bandwidth
[07:18] <fabbione> that will do most of the stuff to open 6.8
[07:18] <fabbione> oh if that's the problem  i can do it
[07:19] <lamont> if you could, I'd owe you yet another beer
[07:19] <fabbione> lamont: ok i will do it
=== lamont is tired and rushed right now...
[07:20] <fabbione> lamont: do you also want me to upload?
[07:20] <lamont> sure
[07:20] <lamont> hrmpf.  not sure if my commit changing the release to 'breezy' took...
[07:20] <lamont> of you're not messing with it, I'll clean that up on preX,7
[07:20] <fabbione> lamont: no problem. i am doing it
[07:20] <lamont> ok.  /me steps back and lets fabbione drive
=== fabbione grrr's at binutils still broken on sparc
[07:27] <lamont> h
[07:27] <lamont> g'night then
[07:32] <fabbione> good night lamont
=== ..[topic/#ubuntu-kernel:fabbione] : Ubuntu kernel development discussion ONLY | http://www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/KernelTeam | There are no kernel bugs.. only broken hardware | http://people.u.c/~lamont/Archives/kernel-team@ubuntu.com--2005/ playground: kernel-debian--preX,8--2.6.12
[08:00] <fabbione> lamont-away: 6.7 is up
[08:00] <fabbione> and i am off
=== fabbione &
=== JaneW [~JaneW@wbs-146-169-90.telkomadsl.co.za]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== chmj [~chmj@196.36.161.235]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== JaneW [~JaneW@wbs-146-169-90.telkomadsl.co.za]  has left #ubuntu-kernel ["Bye"] 
=== chmj [~chmj@196.36.161.235]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== zul [~chuck@CPE0006258ec6c2-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[02:32] <zul> hey
[03:09] <zul> hmm...seems to be just me in my group today
[03:11] <chmj> hey chuck 
[03:21] <zul> hey chmj 
=== lamont [~lamont@15.238.5.30]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== JaneW [~JaneW@wbs-146-184-247.telkomadsl.co.za]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== JaneW [~JaneW@wbs-146-184-247.telkomadsl.co.za]  has left #ubuntu-kernel ["Bye"] 
[05:32] <lamont> hrm.. is it acpi=no, or 'noacpi'
[05:44] <zul> just a sec ill check
[05:46] <zul> pci=noacpi
[05:46] <zul> doh..
[05:47] <zul> acpi=off to disable ACPI
=== crimsun [~crimsun@sh.nu]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== doko_ [~doko___@dsl-084-059-071-048.arcor-ip.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== lamont grumbles
[07:14] <fabbione> hey lamont
[07:15] <lamont> -6.7 hangs.  feh
=== lamont did his testing on -4, so there's something in the 5 or 6 abi change that is bad juju for ia64
[07:16] <fabbione> you joking right?
[07:16] <fabbione> did you test on the latest code?
[07:16] <fabbione> didn't.. even
[07:16] <lamont> I thought I had
[07:17] <lamont> that was going to be this morning's test.
=== lamont diffs
[07:17] <lamont> -6.7 identifies the ide devices, and then never prints the disk model name
=== lamont hangs his head.
[07:17] <fabbione> bad initrd?
[07:18] <lamont> OTOH, PRINTK_TIME is known to be fatal.
[07:18] <lamont> could be initrd, but I don't think so...
[07:18] <jbailey> fabbione: Aren't you on holidays?
[07:18] <lamont> config diff shows ACPI_HOTKEY being new, and some USB/SQUASHFS changes
[07:18] <fabbione> jbailey: yes i am.. waiting for the shower to be free :)
[07:19] <fabbione> lamont: compare the 2 initrd module list
=== fabbione goes and take a shower
[07:34] <fabbione> later fellas
[07:35] <zul> toodles
[07:35] <zul> so it might not be my patch that messed up ia64?
[07:35] <zul> that would be ironic
[07:37] <lamont> zul: well, there _were_ other issues, too... :-)
[07:38] <zul> still :)
[07:40] <zul> ill fix those tonight then
[07:50] <lamont> hrm... reading changelog... wonder if I can get away with just dropping external-gloal-acpi_update-fixups
[07:51] <zul> just for ia64 right?
[07:52] <lamont> just for testing
[07:52] <zul> ah..i would think so
[07:54] <lamont> mjg59: then you have an even newer acpi cluster for me to play with?
[07:54] <lamont> 11 MB of baz diff... score!
[07:56] <lamont> and 10MB after stripping the {arch} cruft
=== lamont cries
[08:03] <lamont> zul: lets kick the content of your patches around on the mailing list or something before they go in as well, mk?
[08:04] <zul> mk
=== Seveaz [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== lamont reverts the acpi patches back to their -4.4 state, for his testing
[09:39] <zul> mjg59: /proc/acpi/button is back in 2.6.13
[09:49] <lamont> hrmpf.  acpi is tentatively acquitted
[10:02] <zul> going home
=== lamont pares the diff down to ~3.8MB
[10:51] <lamont> ipv6: value -6917529019037819368 out of IMM22 range
[10:51] <lamont> hehehe
[11:03] <mdz> lamont: l-r-m seems to be unhappy on ia64; is that normal?
[11:05] <lamont> dunno yet.... still fighting with the kernel on ia64