rather than [09:43] ok, I'll play a bit with it, see what happens [09:44] I also noticed all kioslaves index.docbooks are together in 1 directory [09:45] yeah, but I assume there's a way to do it outwith that [09:45] ask on #kde-docs if you get stuck [09:46] yup, ok, I'll do [09:47] did you see the uds_hidden.diff patch? [09:48] "I like the patch" from dfaure. that's a good sign :) [09:49] yeah that's what I thought too, certainly the "I commit it" part ;) [09:49] but I've to get it tested / test it first [09:50] how difficult is it to test it by myself? [09:51] is it backwards compatable somehow or will existing ioslaves suddenly show all files until they're modified to use uds_hidden? [09:51] backwards compatible [09:51] how does that work? [09:52] there's an isHidden() function. INstead of only looking at the dot, it now checks for the m_hidden member, [09:52] which can be Auto, Hide or Show [09:52] Auto is the default, if m_hidden == Auto it fall through to the dot-checking code [09:53] if UDS_HIDDEN is given m_hidden is set to Hide or Show depending on value in m_long of the UDSAtom [09:53] true = Hide, false = Show [09:53] so essentially UDS_HIDDEN overrides the dot or the absence thereof [09:53] clever clever [09:54] thanks. (I didn't feel like modifying all ioslaves :) [09:57] so, how difficult is it to test it by myself (= compiling KDE I suppose?). [10:08] not tricky, just time consuming [10:08] hmm ok, how long do you estimate compile time on an 800 MHz Amd Duron? [10:08] get kdelibs 3.5 branch from SVN [10:08] couple of hours? [10:09] writing a patch without testing it :) that's pretty impressive [10:09] ok that's not too bad [10:10] well writing it not me thinks, rather writing a patch without testing, which has no bugs at all when finally tested ;) [10:11] I'll test tomorrow, my PC is too noisy to keep it on while sleeping [10:12] for more pretty output use unsermake -p [10:12] that has a little % indicator [10:12] that's cool [10:13] very [10:15] Riddell: a new kio-locate release should be finished before 11th isn't it? [10:16] or are you delaying kubuntu release if KDE 3.5 is not yet released? [10:16] http://jrepin.blogspot.com/2005/07/jlps-kde-35-previews-part-1.html [10:16] amazing screens [10:16] from kde 3.5 [10:17] 11th is feature freeze, but kio-slave is still in universe [10:17] "Stability of this prebeta version is very good." [10:17] I should hassle the authorities to get it into main before then [10:18] tvo: no, we can't delay breezy alas [10:18] but 3.5 should be in backports [10:19] if Mez agrees :) [10:19] ok, was just checking.. [10:22] yeah, it's a shame === allee [~ach@dialin-212-144-131-208.arcor-ip.net] has joined #kubuntu-devel [10:31] Riddell, if you can help me make it possible for both [10:33] without the C++ transition it should be a lot easier === seth_k [~seth@24-117-104-21.cpe.cableone.net] has joined #kubuntu-devel === seth_k [~seth@24-117-104-21.cpe.cableone.net] has joined #kubuntu-devel [11:15] Riddell, yes, but - are you on about bp'ing to hoary or breezy