| lamont | mdz: there exists a slight chance that we'll make :33 | 12:17 |
|---|---|---|
| lamont | (i386 kernel that is) | 12:17 |
| lamont | yeah, the chroot was unhappy. removing a few dozen packages made it happy again | 12:17 |
| mdz | it's there for :03 at least | 01:01 |
| lamont | mjg59: you around? | 01:03 |
| lamont | mdz: for everyone but ia64, which is working on #3 of 4. :( | 01:05 |
| lamont | but, of course, it doesn't matter, since -6.8 won't boot on ia64 anyway | 01:07 |
| === doko_ [~doko___@dsl-084-059-068-243.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === karlheg [~karlheg@host-250-237.resnet.pdx.edu] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === fs [fs@213.178.77.98] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === Seveas [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === Seveaz [~seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| mjg59 | lamont: Hello? | 05:34 |
| lamont | got a more recent acpi patch for me? | 05:35 |
| lamont | the one in -6.7 gives me my choice of hanging early or hanging earlier | 05:35 |
| lamont | ia64 | 05:35 |
| lamont | my next try is to just rip acpi back to the the kernel.org 2.6.12 and see if even that works | 05:36 |
| lamont | there may also be config file options I could turn off again | 05:47 |
| lamont | although, of course, disabiling acpi completely is a non-option | 05:47 |
| mjg59 | lamont: Not right now, but I can do | 05:59 |
| lamont | thanks muchly | 06:01 |
| === jbailey [~jbailey@modemcable139.249-203-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| jbailey | Might be some new breakage in the -6.7 kernel. When I booted my ppc64 box this morning, it started loading X and suddenly rebooted. | 06:45 |
| jbailey | Hasn't recurred, though. | 06:45 |
| === dmk [~dmk@host81-156-25-86.range81-156.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| === jimpanic [~jimmy@chello080109082145.3.15.vie.surfer.at] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
| jimpanic | uuhm...stupid question: does the amd64-version of ubuntu run in long-mode or only in protected-mode? | 07:05 |
| jimpanic | too stupid to answer it, eh? ;) | 07:10 |
| jbailey | Most of us are probably elsewhere, it's a lovely day out. | 07:15 |
| jbailey | If I understand the question right, it runs in long mode. | 07:15 |
| jbailey | The amd64 port is a pure native port. | 07:15 |
| jimpanic | thank you :) | 07:17 |
| jbailey | jimpanic: No prob. I'm fairly new to amd64, so I hope that's what you need. =) | 07:19 |
| jimpanic | protected-mode -> 32bit; long-mode -> 64bit | 07:24 |
| jimpanic | was just wondering if all the programs are ported or if they`re able to run in long-mode(64)..or if the kernel only runs in protected-mode(32). | 07:25 |
| jbailey | No, the userspace is all in long mode. | 07:26 |
| jimpanic | that`s nice! | 07:27 |
| jbailey | You can opt to run a 32 bit userspace on a 64bit kernel, but it's not that common. | 07:27 |
| jimpanic | of course, but do the 32bit-binaries natively run in long-mode? | 07:28 |
| jbailey | No, the kernel is capable of setting up the environment for both. | 07:30 |
| jimpanic | ok, thanks :) | 07:31 |
| jbailey | anytime. | 07:32 |
| lamont | -6.8 builds on hppa | 09:22 |
| lamont | in only 3 hours. :-( | 09:22 |
| jbailey | lamont: Surely HP has a spare superdome they can loan you... =) | 09:37 |
| lamont | heh | 10:37 |
| === lamont [~lamont@mix.mmjgroup.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!