/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2005/08/19/#ubuntu-kernel.txt

fabbioneMithrandir: there is very little point in adding modules to kernel-wedge.07:40
fabbioneif you need to ship modules, you need to do it directly from the kernel.07:40
fabbionewe removed the "lists" dependencies between kernel and kernel-wedge07:40
Mithrandirfabbione: how do I do that?  I didn't see a way.09:34
fabbioneMithrandir: debian/d-i/09:35
fabbionethere is shared/ that has the same meaning as adding a module to kernel-wedge09:36
fabbionethe trick is in what you include in the unionfs-modules per arch09:36
fabbioneinstead of <unionfs>09:36
fabbionethat would be "shared/unionfs"09:36
fabbionebut if unionfs udebs are required, just remind me on monday09:37
fabbionei need to unfuck the baz repo first09:37
fabbioneand open proper devel branch first09:37
MithrandirI did that, but kernel-wedge gen-control didn't output anything about unionfs-modukes09:37
Mithrandirmodules, even09:37
fabbioneMithrandir: you still need to tell that you want the module in a per arch specific way09:37
fabbioneand note that kernel-wedge is stupid09:38
Mithrandiryes, but gen-control needs to have a description and so on, that seems to go into kernel-wedge.09:38
fabbioneif you check the debian/rules, you will see that we copy the info in another dir to make them available to kernel-wedge09:38
fabbioneMithrandir: you can always override it locally09:38
Mithrandirhow?09:38
fabbioneanyway did you commit anything about this into baz?09:39
Mithrandirnot yet09:39
fabbioneif so in which branch??09:39
fabbioneojk09:39
fabbioneok09:39
Mithrandiroverriding where modules goes (per arch) is easy, but you can't _add_ modules without touching kernel-wedge, or at least it seems that way to me.09:39
fabbioneMithrandir: debian/d-i/$arch/package-list iirc or very similar09:39
fabbioneMithrandir: nah.. we override all the lists of modules from kernel-wedge09:40
fabbioneanyway, don't worry..09:40
fabbionewe will look at it tomorrow after i get a proper baz branch and stuff09:40
fabbionesunday.. last day of holidays :)09:40
Mithrandirshouldn't there be a description too in the package-list?09:41
Mithrandirand shouldn't there be a shared/package-list too?09:42
fabbioneMithrandir: description can be added to arch/packages-list09:44
fabbioneshared/package-list is not taken into account afaik09:44
fabbionelast time i did check kernel-wedge code it only use the global provided by kernel-wedge and per arch specific one09:44
Mithrandirok09:47
=== Seveas [n=seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== doko_ [n=doko___@dsl-084-059-095-057.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c2-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
zulhey05:06
zulfabbione: are you around?05:17
=== Seveaz [n=seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== mdke [n=matt@unaffiliated/mdke] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== mdke [n=matt@unaffiliated/mdke] has left #ubuntu-kernel []
=== Diablo-D3 [i=diablo@65.99.190.76] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
Diablo-D3<Diablo-D3> /boot/config-2.6.10-5-k7:CONFIG_PREEMPT=y09:57
Diablo-D3<Diablo-D3> /boot/config-2.6.12-6-k7:# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set09:57
Diablo-D3<Diablo-D3> so... preempt has been turned off in later packages?09:57
mdzDiablo-D3: you seem to have answered your own question before asking it :-)10:18
=== mxpxpod [n=bryan@unaffiliated/mxpxpod] has joined #ubuntu-kernel
Diablo-D3mdz: hrm?11:18
Diablo-D3thats the question Im asking, btw11:18
Diablo-D3I dont know whats really goind on11:18
mdzDiablo-D3: you answered it already11:18
mdzin 2.6.10-5-k7, CONFIG_PREEMPT=y, and in 2.6.12-6-k7, CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set11:18
Diablo-D3mdz: but that doesnt mean 2.6.12 doesnt have preempt11:19
Diablo-D3say, if, preempt is default in 2.6.1211:19
mdzthe default is irrelevant; if it is not set, then it is not enabled11:19
Diablo-D3why?11:20
=== Diablo-D3 doesnt exactly know how kernel makefiles work
Diablo-D3#ubuntu-laptop is open for buisness11:38

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!