[08:27] <elmo> lamont/infinity: still missing powerpc daily d-i
[08:33] <lamont> will check shortly
[10:03] <doko> jbailey: do you have any outstanding changes for gcc-4.0 ?
[10:03] <jbailey> doko: I don't think so.
[10:03] <jbailey> doko: I'm just looking at the glibc packaging for putting the include files in the right place.
[10:03] <jbailey> I don't think it affects youin any way, though.
[10:04] <doko> ok, just have to make an update due to the libcairo upload
[10:04] <jbailey> Actually.
[10:04] <jbailey> Hmm
[10:04] <jbailey> Oh cool, /usr/include/GNU-TRIPLE works on ppc too
[10:04] <jbailey> Nice. =)
[10:04] <jbailey> I should undo my linux-kernel-header wrappers and just drop those in their various directories.
[10:06] <doko> yes, I have to backport that to 3.4
[10:07] <jbailey> Have you thought of the default gcc for 6.04, btw?
[10:09] <doko> ENOTIME
[10:10] <doko> it's difficult, assume that it's released in Sep/Oct, then we won't have a .1 release for 6.04
[10:10] <jbailey> I was more thinking about all the Java work that's gone into 4.1
[10:11] <doko> even now, we have five or six wrong-codegen fixes not in the gcc, which are already in cvs
[10:11] <fabbione> doko: speaking of which.. the gcc ice on sparc?
[10:11] <fabbione> for mysql-*?
[10:12] <fabbione> i did send you all the info a looong time ago...
[10:12] <doko> fabbione: use -O2
[10:13] <fabbione> doko: so i need to do a port upload..
[10:13] <fabbione> of a package because gcc is broken?
[10:15] <doko> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23454
[10:18] <doko> fabbione: or use gcc-3.4
[10:19] <jbailey> fabbione: You're not doing kernel anymore, right?  That should leave you lots of time for gcc hacking. =)
[10:21] <fabbione> jbailey: no
[10:21] <fabbione> no way i will start to poke gcc
[10:22] <doko> fabbione: fix binutils ;-)
[10:22] <doko> for spaaarc
[10:23] <fabbione> doko: did the fix made upstream?
[10:25] <doko> I didn't check
[10:25] <fabbione> doko: tsk...
[10:27] <doko> heh, its a spaaaaarc ;-)
[10:34] <doko> fabbione looks moped
[11:56] <lamont> doko: if you get bored, you could look at why cfdisk was segfaulting unless built -O1... (#323463, aka ubuntu #13486) - I'm blaming gcc