jbailey | I was checking out the gcc-4.0 ftbfs that filed in Debian. | 12:03 |
---|---|---|
doko | which one? | 12:04 |
jbailey | Making sure I could close it in Ubuntu when I discovered that it was ftbfs here. | 12:04 |
jbailey | http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13660 | 12:04 |
doko | ah, yes, that one should be fixed with the biarch include dirs? | 12:08 |
jbailey | I was hoping so, or that it didn't affect us at all (since we were able to build gcc-4.0 before just against the glibc) | 12:10 |
jbailey | But then I had that ftbfs. | 12:10 |
jbailey | So... =) | 12:10 |
doko | the 3.4 with biarch include dirs is in the archives. | 12:12 |
jbailey | Cool! | 12:34 |
=== lamont grumbles that doko did another gcc-3.3 upload, but didn't switch to expect-tk8.3 for hppa. | ||
=== ajmitch [n=ajmitch@203.89.166.146] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
=== doko [n=doko___@dsl-084-059-069-234.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
lamont-away | doko: fwiw, gcc-3.4's logwatch process never exits, until you kill it... :-( [hppa] | 09:10 |
=== lamont-away sleeps | ||
doko | lamont-away: but it does terminate for 4.0? | 09:16 |
lamont-away | dunno - I'll make a note of it next time there's a 4.0 upload | 09:19 |
doko | jbailey: the glibc build did fail on i386 ... | 09:19 |
lamont-away | doko: -9 or -10? | 09:20 |
doko | -9 | 09:21 |
lamont-away | (-9 is known/expected, -10 should build...) | 09:21 |
lamont-away | he was grumbling about it earlier | 09:21 |
doko | I don't see a -10 | 09:21 |
lamont-away | he was going to upload it sometime "soonish" | 09:21 |
lamont-away | -9 had missing build-depends, iirc | 09:21 |
lamont-away | but it's 0121, I should really crawl into bed | 09:21 |
doko | good night, really :) | 09:23 |
doko | jbailey: if you move around the headers in l-k-h, the headers for the default arch will stay where they are? | 09:24 |
jbailey | ROAR I hate sleeping alone in such a big place. Noises keep waking me up. | 10:09 |
jbailey | doko: I was testing that gcc-4.0 still built correctly with the new glibc and the build deps in a clean chroot while I was at it. | 10:10 |
=== jbailey uploads -10 now and then goes back to bed | ||
doko | heh, think you're in Montreal? | 10:12 |
jbailey | Err.. | 10:12 |
jbailey | Is this one of those twilight zone moments where you tell me that I'm really in another universe? | 10:12 |
doko | anyway, do you have a l-k-h package which I can test? | 10:13 |
doko | you didn't move from Toronto to some French province? | 10:13 |
jbailey | Yup. The province of Qubec, city of Montral. | 10:13 |
jbailey | Hey, I see that the massive failures in gcc-4 biarch went away except in Java and mudflap, cool. | 10:15 |
doko | we disabled mudflap for biarch | 10:17 |
jbailey | doko: But in Toronto we lived on the 11th floor surrounded by concrete. | 10:17 |
jbailey | And it was a 1-room appartment. | 10:17 |
jbailey | Here, there's 4 rooms, and it's woodframe. | 10:17 |
jbailey | So things creak and groan, and they're too far away to just look at from bed. | 10:17 |
doko | and libjava isn't built as well, so the failures are ok | 10:17 |
jbailey | I think what woke me up just now was the door to the outside storage swingning a bit (It's broken and needs to be repaired so that it will stay shut) | 10:18 |
jbailey | But I woke up basically to the sound of a door openning. | 10:18 |
jbailey | *sigh* | 10:18 |
jbailey | glibc ubuntu10 uploaded. | 10:19 |
doko | do you have a l-k-h for testing somewhere? | 10:19 |
doko | thanks | 10:19 |
jbailey | I don't. I was trying to decide if it's worth it for breezy, or if it's too featurish. | 10:20 |
jbailey | Right now it's setup the same way that ppc/ppc64, sparc/sparc64 and s390/s390x is. | 10:20 |
doko | if we want to build the libs from amd64-libs, it's needed | 10:20 |
jbailey | Why? I think the current biarch stuff should cover it | 10:20 |
doko | no, that' what drow did mention. | 10:21 |
doko | i.e. ncurses includes the wrong headers. wait ... | 10:21 |
jbailey | Debian's lkh is only vaguely related to Ubuntu's. =( | 10:21 |
jbailey | Lemme double check. | 10:22 |
jbailey | Oh, hmm, I'm on crack it seems. | 10:22 |
jbailey | I thought I had biarch'd i386 | 10:22 |
doko | ncurses in my home on chinstrap | 10:23 |
jbailey | Ah, I have done so. | 10:24 |
jbailey | Right. the asm directories, not the linux/ directory which is common. | 10:24 |
doko | shouldn't it be safe, if we just move the headers for the non-default arch to /usr/include/<arch> ? | 10:24 |
jbailey | It should be, but I think Matt considers those things to be features. | 10:25 |
jbailey | And it should be safe to do it the way it's already done, since that's how it's been for other biarchs in the Sarge release. | 10:25 |
doko | so we have to keep amd64-libs, but drop glibc from it? | 10:26 |
jbailey | No idea. I wouldn't have considered those features. | 10:26 |
doko | well, one goal was to remove at least amd64-libs | 10:27 |
=== Seveas [n=seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
=== doko [n=doko@dsl-084-059-069-234.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
=== doko [n=doko@dsl-084-059-069-234.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!