/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2005/08/25/#ubuntu-toolchain.txt

jbaileyI was checking out the gcc-4.0 ftbfs that filed in Debian.12:03
dokowhich one?12:04
jbaileyMaking sure I could close it in Ubuntu when I discovered that it was ftbfs here.12:04
jbaileyhttp://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366012:04
dokoah, yes, that one should be fixed with the biarch include dirs?12:08
jbaileyI was hoping so, or that it didn't affect us at all (since we were able to build gcc-4.0 before just against the glibc)12:10
jbaileyBut then I had that ftbfs.12:10
jbaileySo... =)12:10
dokothe 3.4 with biarch include dirs is in the archives. 12:12
jbaileyCool!12:34
=== lamont grumbles that doko did another gcc-3.3 upload, but didn't switch to expect-tk8.3 for hppa.
=== ajmitch [n=ajmitch@203.89.166.146] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== doko [n=doko___@dsl-084-059-069-234.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
lamont-awaydoko: fwiw, gcc-3.4's logwatch process never exits, until you kill it... :-( [hppa] 09:10
=== lamont-away sleeps
dokolamont-away: but it does terminate for 4.0?09:16
lamont-awaydunno - I'll make a note of it next time there's a 4.0 upload09:19
dokojbailey: the glibc build did fail on i386 ...09:19
lamont-awaydoko: -9 or -10?09:20
doko-909:21
lamont-away(-9 is known/expected, -10 should build...)09:21
lamont-awayhe was grumbling about it earlier09:21
dokoI don't see a -1009:21
lamont-awayhe was going to upload it sometime "soonish"09:21
lamont-away-9 had missing build-depends, iirc09:21
lamont-awaybut it's 0121, I should really crawl into bed09:21
dokogood night, really :)09:23
dokojbailey: if you move around the headers in l-k-h, the headers for the default arch will stay where they are?09:24
jbaileyROAR I hate sleeping alone in such a big place.  Noises keep waking me up.10:09
jbaileydoko: I was testing that gcc-4.0 still built correctly with the new glibc and the build deps in a clean chroot while I was at it.10:10
=== jbailey uploads -10 now and then goes back to bed
dokoheh, think you're in Montreal?10:12
jbaileyErr..10:12
jbaileyIs this one of those twilight zone moments where you tell me that I'm really in another universe?10:12
dokoanyway, do you have a l-k-h package which I can test?10:13
dokoyou didn't move from Toronto to some French province?10:13
jbaileyYup.  The province of Qubec, city of Montral.10:13
jbaileyHey, I see that the massive failures in gcc-4 biarch went away except in Java and mudflap, cool.10:15
dokowe disabled mudflap for biarch10:17
jbaileydoko: But in Toronto we lived on the 11th floor surrounded by concrete.10:17
jbaileyAnd it was a 1-room appartment.10:17
jbaileyHere, there's 4 rooms, and it's woodframe.10:17
jbaileySo things creak and groan, and they're too far away to just look at from bed.10:17
dokoand libjava isn't built as well, so the failures are ok10:17
jbaileyI think what woke me up just now was the door to the outside storage swingning a bit (It's broken and needs to be repaired so that it will stay shut)10:18
jbaileyBut I woke up basically to the sound of a door openning.10:18
jbailey*sigh*10:18
jbaileyglibc ubuntu10 uploaded.10:19
dokodo you have a l-k-h for testing somewhere?10:19
dokothanks10:19
jbaileyI don't.  I was trying to decide if it's worth it for breezy, or if it's too featurish.10:20
jbaileyRight now it's setup the same way that ppc/ppc64, sparc/sparc64 and s390/s390x is.10:20
dokoif we want to build the libs from amd64-libs, it's needed10:20
jbaileyWhy?  I think the current biarch stuff should cover it10:20
dokono, that' what drow did mention.10:21
dokoi.e. ncurses includes the wrong headers. wait ...10:21
jbaileyDebian's lkh is only vaguely related to Ubuntu's. =(10:21
jbaileyLemme double check.10:22
jbaileyOh, hmm, I'm on crack it seems.10:22
jbaileyI thought I had biarch'd i38610:22
dokoncurses in my home on chinstrap10:23
jbaileyAh, I have done so.10:24
jbaileyRight.  the asm directories, not the linux/ directory which is common.10:24
dokoshouldn't it be safe, if we just move the headers for the non-default arch to /usr/include/<arch> ?10:24
jbaileyIt should be, but I think Matt considers those things to be features.10:25
jbaileyAnd it should be safe to do it the way it's already done, since that's how it's been for other biarchs in the Sarge release.10:25
dokoso we have to keep amd64-libs, but drop glibc from it?10:26
jbaileyNo idea.  I wouldn't have considered those features.10:26
dokowell, one goal was to remove at least amd64-libs10:27
=== Seveas [n=seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== doko [n=doko@dsl-084-059-069-234.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== doko [n=doko@dsl-084-059-069-234.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!