[12:54] when i boot my amd64 box with the breezy 2.6.12 kernel i get a 'can't find libc.so.6' error. in order to fix it, i have to mount the initrd.img, cp -a the contents, mv the libs from lib64 to lib, and mkcramfs a new initrd. Is this a known issue? === Mez [n=Mez@cpc3-lich4-3-0-cust227.brhm.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Mez [n=Mez@cpc3-lich4-3-0-cust227.brhm.cable.ntl.com] has left #ubuntu-kernel ["Leaving"] === BenC [n=bcollins@ip68-107-227-12.hr.hr.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === mxpxpod [n=bryan@unaffiliated/mxpxpod] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [02:40] lamont: ping [02:45] mxpxpod: si? [02:45] lamont: if you grab svn of linux-wlan-ng, they're at final [02:46] uh, ok. === lamont hasn't been working that angle of things much === rtcm [n=jman@217.129.142.72] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === mxpxpod [n=bryan@unaffiliated/mxpxpod] has left #ubuntu-kernel ["Leaving"] === smurfix [n=smurf@debian/developer/smurf] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Mez [n=Mez@cpc3-lich4-3-0-cust227.brhm.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [04:01] erm... It may just be me... but ... [04:01] the bt878 kernel module is broke === BenC [n=bcollins@ip68-107-227-12.hr.hr.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [04:45] mdz: what's the policy on arch-specific-for-SCC packages required main packages (but only for SCC)? (e.g. gcc-hppa64) [04:45] er, gcc-3.4-hppa64 [04:45] palo [04:45] libgcc2 === doko_ [n=doko@dsl-084-059-069-204.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === calc [n=ccheney@ip70-185-4-246.ma.dl.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === doko__ [n=doko@dsl-084-059-071-032.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [06:21] morning === BenC [n=bcollins@ip68-107-227-12.hr.hr.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [08:05] lamont: parse error? === Seveas [n=seveas@dyn127.roaming.few.vu.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [08:50] mdz: e.g., linux-source-2.6.12 build-depends: ..., gcc-3.4-hppa64 [hppa] , ... [08:50] should gcc-3.4-hppa be promoted to main, or does it suck to be SCC architecture? [08:51] there are other packages which should probably be main as well. [08:51] lamont: just looking at the string "gcc-3.4-hppa" makes me CRINGE [08:51] it's a cross-compiler [08:51] generates 64-bit hppa code (so that you can have a 64-bit kernel for those machines that support and/or require it. [08:51] to date, that binary is only built on hppa (32-bit user space) [08:52] problem is that germinate doesn't look at non-FCC architecture build-deps, or some such === BenC [n=bcollins@ip68-107-227-12.hr.hr.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [08:55] mdz: I have my preference on that, of course.. but whatever makes sense is fine. on that note, very much bedtime [08:59] germinate does look at ia64 [08:59] though elmo and I were discussing today and that should probably change [08:59] but we need a better way to handle this sort of thing [09:02] mdz: i am updating ocfs2 to 1.1.1 [09:03] fabbione: no changes to common code, I assume? [09:03] the code was release 4 days ago.. but they forgot to published it on oss [09:03] mdz: ocfs2 is extremely contained in 2 dirs fs/configfs and fs/ocfs2 [09:03] no common code change [09:04] ok [09:05] but i need to verify the ABI again [09:05] that's something i will be able to see in an hour or so === chmj [n=chmj@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [09:18] morning [09:30] hi chmj [09:37] hi chmj [09:37] hi Mithrandir === TheMuso [n=luke@dsl-202-173-132-131.nsw.westnet.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Seveas [n=seveas@dyn127.roaming.few.vu.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === BenC [n=bcollins@ip68-107-227-12.hr.hr.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [12:30] BenC: you around? === rtcm [n=jman@217.129.142.72] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === BenC [n=bcollins@ip68-107-227-12.hr.hr.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c2-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [02:06] heylo === rtcm [n=jman@217.129.142.72] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === jbailey_ [n=jbailey@modemcable139.249-203-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [03:32] hey jeff === jbailey_ [n=jbailey@modemcable139.249-203-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [03:45] we should integrate the hdaps driver, so I can use my x40 as an input device. [03:51] Mithrandir: what's that? [03:52] http://rlove.org/log/2005082203 and http://rlove.org/log/2005082202 [03:53] Why does an "x40" make me think of heavy artillery? [03:54] it _is_ approximately 210mm in one direction, which is fairly heavy arty. [03:57] I think it's essential to ensure enterprise adoption of ubuntu. [04:12] accelorometer? [04:13] yup [04:13] Turns out it's not an accelorometer [04:14] And it's also trivial to do in userspace, but still [04:14] Actually, the sad part is gadgets and such is probably what's needed. We need everything given away at comdex or wherever in a given year to work better on Linux than on Windows. [04:14] Then all the CEOs in the world will demand Ubuntu on their systems. === chmj [n=chmj@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === BenC [n=bcollins@ip68-107-227-12.hr.hr.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [04:38] BenC: you awake? === chmj [n=chmj@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [04:51] hey fabbione === Seveas [n=seveas@ipd50ab46e.speed.planet.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [06:06] mjg59: I'm probably doing another initramfs-tools upload later today. Is there anything you need tweaked for your usplash stuff? [06:07] jbailey: Do we have support for /dv moving yet? [06:07] mjg59: Nope, how 'bout I do that. =) [06:07] Sounds good :) === BenC [n=bcollins@ip68-107-227-12.hr.hr.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [07:41] BenC: ????? [07:42] never mind.. [07:43] ttyl === mdz_ [n=mdz@ca-studio-bsr1o-251.vnnyca.adelphia.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === BenC [n=bcollins@216.144.233.50] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [08:11] let's see if this system stays connected any better [08:23] BenC: what's up with your network? [08:36] not really the network [08:36] just IRC [08:36] my ssh sessions aren't affected [08:36] mdz: can you look at 4081 and tell me if it's still relevant? [08:38] BenC: it's fixed in current images, but the nature of the bug is such that the buggy postrm is lurking on installed systems, to bite the user when they upgrade [08:38] were the "broken" images ever in a stable release, or are they just dev cycle images? [08:39] BenC: if we can verify that the warty and hoary kernels don't have the bug, we're OK [08:39] that's the question [08:39] ok [08:39] the bug says that warty is unaffected [08:39] I'll check hoary [08:42] my 2.6.10-5 breezy image contains the correct bits in postrm [08:42] err, not breezy [08:42] hoary [08:43] sounds like there's no need to keep it open then [09:13] BenC: i have a patch in my arch that fixes a bug [09:13] so if you want to pull it that would be great thanks.. [09:19] what's your repo url again? === doko_ [n=doko@dsl-084-059-085-062.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [09:45] http://zulinux.homelinux.net/arch/zulcss@gmail.com--2005 [09:48] how do you do a merge command? === BenC is still new to baz [09:53] baz merge zulcss@gmail.com--2005/$component--$branch--$version [09:58] sorry was on a conference call [10:02] thanks [10:08] BenC: you're on the tech board meeting agenda, and the meeting has begun === lamont [n=lamont@15.238.5.125] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === rtcm [n=jman@217.129.142.72] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [10:50] BenC: Around? === Seveas [n=seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [11:32] yeah === TheMuso [n=luke@dsl-202-173-132-131.nsw.westnet.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-kernel