[12:54] <caldwell_> when i boot my amd64 box with the breezy 2.6.12 kernel i get a 'can't find libc.so.6' error.  in order to fix it, i have to mount the initrd.img, cp -a the contents, mv the libs from lib64 to lib, and mkcramfs a new initrd.  Is this a known issue?
[02:40] <mxpxpod> lamont: ping
[02:45] <lamont> mxpxpod: si?
[02:45] <mxpxpod> lamont: if you grab svn of linux-wlan-ng, they're at final
[02:46] <lamont> uh, ok.
[04:01] <Mez> erm... It may just be me... but ...
[04:01] <Mez> the bt878 kernel module is broke
[04:45] <lamont> mdz: what's the policy on arch-specific-for-SCC packages required main packages (but only for SCC)?  (e.g. gcc-hppa64)
[04:45] <lamont> er, gcc-3.4-hppa64
[04:45] <lamont> palo
[04:45] <lamont> libgcc2
[06:21] <fabbione> morning
[08:05] <mdz> lamont: parse error?
[08:50] <lamont> mdz: e.g., linux-source-2.6.12 build-depends: ..., gcc-3.4-hppa64 [hppa] , ...
[08:50] <lamont> should gcc-3.4-hppa be promoted to main, or does it suck to be SCC architecture?
[08:51] <lamont> there are other packages which should probably be main as well.
[08:51] <mdz> lamont: just looking at the string "gcc-3.4-hppa" makes me CRINGE
[08:51] <lamont> it's a cross-compiler
[08:51] <lamont> generates 64-bit hppa code (so that you can have a 64-bit kernel for those machines that support and/or require it.
[08:51] <lamont> to date, that binary is only built on hppa (32-bit user space)
[08:52] <lamont> problem is that germinate doesn't look at non-FCC architecture build-deps, or some such
[08:55] <lamont> mdz: I have my preference on that, of course.. but whatever makes sense is fine.  on that note, very much bedtime
[08:59] <mdz> germinate does look at ia64
[08:59] <mdz> though elmo and I were discussing today and that should probably change
[08:59] <mdz> but we need a better way to handle this sort of thing
[09:02] <fabbione> mdz: i am updating ocfs2 to 1.1.1
[09:03] <mdz> fabbione: no changes to common code, I assume?
[09:03] <fabbione> the code was release 4 days ago.. but they forgot to published it on oss
[09:03] <fabbione> mdz: ocfs2 is extremely contained in 2 dirs fs/configfs and fs/ocfs2
[09:03] <fabbione> no common code change
[09:04] <mdz> ok
[09:05] <fabbione> but i need to verify the ABI again
[09:05] <fabbione> that's something i will be able to see in an hour or so
[09:18] <chmj> morning 
[09:30] <Mithrandir> hi chmj
[09:37] <fabbione> hi chmj 
[09:37] <fabbione> hi Mithrandir 
[12:30] <fabbione> BenC: you around?
[02:06] <zul> heylo
[03:32] <zul> hey jeff
[03:45] <Mithrandir> we should integrate the hdaps driver, so I can use my x40 as an input device.
[03:51] <fabbione> Mithrandir: what's that?
[03:52] <Mithrandir> http://rlove.org/log/2005082203 and http://rlove.org/log/2005082202
[03:53] <jbailey_> Why does an "x40" make me think of heavy artillery?
[03:54] <Mithrandir> it _is_ approximately 210mm in one direction, which is fairly heavy arty.
[03:57] <Mithrandir> I think it's essential to ensure enterprise adoption of ubuntu.
[04:12] <jbailey_> accelorometer?
[04:13] <Mithrandir> yup
[04:13] <mjg59> Turns out it's not an accelorometer
[04:14] <mjg59> And it's also trivial to do in userspace, but still
[04:14] <jbailey_> Actually, the sad part is gadgets and such is probably what's needed.  We need everything given away at comdex or wherever in a given year to work better on Linux than on Windows.
[04:14] <jbailey_> Then all the CEOs in the world will demand Ubuntu on their systems.
[04:38] <fabbione> BenC: you awake?
[04:51] <zul> hey fabbione 
[06:06] <jbailey> mjg59: I'm probably doing another initramfs-tools upload later today.  Is there anything you need tweaked for your usplash stuff?
[06:07] <mjg59> jbailey: Do we have support for /dv moving yet?
[06:07] <jbailey> mjg59: Nope, how 'bout I do that. =)
[06:07] <mjg59> Sounds good :)
[07:41] <fabbione> BenC: ?????
[07:42] <fabbione> never mind..
[07:43] <fabbione> ttyl
[08:11] <BenC> let's see if this system stays connected any better
[08:23] <mdz_> BenC: what's up with your network?
[08:36] <BenC> not really the network
[08:36] <BenC> just IRC
[08:36] <BenC> my ssh sessions aren't affected
[08:36] <BenC> mdz: can you look at 4081 and tell me if it's still relevant?
[08:38] <mdz_> BenC: it's fixed in current images, but the nature of the bug is such that the buggy postrm is lurking on installed systems, to bite the user when they upgrade
[08:38] <BenC> were the "broken" images ever in a stable release, or are they just dev cycle images?
[08:39] <mdz_> BenC: if we can verify that the warty and hoary kernels don't have the bug, we're OK
[08:39] <mdz_> that's the question
[08:39] <BenC> ok
[08:39] <BenC> the bug says that warty is unaffected
[08:39] <BenC> I'll check hoary
[08:42] <BenC> my 2.6.10-5 breezy image contains the correct bits in postrm
[08:42] <BenC> err, not breezy
[08:42] <BenC> hoary
[08:43] <mdz_> sounds like there's no need to keep it open then
[09:13] <zul> BenC: i have a patch in my arch that fixes a bug
[09:13] <zul> so if you want to pull it that would be great thanks..
[09:19] <BenC> what's your repo url again?
[09:45] <zul> http://zulinux.homelinux.net/arch/zulcss@gmail.com--2005
[09:48] <BenC> how do you do a merge command?
[09:53] <Mithrandir> baz merge zulcss@gmail.com--2005/$component--$branch--$version
[09:58] <zul> sorry was on a conference call
[10:02] <BenC> thanks
[10:08] <mdz_> BenC: you're on the tech board meeting agenda, and the meeting has begun
[10:50] <jbailey> BenC: Around?
[11:32] <BenC> yeah