=== Riddell-1wa [i=jr@muse.19inch.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain [04:25] jbailey: p.u.c~lamont/buildLogs/Test [04:25] /... === doko_ [n=doko@dsl-084-059-069-204.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === doko__ [n=doko@dsl-084-059-071-032.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain [06:11] elmo : How much do I have to beg for us to try a ppc64 kernel somewhere?... I'm seeing some seriously weird misbehaviors. [06:21] morning [06:43] infinity: I'll have a look this afternoon if I can [06:55] infinity: If needed, I run a ppc64 kernel here. [07:15] jbailey : Unless "here" is one of our buildds, it's not much help. ;) [07:15] The ppc32 kernels on the buildds are festering bits of poo. === Seveas [n=seveas@dyn127.roaming.few.vu.nl] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === chmj [n=chmj@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === Seveas [n=seveas@dyn127.roaming.few.vu.nl] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain [12:21] doko: ping? [12:21] doko: is there any news about binutils fix for sparc? [12:21] fabbione: I didn't check. [12:22] doko: mind to take a look please? [12:22] i am a bit reluctanct to touch ninutils [12:22] binutils === jbailey_ [n=jbailey@modemcable139.249-203-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain [03:21] doko, jbailey: the fix for --as-needed is in binutils cvs head as of today [03:21] http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12822 [03:21] see the last 2 comments [03:21] can we please get it in? === jbailey_ looks [03:22] *13000 lines of testsuite updates*? [03:23] Ooo, It also fixes the multiple PLT bug? [03:23] lamont, ^^ [03:24] I want to spend a bit of time today on initramfs-tools first, [03:24] But after that if doko hasn't done it, I will. [03:24] cool [03:26] jbailey_ : You still have another client connected, and it claims to be asleep. Make up your mind. [03:27] infinity, I have a guest over. She was supposed to set an alarm so that I could sit at my desk, so I'm on my laptop in the otoher room. [03:27] Not a big deal. I would've logged it out usually if I had expected this. [03:27] Although given the choice of the two states.... [03:28] (You need ot run your IRC client in screen, so you can just attach to it from anywhere) [03:30] elmo: did you look at binutils yesterday for the patch as well? ^^^ [03:31] infinity, I keep looking at console based IRC sessions, and not being happy with what I find. [03:32] I want screen for X. [03:32] Or rather, X apps. [03:32] vnc isn't quite sufficient. [03:34] jbailey: amusingly, the _GOT_ bug was gcc-4.0 codegen === jbailey_ [n=jbailey@modemcable139.249-203-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain [03:35] Mmm.. other button. === chmj [n=chmj@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain [04:21] doko: yeah, I'm looking at a new binutils for debian including that patch [04:22] jbailey: ^^^ [04:26] Coo. === chmj [n=chmj@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === Seveas [n=seveas@ipd50ab46e.speed.planet.nl] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === doko_ [n=doko@dsl-084-059-085-062.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === lamont [n=lamont@15.238.5.125] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === Seveas [n=seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain [11:21] infinity/lamont: ? [11:22] si? [11:22] infinity/lamont: all 3 ppc buildds are powerpc64; please don't restart them till you linux32 the builds [11:22] or whatever the appropriate command is [11:22] roger [11:22] uh... yeah... doko/jbailey? [11:23] anything mortally pressing, or can I stall for a couple hours/ [11:23] ? [11:23] nothing AFAIK [11:23] btw, linux32 looks like it works fine [11:24] $build_env_cmnd='sparc32'; [11:24] hmm, OOo2 is failing on ppc with strange errors ... eventually I have to try it on a ppc32 kernel. looks like memory corruption, doesn't fail exactly at the same place [11:24] ^-- is what vore uses to force builds in 32bit, presumably we just need something similar [11:24] right [11:24] lamont: but don't use 'sparc32' ;-P [11:25] lol\ [11:25] and I've installed linux32 in base for all 3, I'll leave the chroots to you; dunno if it's needed there [11:25] doko: do I want 'linux32' or 'ppc32' or??? [11:25] linux32 [11:25] lamont: Nothing from me. [11:26] jbailey: was fishing for the command syntax. ;-) [11:26] lamont: *lol* =) [11:26] I've never tried linux32 on my ppc system. Nothing has failed to build because of it. [11:27] jbailey: 64-bit kernel? [11:27] Linux ppc64 2.6.12-7-powerpc64-smp #1 SMP Fri Aug 19 16:03:19 UTC 2005 ppc64 GNU/Linux [11:27] well, if nothing fails to build, then I'm happy... [11:27] I assume taht 64-bit kernels still build too? [11:28] I haven't done any kernel work on this box at all. [11:28] (AFAIK, sparc needed the kernel build to be different than the rest of the world, so that it worked...) [11:28] well, it'll show up as ftbfs issues then, I expect. :-) [11:28] But all my glibc and gcc testing for the biarch stuff was done without linux32. [11:29] cool. [11:29] I'll kick them sometime this afternoon, if infinity doesn't beat me to it [11:31] lamont: don't forget the d-i + livecd stuff too [11:42] elmo: right