[04:25] <lamont-away> jbailey: p.u.c~lamont/buildLogs/Test
[04:25] <lamont-away>  /...
[06:11] <infinity> elmo : How much do I have to beg for us to try a ppc64 kernel somewhere?... I'm seeing some seriously weird misbehaviors.
[06:21] <fabbione> morning
[06:43] <elmo> infinity: I'll have a look this afternoon if I can
[06:55] <jbailey> infinity: If needed, I run a ppc64 kernel here.
[07:15] <infinity> jbailey : Unless "here" is one of our buildds, it's not much help. ;)
[07:15] <infinity> The ppc32 kernels on the buildds are festering bits of poo.
[12:21] <fabbione> doko: ping?
[12:21] <fabbione> doko: is there any news about binutils fix for sparc?
[12:21] <doko> fabbione: I didn't check.
[12:22] <fabbione> doko: mind to take a look please?
[12:22] <fabbione> i am a bit reluctanct to touch ninutils
[12:22] <fabbione> binutils
[03:21] <fabbione> doko, jbailey: the fix for --as-needed is in binutils cvs head as of today
[03:21] <fabbione> http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12822
[03:21] <fabbione> see the last 2 comments
[03:21] <fabbione> can we please get it in?
[03:22] <jbailey_> *13000 lines of testsuite updates*?
[03:23] <jbailey_> Ooo, It also fixes the multiple PLT bug?
[03:23] <jbailey_> lamont, ^^
[03:24] <jbailey_> I want to spend a bit of time today on initramfs-tools first,
[03:24] <jbailey_> But after that if doko hasn't done it, I will.
[03:24] <fabbione> cool
[03:26] <infinity> jbailey_ : You still have another client connected, and it claims to be asleep.  Make up your mind.
[03:27] <jbailey_> infinity, I have a guest over.  She was supposed to set an alarm so that I could sit at my desk, so I'm on my laptop in the otoher room.
[03:27] <jbailey_> Not a big deal.  I would've logged it out usually if I had expected this.
[03:27] <jbailey_> Although given the choice of the two states....
[03:28] <infinity> (You need ot run your IRC client in screen, so you can just attach to it from anywhere)
[03:30] <doko> elmo: did you look at binutils yesterday for the patch as well? ^^^
[03:31] <jbailey_> infinity, I keep looking at console based IRC sessions, and not being happy with what I find.
[03:32] <jbailey_> I want screen for X.
[03:32] <jbailey_> Or rather, X apps.
[03:32] <jbailey_> vnc isn't quite sufficient.
[03:34] <lamont> jbailey: amusingly, the _GOT_ bug was gcc-4.0 codegen
[03:35] <jbailey_> Mmm.. other button.
[04:21] <elmo> doko: yeah, I'm looking at a new binutils for debian including that patch
[04:22] <doko> jbailey: ^^^
[04:26] <jbailey_> Coo.
[11:21] <elmo> infinity/lamont: ?
[11:22] <lamont> si?
[11:22] <elmo> infinity/lamont: all 3 ppc buildds are powerpc64; please don't restart them till you linux32 the builds
[11:22] <elmo> or whatever the appropriate command is
[11:22] <lamont> roger
[11:22] <lamont> uh... yeah... doko/jbailey?
[11:23] <lamont> anything mortally pressing, or can I stall for a couple hours/
[11:23] <lamont> ?
[11:23] <elmo> nothing AFAIK
[11:23] <elmo> btw, linux32 looks like it works fine
[11:24] <elmo> $build_env_cmnd='sparc32';
[11:24] <doko> hmm, OOo2 is failing on ppc with strange errors ... eventually I have to try it on a ppc32 kernel. looks like memory corruption, doesn't fail exactly at the same place
[11:24] <elmo> ^-- is what vore uses to force builds in 32bit, presumably we just need something similar
[11:24] <lamont> right
[11:24] <doko> lamont: but don't use 'sparc32' ;-P
[11:25] <lamont> lol\
[11:25] <elmo> and I've installed linux32 in base for all 3, I'll leave the chroots to you; dunno if it's needed there
[11:25] <lamont> doko: do I want 'linux32' or 'ppc32' or???
[11:25] <doko> linux32 
[11:25] <jbailey> lamont: Nothing from me.
[11:26] <lamont> jbailey: was fishing for the command syntax. ;-)
[11:26] <jbailey> lamont: *lol* =)
[11:26] <jbailey> I've never tried linux32 on my ppc system.  Nothing has failed to build because of it.
[11:27] <lamont> jbailey: 64-bit kernel?
[11:27] <jbailey> Linux ppc64 2.6.12-7-powerpc64-smp #1 SMP Fri Aug 19 16:03:19 UTC 2005 ppc64 GNU/Linux
[11:27] <lamont> well, if nothing fails to build, then I'm happy...
[11:27] <lamont> I assume taht 64-bit kernels still build too?
[11:28] <jbailey> I haven't done any kernel work on this box at all.
[11:28] <lamont> (AFAIK, sparc needed the kernel build to be different than the rest of the world, so that it worked...)
[11:28] <lamont> well, it'll show up as ftbfs issues then, I expect. :-)
[11:28] <jbailey> But all my glibc and gcc testing for the biarch stuff was done without linux32.
[11:29] <lamont> cool.
[11:29] <lamont> I'll kick them sometime this afternoon, if infinity doesn't beat me to it
[11:31] <elmo> lamont: don't forget the d-i + livecd stuff too
[11:42] <lamont> elmo: right