[12:28] <jbailey> BenC: Not if he's seeing it in colony 5.  Have to pnt this bacak to mjg59 
[12:29] <mjg59> Nngh.
[12:29] <mjg59> What?
[01:17] <BenC> 16327
[01:18] <BenC> it's a problem where e100 NIC is not working after resume
[01:18] <BenC> I thought updated scripts were supposed to handle that properly
[06:49] <fabbione> yo
[06:49] <fabbione> BenC: yeah.. volatile is l-r-m business
[03:02] <zul> morning
[04:50] <zul> meh...i was sick again this weekend..
[06:50] <zul> sheesh you guys are quiet for once
[06:54] <BenC> *belch*
[07:00] <zul> heh..how is it going ben?
[07:01] <BenC> not too bad
[07:01] <BenC> you?
[07:04] <zul> good...went to a hockey game last night but ok 
[07:06] <zul> what are you working on this week so we can coordinate it or something
[07:09] <desrt> jbailey; ping
[07:12] <BenC> working on doing an upload later today
[07:13] <BenC> I am going through some P2 level bugs to clear out my bug queue
[07:15] <jbailey> desrt: pong
[07:15] <jbailey> zul: The weather changes have been a bit insane around here too.
[07:17] <desrt> jbailey; just bugging you about ubug 14456 :)
[07:17] <desrt> i hate to nag, but it's so tempting :)
[07:17] <jbailey> Eh?
[07:17] <jbailey> HTH did you get a kernel feature put in this late? =)
[07:17] <desrt> IN_MASK_ADD
[07:17] <desrt> i have dirt on benc
[07:18] <jbailey> I can only assume. =)
[07:23] <zul> jbailey: its been raining here all day from what i can tell ;)
[10:41] <fabbione> BenC: ping?
[10:58] <BenC> ?
[10:59] <BenC> fabbione: I did a full kernel package build in 40 minutes on the e3k
[10:59] <fabbione> neat :)
[11:00] <BenC> fabbione: I want to give you initial access to set things up, but be aware that the machine will go down for a few days within the next week while I finish moving
[11:00] <fabbione> BenC: if i could get ssh access to the box, i can setup the buildd
[11:00] <BenC> msg me your pub ssh key
[11:00] <fabbione> BenC: sure, we can wait after the move if you prefer
[11:00] <fabbione> BenC: i did setup another buildd on saturday so we are catching up pretty fast
[11:00] <BenC> that would probably be best
[11:00] <fabbione> sure
[11:00] <fabbione> that works for me
[11:00] <BenC> /dev/mapper/debian-org
[11:00] <BenC>                       236G  287M  224G   1% /org
[11:01] <BenC> FYI :)
[11:01] <fabbione> tsk
[11:01] <fabbione> root@trider-g7:~ # vgs
[11:01] <fabbione>   VG   #PV #LV #SN Attr  VSize VFree  
[11:01] <fabbione>   mofo   1  21   0 wz--n 1.09T 129.62G
[11:01] <fabbione> *grins*
[11:01] <fabbione> ehehe
[11:01] <BenC> mine was free, how much ws yours? :)
[11:01] <doko> BenC: while you are here ... mind fixing gcc-4.1 biarch, so you can test-rebuild the archive with 4.1? ;-P
[11:01] <fabbione> actually.. not thay much ;)
[11:02] <BenC> doko: fix it in what way?
[11:02] <fabbione> approx 8000DKK that would be around 1200USD i think
[11:02] <BenC> not too bad
[11:02] <fabbione> + another 800GB on another box
[11:02] <doko> BenC: that the patches apply again and the biarch-compiler builds
[11:02] <BenC> doko: URL to source?
[11:03] <BenC> I can start a build and get you something tonight
[11:03] <doko> BenC: gcc-snapshot package, enable biarch in debian/rules.defs
[11:03] <fabbione> doko: yeah.. gcc-snapshot farted on me today
[11:03] <BenC> debian or ubuntu archive?
[11:03] <doko> shouldn't matter
[11:04] <fabbione> but it did stall on a test suite for more than 150 minutes
[11:04] <fabbione> and buildd did kill it
[11:04] <fabbione> so it might as well being looping there for nothing
[11:04] <doko> yes, I should update the snapshot package as well
[11:06] <BenC> 20050904?
[11:07] <fabbione> doko: try to get a working gcc-4.0 for dapper my friend because we need to switch the kernel
[11:07] <fabbione> and there are way too many ICE's on sparc
[11:07] <fabbione> BenC: btw #ubuntu-toolchain is available as well as #ubuntu-sparc
[11:14] <doko> BenC: yes
[11:14] <doko> fabbione: what is wrong?
[11:18] <fabbione> doko: are gcc ICE's ok?
[11:19] <BenC> doko: the sparc-biarch patch seems to apply with only a little fuzz
[11:19] <BenC> I'll try a build and see what happens
[11:25] <doko> BenC: yes, I did try to update the patch, but it did fail the build, so obviously my update wasn't correct
[11:26] <doko> fabbione: ICE's are ok as long as you can work around them. preprocessed source would be helpful
[11:27] <fabbione> doko: you got it already :)
[11:27] <fabbione> but i am more worried for the kernel
[11:27] <fabbione> in terms of miscompilation
[11:27] <fabbione> where it builds, but it builds crap
[11:28] <doko> :-/
[11:28] <fabbione> and the kernel is good and bad as test case
[11:28] <fabbione> given that it builds almost always on gcc-40
[11:28] <fabbione> but it miscopiles
[11:28] <fabbione> so very difficult problems to hunt down
[11:29] <fabbione> but than.. that's why we have you
[11:30] <fabbione> good night guys
[11:31] <doko> well, unfortunately the kernel is the only piece of software compiled with -m64 ...
[11:32] <BenC> libc6
[11:33] <doko> ok, s/built/tested/
[11:34] <doko> maybe an experimental sparc64 arch wouldn't be bad
[11:38] <BenC> I've done a lot with libc6-sparc64 in the past
[11:38] <BenC> but not recently
[11:38] <BenC> built X against it once
[11:38] <BenC> and ran it :)
[11:44] <BenC> ../../../src/libiberty/cplus-dem.c:55: error: conflicting types for 'malloc'
[11:44] <BenC> doko: that's the error I see, and that isn't related to sparc at all
[11:46] <fabbione> doko: well i am not talking only about sparc for the kernel.. here is morelikely arch: all
[11:46] <doko> BenC: I hope I can find some time to look at it this week, but that's not the thing I did see in the past
[11:47] <BenC> well, I'm gonna manually fix that and continue the build
[11:47] <doko> fabbione: sure, I wouldn't trust gcc-4.0 too much for the kernel
[11:47] <fabbione> doko: fix it :P
[11:47] <fabbione> anyway i am off for real
[11:47] <fabbione> good night
[11:48] <fabbione> BenC: nice upload.. i will let you know tomorrow if it did build on sparc (if you haven't test it yet)
[11:49] <BenC> it does
[11:49] <BenC> I built it before upload
[11:49] <fabbione> eheheh cool
[11:49] <BenC> doko: I can't even get libiberty to build, so there's some inherent problem
[11:49] <BenC> doko: things like HAVE_SYS_STAT aren't defined
[11:50] <BenC> I wonder if it has something to do with the biarch patches autoconf rerun