=== dilinger [i=dilinger@69.9.180.118] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [12:05] do you guys have plans for the post-breezy kernel yet? [12:59] dilinger: switch to hurd? :) === doko [n=doko@dslb-084-059-075-013.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === crimsun [n=crimsun@pdpc/supporter/silver/crimsun] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [03:14] dilinger: I think it's at least 2.6.14 [03:25] lamont-away, dilinger: BenC was polling for opinions on which kernel, I don't think anyone suggested that he should spend any breath on 2.6.13 [03:38] jbailey: right - the real question is 2.6.14 or 2.6.15. :-) [03:40] You mean for release, or for first Breezy update? === doko_ [n=doko@dslb-084-059-066-058.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === TheMuso [n=luke@dsl-202-173-132-131.nsw.westnet.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === doko__ [n=doko@dslb-084-059-071-086.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Yagisan [n=jamie@60-240-22-254-nsw-pppoe.tpgi.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === doko [n=doko@dslb-084-059-078-130.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === chmj [n=chmj@wbs-146-175-30.telkomadsl.co.za] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === doko [n=doko@dslb-084-059-085-198.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === doko_ [n=doko@dslb-084-059-083-150.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === doko__ [n=doko@dslb-084-059-098-251.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Mithrandir [n=tfheen@c5100BC63.inet.catch.no] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === doko_ [n=doko@dslb-084-059-102-039.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === chmj [n=chmj@wbs-146-175-30.telkomadsl.co.za] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === doko_ [n=doko@dslb-084-059-066-133.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === doko_ [n=doko@dslb-084-059-094-041.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === HiddenWolf [n=HiddenWo@136.93.dynamic.phpg.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === fusch [n=fusch___@p548753D3.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === markuman [n=markuman@p5092714F.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === markuman [n=markuman@p5092714F.dip.t-dialin.net] has left #ubuntu-kernel [] === fusch [n=fusch___@p548753D3.dip.t-dialin.net] has left #ubuntu-kernel ["Leaving"] === doko [n=doko@dialin-145-254-047-027.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [03:27] fabbione: do you know if we already have plans to do a -9.20 outside of my &*%_^& [03:28] lamont-away: no plans for -20 [03:28] we are in security mode only [03:29] right... time to find a security bug then, eh? [03:29] there is one pending.. but no patch yet === doko [n=doko@dslb-084-059-069-210.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === chmj [n=chmj@wbs-146-175-30.telkomadsl.co.za] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === calc [n=ccheney@ip70-185-4-246.ma.dl.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === lamont [n=lamont@15.238.6.23] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [08:49] fabbione: around? [08:51] infinity/mjg59? [08:52] - Changes by Adam Conrad and Matthew Garrett: [08:52] - [08:52] - * Make ide probe quite: [08:52] - - Add patch drivers-ide_quiet_probe_failures.dpatch. [08:52] - === lamont wonders why that isn't in baz... [08:53] or maybe I'm just completely out-of-date in the tree. sigh. === HiddenWolf [n=HiddenWo@136.93.dynamic.phpg.net] has left #ubuntu-kernel ["Leaving"] [09:54] lamont: re [09:54] fabbione: about to upload -9.20 [09:54] wanna play with it and bless it first? [09:55] lamont: wanna show me the debdiff? [09:55] i am dead tired to really play with a kernel === lamont looks for a convenient diff [10:02] fabbione: emailed you a diff of the two directories [10:03] ok thanks [10:03] off to a meeting [10:05] lamont: if i assume correctly that you did copy ide-modules and removed only the ide-genric stuff, it looks good to me [10:07] yea - that idemodules is a copy of shared/ with ide-generic removed [10:07] lamont: that's perfect [10:07] there is another way too, [10:07] like addind a ? after the modules name in shared/.. [10:08] the ? means that kernel-wedge should add the module if available, otherwise skip it [10:08] without the ? it's a must have module.. hence fail if not there [10:08] (that's where you crashed) [10:08] fabbione: yeah, but that violates the 'only change ia64 this week' policy... [10:08] right [10:08] but none would have ever noticed it :) === lamont is going to testbuild on concordia before uploading as well.... do I want to try amd64 or i386? [10:09] it doesn't matter.. [10:09] just build on [10:09] one [10:09] if they did build 9.19 and there are no changes, 9.20 will be the same [10:10] yeah - but I want to be absolutely certain that this isn't ftbfs - 'twould be embarassing [10:11] i am pretty sure it won't FTBFS [10:11] :) [10:11] instead, test it on ia64 :) [10:11] and unlike the doctor in serenity, I do have a sword... just not at work [10:11] did that yesterday, and it's running again now... [10:11] will take about 1.5 hours more, so I have time for an i386 build... [10:12] did you move the abi/2.6.12-9.18 to abi/2.6.12-19? [10:12] well if you didn't it would have failed at clean: [10:12] yeah - but I changed that into a #mv at the top of the diff... [10:13] oh right [10:13] i missed that :) [10:14] and going back and diffing that specifically, no change. :-) [10:14] I rock... successfully did a 'mv'. :-) [10:14] ehe [10:16] i am heading to bed [10:16] cya later [10:17] g'night [10:17] oh last thing.. what are the today's %? [10:17] sparc has been building a lot the last 2 days :) [10:18] never mind :) [10:18] i guess you are gone [10:18] and so i am [10:18] :) [10:19] feh. concordia has old build-deps. [10:19] so once ia64 is done agaain, it gets uploaded. [11:24] -9.20 uploaded