[12:05] <dilinger> do you guys have plans for the post-breezy kernel yet?
[12:59] <calc> dilinger: switch to hurd? :)
[03:14] <lamont-away> dilinger: I think it's at least 2.6.14
[03:25] <jbailey> lamont-away, dilinger: BenC was polling for opinions on which kernel, I don't think anyone suggested that he should spend any breath on 2.6.13
[03:38] <lamont-away> jbailey: right - the real question is 2.6.14 or 2.6.15. :-)
[03:40] <jbailey> You mean for release, or for first Breezy update?
[03:27] <lamont-away> fabbione: do you know if we already have plans to do a -9.20 outside of my &*%_^&
[03:28] <fabbione> lamont-away: no plans for -20
[03:28] <fabbione> we are in security mode only 
[03:29] <lamont-away> right... time to find a security bug then, eh?
[03:29] <fabbione> there is one pending.. but no patch yet
[08:49] <lamont> fabbione: around?
[08:51] <lamont> infinity/mjg59?
[08:52] <lamont> -  Changes by Adam Conrad and Matthew Garrett:
[08:52] <lamont> -
[08:52] <lamont> -  * Make ide probe quite:
[08:52] <lamont> -    - Add patch drivers-ide_quiet_probe_failures.dpatch.
[08:52] <lamont> -
[08:53] <lamont> or maybe I'm just completely out-of-date in the tree.  sigh.
[09:54] <fabbione> lamont: re
[09:54] <lamont> fabbione: about to upload -9.20
[09:54] <lamont> wanna play with it and bless it first?
[09:55] <fabbione> lamont: wanna show me the debdiff?
[09:55] <fabbione> i am dead tired to really play with a kernel
[10:02] <lamont> fabbione: emailed you a diff of the two directories
[10:03] <fabbione> ok thanks
[10:03] <lamont> off to a meeting
[10:05] <fabbione> lamont: if i assume correctly that you did copy ide-modules and removed only the ide-genric stuff, it looks good to me
[10:07] <lamont> yea - that idemodules is a copy of shared/ with ide-generic removed
[10:07] <fabbione> lamont: that's perfect
[10:07] <fabbione> there is another way too,
[10:07] <fabbione> like addind a ? after the modules name in shared/..
[10:08] <fabbione> the ? means that kernel-wedge should add the module if available, otherwise skip it
[10:08] <fabbione> without the ? it's a must have module.. hence fail if not there
[10:08] <fabbione> (that's where you crashed)
[10:08] <lamont> fabbione: yeah, but that violates the 'only change ia64 this week' policy...
[10:08] <fabbione> right
[10:08] <fabbione> but none would have ever noticed it :)
[10:09] <fabbione> it doesn't matter..
[10:09] <fabbione> just build on
[10:09] <fabbione> one
[10:09] <fabbione> if they did build 9.19 and there are no changes, 9.20 will be the same
[10:10] <lamont> yeah - but I want to be absolutely certain that this isn't ftbfs - 'twould be embarassing
[10:11] <fabbione> i am pretty sure it won't FTBFS
[10:11] <fabbione> :)
[10:11] <fabbione> instead, test it on ia64 :)
[10:11] <lamont> and unlike the doctor in serenity, I do have a sword... just not at work
[10:11] <lamont> did that yesterday,  and it's running again now...
[10:11] <lamont> will take about 1.5 hours more, so I have time for an i386 build...
[10:12] <fabbione> did you move the abi/2.6.12-9.18 to abi/2.6.12-19?
[10:12] <fabbione> well if you didn't it would have failed at clean:
[10:12] <lamont> yeah - but I changed that into a #mv at the top of the diff...
[10:13] <fabbione> oh right
[10:13] <fabbione> i missed that :)
[10:14] <lamont> and going back and diffing that specifically, no change. :-)
[10:14] <lamont> I rock... successfully did a 'mv'. :-)
[10:14] <fabbione> ehe
[10:16] <fabbione> i am heading to bed
[10:16] <fabbione> cya later
[10:17] <lamont> g'night
[10:17] <fabbione> oh last thing.. what are the today's %?
[10:17] <fabbione> sparc has been building a lot the last 2 days :)
[10:18] <fabbione> never mind :)
[10:18] <fabbione> i guess you are gone
[10:18] <fabbione> and so i am
[10:18] <fabbione> :)
[10:19] <lamont> feh.  concordia has old build-deps.
[10:19] <lamont> so once ia64 is done agaain, it gets uploaded.
[11:24] <lamont> -9.20 uploaded