lamont | doko/et.al...: what was the -m64/-m32 issue? | 01:20 |
---|---|---|
doko | ? | 01:45 |
doko | which platform? | 01:45 |
infinity | We've got it sorted. | 01:47 |
jbailey | These are not droids you're looking for? | 01:48 |
lamont | jbailey: nah, it's just that I hate gcc args | 01:48 |
infinity | They hate you too. | 01:49 |
lamont | can't make them say '-march=64 -mtune=64', no... that'd be too easy to parse. | 01:49 |
infinity | Says so in the manpage. | 01:49 |
lamont | doko: and how come i386 doesn't have an option to generate ia64 code? and vice versa? | 01:49 |
infinity | "SEE ALSO: GCC hates lamont." | 01:49 |
jbailey | That's fine. I'm a GNU maintainer. manpages aren't canonical. =) | 01:49 |
lamont | it _would_ actually be nice to get -m32 working on ia64 | 01:49 |
jbailey | lamont: Feh. | 01:49 |
doko | lamont: it does. it's called a cross-compiler :-P | 01:49 |
jbailey | lamont: You're kidding, right? =) | 01:49 |
lamont | jbailey: 99% kidding... | 01:50 |
infinity | -m32 on ia64 may be doable. The other way ain't ever going to happen. | 01:50 |
lamont | but it would fix mithrandir's latest breakage of ia32-libs-openoffice$mumble | 01:50 |
lamont | infinity: yeah, assumed as much | 01:50 |
jbailey | Oh. Does ia32-libs cover it? | 01:50 |
jbailey | I'm all about painful elimination of ia32-libs | 01:50 |
infinity | "it"? | 01:51 |
lamont | jbailey: oo.o2 was ftbfs on ia64 for breezy.. .root cause was one package with comple errors becausee it assumed biarch was present, and the other was an 'Architecture: amd64' that should have had ia64 as well. | 01:51 |
lamont | infinity: -m32 | 01:51 |
lamont | because then the compile error would go away | 01:51 |
infinity | Yes, yes it would. | 01:51 |
infinity | And ia32-libs going away would be so amazingly wonderful that I may crap myself with glee. | 01:52 |
lamont | jbailey: painful or otherwise, getting rid of ia32-libs* is a noble goal. | 01:52 |
jbailey | I LIKE PAIN | 01:52 |
jbailey | wait | 01:52 |
jbailey | that came out wrong | 01:52 |
lamont | but enough.. I'm leaving for home 22 minutes ago, according to what I told my wife... must flee. | 01:52 |
lamont | jbailey: I'll bring something to hit you with to UBZ then. :-) | 01:52 |
lamont | on later from home | 01:53 |
doko | see you tomorrow | 01:53 |
jbailey | doko: Yes, dear. | 01:54 |
doko | jbailey: ok, I'll leave .... | 01:54 |
lamont-away | moof | 02:32 |
lamont-away | checking whether strstr is declared... | 02:38 |
lamont-away | malloc: ../bash/jobs.c:708: assertion botched | 02:38 |
lamont-away | free: underflow detected; mh_nbytes out of range | 02:38 |
lamont-away | Aborting.../bin/sh: line 1: 9172 Aborted /bin/sh | 02:38 |
lamont-away | go gcc - it's your birthday | 02:39 |
lamont-away | gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3/debian, that is | 02:39 |
=== doko [n=doko@toronto-HSE-ppp4022107.sympatico.ca] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
fabbione | hey doko | 02:21 |
fabbione | doko: http://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/ | 02:22 |
fabbione | oo2-no-g++-3.4.bz2 | 02:22 |
fabbione | this is the build failure without g++-3.4 | 02:22 |
fabbione | i assume that upstream did change default c++ compiler on sparc, because they didn't get David patch | 02:22 |
fabbione | install g++-3.4 builds all the way | 02:23 |
fabbione | so we can either revert the upstream change and go with g++-4.0 | 02:23 |
fabbione | or just add that build-deps for sparc | 02:23 |
fabbione | up to you | 02:23 |
fabbione | i am off for a bit | 02:24 |
=== doko [n=doko@modemcable139.249-203-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
fabbione | doko: hey did you read what i wrote before? | 03:59 |
doko | yes | 04:18 |
doko | obviously that was the "fix" that _rene" did mention :-( | 04:18 |
fabbione | bah | 04:18 |
=== fabbione [n=fabbione@port49.ds1-van.adsl.cybercity.dk] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
=== lamont [n=lamont@mib.fc.hp.com] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!