[04:40] <BenC> zul: ping
[04:40] <zul> BenC, pong
[04:41] <BenC> can you email me your git url?
[04:41] <zul> sure
[04:41] <zul> whats your email again?
[04:42] <BenC> bcollins@u.c
[04:42] <zul> i kind of have an automated kernel build system going..well script at least 
[04:43] <BenC> are you synced to the latest git?
[04:43] <zul> im doing a build right now
[04:43] <BenC> x86 and amd64 are building right now, and ppc will build as soon as kernel-package gets fixed
[04:43] <zul> cool
[04:43] <zul> i had problems will building kernel-docs yesterday but that could have been me
[04:44] <BenC> haven't booted amd64, but the only problem I had with x86 was the rt2500pci driver not working anymore
[04:44] <BenC> nah, it is fixed now
[04:44] <zul> goodie
[04:44] <BenC> ll_rw_blk.c was moved, and DocBook parsed the old location
[04:44] <zul> that is what i thought
[04:45] <zul> i did add the speakup stuff and the new kernel drivers to the .config yet either
[04:46] <zul> scarey 
[04:47] <zul> http://linuxicc.sourceforge.net/
[04:48] <BenC> pulling now
[04:48] <zul> nifty
[04:49] <zul> i just did a pull with my stuff and doing a build
[04:51] <zul> i need to fix those copy_to_user warnings they are starting to bug me
[04:55] <BenC> things like that need to be sent upstream
[04:56] <zul> yeah ill submit a patch to kj
[04:56] <BenC> I don't want to clutter out tree (especially since we aren't doing patches) with non-functional fixes
[04:57] <zul> sure
[05:01] <BenC> what are the changes for mips/Kconfig coming from?
[05:01] <BenC> it's a big conflict
[05:01] <zul> linux-speakup
[05:08] <BenC> what exactly is that?
[05:08] <zul> linux for blind users
[05:08] <BenC> also, please make sure your diffs are clean, there's one file I pulled from you that had a change from if ( to if(
[05:09] <zul> sorry
[05:09] <BenC> and nothing else, and there were a few white space changes in one driver, and actually a typo introduced aswell
[05:09] <zul> damn it
[05:10] <BenC> ok, I'll finish this merge when I get back
[05:10] <BenC> thanks dude
[05:10] <zul> no probs
[05:10] <zul> thanks for pulling
[05:40] <joh> Any 2.6.14.2 backport to breezy?
[05:41] <zul> probably not yet
[05:42] <zul> breezy only gets security updates really
[05:42] <zul> and its 2.6.12 
[05:43] <zul> so no 2.6.14, dapper is oging to be 2.6.15
[05:50] <joh> Ok, I'll have to roll my own then ... :)
[05:50] <zul> exactly
[05:54] <joh> One thing though, the KernelBuildpackageDetailedHowto on the wiki explains some, but not all. How are the ubuntu linux-headers generated? When I used the method from the wiki, the linux-headers package was incomplete and it was impossible to build anything against it. It was missing the headers (i.e. /lib/modules/.../build was pointing to the linux source tree, not any /usr/src/linux-headers-... as it is in the official ubuntu packages. Any hints?
[05:55] <joh> It seems that howto is a bit outdated :P
[05:58] <joh> Also, how do I convert a vanilla kernel tree to a debian/ubuntu tree with dpatches etc?
[05:59] <joh> linux-patch-ubuntu-2.6.12 perhaps...
[05:59] <joh> or not :p