| jbailey | <stdin>: Assembler messages: | 12:02 |
|---|---|---|
| jbailey | <stdin>:4: Warning: Empty argument of .endp | 12:02 |
| jbailey | <stdin>:4: Warning: `__syscall_error_4' should be an operand to this .endp | 12:02 |
| jbailey | I wonder if that's new (for ia64) | 12:02 |
| fabbione | doko: | 05:52 |
| fabbione | checking LIBART_LIBS... -lart_lgpl_2 | 05:52 |
| fabbione | checking for XTestQueryExtension in -lXtst... no | 05:52 |
| fabbione | configure: error: libXtst not found, required by java.awt.Robot | 05:52 |
| fabbione | gcc-snapshot on sparc ^^ | 05:52 |
| fabbione | _20051118-0ubuntu1 | 05:52 |
| fabbione | doko: sparc is building gcc-4 and gcc-3.. if they are not FTBFS you are good go ;) | 05:58 |
| fabbione | later | 05:58 |
| === rtcm [n=jman@81.84.150.197] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| === infinity [n=adconrad@loki.0c3.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| === Riddell [i=jr@kde/jriddell] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| infinity | doko : On ia64 and powerpc, gcc-4.0 gets this: | 07:34 |
| infinity | checking for X... no | 07:34 |
| infinity | *** xlib peers requested but no X library available | 07:34 |
| infinity | make[3] : *** [configure-target-libjava] Error 1 | 07:34 |
| === chmj [n=chmj@wbs-146-146-43.telkomadsl.co.za] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| doko | infinity: nice, do you know why? | 09:23 |
| doko | infinity: on i386 and amd64 as well? | 09:25 |
| infinity | doko : No, i386 and amd64 built fine, just ppc and ia64 choked. I'll rety them in a bit to see if it was a transient build-dep issue. | 12:35 |
| infinity | Oh, wait. | 12:37 |
| infinity | Did I need a specific newer version of something that might be stuck in the chroots? | 12:37 |
| infinity | Nevermind, the chroots are up to date anyway. | 12:38 |
| === infinity respins powerpc and ia64 to see what happens. | ||
| doko | it's strange, that the generice test for X fails. please keep the build, so you have a look at the config.log file | 12:41 |
| infinity | Meh. Too late to keep the build, already started it. | 12:41 |
| infinity | (sbuild on our buildds is configured to remove failed trees, so we don't eat disk insanely) | 12:42 |
| infinity | But if it fails again, I'll muck with it again and keep the tree. | 12:42 |
| Riddell | doko: so libstdc++ transition has happened? | 02:47 |
| doko | Riddell: no, no powerpc packages yet | 02:48 |
| Riddell | doko: so I shouldn't start uploading? | 02:49 |
| doko | no | 02:57 |
| jbailey | doko: What's blocking PPC? | 02:59 |
| doko | a strange build failure, no X found. infinity is currently rebuilding | 03:06 |
| jbailey | Feh, I hope it's not some part of the X transition. | 03:09 |
| jbailey | I have ppc and amd64 building. i386 and ia64 fail for glibc right now. | 03:09 |
| jbailey | I'll be back to hacking on that in an hour or so, I think. | 03:09 |
| doko | X transition? | 03:15 |
| jbailey | To modular X, blocked by glibc. | 03:26 |
| infinity | doko : Around? | 03:39 |
| infinity | doko : conftest.c:23:27: error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such file or directory | 03:42 |
| doko | that's in libxt-dev? | 03:47 |
| infinity | In theory. | 03:47 |
| doko | strange that his breaks on only two architectures | 03:48 |
| fabbione | it might as well be that the other 2 chroots are dirty :) | 03:48 |
| infinity | They're not. | 03:49 |
| infinity | I already checked that. | 03:49 |
| doko | fabbione: but then, my own chroots are dirty as well | 03:49 |
| infinity | I wonder if another -dev lib used to depend on libxt-dev, and your upload happened at just the right time to catch that changing. | 03:49 |
| fabbione | doko: we all know you like "dirty" stuff :P | 03:50 |
| fabbione | is that only on gcc-4.? | 03:50 |
| fabbione | or also 3.4? | 03:50 |
| doko | no, 3.4 doesn't build java | 03:51 |
| fabbione | i saw that error yesterday on -snapshot | 03:51 |
| fabbione | (pasted the log here) | 03:51 |
| fabbione | on sparc | 03:51 |
| infinity | I blame GTK. | 03:51 |
| infinity | Anyhow. | 03:52 |
| infinity | doko : Your configure test explicitely includes that header (it's not pulled in through a transient dep in another header), so you may as well just build-dep on libxt-dev and call it a day. | 03:52 |
| jbailey | I like how even GCC can say "Iz gtk bug" and possibly be right. | 03:53 |
| doko | :) | 03:53 |
| doko | infinity: that configure test comes directly from autoconf ... | 03:53 |
| infinity | doko : And autoconf is wrong, because it assume a monolithic X, but whatever. One battle at a time. :) | 03:54 |
| infinity | I believe changes are going into autoconf upstream to make the X tests more correctly modular. | 03:54 |
| doko | ok, thanks for figuring that out ... | 03:55 |
| infinity | Can you upload ASAP, or should I just pre-seed the chroots with xt-dev and rebuild? | 03:56 |
| doko | uploading now ... | 03:58 |
| fabbione | doko: you also want to reupload gcc-snapshot | 03:59 |
| fabbione | for the same reason | 03:59 |
| doko | fabbione: not now ... | 03:59 |
| infinity | It's hardly urgent. | 03:59 |
| fabbione | fabbione doko: | 03:59 |
| fabbione | fabbione checking LIBART_LIBS... -lart_lgpl_2 | 03:59 |
| fabbione | fabbione checking for XTestQueryExtension in -lXtst... no | 03:59 |
| fabbione | fabbione configure: error: libXtst not found, required by java.awt.Robot | 03:59 |
| fabbione | fabbione gcc-snapshot on sparc ^^ | 03:59 |
| fabbione | fabbione _20051118-0ubuntu1 | 03:59 |
| fabbione | fabbione doko: sparc is building gcc-4 and gcc-3.. if they are not FTBFS you are good go ;) | 03:59 |
| fabbione | no | 03:59 |
| fabbione | just FYI | 03:59 |
| infinity | xtst-dev != xt-dev | 03:59 |
| === fabbione smells more borkage | ||
| infinity | If Java really needs xtst-dev too, you just found another build-dep. :) | 03:59 |
| doko | no, that's something else. xtst-dev is needed for something called JavaRobot | 04:00 |
| doko | but it's interesting, that the build did succeed on i386 and amd64 | 04:03 |
| infinity | Oh, cock. | 04:04 |
| infinity | doko : Do you disable logwatch on ubuntu, or is it just breaking? | 04:04 |
| infinity | doko : gcc-3.4 on ia64 timed out in the testsuite. | 04:05 |
| doko | no, it was never enabled on ia64 | 04:05 |
| infinity | Ahh. I assumed it was enabled on all arches. | 04:06 |
| infinity | Silly me. | 04:06 |
| infinity | Maybe if it was, the odd bugs with it occasionally hanging would have been found sooner. :) | 04:07 |
| infinity | (I still need to look into that some day... I had to kill logwatch on kullervo the other day for gcc-3.4... And lamont had to kill it on hppa, I think) | 04:07 |
| lamont-away | infinity: this time I just had to kill of an expect from 3.4 | 04:09 |
| lamont-away | interesting... said find started after findutils sbuild started. | 04:09 |
| infinity | Ahh. | 04:09 |
| infinity | ARGH. | 04:10 |
| infinity | buildd-watcher on floe is racing AGAIN. | 04:10 |
| infinity | Why just floe? Have you hand-hacked something there? <stafre> | 04:10 |
| infinity | s/starfe/stare/ | 04:10 |
| lamont-away | not to the best of my knowledge... | 04:10 |
| infinity | Same buildd-watcher as on hooker... | 04:11 |
| infinity | <sigh> | 04:11 |
| infinity | I'm going to shut down the buildd on floe for now, and look into it tomorrow when my plate's not so full. | 04:12 |
| infinity | Having several buildds running and competing with each other for chroots is kinda. Uhm. Bad. | 04:12 |
| infinity | (Yes, that happened earlier today) | 04:13 |
| infinity | Though right now, we only seem to have one buildd/sbuild, thankfully. Many buildd-watchers, though. | 04:13 |
| lamont-away | buildd-watcher backs up sometimes, yes. | 04:13 |
| lamont-away | there might be a window where it assumes that it's find (build-tree cleaning/reporting, etc) will finish before another buildd-watcher starts. | 04:14 |
| lamont-away | this is not always the case... | 04:14 |
| fabbione | hey lamont-away | 04:14 |
| infinity | Oddly enough, this never seems to happen on m68k, despite my running buildd-watcher several times per hour and having really, really, really slow I/O. | 04:15 |
| infinity | I guess I should check your diffs against Ryan's tree. | 04:15 |
| infinity | doko : I see you're getting pressure from vorlon for the system compiler split. | 04:17 |
| infinity | (or, at least splitting java out) | 04:17 |
| infinity | doko : You really should have put it in big blinking letters in your toolchain roadmap so you could do it on paid time. It's totally justifiable for Ubuntu as well. | 04:18 |
| doko | infinity: it should be in JavaRoadmap | 04:21 |
| elmo | infinity: our insane number of distros doesn't help, most m68k buildds only have one chroot to traverse | 04:24 |
| elmo | at least, whenever I look at a buildd they tend to sit their in io wait for a rather pointless find over the chroots | 04:24 |
| infinity | elmo : Well, 6. | 04:24 |
| infinity | But yeah, we have more than 6. | 04:25 |
| jbailey | What's happening with a core compiler split? | 04:26 |
| elmo | ? | 04:27 |
| doko | gcc-4.0 sucks in the whole archive as b-d's while completing libgcj ... | 04:28 |
| doko | jbailey: and even in ubuntu it would be nice to get rid of the x dependencies, as you can see | 04:28 |
| fabbione | jbailey: i think it all goes back to modular gcc... | 04:29 |
| fabbione | that i did propose not too long ago to $icantrememberwhoinhere | 04:29 |
| infinity | Ah-ha. | 04:29 |
| infinity | lamont : I'll fix the "buildd-watcher takes too effin' long" bug tomorrow when I have time to test it. | 04:30 |
| doko | fabbione: I can't remember, did you? | 04:30 |
| infinity | But it's pretty obvious. | 04:30 |
| infinity | Original code: | 04:30 |
| fabbione | doko: i don't think it was to you actually | 04:30 |
| infinity | next if $file =~ m#^build/chroot-[^/] +$#; | 04:30 |
| fabbione | doko: more likely jbailey | 04:30 |
| infinity | Ours kinda. Uhm. Doesn't do that. | 04:30 |
| elmo | hahaha | 04:30 |
| === infinity claps. | ||
| elmo | more to the point ours doesn't match 'build/' | 04:30 |
| infinity | Stupid build-* split. | 04:30 |
| infinity | elmo : Yes, we explicitely name all the build-$DIST targets in ours... Then don't exclude the chroots. | 04:31 |
| infinity | I'd blame lamont, but this is a public channel, and I'm a nice person. | 04:31 |
| infinity | Oops, gthat was my out loud voice. :) | 04:31 |
| infinity | s/gthat/that/ | 04:31 |
| fabbione | ahaha | 04:31 |
| lamont-away | infinity: oops. :) | 04:32 |
| lamont-away | infinity: sigh | 04:32 |
| infinity | I'll fix it tomorrow. | 04:33 |
| lamont-away | was that in our original base, or just merged in from upstream? | 04:33 |
| infinity | For bonus points, I'll actually run a full watcher run, with no report-ed-old-files cache and actually clean everything up, so I can stop ignoring cron's whining. | 04:33 |
| === lamont-away added an -xdev to the find, which got rid of the ccache search.. :-) | ||
| lamont-away | ok | 04:34 |
| infinity | Heh, but if chroot is properly ignored (and ~/ccache as well), that's a non issue. | 04:34 |
| infinity | elmo : floe should stop setting off alarms for you. | 04:34 |
| infinity | Though I'm curious why floe is the only one that races this badly. Either it has one mother of a huge chroot somewhere (that should be removed and rebuilt), or something's desperately wrong with that box. | 04:35 |
| infinity | I'm going to assume the former, cause it seems well behaved otherwise. | 04:36 |
| lamont-away | fwiw, pitti picks really ugly version numbers | 04:36 |
| lamont-away | inkscape_0.42-1build1ubuntu0.1 is now in breezy-security | 04:37 |
| infinity | foo_1.2.3-1ubuntu05.10? | 04:37 |
| infinity | Oh, eww. | 04:37 |
| lamont-away | 'zactly | 04:37 |
| infinity | Someone should point out to him that 'u' is higher than 'b'. | 04:38 |
| elmo | did you guys get my mail about b-backports btw? | 04:38 |
| elmo | [nb: I'm not chasing, I don't care when it's done, just checking] | 04:38 |
| lamont-away | elmo: when did you send it? | 04:38 |
| infinity | elmo : Yes, and I'll enable it tomorrow, if the world doesn't come to an end first. :) | 04:38 |
| lamont-away | there it is | 04:39 |
| elmo | infinity: kthx | 04:39 |
| infinity | Unless lamont feels the urge. | 04:39 |
| fabbione | can't we forget about -backports by ... let say.. mistake? | 04:39 |
| === infinity coughs. | ||
| fabbione | i mean | 04:40 |
| fabbione | that would comply with the specs | 04:40 |
| lamont-away | infinity: I'll go ahead and create the chroots - that's the easy part. | 04:40 |
| lamont-away | then it should autostart when the nightly chroot update runs | 04:41 |
| fabbione | quoting: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BackportsPromotion | 04:41 |
| infinity | Such faith you have in your automated tools. I like it. | 04:41 |
| fabbione | "Make people more aware of backports, and make the backport request process LESS transparent" | 04:41 |
| lamont-away | adare is now launchpad, yes? | 04:42 |
| fabbione | i can't see anything more hidden than not creating the chroots ;) | 04:42 |
| infinity | lamont-away : In theory. Not sure it's being used as such, but it's definitely not hooked into w-b either. | 04:42 |
| infinity | fabbione : Hah. Nice thinko. | 04:42 |
| fabbione | infinity: when i read that at UBZ i was >< this close to approve the specs :D | 04:43 |
| infinity | Sadist. | 04:43 |
| fabbione | oh yeah | 04:43 |
| fabbione | I LOVE TO SEE PEOPLE SUFFER IN ENDLESS PAIN | 04:44 |
| === infinity goes back to work, after briefly wondering WHY he's working at 2:44am. | ||
| infinity | What I wouldn't give for a nasty case of narcolepsy in my old age. | 04:44 |
| === lamont-away is building the chroots, then I get to go work on septic systems. sigh | ||
| infinity | Man, HP really makes you start at the bottom of the ladder when you're a new hire again, don't they? :) | 04:45 |
| lamont-away | elmo: chroots are created everywhere | 04:58 |
| lamont-away | infinity: nah - this is house work... and the more I procrastinate, the deeper the sludge in the tank. Hence, todya | 04:58 |
| lamont-away | the damage was discovered friday when the nice people pumped the tank for me. | 04:59 |
| lamont-away | but I fear I shall be buying hip-waders before the day is out. | 04:59 |
| infinity | And throwing them out tomorrow. | 05:00 |
| lamont-away | nah - you just put trash bags on them first. :-) | 05:00 |
| === jbailey [n=jbailey@modemcable139.249-203-24.mc.videotron.ca] has left #ubuntu-toolchain ["Leaving"] | ||
| Riddell | infinity: are you going to upload subversion with new libdb ? | 06:53 |
| doko | Riddell: he has to ... it's not buildable otherwise | 06:58 |
| Riddell | and neither is large chunks of KDE | 06:59 |
| === chmj [n=chmj@wbs-146-146-43.telkomadsl.co.za] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| === doko_ [n=doko@dslb-084-059-107-096.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| lamont-away | checking for XTestQueryExtension in -lXtst... no | 09:34 |
| lamont-away | configure: error: libXtst not found, required by java.awt.Robot | 09:34 |
| === lamont-away kicks doko | ||
| lamont-away | interestingly, libxt-dev is in build-depends | 09:34 |
| doko_ | lamont-away: which architecture? | 09:45 |
| lamont-away | that was -2 on ppc | 10:04 |
| lamont-away | is -3 the end of it? | 10:05 |
| fabbione | i told ya that we needed more :) | 10:43 |
| fabbione | gcc-snapshot rules! | 10:43 |
| fabbione | doko: still around? | 10:45 |
| doko | fabbione: yes | 10:59 |
| fabbione | doko: ok-- gcc-4.0 is going to build in 10/15 minutes of sparc | 10:59 |
| fabbione | 3.4 is up | 10:59 |
| fabbione | do we need gcj before we start the transition? | 11:00 |
| doko | no | 11:00 |
| doko | hmm, but gettext depends on it ... | 11:00 |
| fabbione | is gettext a pkg that needs transition? | 11:00 |
| fabbione | well i guess it's going to stall the others | 11:03 |
| fabbione | we will see tomorrow | 11:04 |
| fabbione | doko: thanks for the info | 11:04 |
| fabbione | i am off to sleep | 11:04 |
| doko | no, it doesn't need a transition, but a working libgcj | 11:04 |
| fabbione | ok | 11:04 |
| lamont | gcc-4.0 (-3) will start building on hppa momentarily | 11:06 |
| doko | note that I did separate the build of the gcj packages into a separate source package, so you need to build that as well. that's currently stuck in NEW | 11:08 |
| lamont | can we get that unstuck please? | 11:09 |
| lamont | or does that not need to happen before the transition starts? | 11:09 |
| lamont | avg-pkg-build-time gcc-4.0 | 11:09 |
| lamont | gcc-4.0: 06:31:36 (3 entries, sigma 00:46:59) | 11:09 |
| doko | the build time will drop, it doesn't build java anymore | 11:11 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!