=== lamont-away wanders off for a while [12:11] mdz: I'm done for now, the next stage will require some more scripting, which I can do out of band [12:12] elmo: ok [12:16] doko: done [12:18] doko: please use source package names in the wiki [12:18] reports are only needed for source packages anyway [12:21] mdz: thanks [12:50] mdz: please process NEW / main promotions of *c2a* binaries at the end of your workday again, if possible. I hope we can accelerate this thing a bit. [12:50] heading to bed now ... [12:55] GRR [12:55] E: libakode2 in dapper is in the overrides more than once. [12:55] ERAHAERHGQ%#YQ#$%YQ#$%YQ%#YH [12:57] is that my fault? [12:57] no [01:08] elmo: must be mine then === lamont [n=lamont@mib.fc.hp.com] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain [01:20] elmo: were you new-ing at the same time that I was? [01:33] woo hoo. gcj-4.0/hppa is in the install stage [01:37] dh_movefiles: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated. [01:37] bad gcj-4.0 [01:40] NOTE: The package could have used binaries from the following packages [01:40] (access time changed) without a source dependency: [01:40] gettext: /usr/bin/xgettext /usr/bin/msgfmt /usr/bin/msgmerge [01:40] python-dev: /usr/bin/python [01:40] it still build-depends gettext [03:03] hppa is now unstuck and building === lamont begins creating a second hppa buildd on a 4-way J7000 === lamont -> dinner === jbailey [n=jbailey@modemcable139.249-203-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain [03:20] gcj-4.0: Depends: libgcc (>= 4.0.2) [03:20] shouldn't that be libgcc1? [03:48] Probably, yes. [04:36] why isn't gettext-kde in anastacia? [04:37] mdz: gettext-kde main inclusion report http://wiki.kubuntu.org/MainInclusionGettextKDE [04:37] Riddell: is it seeded? [04:38] no, new build-dep [04:44] since when? cron.sync only runs once a day [04:48] since about 6 hours ago [04:48] or whenever I uploaded new kde stuff [04:54] yeah, wait a while; unfortunately germinate is an expensive operation for 6 arches + 3 distros, so it only runs once a day [04:55] right [05:22] mdz: yes [05:30] anyone know where libjvm.so should be found? it's wanted by kdebindings [05:31] usr/lib/j2se/1.4/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so multiverse/devel/j2re1.4 [05:32] hmm, multiverse, didn't think of that. maybe best do without java bindings then [05:39] elmo: still about? [05:39] wanted to make sure that buildd@bld-4.mmjgroup.com wasn't going to cause barfage [05:41] added [05:43] danke === lamont goes to actually hook said beast up to the network and power. === lamont [n=lamont@mib.fc.hp.com] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === chmj [n=chmj@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain === chmj [n=chmj@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain [10:00] is the archive still broken? [10:01] Define broken. [10:03] broken = we can't start with the c++/kde uploads [10:05] Have we not already been doing c++ transition uploads? [10:05] I'm sure I've seen some. [10:05] yeah [10:05] at least a couple of libs [10:06] gcj appears to be uninstallable, but if you're not building java stuff you should be okay. [10:06] bah, I am building java stuff :-/ [10:06] mostly [10:06] Oh. Sucks to be you, then. :) [10:08] yes, looks like it's a mistake [10:09] doko: since you are going to push ubuntu9, can you please disable the unrequired test-suites? [10:09] it will save some hours in building gcj [10:14] fabbione: they currently are disabled anyway [10:18] fabbione: 8 did succeed otherwise? [10:20] doko: yup [10:24] is dapper gonna come with ai64 ? [10:25] or dapper+1 [10:42] We won't officially release on ia64, afaik, but the ia64 port is fairly healthy. [02:39] SCCs don't "officially" release, or do you think it'll suck in other random ways? === doko hides, we need -4ubuntu10 ... [02:41] doko: well be fast than [02:41] i didn't start building 9 yet [02:44] no, test build and install first. [02:45] jbailey : I don't see ia64 sucking. It looks to be in pretty good shape. [03:59] elmo: mucho UNACCEPT mail... fix pls [04:36] infinity: I haven't tracked ia64 beyond glibc builds. =) I thought SCC archs could release, but we just didn't care about them for security? [04:42] doko: with a multi-hour build time, could you queue up your gcj fixes and upload them at once, instead of camm-style? [04:42] lamont-away: that was the last one [04:43] doko: you're sure this time, eh? [04:44] :-) [04:54] lamont-away: It's only fun if you can get all three of the primary arches buildds building your package at the same time. [04:55] heh === lamont-away throws fruit at jbailey [05:00] lamont-away: Isn't today the biggest holiday of the year in the US? Does your wife know that you're at the computer? =) [05:01] nah - the "canonical dead dude" holiday in a month or so is bigger. === jbailey 's first thought was "Someone DIED?" [05:01] (quote derived from _Bill_and_Ted's_Excellent_Adventure_. Or was it Fast_Times?) [05:02] But, little c. right. [05:02] "so what you're telling me is that Napoleon was a short, fat, dead dude?" "Yeah." [05:02] holidays tend to be commemorating dead dudes. [05:03] Sure. The living that name holidays after them are usually the type that the US army is trying to get rid of. Fairly actively. =) [05:04] cute factoid on Fast Times... One of the actors is "Nicolas Cappola", who later changed is name to "Nicolas Cage", to separate himself from nepotism charges because of his uncle (Francis Ford Coppola). [05:05] lots of big-name 80/90's actors in that movie... all very young and very just-starting. [05:05] wow. that's really on-topic. [05:05] :-( === doko [n=doko@dslb-084-059-090-000.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain