/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2005/11/30/#ubuntu-doc.txt

=== jsgotangco [n=jsg@210.4.38.43] has joined #ubuntu-doc
jsgotangcommm?12:17
jsgotangcoROCK?12:17
jsgotangcothat doesn't sound so mdke 12:17
mdkeelol12:20
mdkelolol12:20
mdkedamn keyboard12:20
jsgotangco:P12:21
mdkehello jsgotangco 12:21
mdkehey good time to arrive12:21
mdkecheck out my about ubuntu12:21
mdkehttp://doc.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/about-ubuntu/C/index.html12:21
jsgotangcoits only 7:21am12:22
jsgotangcoheh12:22
=== jsgotangco checking it out now
jsgotangcowow that's pretty mad css going12:22
mdkehardly ;)12:22
mdkei copied the background from the old hoary one, and the fonts and stuff is all classic ubuntu fonts12:22
jsgotangcoahhh12:23
mdkejust need to get rid of that double line at the top12:23
mdkeit is added by the stylesheet i suppose12:23
jsgotangcoi havent been updating my svn i hvae been studying henrik's opencd with the moin based browser thing12:23
mdke?12:23
mdkehe said there was a new version out, what is new?12:24
jsgotangcoupdated apps12:24
jsgotangcodesktop moin12:24
mdkelol12:24
mdkenice one12:24
mdkehave you been working on it?12:24
jsgotangcoyeah12:24
jsgotangcothe next orchard will have full moin12:25
mdkeorchard?12:25
jsgotangcoits the build system12:25
mdkei didn't know you worked on theopencd12:25
mdkecool12:25
jsgotangconot that much, just contributing bits of stuff 12:25
mdketell me more!12:26
jsgotangcohttp://wiki.theopencd.org/MoinBasedBrowser12:26
mdkehehe12:27
mdkehenrik is obsessed with moin :)12:27
mdkein a good way12:27
jsgotangcomgalvin, ping?12:28
=== wazza [n=warren@auproxy1.proxy.lucent.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc
jsgotangcothere's no 24UTC right?12:28
mdkeno, not to my knowledge12:29
jsgotangcothat would be 00 the next day12:29
jsgotangcoheh12:29
jsgotangcomgalvin, i don't think there's a 24UTC12:29
mdkeis that a docteam meeting?12:30
=== mdke looks
jsgotangcono a private one =)12:31
mdkeoh i c12:31
mdkefor that book eh?12:31
mdkehow's it going?12:32
jsgotangcopretty good12:32
mdkehow long left?12:33
jsgotangcotheres work in progress going..12:33
jsgotangcooh a bit longer12:33
mdkecool12:33
mdkeit won't be open source will it?12:33
jsgotangcoahh i haven't really gone through the licensing yet...12:33
=== jsgotangco is busy preparing for a trip next week
mdkecool12:34
mdkeyou never know ;)12:34
mdkejsgotangco, what time is the next docteam meeting? are we going to rotate them 14 -> 23?12:34
jsgotangcoi'd like to rotate it12:34
mdkei can't remember12:34
mdkewhat time did we rotate it to last time?12:34
mdke22 or 23 i think12:35
jsgotangcoi belive i said we'll do the next one at 2212:35
mdkeawesome12:35
=== mdke updates
jsgotangcoat least that would be a saturday morning for me12:35
mdke22 is good for me too12:36
mdkerob1, around? i don't think the desktopguide is building12:36
mdkerob1, http://pastebin.ca/3100912:42
Burgworkmdke, about ubuntu is still too wordy, but the css is nice12:42
mdkeBurgwork, i haven't changed the words, except to add the section on gnu12:42
mdkethe words are sabdfl's12:43
jsgotangcowe'll change it soon, AboutUbuntu isn't that hard really12:43
mdkechange what?12:43
jsgotangcothe text if needed12:43
mdkethe words?12:43
jsgotangco"if needed"12:44
mdkeyeah12:44
mdkemark said that he likes them12:44
mdkei pointed him at BrowserDefaults today and he suggested that the words could stay the same12:44
mdkei think the doc should be shorter too fwiw12:45
jsgotangcoit shouldn't scroll on a standard resolution12:45
jsgotangcowell not standard, but the majority resolution12:46
mdkei dunno about that12:46
mdkethe ubuntu website scrolls12:46
mdkebut shorter sections would be good12:46
jsgotangcothere must be a way to make this look more interesting..12:47
mdkesomething I really want to figure out how to do is how to include the Ubuntu top bar on all our docs12:47
jsgotangcouse a kde stylesheet haha12:48
mdkethat doesn't do it either ;)12:48
mdkehttp://kubuntu.org/docs/kquickguide/C/12:48
mdkebut it must be really easy12:49
Burgworkmark is on crack, to be honest12:49
Burgworkstart.ubuntu.com is going to take the words away, finally12:49
jsgotangcoits a very good toolchain12:49
mdkeBurgwork, will start.ubuntu.com be both online and offline, depending on whether the user has internet access?12:49
Burgworkno idea12:50
mdkealso, don't forget that the spec isn't approved12:50
Burgworkthe most likely usecase is that someone opens a browser to go on the web12:50
Burgworkif they have  browser open offline, they either have a local apache install or have opening an html file from nautilus12:51
Burgworkin either case, it doesn't really matter12:51
mdkei agree with that.12:51
mdkebut a lot of people don't12:51
BurgworkI think the number of people who open a browser before they have internet access is vanishingly small12:52
Burgworka thus you must satisfy the 95%, who don;t want a giant block of text as their homepage12:52
mdkewell i hope that about ubuntu is useful to at least some people12:53
Burgworkwe should keep the document12:53
jsgotangcosure12:53
Burgworkjust don;t have it is the default homepage12:53
=== mdke nods
mdkewhat are we gonna do with the document though?12:54
Burgworkit can be linked off of start12:54
Burgworkand we can ship it12:55
mdkeit looks crap in yelp tho12:55
mdkebest just to move it to the website and be done with it :D12:55
Burgworkprobably12:55
mdkeoh well12:55
Burgworkthen it probably should be at www.ubuntu.com/about12:56
=== mdke nods
mdkecurrently that stuff is at /ubuntu12:56
Burgworkcan you ping hendrik about that?12:56
mdkewhat, to change the url?12:56
Burgworkyes12:56
mdkeyeah12:57
mdkewe'll have to put some redirects in12:57
Burgworkoh, and www.ubuntu.com, the upper left, the graphic is corrupted12:57
Burgworkbut on the wiki12:57
Burgworkbut not12:57
mdkecorrupted how?12:57
mdkelooks the same here12:58
mdkehave you seen the moin version of the site?12:58
Burgworkhttp://img308.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshotubuntulinuxforhumanb.png12:58
Burgworkoh12:58
Burgworkshould I file a bug about this12:58
mdkewhere is the corruption?12:59
Burgworklook above the tabs12:59
Burgworksee the streaking?12:59
mdke_above_ yes01:00
mdkeargh01:00
mdkei mean yes01:00
mdkeBurgwork, that is upper right :)01:00
Burgworkoh01:00
mdkeinteresting, i don't get it in firefox01:00
jsgotangcobrb01:00
BurgworkI did that yesterday with my brother01:00
mdkeBurgwork, if you don't see it here, probably forget about it and wait for the new site01:01
mdkehttp://69.60.114.106/01:01
BurgworkI see it there, but not as bad01:02
mdkethen file it i guess01:02
BurgworkI just pinged hendrik01:02
mdkehe's not online01:02
Burgworkby email01:03
mdkeaha01:03
mdkethat'll do the trick01:03
Burgworkjust found one more thing01:03
Burgworkthe favico needs to be transparent01:03
mdkeyeah that would be nice01:03
Burgworkthe fonts don't look as good in the moin version01:04
Burgworkthey are too small01:04
mdkei think it is the line spacing01:04
Burgworklooks at the tabs01:04
Burgworkthe words are much smaller their01:05
Burgworks/their/there01:05
mdke1.25 as apposed to 1.5 line spacing01:05
mdkeyeah that was intentional01:05
Burgworkugh01:05
Burgworkthat makes them harder to read01:05
mdkethe tabs?01:05
mdkei preferred em bigger too01:05
Burgworkwe need less words and more space on the website01:06
mdkerefresh01:07
mdkethat's about the same as ubuntu.com i think01:08
mdkeBurgwork01:10
Burgworkyup?01:13
mdkeyou see the difference?01:14
mdkethat is 1.5 spacing rather than 1.2501:14
Burgworkyes I do01:14
Burgworkanything that decreases space is a bad thing01:14
mdkeok changing back now, i've mailed henrik to suggest increasing space01:15
Burgworkdo you have full control over that moin install?01:15
mdkewell...01:15
mdkei have admin rights on that server01:15
mdkethe amount of control is limited by the fact that I don't know what I'm doing that well01:16
mdkei'm no moin expert01:16
Burgworkah01:16
=== Burgwork wants to go to town on the number of words on the main page
mdkelol01:17
mdkedon't do that01:17
mdkebut you have a good point01:18
Burgworkah yes01:18
Burgworkhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/RestrictedFormats?action=diff&rev2=135&rev1=13401:18
Burgworkguess who made that edit ;)01:18
mdkelots of words really are just an excuse for not bothering to structure the site carefully01:18
mdkeyou?01:19
Burgworkor somebody being paid by the black pixel01:19
Burgworkyep01:19
Burgworkthose two paragraphs could be said in one01:19
mdkeheh01:19
mdkegood edit01:19
Burgworkif the person was interested in more, they can google the topic01:19
mdkealthough, perhaps the word "patent" wouldn't go amiss01:20
mdkeor a link to a page which explains what free means01:20
mdkeoh, you've done that :)01:20
mdkeawesome01:20
Burgworkactually, RestrictedFormats is quite sane right now01:21
Burgworkand quite well formatted01:21
BurgworkI just needed to tweak it now01:21
Burgworkhmm, I make a great deal of sense right now01:21
mdke:)01:22
mdkeyeah, no other linux distros have so many words on their websites01:23
mdkewell gentoo probably does, but it's all news01:23
Burgworkgentoo is in the middle of redesigning the website01:25
=== jjesse [i=user@69-87-142-181.async.iserv.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== robitaille [n=robitail@ubuntu/member/robitaille] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== jsgotangco [n=jsg@210.4.38.43] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== LaserJock [n=LaserJoc@adsl-69-104-117-67.dsl.renocs.pacbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== highvoltage [n=Jono@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== robitaille [n=robitail@ubuntu/member/robitaille] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== zenrox [n=zenrox@71.115.198.118] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== Belutz [n=Belutz@ubuntu/member/belutz] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== jsgotangco [n=jerome@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== enrico [n=enrico@debian/developer/enrico] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== uniq [n=frode@213.184.199.55] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== jjesse [n=jjesse@mail.ftpb.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== Kamping_Kaiser [n=Kaiser@ppp207-235.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== jjesse [n=jjesse@mail.ftpb.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== apokryphos [n=apokryph@70.85.216.98] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== enrico [n=enrico@debian/developer/enrico] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== mgalvin_ [n=mgalvin@host-66-202-95-170.spr.choiceone.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== WaterSevenUb [n=WaterSev@195-23-220-244.net.novis.pt] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== highvolt1ge [n=Jono@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== highvoltage [n=Jono@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== Belutz_ [n=Belutz@ubuntu/member/belutz] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== LaserJock [n=LaserJoc@ppp-69-227-156-242.dsl.renocs.pacbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
LaserJockmdke: I got the packaging guide to open in yelp07:23
mdkeLaserJock, cool!07:52
mdkeLaserJock, wanna send a patch?07:52
LaserJockmdke: well, in a bit. I am still trying to clean it up a bit.08:10
LaserJockgotta get lunch, I'll be back in an hr or so08:19
=== Burgwork wonders whether he should approve mako to be a member of the doc team
mdkedon't see why not08:30
mdkealthough that team will eventually govern commit access so we should probably limit it to contributors08:30
mdkeBurgwork, ask him why he applied08:30
BurgworkI approved him08:34
BurgworkI don't harm in letting him have commit access08:34
mdkeno, this is a good point08:34
Burgworklets just say he is not an unknown08:34
mdkehe applied recently? odd, hopefully he is thinking of doing some doc work :)08:35
Burgworkhe applied today08:35
BurgworkBenjamin Mako Hill   2005-11-25    Approved08:36
mdkecool08:36
Burgworkwhat about having the wiki team as part fo the doc team08:37
mdkeit is already I thought08:37
mdkei dunno if that would screw around with commit access08:37
Burgworkcan we make it so that only people who are actually members and not members through another gropu have access?08:37
mdkenot sure08:38
mdkethey haven't sorted out the commit access thing anyway08:38
mdkethey are working on it for bzr... but i don't think it's finished08:38
BurgworkI was chatting with SteveA, he said that fine grained access control was coming08:38
mdkeyeah, but bzr only I think08:38
mdkei spoke to spiv last night about it08:38
Burgworkthey are looking to make the auth mechanism quite plugable08:38
mdkeanyhow we can think about bzr soon anyway08:39
Burgworkyes08:39
BurgworkI like dapper+1 myself08:39
Burgworkeven now is too late into the cycle to really switch08:39
mdkeassuming it will work for us, dapper+1 is fine by me08:39
=== apokryphos sees http://doc.gwos.org and wonders why there's another duplication of effort :D
mdkei'm not convinced, and spiv kinda confirmed this, that we need a decentralised version control system08:40
mdkebut apparently they are working on a centralised thing for bzr anyway08:40
Burgworkcvs mode08:40
mdkeapokryphos, yeah, we've had quite a lot of discussion with that group08:40
mdkeBurgwork, http://bazaar.canonical.com/LockStepDevelopment08:40
Burgworkhmm08:41
BurgworkI realized why moin pisses me off so much08:41
apokryphosmdke: what's the deal with it? Are they archiving stuff or just on another whole project? Seems like there already is (i) a doc team; (ii) a wiki08:41
Burgwork1) It assumes content is more important that presentation08:41
Burgwork2)It assumes that the editors have other means of communicating08:41
BurgworkMediawiki assumes neither of these things08:41
mdkeapokryphos, start about http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=81666&page=308:42
apokryphosthanks08:43
mdkeapokryphos, about post 25 (me)08:43
mdkethen go over the page08:43
=== thechitowncubs [n=john@c-67-175-52-127.hsd1.il.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
apokryphosarggh08:47
apokryphosreally don't like to generalize here, but linux+forums ends up always aggrevating me :/08:47
mdkei used to love the gentoo forums08:47
mdkewhenever I post in ubuntuforums, I always find myself struggling to make peace and promote discussion08:47
apokryphosprecisely. I stepped in the other day to say that constructive criticism and patches for programs are good, and I got called a "moron" and a troll. Gah.08:48
mdkethat doc.gwos thing is such a shame, because so much great effort goes into it which could go into the wiki08:48
=== dholbach [n=daniel@ubuntu/member/dholbach] has joined #ubuntu-doc
dholbachhi08:49
apokryphos'zactly; we should be able to reason through things like that -- it's made too difficult08:49
mdkeapokryphos, i spent a lot of hours on it, not just in that forum thread but also on irc and by email, no good08:49
mdkedholbach, hi08:49
apokryphosI guess when people don't want to reason, they simply won't.08:50
dholbachmdke: did we agree on 5.11-1 as a version number?08:51
mdkedholbach, no, but that is fine by me08:51
dholbachmdke: or maybe better 5.11.1, 5.11.2, 5.11.308:52
dholbachhmmm08:52
mdkedholbach, whichever you prefer08:52
dholbach:)08:52
apokryphos5.11.1!08:52
apokryphosdamn those hyphens :-O08:52
dholbach5.11.1-1 :)08:52
mdkeheh08:52
mdkedholbach, so in terms of building docs, all that is necessary should be "make gdeb" in the ubuntu directory08:53
dholbachi do     debuild08:53
dholbachwhich i do in every other package too08:53
=== mdke doesn't know how that works
mdkewhat calls the "make gdeb"?08:54
dholbachif you have a look at debian/rules08:54
dholbach(that's the package makefile)08:54
mdkeoh yeah08:54
dholbachan obfuscated version of it08:54
mdkecool08:55
=== jjesse [n=jjesse@mail.ftpb.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc
mdkehi there jjesse 08:55
jjessehello mdke08:56
jjessejust upgraded to kde3.5rc2 :)08:56
jjesseboy is it slow here at work today over 1/2 of the company is gone08:56
mdkeholidays?08:56
dholbachyou normally have build targets in packages like build, clean, binary, ... - but jbailey wrote large parts of cdbs (which is used in this package), which hide the internals of a package build system and make it easier08:56
jjessemdke: yeah day after thanksgiving08:56
mdkedholbach, ah i see08:56
mdkejjesse, turkey leftovers eh08:57
jjessemmm turkey :)08:57
apokryphosjjesse: try out kopete -- many advances 8)08:57
mdkedholbach, so did you svn up?08:57
dholbachsvn export08:58
jjesseapokryphos: yeah?  i'll have to check them out08:58
apokryphossmooth scrolling, full webcam support, other convenientisms, and other msn-messenger-type things (i.e. nudges etc(08:58
mdkedholbach, cool, how is it lookin?08:58
dholbachmdke: will build in a sec08:59
mdke:)08:59
jjesseapokryphos: it looks a lot cleaner09:02
=== apokryphos nods
dholbachmdke: does this look cool to you? http://ubuntu.gplan.info/docs/package-diff.txt09:06
dholbachmdke: translations dropped, some pictures changed, serverguide added (to sum it up, if i didn't overlook anything)09:07
dholbachVersion: [-5.10-6-]  {+5.11-1+}09:07
dholbachInstalled-Size: [-6360-]  {+984+}09:07
mdkeooh hang on09:07
dholbach^ this is just a bit worrying ;)09:07
mdkewhat is worrying?09:08
dholbach6,3MB -> 984 KB09:08
dholbach;)(09:08
mdkeoh, that's just the translations09:08
mdkei need an image moving09:08
dholbachwhich one?09:08
=== dholbach hangs on
mdkecan you add this line to debian/install09:08
mdkeubuntu/images/C/ubuntuheader.png usr/share/ubuntu/help/images/C09:09
dholbachshould all the documents be registered?09:09
mdkei wanna check one more thing too09:09
mdkei don't understand these:09:10
mdke/usr/share/ubuntu/libs/cdo-C.ent09:10
mdke/usr/share/ubuntu/libs/global.ent09:10
dholbachthey don't seem to get installed in the new package09:11
dholbacherrrrr, they GET installed in the new package09:11
mdkeyeah09:11
mdkehmm09:11
dholbachls that wrong?09:11
mdkethe last package had this:09:12
mdkelibs/*ent usr/share/ubuntu-docs/libs09:12
mdkelibs/*ent usr/share/gnome/libs09:12
mdkegnome/libs/*ent usr/share/gnome/help/libs09:12
mdkegnome/libs/*ent usr/share/ubuntu-docs/gnome/libs09:12
mdkedholbach, can I change the debian/install and insert those, then you go an svn up?09:13
dholbachhm, did i mess with this?09:13
mdkedunno09:13
dholbachgnome/libs -> ubuntu/libs, right?09:13
mdkeyeah09:13
mdkeand usr/share/ubuntu-docs/libs09:13
dholbachright09:13
mdkedholbach, are you gonna change it, or shall I?09:15
dholbachi change it in the package - you do in svn?09:15
mdkeokay... you can't do svn up there?09:16
dholbachi don't think, i have an account09:16
mdkesvn up just pulls the new changes09:17
mdkei'll commit and you can pull em?09:17
dholbachi'm clearly not as experienced with svn :)09:17
dholbachi changed it here already09:17
dholbachi will install the package and see how it works for me09:18
mdkehang on again :)09:18
mdkei actually don't see any difference between the debian/install in our trunk and the one in branches/breezy, so I don't understand why those two extra files are there09:19
dholbachyou created/moved those .ent files afterwards?09:20
dholbachand they got in because of the '*'?09:20
mdkebut why are they in a strange place?09:20
mdke/usr/share/ubuntu/libs09:21
mdkeoh i see it09:21
mdkeperhaps we can just remove that line09:21
mdkelibs/*ent usr/share/ubuntu/libs09:21
dholbachubuntu/images/C/UbuntuLogo.png usr/share/ubuntu/help/images/C09:22
dholbachubuntu/images/C/IconUbuntu.png usr/share/ubuntu/help/images/C09:22
dholbachseem to be typos too09:22
dholbachmust have been, early in the morning09:22
mdkeyeah09:22
mdkeit's because you/me changed gnome to ubuntu09:23
mdkeit should have remained "gnome" i think09:23
dholbachright, what about that other stuff going to    usr/share/gnome/... 09:23
mdkei think the "Files in first .deb but not in second" are fine09:24
dholbachcool09:25
dholbachthat makes me happy09:25
mdkewith the exception09:25
dholbachand brings christmas a bit closer :)09:25
mdkeof those two images you pointed out, and *ent09:25
dholbachright, let's see how they look after the next build09:25
mdkecool09:25
dholbachhttp://ubuntu.gplan.info/docs/package-diff3.txt09:30
mdkelookin09:30
dholbachsitll one /ubuntu/ item09:30
dholbachfound it09:31
mdkei think that those ents and the pngs should be in the same place as for the breezy package09:31
mdkeperhaps they are... it's difficult to see from the diff09:32
mdkewe should have /usr/share/gnome/help/images/C/IconUbuntu.png09:32
dholbachif you have the normal package installed, it should be all in /var/lib/dpkg/info/ubuntu-docs.list09:32
mdke/usr/share/gnome/help/images/C/UbuntuLogo.png09:32
mdkein our package as well09:32
dholbachor you can run    dpkg -c    on the deb09:32
dholbachhrm, they're in ubuntu-docs/...09:34
dholbachone of them is symlinked though09:34
mdkehmm09:34
=== dholbach links the other one too
mdkewe just need to preserve the situation from breezy for those09:34
mdkeeverything *ent and *png should be in the same place09:36
dholbachwhy were they linked before?09:36
mdkei think we need them both in /usr/share/gnome/help (for about ubuntu) and /usr/share/ubuntu-docs for the other documents09:37
dholbachok09:37
dholbachthat's what i just did09:37
dholbachfor both .png09:37
mdkegreat09:37
=== n1c0las [n=nicolas@nicolas.xs4all.nl] has joined #ubuntu-doc
dholbachok, looks MUCH better now09:43
dholbachhttp://ubuntu.gplan.info/docs/package-diff4.txt09:43
dholbach"Files in first .deb but not in second" now contains the .omf and .xml (which should be translated) and quicktour png files09:44
=== mdke is starting to lose track :)
mdkeafaics looks good09:46
dholbachsorry09:46
dholbach:)09:46
dholbachnow i get     cannot create dhelp file '/usr/share/doc/ubuntu-docs/HTML/en/quicktour/C/.dhelp': File not found09:47
mdkewe can iron out any minor troubles, I think it is all good09:47
=== dholbach will track it down
mdkethe quicktour shouldn't be in there09:47
dholbachyep09:47
dholbachi drop debian/ubuntu-docs.doc-base.quicktour09:48
mdkesounds good09:49
dholbachnow lintian complains about a too long extended description - that's in debian/control09:54
dholbachi will trim it a bit09:54
dholbachbut that's rather silly :)09:54
dholbachoh yes... those should be just 80 chars09:54
dholbachper line09:54
mdkeok, cool09:55
dholbachi know it's fascistic, but anyway, i'll change it09:55
mdkesure09:55
dholbachand we'll have NEW docs soon! WOW! :)09:55
=== dholbach can't believe it :)
jjessewahooo!!!09:56
jjesse:)09:56
mdkethis is exciting09:56
mdkedholbach, send me a diff of what you've changed and I'll apply it to our trunk09:56
mdkebut we need to get you commit access09:56
dholbachyou don't want me to :-p09:56
dholbachnext time i test this, i won't do it on my laptop ... the disk is so effing slow09:57
dholbachit installs and it doesnt explode10:00
dholbachWOW10:00
dholbachlet's have a look, where i can see all this funky documentation10:00
mdkein yelp10:00
mdkealso, firefox homepage should be a bit prettier10:00
dholbachfile:///usr/share/ubuntu-artwork/home/index.html ?10:02
mdkethink so yeah10:03
dholbachhrm, it should normally show some pictures or something, no?10:03
mdkejust the logo10:03
dholbachit doesnt show anything now10:03
dholbachand yelp is broken in dapper10:03
dholbachYAY10:03
dholbach:)10:03
mdkecool10:03
dholbachdoesnt show pictures i mean10:04
mdkeok10:04
mdkeon breezy, the logo is in file:///usr/share/images/C/UbuntuLogo.png10:04
dholbachok, here's what i will do now: i will upload the .deb package to my place, send you the diff10:04
mdkethe new one should be file:///usr/share/images/C/ubuntuheader.png10:04
dholbachi hope we'll get yelp sorted out again10:04
mdkehope so10:04
mdkebut yelp is pretty shit for our documentation anyway10:04
dholbachtrying (in vain) to upload a package to the archive now, is probably not the best thing to do :)10:05
mdkehmm10:05
dholbachyou want to have it uploaded?10:05
mdkeno, that's cool10:05
mdkeas long as our svn is up to date10:06
mdkewe can upload whenever10:06
dholbachok10:06
dholbachcool10:06
dholbachi don't mind, if we upload a package and an image is missing10:06
mdkeme neither10:06
mdkebut I can fix that quickly10:06
dholbachbut if i can't have a look with yelp, that's something different ;)10:06
mdkeso yelp breaking is not our fault?10:07
mdkeit was already broken?10:07
dholbachyes10:07
dholbachbecause of the new firefox in dapper10:07
mdkeahh10:07
mdkefine10:07
dholbachyelp relies on firefox for the rendering10:07
dholbachyeah, great! :)10:07
mdkewell I'm sure that will be fixed quickly10:07
mdkesend me the patch, then I'll fix the image thing, and we can upload once yelp is fixed10:08
dholbachthanks a lot10:09
mdkeor before, if you like10:09
dholbachi will try looking at the package tomorrow with a breezy-livecd :)10:10
mdkerock10:10
dholbachi messed up the build dir and the .deb is just 140K big now10:20
dholbachi will have to investigate10:21
dholbachbut i think i won't do that now, but just get out and have a beer somewhere :)10:21
dholbachsorry to disappoint you there, but i'll mail you10:22
dholbachi'm just a bit tired today10:22
mdkedholbach, np10:35
dholbachhave a nice weekend guys :)10:35
=== dholbach hugs mdke
=== dholbach hugs everybody else
mdkesee ya :)10:36
=== LaserJock [n=LaserJoc@ppp-69-227-156-242.dsl.renocs.pacbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== rob1 [n=rob@ubuntu/member/rob1] has joined #ubuntu-doc
rob1wow.. full house today11:39
rob1theres only like 4 people away11:39
mdkeyo11:40
rob1hi mdke11:40
mdkerob1, i meant to ask you, do you know why the internal links don't work in the desktopguide xml?11:40
mdkethat olink stuff, is it just for the html?11:41
rob1the olink stuff is for olinks within the document11:41
rob1I haven't done them yet (they are still all xrefs)11:41
rob1but they still should be working11:41
rob1at least they do here when I build html using the /ubuntu Makefiles11:42
mdkerob1, can you try opening the xml in yelp11:42
mdke?11:42
rob1they work for me there too11:42
rob1hang on11:42
rob1yep the xrefs are working in yelp for me11:43
rob1well, they are forwarding to the right page11:44
rob1the olinks will forward to the exact link11:44
mdkehmm11:44
rob1thats why we have the db files, the olinks use them to find where the link is11:45
mdkedunno why I couldn't get them to work11:45
mdkerob1, anyhow, what files apart from xml need to go in the package?11:45
rob1well all the xml files including olinkdb.xml, plus the db directory (and you need to run the make file at least once to create the .db files)11:46
mdkegosh11:47
rob1and sample11:47
mdkeok11:47

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!