/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2005/12/21/#ubuntu-doc.txt

=== wj1 [n=Warren@auproxy1.proxy.lucent.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc
BurgworkLaserJock, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HowToBuildDebianPackagesFromScratch12:09
mdkeevening all12:09
LaserJockhi12:10
LaserJockBurgwork: yeah, seen it.12:10
LaserJockthanks12:10
=== mgalvin [n=mgalvin@ubuntu/member/mgalvin] has joined #ubuntu-doc
LaserJockmdke: just got an email from breezy-updates, cool12:20
mdkeah good12:20
mdkenow to get it approved...12:21
BurgworkLaserJock, mind merging the relevant parts into your own doc and then turning that into a redirect?12:24
mdkei thought their doc wasn't on the wiki12:25
LaserJockBurgwork: hmm, well I will certainly cover the relevant parts but I'm not sure about a redirect12:26
Burgworkmdke, that is some other doc12:26
BurgworkLaserJock, they cover the same subject material12:26
mdkeLaserJock, we don't want wiki pages with the same stuff if possible, it's confusing12:26
LaserJockis it usually ok to redirect wiki to doc.u.c12:27
LaserJockmdke: well, honestly the Packaging guide will probably replace many wiki pages12:27
LaserJockthat is one of the main points12:27
LaserJockthere is packaging info literally all over the wiki12:27
LaserJockbut it is scattered and sometimes wrong12:28
mdkeredirecting to doc.u.c is not really possible12:29
mdkeyou can link there obviously12:29
mdkeit would be nice to tidy up some of the packaging info around the wiki, especially the wrong bits12:30
LaserJockyeah, that is one of my tasks12:30
LaserJockI need to work on w.u.c/MOTU/DocTodo also12:30
=== mdke reboots
=== bshumate [n=bshumate@adsl-210-97-121.clt.bellsouth.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== wj1 [n=Warren@auproxy1.proxy.lucent.com] has left #ubuntu-doc []
LaserJockhmm, so maybe I just make a wiki page that has links to all the Packaging wiki pages12:36
mdkeLaserJock, something like https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperResources12:41
mdkeor https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DevelopersDocumentation12:41
LaserJockargghh, there is just too many to keep track off12:42
mdkejust pick one :)12:42
LaserJockbut I'm trying to pool info together, decide what is correct and what isn't and get it in a good form12:43
LaserJockDeveloperResources is a good starting point12:44
LaserJockshoot, there is DeveloperDocumentation and DevelopersDocumentation12:46
mdkeheh12:48
LaserJockman I wish the wiki could be cleaned up12:48
LaserJockI liked BetterWikiDocs, btw12:49
mdkeah cool12:50
=== jsgotangco [n=ubuntu@210.4.38.43] has joined #ubuntu-doc
BurgworkLaserJock, it will come, with better tools12:58
mhzany one here working on edubunt ucookbook?12:59
Burgworkmhz, jsgotangco is/was01:00
mhzyup01:00
jsgotangcomhz, at the moment, its kjcole and elkner in a bzr rep01:00
mhzkjcole and jelkner too01:00
mhzso you dont know which branch it is?01:01
mhzhmmm, interesting... https://launchpad.net/products/?text=edubuntu01:06
mhzshows both doc teams working on edubuntu01:06
mhzjsgotangco: http://pchb1f.gallaudet.edu/~kjcole/Edubuntu/Cookbook/ is the branch01:10
mdkehey jerome01:13
jsgotangcomhz, like i said in a previous email, its a totally different document to what I have started01:13
jsgotangcomdke, hey dude, you've been busy lately what's up?01:13
mdkeworkin ;)01:13
mdkenearly christmas tho01:14
mdkehow's your job going?01:14
jsgotangcoyes, ive been pretty busy myself01:14
mhzjsgotangco: so you want me to collaborate where?01:14
jsgotangcomhz, i cannot commit to edubuntu atm, i'm just overwhelmed by commitments01:14
mdkemhz, it's up to you01:15
mdkemakes sense to work on the active doc tho01:15
jsgotangcomdke, job is good i've been exposed to a lot of mobile porn lately though01:15
mdkelol01:15
mdkejsgotangco, you say that like it's a bad thing01:15
jsgotangcomdke, yeah especially if one section of the company devotes to gay porn01:16
mhzhehehe01:16
mdkelol01:16
mhzeeeek01:16
mdkeall legal i hope01:16
jsgotangcobut i'm just a solutions architect, i make the infrastructure decisions irregardless of whats the content heh01:16
jsgotangcomdke, sure of course, its perfectly normal to have such an adult mobile culture in au01:16
mdke:)01:17
mdkethese aussies....01:17
jsgotangcothink of it as mobile king's cross hah01:17
jsgotangcobut its only like 2% of the business most of it are targeted to teens01:17
mdkeouch01:18
mdkesounds like the porn side is better01:18
jsgotangcohahaha01:18
jsgotangcowe have this old ivr machine which is an interesting piece of work01:19
jsgotangcoi wouldn't delve into details but i won't be calling an adult chat line for sure after learning who's behind those voices...01:19
mdkehahaha01:20
mdkescary01:20
jsgotangcoyeah dude i'm pretty shocked as well01:22
jsgotangcohehe01:22
jsgotangcoimagine people pay $3au for that crap01:23
jsgotangcoper minute01:23
mdkehmm01:24
mdkedoes sound a bit silly01:24
jsgotangcointerestingly enough we still get good revenue from the old system, but mobile has been the cash cow01:24
jsgotangcomdke, how come you're still not aggregated?01:25
mdkejsgotangco, apparently planet is broken still01:25
mdkei find it weird because planet is the simplest software ever to run, you just need a cronjob and access to config.ini, and you're away01:26
jsgotangcoyeah01:26
mdkeit's annoying me recently because I want to post about so many things related to ubuntu-it and ubuntu-docs01:26
mdkeactually I might send a few emails to sounder now01:27
jsgotangcoah k so people are stuck at the moment with our crappy posts01:27
mdkenot crappy at all :)01:27
=== jsgotangco starts to blog linus you're developing for idiots
jsgotangcomdke, we should seriously start looking into bzr01:28
jsgotangcoits been very very usable lately01:29
mdkeyes01:29
mdkei've made a few brief excursions onto the wiki01:29
mdkeso far I'm not convinced...01:29
jsgotangcoreally?01:29
mdkeI would be convinced if we had more stable contributors, so that people would take charge of supervising merges to particular docs01:29
mdkebut a centralised system works well for us, IMO, until that happens01:30
jsgotangcoyes01:30
mdkewe'll see01:30
jsgotangcoperhaps till 6.1001:30
mdkethe one big advantage to bzr01:30
mdkeis LP01:30
mdkemuch better integration there01:30
mdkeLaserJock, what is the status of the packaging guide in our svn?01:36
LaserJockvery old01:36
LaserJocktheCore and I am doing a complete rewrite, however I think it is best to keep the old one up until we have a rough draft01:37
mdkedo you have a new version you wanna upload?01:37
mdkeah ok01:37
mdkeLaserJock, where is your current work?01:37
LaserJockon my computer ;-)01:38
mdkeoh right01:38
mdkewiki page?01:38
mdkeany spec?01:38
jsgotangcomdke, awesome work on flight2 docs01:39
LaserJockwe are using https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuPackagingGuide/Outline as an outline01:39
LaserJockI am currently getting feedback from -motu on it01:39
jsgotangcomdke, and yelp speed has improved even on xml01:40
mdkejsgotangco, you're not going to convince me :) we really need to ship html IMHO01:40
mdkeLaserJock, thanks01:41
mdkejeez this is the worst spec ever01:41
mdkehttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/DocsPackaging01:41
jsgotangcomdke, well i do admit the html css is great01:42
jsgotangcoeh? there's nothing in it01:42
jsgotangcoand it seems to have my name as well01:42
jsgotangcotee hee01:42
mdkei'm deleting it, ok by you?01:43
mdkeit's done anyway01:43
jsgotangconp01:43
jsgotangcomaybe you can put on a wiki how your method01:43
mdkeit's quite standard I think01:43
jsgotangcoblah awesome english01:43
mdkeanyway, anything important is in debian/README01:43
jsgotangcoyeah01:44
jsgotangcoPSG-01   mdke (Matthew East)   01:44
mdkehmm?01:45
mdkei can't see most of those characters01:45
jsgotangcoits in hangeul (korean)01:45
HrdwrBoBbecause your client is not UTF801:45
jsgotangcoi think they were discussing about docs01:45
jsgotangcoi've been idling at the korean channel lately although most of the time i have no idea what they are discussing01:45
mdkeHrdwrBoB, term_charset = UTF-801:45
mdkejsgotangco, that was in there eh?01:46
jsgotangcoyeah in another server01:46
jsgotangcoive been helping out the team01:46
mdkeah cool01:47
mdkei'm very big in korea01:47
=== mdke coughs
mdkejsgotangco, so tell us about this asia business tour thing01:48
mdkewho's going?01:48
jsgotangcosabdfl and some canonical staff01:49
mdkelooks like a pretty damn cool idea01:49
mdkeis it top secret who is going?01:49
jsgotangcoi wont be surprised if the devs based in london would come01:49
jsgotangconot at all01:49
jsgotangcowe just have no idea who else is going01:49
mdkeah right01:49
mdkeare you travelling too?01:50
jsgotangcoprobably cvd would come01:50
jsgotangcomost likely around asean only01:50
jsgotangco(south east asian nations)01:50
mdkecool01:51
jsgotangcoit doesnt cost that much to travel between ASEAN nations01:52
=== mdke nods
mdkei gotta sleep01:53
mdkesee you later01:53
jsgotangconight01:55
=== KingBahamut [n=bahamut@c-24-98-229-28.hsd1.ga.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
LaserJockmdke: here is a quick list of packaging resources on the wiki and elsewhere: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuPackagingGuide/Resources03:09
=== hyperactivecrond [n=chris@ppp-69-214-139-148.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== mgalvin [n=mgalvin@ubuntu/member/mgalvin] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== mgalvin [n=mgalvin@ubuntu/member/mgalvin] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== Burgwork [n=corey@S010600131016cf6f.gv.shawcable.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== bhuvan [n=bhuvan@ubuntu/member/bhuvan] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== wj1 [n=Warren@auproxy1.proxy.lucent.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== wj1 [n=Warren@auproxy1.proxy.lucent.com] has left #ubuntu-doc []
=== LaserJock [n=LaserJoc@adsl-69-227-134-29.dsl.renocs.nvbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
Madpilothttp://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/581706:15
Madpilot^^^ getting that validation error w/ common-tasks.xml06:15
MadpilotWTF does it mean?06:15
MadpilotI copied the layout exactly from the next entry down, and it still doesn't validate...06:16
Madpilotnevermind, fix the damn thing... f'ing XML... ;)06:18
Madpilotfixed, even...06:18
LaserJockwhat was wrong?06:21
LaserJockI usually get stuff like that when I forgot to use / to close a tag06:21
Madpilotno, I misspelled a tag :(06:22
Madpilotfixed now, diff generated, it'll be off to the list in a moment06:22
LaserJockdoh, that will do it ;-)06:22
Madpilotpatch sent - BitTorrent now has a basic entry in common tasks06:24
=== zenrox [n=zenrox@71.115.198.118] has joined #ubuntu-doc
LaserJockMadpilot: cool06:31
MadpilotLaserJock: do you own an iPod? if yes, do you want to write that section? there's nothing there now... :)06:32
=== poningru [n=poningru@pool-71-243-233-253.tampfl.fios.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
LaserJockMadpilot: unfortunately no, maybe after Christmas though ;-)06:36
Madpilothehe06:37
Madpilotwas considering treating myself to an iRiver for Xmas - they play .ogg, I have about 30Gb of music in .ogg here :)06:37
LaserJockyeah, that is what I am trying to figure out06:37
LaserJockI have quite a bit of .ogg too ~2GB06:38
LaserJockI wish iPods would play .ogg, that would rock06:39
Madpilotsome of the iRivers look pretty cool - about the size of an iPod shuffle, but with actual controls & a screen06:40
jsgotangcoyeah06:40
jsgotangcoiRivers rock06:40
LaserJocklike what model?06:43
MadpilotI was looking at the 799 or 899 - they're identical except for the external skin... (marketing causes strange things...)06:44
Madpilotonly 1Gb flash drive, but that's enough for a lot of .ogg files...06:44
LaserJockhmm06:45
LaserJockbut with an iPod nano you get 2GB06:47
Madpilotbut no .ogg06:47
LaserJocktrue06:48
LaserJockI would like to support .ogg from a philosophical stand point06:48
MadpilotI'm supporting .ogg because I've already go masses of music ripped to it...06:49
Madpilotgot, not go...06:49
LaserJockwell, I can make .mp3's if I need to, but ...06:50
Madpilotlikewise06:50
LaserJockmaybe a H10 would be better06:50
LaserJockoh, wait. They don't say the support .ogg06:51
MadpilotI think they do06:51
=== zenrox [n=zenrox@71.115.198.118] has joined #ubuntu-doc
MadpilotI just want a music player, a tiny colour screen is a waste of money for me - that's why I'm looking at the 799/89906:51
LaserJockthey just say MP3, WMA, and ASF on their website06:51
LaserJockMadpilot: true, I just want something that is going to last a while06:52
LaserJockhmm, the battery lifetime is much better with the 799/899 than the others06:57
=== manicka [n=manicka@203-158-39-222.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== robitaille [n=robitail@ubuntu/member/robitaille] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== manicka [n=manicka@203-158-39-222.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== burglaptop [n=corey@S0106001217da6aab.gv.shawcable.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== Madpilot [n=bburger@S0106000d88b9f3db.gv.shawcable.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== jsgotangco [n=ubuntu@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== wjb [n=warren@c220-237-178-175.lowrp1.vic.optusnet.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== manicka [n=manicka@203-158-39-222.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== Skywind [n=Skywind@218.104.86.222] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== mpt [n=mpt@201-27-7-12.dsl.telesp.net.br] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== bshumate [n=bshumate@adsl-210-97-121.clt.bellsouth.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== jjesse [n=jjesse@mail.ftpb.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== sqrat1121 [n=sqrat@pcp0012061597pcs.limstn01.de.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
sqrat1121greetings... what's the best way to install fop on breezy? I'm semi-newb but I'll rtfm and do whatever it takes. Any advice?01:59
=== sqrat1121 [n=sqrat@pcp0012061597pcs.limstn01.de.comcast.net] has left #ubuntu-doc []
=== macgyver2_ [n=c6743dfe@you.have.just.been.owned.by.vengefuldeath.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== macgyver2_ [n=c6743dfe@pdpc/supporter/student/macgyver2] has left #ubuntu-doc []
=== jjesse [n=jjesse@mail.ftpb.com] has joined #ubuntu-doc
Madpilotmeeting in five minutes?02:56
jjesseyup02:58
Madpilotcool02:58
Madpilotgood morning, and all that02:59
jjessemorning Madpilot 02:59
jjessehmm where's the setting in konversatation to keep the window always on top?02:59
=== jsgotangco [n=jsg@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #ubuntu-doc
jjessemorning jsgotangco 03:03
jsgotangcohey03:03
=== mhz [n=mhz_chil@pc-252-84-215-201.cm.vtr.net] has joined #ubuntu-doc
mdkehello all03:26
mhzhi03:26
mdkehow's the meeting?03:26
=== mgalvin [n=mgalvin@ubuntu/member/mgalvin] has joined #ubuntu-doc
Madpilotno meeting yet, but there's a few of us in -meeting already03:26
mdkewho's around?03:26
mhzmdke: can the wiki be used as personal Blog to register anything regarding your hardware testings, kernel configs, etc?03:27
mdkemhz, sure03:28
mhzmdke: okis.03:28
mhzmdke: and do you have 'ground rules' we can use to invite necomers to wikis, not to use wiki names like tHISiSmYwikiPAGE03:29
mhz?03:29
mdkenot to my knowledge03:29
mdkeexcept for WikiGuide03:30
Madpilotthere's some mention of "good wiki page titles" in WikiGuide, isn't there?03:30
=== mdke can't remember
=== mhz opening tab
mhzCould we have a bot to provide us with wiki URL's ?03:31
Madpilotyeah - 4th bullet point in Style & Guidelines03:32
mhzindeed03:32
mhz5th03:33
mdkejsgotangco, iosn looks cool04:36
jsgotangcoexcept it lacks money04:37
jsgotangcosadly, its terribly undermanned04:37
mdkeoh well, at least it exists04:38
jsgotangcomdke, yeah jdub's wife is also involved with it04:40
mdkeok04:40
jdubmdke: you'll be pleased to know that i am about to try and unfuck the planet situation again (knowing that elmo is around to pick on him if anything's still broken)04:41
mdkejdub, very pleased :) seriously what is the trouble with giving you write access to a server? you're a trustworthy chap04:42
mdkehenrik has access to wikiconfig.py iirc04:42
jsgotangcojdub, how about a hackergotchi/04:42
jdubi have write access to a different server, where planet will be moved, but it is not set up correctly04:42
jdubjsgotangco: for you?04:43
jsgotangcoyeah04:43
mdkei was gonna say jsgotangco 04:43
mdkenice hackergotchi04:43
jsgotangcoi have one in lp04:43
mdkei saw it on the wiki page04:43
mdkejdub, anyway, awesome news, thanks04:43
jsgotangcoyou think that's good? i thought it was bad...not really good at gimp04:43
mdkeit's loads better than mine04:43
mdkedamn laptop touchpads...04:44
jsgotangcojdub, yeah it sucks to look like a chess pawn in planet04:45
jdubjsgotangco: yeah dude, that's a nice one!04:45
jdubwell done!04:45
jdubnoice04:46
=== mpt [n=mpt@200-171-140-32.dsl.telesp.net.br] has joined #ubuntu-doc
jdubjsgotangco: was that your first? most people don't get it right on the first go.04:48
jsgotangco2nd04:48
jdubahr04:48
jdubcool original photo too04:49
jsgotangcoi tried to smoothen it further but it looked worse04:49
jsgotangcogaussian blurs can be double edged swords04:49
jdubi think the best hackergotchis are the ones where, if you look at the original complete photo, it looks like the hackergotchi stamped onto a generic background image04:49
=== jsgotangco thought most hackgotchis in p.g.o. aren't gimp jobs
jdubwell04:51
jdubhrm04:51
jsgotangcothey look to clean to me04:51
jdubso you do know that most gnome developers are actually real people, with complete bodies and so on, right? :-)04:51
jsgotangcohaha04:52
Madpilotreally? :P04:52
jdublittle known fact04:52
jdubwe don't live in jars, either04:52
jsgotangcoi finally believed that when i got to eat dimsum with jdub04:53
jsgotangcoheh04:53
jdubdude04:53
jdubseriously04:53
jdubi will tell you again04:53
jdubthat i WASN'T FLINCHING at the jars04:54
jdubAT ALL04:54
=== jsgotangco cracks up
jsgotangcojdub, have you seen DapperFlight2 wiki page?04:54
jjesseit rocks04:54
jdubhmm, it has been sitting in a browser tab, unread04:56
jdubfie on these so-called "innovations"04:56
jdubthanks for reminding me :)04:56
jdubWHO WROTE THIS?04:57
jsgotangcoits mgalvin 04:57
jdubTELL ME NOW04:57
jsgotangcohe did the whole thing04:57
jdubdude04:57
jdubseriously04:57
mgalvinhey04:57
jdubi am going to go to galvinia04:57
jduband kiss you04:57
jdubon a mountain04:57
mgalvinglad you like it, but my wife might get jealous ;)04:58
jdubshe can come too04:58
jdubi'll bring pia04:58
jjesseas long as you don't compare who is the better kisser04:58
jdubit'll be great04:58
jsgotangcohahahhaa04:58
mgalvinhehe04:58
jdubthen we can base jump from MOUNT GALVINIA04:58
jdubdude04:58
jdubsee04:58
jdub*most* of this is about BENEFITS04:59
jsgotangcoyeah04:59
jdubwhich is THE BOMB04:59
jdubmgalvin: only recommendation i'd make is that in the few places you're focusing on features ahead of benefits, switch them around05:01
jsgotangcobenefits first, features last?05:01
jdubwell, first you say what the benefit is, then back it up by describing the feature that enables the benefit05:01
jdubFASTER STARTUP TIME05:01
mgalvingood point, i'll keep that in mind for DapperFlight3 :)05:02
jsgotangcoahhh05:02
jdub- hardware detection speed, gnome desktop optimisations05:02
jdub- bootchart for developer analysis of startup issues05:02
jdub- blah blah05:02
jdubthen your contents list is all benefits too :-)05:04
jdubfaster startup time05:04
jdubnew applications05:04
jdubimproved look'n'feel05:04
jdubincreased hardware support05:04
jsgotangcojdub, one thing i notice on *most* software writeups are about features though..that can overwhelm the reader...05:04
jdubyeah05:04
jsgotangcoi get your point now05:05
jsgotangco:)05:05
jdubbut this is so on the money in terms of presentation and focus05:05
jdubmgalvin: ROCK ON!05:05
mgalvinthnx :)05:05
jdubmgalvin: do you generally get this out post-release?05:05
jsgotangcono it got out during flight2 release announcement05:06
jsgotangcoKamion mentioned it05:06
jdubawesome05:06
jdubgood05:06
mgalvinwell its the first full one i have done and it was done right on time05:06
jjesseand hopefully if somoene can let me know we can get a kubuntu dapper flight 305:06
mgalvinyea colin mentioned it in the announcement05:06
jjesseand link that to kaimon's announcment05:06
mgalvini will usually track the dev pretty closely so I can certainly do them pre-release so the link can be in the announcements05:08
mgalvins/will//05:08
jdubmgalvin: i will chat to kamion, ask if he would be willing to sync up more formallyish05:11
jduband when i say "ask" i mean "encourage"05:11
mgalvinsounds good05:11
mdkemgalvin, how about adding menu improvements (MenusRevisited)05:12
jdubgood one05:12
mdkewould come under 405:12
mdkeui improvements05:12
mgalvinjdub: i am usually around all day too, so i am easy to get a hold of05:12
mgalvinmdke: +105:13
jdubmgalvin: where are you based?05:13
jsgotangconew york05:13
jdubui improvements == feature :-)05:13
mgalvinny05:13
jdubsome day i will get there05:13
mgalvincool05:13
jdubhaha05:13
jdubinteresting to see the ubuntu article on slashdot05:14
mdkebtw is there a good way to report bugs in planet?05:14
jdubdevel@lists.planetplanet.org05:14
jdubi will have to make a launchpad entry for it sometime05:14
mdkethanks05:14
jdubor maybe i have05:14
jdubi forget05:14
=== mgalvin worries about ./ effect since the images are still on my sever :-/
jsgotangcooh it got into slashdot?05:16
mdkemgalvin, i don't think that page has been /.'ed05:16
jdubmgalvin: ok, we'll have to sort that out for you05:16
mgalvinnope, i don't see it there05:16
mdkemaybe you can get the images uploaded to the wiki server or somewhere else05:17
mgalvinjdub: mdke and I did move the images to doc.ubuntu.com but  that server has speed/mem issues from time to time05:17
mgalvinso i am still hosting the images05:17
mgalvinthey are also in the doc svn repository so anybody can grab them easily05:18
jsgotangcoit is?05:18
=== jsgotangco didnt know that
jsgotangcooh right05:18
=== jsgotangco remembers downloading a bunch of pngs
mgalvinjsgotangco: we put them there the other day but it was taking minutes and the images still were no loading05:19
mgalvinso i switched back to my box05:19
mdkeyeah the server was blocked05:19
mdkeit's not powerful enough to handle help.u.c05:20
jsgotangcoi gotta sleep05:26
jsgotangcosee you later folks05:26
mgalvinnight05:26
mdkeciao05:26
jsgotangcojdub, are you joining the asia tour?05:45
jdubmaybe for bits of it05:45
jdubwe'll see05:45
jdubi'll be busy at lca and possibly other things05:45
jsgotangcoright05:45
=== mgalvin -> lunch
=== ealden [n=ealden@219.90.94.79] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== theCore [n=thecore@Toronto-HSE-ppp3776001.sympatico.ca] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== bojicas [n=bojicas@217.164.216.121] has joined #ubuntu-doc
=== LaserJock [n=LaserJoc@lambda.chem.unr.edu] has joined #ubuntu-doc
LaserJocktheCore: ping?06:57
theCoreLaserJock, pong06:58
LaserJocktheCore: I added a new page wiki page, UbuntuPackagingGuide/Resources06:58
theCorecool06:59
theCorethat page gonna be helpful07:00
LaserJockif you come across web pages or wiki pages that have good packaging info add it to the list07:00
theCoresure07:00
LaserJockI especially want to nail down the Ubuntu wiki pages07:00
LaserJockwe need to see what the wiki has and what we will be replacing ;-)07:03
theCoreit doesn't seem you missed a single wiki page about packaging07:05
LaserJockwell, I did searchs for package, packaging, and developer07:06
=== theCore [n=thecore@Toronto-HSE-ppp3776001.sympatico.ca] has joined #ubuntu-doc
jdubhttp://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-doc-devel-list/2005-December/msg00020.html08:33
LaserJockjdub: very interesting08:38
mdkeyep, good news if it works08:38
LaserJockwould that effect the decision to ship .html?08:44
mdkenot for me08:44
jdubmdke: you're going to have to figure out some reasons why it makes sense, if you want to convince us that it's sane08:51
mdkejdub, are you saying that I haven't done that?08:57
mdkealso, who needs convincing?08:58
jduba) yes, b) desktop team08:59
mdkeok08:59
mdkejdub, can you justify a) a bit more? I think my post to the desktop list was pretty compelling08:59
mdkealso, not a single person responded giving one reason to ship xml09:01
jdub- if we're going to give the docs stylesheets some love, it should effect the entire installed set (and the easiest way of doing that is through yelp's css)09:03
jdub- i don't believe loading speed will continue to be an issue09:03
jdub- same format stuff doesn't matter, we can render whatever wherever we want09:04
mdkejdub, (a) the entire installed set includes much html already, which we can't customise (b) there is no reason why we shouldn't have a different css for ubuntu-specific docs09:04
mdkeloading speed is an issue09:04
jduba) the objective is to fix that, by shipping docbook09:05
mdke??09:05
mdkeyou're gonna ship (e.g.) cups docs in docbook?09:05
jdubb) there is - why should ubuntu docs be specially different? a consistent ubuntu-branded theme across the docs would be a very positive step09:05
jdubwhere possible, we should ship docbook where available (such as mutt upstream docs, etc)09:06
jjesseis anyone doing any upstream docs?09:06
jdubi don't think "all the other non-desktop docs" is a reasonable excuse for ubuntu docs :)09:06
mdkei really don't follow your arguments09:06
jdubi'm not entirely convinced the language stuff is sorted, but i'll have to play again09:06
mdkejdub, can we continue on that thread by email, it might be easier to discuss that way09:06
jdubok09:08
mdkethe documentation team without exception are in favour of html as far as I can see, so it's just a question of convincing you09:08
jdubdisintegrating a subset of our desktop documentation makes no sense09:09
mdkethe ubuntu specific documentation is not a subset of desktop documentation09:10
mdkeand if the desktop documentation itself was integrated, I'll agree, but it's not09:11
mdkeanyhow, gtg09:11
jdubright, so because in terms of content it's not a subset, that's a good enough reason to disintegrate it from the help system?09:11
mdkeyes, and in any case, I don't think my proposal is correctly described as "disintegration"09:12
mdkeit works really nicely in the same help viewer09:13
jduba) it looks ugly (potentially fixable)09:13
mdkeof course its fixable09:13
jdubb) you can navigate it the same way, it's pointlessly different09:13
jdubs/can/can't/09:13
jdubc) it won't benefit from search, other viewer features09:14
jdubd) why are we being different for the hell of it?09:14
mdkefor the hell of it?09:14
mgalvini have always prefered docbook (but thats just me)09:14
mdkedude you are really just not listening09:14
mpt(b) is a feature, not a bug :-)09:14
mdkeat least pay some respect09:14
mpt(c) is vaporware09:14
mpt(d): for reasons already described on the mailing list09:15
mpt(including it being LIGHT-STORMINGLY FASTAR)09:15
=== mdke looks for search in yelp, doesn't find it
jdubmpt: (b) -> let's talk about this seriously09:16
jjesseshouldn't search be a basic tennet of help?09:16
jdubi know what you want out of the help system09:16
jjessekinda like print09:16
jdubbut that is *not* what our help system is right now09:16
jdubso there's no point pining for the fjords09:16
=== manicka [n=grant@203-158-39-222.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-doc
jdubshoving navigation into shitty html doesn't help the situation09:16
jdubbeing needlessly different doesn't help the situation09:16
mdkeok, with that I give up09:17
mdkeyou're way too aggressive09:17
jdubi think (b) is really important later on, when we don't have HULK-SMASH man pages for graphical software anymore09:17
jdub(c) is implemented and going to ship with 2.1409:17
jdub(d) isn't sufficiently supported from my POV09:18
jdubjjesse: yeah.09:18
jdubmpt: and the speed issue is being very soundly addressed09:18
jjessesorry for being the newbie here, but it seems stupid not to be able to search help files and hsouldn't that be a focus of the help system?09:18
mptjdub, cool, any links for that?09:18
jdubmdke: i am really listening. but i'm totally not convinced. we really ought to ship optimal help for both environments.09:19
mptjdub, using HTML is a very easy way of improving the navigation. Saying "we can't do that because that's not what our help system is right now" is begging the question, in the original sense of the phrase.09:19
jdubmpt: see the link above09:19
jdubmpt: no, it's not. as soon as we choose html, we're choosing to stand out from everything else.09:19
mptWhat "everything else"? Other distros?09:20
jdubmpt: you want our help system to be the right thing, right now. it isn't, and there's no point forcing it.09:20
jdubevery other piece of desktop documentation (rah rah, our docs cover more, sure, but not significantly more, and i regard the differences in the other docs as bugs we need to fix, so why add more by choice, etc.)09:20
jjessewow i just got lost in the converstation09:21
mptIf you mean it's worse for some docs to have a table of contents frame and others not, than for all to have a navigation frame, I disagree09:21
jdubmeanwhile, i'm attempting to start yelp with a different locale, and nothing magic is happening09:21
jdubmpt: the combination of not integrating properly into the help system *and* being needlessly different in the process is a net loss09:22
jdubmpt: gaining or losing a sidebar... not really important. being different to the rest of the desktop docs for no reason... quite unfortunate.09:22
mptdifferent in what way?09:23
mptpresentation?09:23
mpti.e. CSS?09:23
jdubdocument (a) has a nice TOC sidebar09:23
jdubdocument (b) does not09:23
jdubwe have quite a few document (b) bugs hidden in there09:24
jdubbecause we pull lots of non-gnome docs in09:24
mptIMO, "a nice TOC sidebar" is an oxymoron for on-screen help09:24
jdubbut adding more document (b) bugs doesn't make sense09:24
jdubmpt: which is *irrelevant* right now09:24
jdubi know what you want from the help system09:24
jdubthe current one doesn't give it to you09:24
jduband there's no point forcing it by doing silly things09:24
mptgranted, which leaves the question of why using HTML is "silly"09:25
jdubfacts of life: all our docs are man pages for GUI programs, which sucks, but that's what we've got, and that's what our help viewer is optimised for09:25
mptand if you say "because it doesn't have a sidebar", that's circular logic :-)09:25
jdubbecause by shipping HTML we disintegrate those docs from the help system, we ship stuff that works/appears differently for no good reason09:26
mptWhat do you mean by "disintegrate ... from the help system"?09:26
mdkehere you go with the "no good reason" again. pft09:26
jdubmdke: because i don't have one that really satisfies my disbelief that we should deviate from the standard09:26
jdubmpt: translations, search, etc.09:27
mdketranslation?09:27
jdubi've just been sitting here testing - no evidence that it works09:27
mptjdub, as I understand it, translations are no longer an issue, and search, as previously mentioned, Does Not Exist09:27
jdubsearch will ship with 2.1409:27
jdubtranslations appear to be an issue09:27
mptwill Dapper have 2.14?09:28
=== jdub is going to get seb to look into it
jdububuntu ships with the latest gnome, every release dude09:28
mptsorry, I'm not familiar with those version numbers09:28
=== mpt hides
mptif search will be in Dapper and will only work with docbook, then I change my opinion09:28
theCoreI don't know if shipping html docs whould be a good idea ... however it would speed up things but at the cost of losing the centralization of the docs09:28
jjessewhat did we decide during the meeting and thru the mailing list?09:29
jjessei think the arugments presented in those two locations were good enough to convince people at the meeting today09:29
mptjjesse, HTML, but apparently minus some important evidence09:30
jdubjjesse: thing is, we keep going through this every release, and we've yet to have a good reason to diverge from the standard09:31
mptjdub, will search work for docbook only?09:31
jdubmpt: highly likely09:31
jdubwe'll see09:31
jjessewill we see by dapper?09:31
jdubbut that alone won't convince me either09:31
mptdocbook-only search would be enough for me to say "use docbook", but it would be the only concrete reason you've presented so far, afaics09:32
jdubtranslation09:32
jdubneedless divergence09:33
jdubeven if search and translation are sorted, i want to be convinced why we should just randomly diverge09:33
mpt"divergence", "integration", "centralization", all abstract nouns which don't tell me what the precise problem is09:33
jdubwe have a standard09:34
theCorebtw, does yelp can read html ?09:34
jdubtheCore: yes09:34
mptnot that I'm the one who needs convincing :-) .., but I can see why mdke is getting annoyed09:34
jdubtell me why we need to diverge from the standard09:34
jjessedoes anyone have the email thread that was started available?09:34
jdubbecause the advantages in the xml or html post aren't sufficient (though i could be ultimately tempted by speed, if everything else was resolved, but at that point, i'd want to ship everything in html)09:35
jduband the problem with that is that we'd be mostly needlessly diverging from upstream09:35
jjesseif none of the docs that we write are going upstream does it matter? (silly question I don't really know the answer)09:35
jdubjjesse: "xml or html for Ubuntu Guides"09:35
mptI thought we were talking about Ubuntu-specific docs anyway09:36
jjessempt: that's as far as i knew09:36
jdubjjesse: upstream tests a particular setup, if we diverge significantly from that, we're into dangerous territory09:36
jdubthe fact that we're trying to make decisions exclusively to ubuntu specific content indicates we're on the wrong track, from my POV09:37
jjessejdub: even if that divergence is the documentation that is specific to our distro?09:37
jjessei'm really trying to understand the discussion, i hope it comes across that way09:37
jdubjjesse: if there were really good reasons for shipping html, i would want to ship all of our docs in html (and when i say 'our', i mean all the documentation we ship, not ubuntu specific docs)09:37
jjessehopefully my stupid questions don't offend09:37
mptjjesse, http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/2005-December/004486.html09:38
jdubnot at all09:38
jdubi want to help you guys understand the problem space09:38
jdubbecause the desktop team start flinching and stuff when these things come up09:38
theCorei don't get it, what is difference at the end ? normaly we write docbook then export to html, isn't it? so, we wouldn't diverge from upstream ?09:39
mptso mdke's reasons are (1) easier stylability, (2) much faster, (3) can be put on help.ubuntu.com in the same format09:39
jdubi guess an important point is that we need to stop thinking about ubuntu-specific docs separately from the rest of the documentation we ship09:39
jdubmpt: do you need answers to those?09:39
mptwell, I can see (1) isn't necessarily a benefit, if you want to style the docbook stuff in the same way, you have to put in as much if not more effort09:40
mpt(2) you've shown some evidence will be addressed09:40
jdub(1) -> it's branded css either way. by branding the standard stylesheet, we brand everything in one hit. maximum payoff.09:41
mpt(3) is ho-hum, they could be compiled to HTML for help.ubuntu.com in the same way as they'd be compiled to HTML for yelp09:41
jdub(2) -> potentially still an issue, but rapidly being addressed upstream, and not worth diverging for at that point, even if marginally faster09:41
jdub(3) -> yeah09:41
jjessewhat if yelp supported searching in html09:42
jdubstill wouldn't clinch the deal for me09:42
mptand for me (4) it would mean that at least some of the docs didn't have a sidebar, which I regard as an advantage even if some of them still do09:43
mptbut, bah09:43
jjessewow i wish we ccould have had this discussion at the meeting this morning09:43
mptnone of our docs are help yet anyway, so that's really a non-issue09:43
jdubmpt: inconsistent, appeals only to your hope that our documentation will not be man pages for GUI software some time in the future09:43
mptindeed09:44
jdubjjesse: i'm disappointed that it keeps coming up without the right people involved in the decision - this stuff has serious desktop/documentation ramifications09:44
mptI don't think consistency is an issue *at all* -- people use the Web just fine despite inconsistent navigation styles09:44
mptbut not having actual help pages does mean it's a meaningless point at the moment09:45
jdubmpt: inconsistency == bugs09:45
jdubas in, people report this stuff09:45
jdub"my blah blah doesn't have a navigation tree!"09:45
jdubetc.09:45
=== mpt wonders if people report that bug to apple
jdubdon't be fatuous09:45
mptseriously09:45
mpttheir help's a haphazard mixture of framesets09:46
mptHTML 3.2 city09:46
jdubso the thing that really disappoints me here is that it all comes across as an us vs. them thing09:46
mpteh? :-)09:47
jdubwhen really, i'm trying to make sure we have a really rocking doc story on our desktop09:47
mptwho's "them"?09:47
jdubdocteam vs. desktop09:47
jdubdocteam has made this decision, what, three times now?09:47
jduband to be honest, but not wanting to offend, it has always been a bit misguided09:48
mptI see that now09:49
mptbecause the docteam didn't know about those things that you're announcing now about yelp in 2.1409:49
jdubthat's minor09:49
mptlack of information --> bad decisions09:49
jdubback in hoary it was a bad idea09:50
jdubwe don't need to diverge from the standard09:50
jjessethere then needs to be beter communication from the dekstop team09:50
mptwait, now you're into the abstract nouns again :-)09:50
mpthoary's yelp was faster at docbook than breezy's09:50
mptin my experience09:50
jdubjjesse: whenever this discussion has come up, we've tried to help out - the problem is, we continue to disagree that this is a useful strategy09:51
jdubmpt: abstract noun or not, you actually need a reason to diverge from the standard; a good one.09:52
mptwhich mdke presented09:52
mptand we thought they were good reasons09:53
mptbut, in case they weren't, he cross-posted to the desktop list and said "let discussion commence"09:53
mptand there was a deafening silence from the desktop team09:53
jdubso we've knocked those down09:53
jdubnow i'm trying to get at the premise09:53
mptso even if the decision was wrong, it was not the fault of anyone on the doc team.09:53
jdubbecause it's going to suck if this keeps happening09:53
jjesseseems like a problem on the deskotp team09:53
jdubmpt: i was away when that mail was sent, i don't think seb or daniel want to approach the issue09:54
jdubmpt: deafening silence from vuntz, who asked the very same questions i did, but was less demanding about it09:55
=== jdub is giving seb and daniel stick atm
jdubmdke: there? have skype or sip or gtalk or something?10:00
jjessejdub: i think he went to bed?10:07
jdubbummer10:08
mdkejdub, yeah I'm here now, but I don't have that, sorry10:44
mdkempt, I _still_ think they are good reasons ;)10:44
LaserJockso is there wiki page or something doc team goals or objectives for each doc?10:44
LaserJockor status or something10:45
mdkeDocteamProjects10:45
mdkeeach doc should have a spec, linked on that page10:45
mdke(in theory)10:45
jdubmdke: hrm, phone?10:45
LaserJockhmm, ok. I just wanted to get a better overall feel for what's going on and progress10:45
mdkejdub, yeah I have one of those10:45
mptyes, please talk to jdub, mdke10:45
mdkeok10:45
mptthis is a giant communication problem10:45
mptthe more bandwidth, the better :-)10:46
jdubit is not too giant :-)10:46
mdkejdub, i'm pretty tired tho, maybe just a few more comments in here, then bed?10:46
jdubmdke: ok, let me know when you're around next, we'll hook up10:46
mdkewill do10:46
mdkei don't think the communication problem is so big10:46
jdubplanet is waiting on firewall and baz fixage :-)10:46
mdkei read (and so do most others) that gnome-doc-devel list10:47
jdubbut don't bother elmo/znarl about it :)10:47
mdkei won't10:47
jdubbecause they will sautee my testicles in wasabi and soy10:47
jdubwhich is, so i hear, rather uncomfortable10:47
mdkei guess so10:47
jdubalbeit quite tasty10:47
mdkeok, on speed. My concerns are (a) that I haven't seen it yet, and (b) that in any case, it is still doing xml->html, which will have at least a non-trivial effect on the speed10:48
jdubnot that i've tried10:48
mdke(a) is not a biggie10:48
LaserJockmdke: none of the status links on DocteamProjects work10:48
mdkeshaun gives quite good statistics in his post10:48
mdkeLaserJock, yeah they aren't maintained, click the names of the docs for the specs10:49
mdkeok, on fragmentation. I don't think jdub's concerns about fragmenting the docs is a problem, because the Ubuntu docs appear in a totally separate section in the yelp homepage to other docs, and also html means that they can be viewed by people who (shock horror) don't run gnome. This is especially important for the server guide.10:50
mdkealso, it's a gross exageration to call them "man pages for gui's"10:51
mdkethe whole point is to turn them into "help", as mpt calls it10:51
mdkesure, it's not there yet, but it can get there, and working on the basis that it will is a good thing, IMO10:51
mdkeon customised stylesheets for all documents, I'll believe it when i see it10:52
jdubmdke: all the desktop documentation is manpages for guis (this is more of an issue with gnome than ubuntu docs, but we've followed in the same footsteps)10:52
mdkedid you see the serverguide and desktopguide? their aim is to be help10:53
jdubmdke: dpkg -L yelp | grep css10:53
mdkejdub, when I saw I'll believe it when I see it, I mean that I'll believe it when I see the work being done to customise it10:53
mdkeobviously, I know that yelp uses stylesheets10:53
jdubserverguide -> if read on the desktop, awesome that it's integrated properly with the documentation viewer, otherwise it's most likely to be read on a website independently of the machine it's on10:53
jdubok, i'll do it10:54
jdubit's disasterously easy10:54
mdkeok, in the meantime I'll upload an australian translation of html with the next dapper package10:54
jdubdude, i tried putting everything in the right place (according to your scheme) for a different translation, as did seb -> no go10:54
jdubanyway10:54
jduball of this is "let's ship html -> here are some reasons"10:55
jdubnot "why should we diverge from the standard"10:55
mdkethe standard needs reasons too10:55
mdkeit's the same question if you realise that10:55
jdubyou want to diverge from the standard, which satisfies the needs of the entire set of desktop documentation10:55
jdubi don't think the onus is on the desktop team to prove that it's worth sticking with the standard :)10:56
mdkeok two things10:56
mdke1) I accept that the onus is on the changer10:56
mdke2) stop this desktop team vs docteam nonsense10:56
mdkethere is no such battle10:56
jdubi'm not suggesting there's a battle10:56
jdubbut there are two stakeholders here10:57
mdkeI disagree10:57
mdkewe have the same stakes10:57
jduband there's two of us10:57
jdublet's not play semantics10:57
mdkewhat I'm saying is10:57
jdubdesktop team needs to integrate your work10:57
mdkewe have the same objective, people just think differently10:57
jdubyou guys need to write cool docs for desktop team10:57
jdubthat's right10:57
mdkedoesn't matter what team they are in10:58
jduband we're helping each other solve different parts of the problem10:58
jdubthat's not the point, please stop assuming i think there's a 'battle' here10:58
jdubi am here to solve a problem10:58
mdkegood10:58
jdubthe problem, in my mind, is not "how do i help the docteam ship html?"10:59
mdkeok well the question I am trying to address is not that one either10:59
jdubit's "how do i help the docteam ship their docs in the best possible way for our users?"10:59
mdkeit is "what is best for the user?"10:59
jdubright, so thus far, i've yet to see a reason to diverge from the current standard10:59
mdkeso what do you say about speed?11:00
jdubthe only one which *may* have currency is the speed stuff, but that's being fixed, and ultimately, even if it's a tad slower, t11:00
mdkein the light of my last comment11:00
jdubot11:00
mdkefixed is a loose word11:00
jdubit's not worth the inconsistency11:00
mdkethat's the difference between us11:00
mdkei think it is, because I don't think the inconsistency is problematic11:01
mdkeindeed I think that customising only the ubuntu specific docs has advantages11:01
jdubwell that's a problem that we need to work through11:01
jdubcontinuing to think about the ubuntu docs team as a project to work on ubuntu docs is not optimal11:01
mdke?11:01
mdkeoh i see11:02
LaserJockcould we ship both for for now and see how people like it?11:02
mdkeLaserJock, that is what we are doing11:02
jdubLaserJock: they're both in the current dapper package11:02
LaserJockright, but can't we let the user's decide so to speak?11:02
jdubLaserJock: no11:02
mdkehere's the key11:02
jdubmdke: one of ubuntu's biggest wins is deep integration; that's where we can do our best work11:03
mdkewhat we need to do is to ensure that people will use the onboard docs, rather than just websites11:03
jdubin docs land, i'm seeing more entirely original work than integration, which i think is unfortunate11:03
mdkeheh11:03
jdubnot because it doesn't rock, but because there's so much more we could be achieving11:03
jdubglue documentation is part of that11:04
jduboverview documentation is part of that11:04
mdkethis all comes back to that magic email you promised to write about 6 months ago, if I'm not mistaken11:04
jdubbut clearly there are a lot of wins to be had by using what we already have11:04
jdubwhich i did11:04
mdkewell I haven't heard a lot about glue documentation or overview documentation before11:05
mdkesounds good, sure11:06
jdubthat's the stuff that ties everything else (upstream docs) together11:06
jdubthey're not technical terms11:06
mdkeno, i understand what they are11:06
LaserJockbut not ubuntu docs?11:06
LaserJockor ubuntu docs that glue upstream docs together?11:07
jdubLaserJock: we're going to need some ubuntu-specific documentation, and i think what we've got so far is focusing on largely the right areas for that11:07
jdubbut by focusing purely on "ubuntu documentation", we're missing out on the holistic approach11:07
jdubwe can't write documentation for everything on our system11:07
LaserJockah11:08
mptI don't imagine anyone rewriting man pages11:08
jdubanyway, now this is going into la-la land11:08
mptbut I do imagine, for example, the Nautilus help being rewritten11:08
jdubmpt: that wouldn't be an ubuntu doc11:08
mptbecause the upstream is ... beyond words11:08
mpt(and because it wouldn't occur to people that the file manager was a separate program)11:09
jdub(also, yelp has two new co-maintainers, which should increase the work being done on it)11:10
mptand trying to push such a rewrite upstream would probably piss people off11:10
LaserJockjdub: I might be just dense here, but what would an example of a gluing doc be?11:10
jdubLaserJock: "how do i connect to the internet?"11:11
jdubLaserJock: try answering that with one application document ;-)11:11
jdubparticularly given the man-pages-for-gui-programs docs we have now11:11
mdkei think we are trying to answer it in the desktopguide11:11
LaserJockso like the Starter Guide?11:11
jdubLaserJock: albeit less independent11:11
mpt(Random note to anyone editing the desktop guide: "Configuring the network" should be called "Connecting to the Internet", and should be in the "Internet" section, not the "Configuring your system" section. Configuring your system is not a goal. Using the Internet is the goal.)11:14
mdkempt, mental note made11:14
mpt(same applies to much of the stuff in the "Configuring your system" section)11:15
jdubi always misread system as cistern11:16
jdubwhich i only very rarely want to configure11:16
jduband probably couldn't stomach the documentation11:17
LaserJocklol11:17
LaserJockso does Kubuntu use yelp? I assume no11:17
mptno, it uses an HTML viewer11:17
LaserJockbtw, should I edit the UbuntuPackagingGuide spec?11:22
mdkein what way?11:26
LaserJockadd stuff, there is nothing there right now11:26
LaserJockdoes it matter?11:26
mdkesure, if you like11:26
mdkejust point it at the spec you're working on, probably better11:27
LaserJockwhat spec? the outline?11:27
mdkeyeah, that's all there is, isn't it?11:27
LaserJockthat is a subpage of the spec11:27
mdkeah fine11:28
LaserJockwell, I have another resources page11:28
LaserJockalso a subpage11:28
LaserJockI just didn't want to go mucking about with other peoples stuff11:28
LaserJockI still haven't gotten the wiki mentality down ;-)11:28
mdkeyou can go ahead11:28
LaserJockk11:30
=== manicka [n=grant@203-158-39-222.dyn.iinet.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-doc

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!