[12:02] ah.. nope [12:02] I'll remember sometime soon ;) [12:03] ajmitch: hi... what about banshee and ipod-sharp? ;) === jinty is just being a nag;) [12:03] jinty: join the ranks === slomo_ too === tseng nags ajmitch for good measure === ajmitch wonders what tseng has to nag about today [12:08] beats me [12:08] everyone else was doing it [12:08] slomo_: ipod-sharp has dropped a dbus dependency? [12:09] Version: [-0.5.12-1-] {+0.5.12-2+} [12:09] Depends: [-libdbus-glib-1-1 (>= 0.50), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.8.0),-] libglib2.0-cil (>= 2.3.90), libipoddevice0 (>= 0.4.0), mono-classlib-1.0 (>= 1.0) [12:09] yes [12:09] ok [12:09] this isn't mentioned in changelog, is it? :) [12:09] it is... the part about the .config file [12:09] * Install the .config file from ipod-sharp instead of our own now [12:10] doesn't tell me much [12:10] in older versions there was no config file for ipod-sharp so i've written my own... it used dbus in the old days [12:10] now i noticed that there finally is a .config file... and that it doesn't use dbus anymore [12:11] not that it'll make much difference [12:11] since banshee will drag in dbus [12:11] yes [12:15] slomo_: /usr/lib/banshee/Banshee.Dap/njb-sharp.dll does look like crack, right? === rikai [n=gtk2@pool-68-238-63-64.port.east.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:16] ajmitch: why? [12:16] is it the same as libnjb-cil has? [12:16] ajmitch: yes... and the ipod-sharp.dll is the same as in libipod-cil [12:16] crackful [12:17] I'm guessing this is because upstream does some stupid bundling [12:17] exactly... i had a talk with meebey about it yesterday ;) [12:17] yes, I saw some of that [12:18] iirc abock said that he does this because of unstable interfaces... but i don't understand him, he writes both libraries ;) [12:18] snorp really wrote libipod [12:19] yes but lately only abock makes changes [12:20] did you hear anything about 0.10.3 release date? [12:20] nope... maybe next thursday, he always releases on thursdays ;) [12:21] there is cool stuff in cvs [12:22] such as? [12:23] reworking plugins [12:23] there is more exposed, and you can enable/disable them [12:23] fixes to last.fm [12:23] are there new plugins? or is the last.fm still the only one? [12:23] there is a broken file system monitor [12:24] and a sample plugin that prints random songs [12:24] on the console === jaldhar [n=jaldhar@pcp04197965pcs.crosky01.pa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === bpuccio [n=brian@ool-457afde7.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === JohnnyMast [n=rave@cpc2-cosh5-5-0-cust84.cos2.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:49] ajmitch: thanks :) [12:53] Anyone have plans to package the newest GNUStep? === luk [n=luk@108.49-136-217.adsl.skynet.be] has joined #ubuntu-motu === kjcole [n=kjcole@dsl092-145-217.wdc2.dsl.speakeasy.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === lucasvo [n=lucasvo@www.wservices.ch] has joined #ubuntu-motu === lucasvo [n=lucasvo@www.wservices.ch] has left #ubuntu-motu [] === seth_k_ [n=seth@ubuntu/member/sethkinast] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Arrogance [n=aks@ottawa-hs-64-26-167-89.d-ip.magma.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu === whiprush [n=jorge@64.62.190.212] has joined #ubuntu-motu === slomo_ [n=slomo@ubuntu/member/slomo] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:05] hey slomo_ === irvin [n=irvin@ubuntu/member/irvin] has joined #ubuntu-motu === mez_ [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Amaranth [n=travis@ubuntu/member/amaranth] has joined #ubuntu-motu === SEJeff [n=SEJeff@12-203-76-59.client.insightBB.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === jaldhar [n=jaldhar@pcp04197965pcs.crosky01.pa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === rikai [n=gtk2@pool-68-238-63-64.port.east.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === tim1 [n=Tim@dslb-084-058-192-142.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === jsgotangco [n=jerome@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #ubuntu-motu === irvin [n=irvin@ubuntu/member/irvin] has joined #ubuntu-motu === freeflying [n=freeflyi@61.190.65.36] has joined #ubuntu-motu === crypticreign [n=crypticr@dsl092-069-030.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === crypticreign [n=crypticr@dsl092-069-030.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net] has left #ubuntu-motu [] === trulux [n=lorenzo@unaffiliated/trulux] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #ubuntu-motu === punkrockguy318 [n=lukas@pcp02403042pcs.brdgtn01.nj.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === crimsun [i=nobody@warped.bluecherry.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:25] hey crimsun [04:25] Kyral: hi === rikai [n=gtk2@pool-68-238-63-64.port.east.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Kyral happy [04:32] about easychem? === Kyral nods [04:32] yep, read earlier [04:34] Is it bad that this is causing me joy? [04:34] of course not :) [04:35] Oh in case Mez is listening, it builds CLEAN on Breezu [04:35] Kyral ... ? [04:36] easy Backport ;P [04:36] Kyral .... [04:36] joke ;P [04:36] ... ? [04:36] just tell him whether you want it backported [04:36] my first package got into the repos officually === nturner [n=nturner@dsl092-086-237.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:37] Actually I do need it backported lol [04:37] Lab Build uses it [04:38] and I ain't puttin' the lab build on Dapper [04:38] Kyral: then ask, in one easy sentence :) [04:38] yah yah [04:38] I'm hyper right now sheessh [04:39] Mez: could you backport EasyChem to Breezy? [04:39] depends [04:39] does it WORK in breezy? [04:39] I don't have a test case yet lol === Mez checks for FTBFS [05:15] surely if somethings auto-synced from debian - they'd think enought o grab the new packages from debian that are deps of that package [05:20] Maybe the deps can't be synced, and need to be merged. === thierry [n=thierry@modemcable232.48-131-66.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu === _thierry [n=thierry@modemcable232.48-131-66.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Burgundavia [n=corey@S0106000000cc07fc.gv.shawcable.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Sepheebear [n=SepheeBe@cpe-68-175-48-160.nyc.res.rr.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Gloubiboulga [n=gauvain@84.5.38.1] has joined #ubuntu-motu === bpuccio [n=brian@ool-457afde7.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === zakame [n=zak@ubuntu/member/zakame] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #ubuntu-motu === luk [n=luk@56.8-200-80.adsl.skynet.be] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Seveas [n=seveas@ubuntu/member/seveas] has joined #ubuntu-motu === rikai [n=gtk2@pool-68-238-63-64.port.east.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === doko [n=doko@dslb-084-059-094-185.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === joe_alf [n=joe_alf@pcd302027.netvigator.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === irvin [n=irvin@ubuntu/member/irvin] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@CPE-144-136-118-222.nsw.bigpond.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu [08:20] hm can I just sync eris from sid? [08:21] yes [08:22] the new package names in 1.3.9-1 take care of the NMU/libstdc++ alloc [08:22] we don't have to do anything on our side, so a sync is fine. [08:23] ooh, k then, was asking because I was worried about the Conflicts/Replaces thing [08:23] rocking :) [08:24] done [08:29] :) === bpuccio [n=brian@ool-457a9c38.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === robitaille [n=robitail@ubuntu/member/robitaille] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:05] hi robitaille :) [09:05] Hello zakame === poningru [n=poningru@pool-68-238-174-62.tampfl.fios.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:11] hm, ncmpc's already in debian, perhaps another sync candidate :) === Seveas [n=seveas@ubuntu/member/seveas] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Gloubiboulga [n=gauvain@84.5.38.1] has joined #ubuntu-motu === markuman [n=markuman@p509256B6.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === joe_alf [n=joe_alf@pcd552232.netvigator.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === irvin [n=irvin@ubuntu/member/irvin] has joined #ubuntu-motu === dholbach [n=daniel@i577B1B5B.versanet.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:01] good morning and happy new year! :-) === poningru [n=poningru@pool-68-238-174-62.tampfl.fios.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:01] dholbach!!! happy new year!!! [10:02] hey dholbach [10:02] to you guys too [10:03] now go to work! [10:03] *grin* === lfittl [n=lfittl@83-65-242-100.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:07] hehe [10:07] jsgotangco: I have been! === tvo [n=tobi@5354EA9B.cable.casema.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:08] ajmitch: we live in the future [10:09] I've even been working on my debian packages for a change [10:09] ajmitch, was that the sky I just heard falling? ;) [10:09] :P [10:11] so who helps me to write the motu report? ;) [10:11] umm [10:11] it'll be fairly short :) [10:11] 'merges, merges, and more merges' [10:11] merges indeed [10:11] still > 200 assigned [10:13] use triple verbs it seems to be the rage lately [10:13] ajmitch: speaking of debian, can you check my libmemcache for debian? its on mentors :) [10:13] merge. upload. rejoice [10:15] zakame: I can add it to the list :) [10:15] ajmitch: thanks :) === Hobbsee_ [n=Hobbsee_@CPE-144-136-118-222.nsw.bigpond.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:20] when/where do people figure the next Ubuntu dev conference will be? [10:21] Burgundavia: just after dapper is released, I guess. [10:21] Mithrandir, you figure may or end of April? [10:22] yes [10:22] iirc, that was what sabdfl said at UBZ [10:23] hopefully somewhere interesting, though I doubt I'll get to go to this one [10:23] hmm, I have an opportunity to talk at LinuxFestNorthWest on April 30, which last year was right int he middle of UDU [10:23] I expect I will have to bankroll my own way [10:23] ajmitch: why not? [10:24] same reason as Burgundavia [10:24] chances of sponsorship would be low [10:24] eh :) [10:24] sivang, we both got full sponsorship to the last one [10:24] same here then [10:24] Burgundavia: yes [10:25] I am actually cleaning out my email todo list [10:26] sivang: they prefer to sponsor people who are in the general area, and I won't qualify for that :) [10:26] ajmitch: do you know where will be the general area next ? :-) [10:27] not australia/nz [10:27] sivang, I heard rumours of Germany [10:27] I expect Europe [10:27] germany was suggested at UBZ [10:27] ah right, I think I remember now [10:27] it won't be the US [10:27] I hope not :) [10:27] I hope not too, but it is cheaper for me to get there [10:28] but I suspect we (NAers) are a minority [10:28] Burgundavia: true, for me it's sky rocking high :) [10:28] Europe is a nice compromise. Amsterdam, London and Frankfurt are cheap and easy to fly into [10:29] Burgundavia: I recall sabdfl saying something about Amsterdam as well [10:29] anywhere with seedy bars.. ;) [10:29] amsterdam would be sweet [10:30] of course, the pot is better and cheaper where I live... === DapperDrake [n=seveas@ubuntu/member/seveas] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Amaranth [n=travis@ubuntu/member/amaranth] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:34] Asia is the future! [10:35] jsgotangco, sadly, Asia is not today [10:35] Burgundavia: sure but we'll get our jobs tommoro [10:35] w [10:35] :D [10:35] jsgotangco, you mean s/our jobs/your jobs [10:35] yeah [10:35] i'd like to package two libraries that aren't in universe or debian yet. upstream provides debian-packages, but how much of the debian-directory structure should be preserved? [10:35] thanks, but sales is not fleeing NA quite yet === Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@CPE-144-136-118-222.nsw.bigpond.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:36] jsgotangco, also somebody who works is Delhi cannot calm down a screaming Exec at 4:30pm on a Friday [10:37] well... [10:37] because only grovelling on the floor can do that === Burgundavia has had to do that, before in his support job [10:38] tepsipakki: depends on how good the upstream packaging is [10:38] tepsipakki: I've seen some where it was best to start from scratch [10:38] tepsipakki: have you consulted with upstream about getting their package into the Debian proper? [10:39] zakame: yes, no reply [10:40] I'm talking about libgssapi & librpcsecgss, upstream is the folks at CITI (umich.edu) [10:40] they compile nicely, so in theory they shouldn't need much work [10:41] compiling nicely is only the first step [10:41] Bruce Fields is the packages.. maybe I'll just ask him again [10:41] packager.. [10:42] tepsipakki: how about the license? is it good? [10:42] (no time for me to check, and too lazy :P) === poningru [n=poningru@pool-70-110-77-199.tampfl.fios.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:43] humm, seems to MIT.. is it a problem? [10:44] not a prob, as MIT-X is DFSG-free unless I'm wrogn... [10:44] tepsipakki: have you also asked the ppl in #debian-mentors about this? [10:44] nope, I should? [10:45] tepsipakki: perhaps, as there are (already-existing) Debian pkgs :) [10:45] hmm, so what do I ask there?-) [10:46] tepsipakki: what you just asked now ;) [10:46] ok, I'll try [10:52] zakame: your blog should be on planet ubuntu too [10:52] dholbach: should I ping jdub then :) [10:52] zakame: yes :) [10:53] dholbach: ok, thanks! :D === ajmitch will soon be the only motu not on the planet ;) [10:54] ajmitch: you do blog? [10:54] I have a blog with little to no content [10:54] not worth putting on there [10:55] ajmitch: why the only one? :) [10:55] sivang: I was joking === hyakuhei [n=operativ@gentoo/user/RobC] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Gloubiboulga [n=gauvain@84.6.168.137] has joined #ubuntu-motu === lucas [n=lucas@alabama.imag.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:08] hi everybody, happy new year [11:11] to you too [11:11] :) [11:16] I've reported a bug, but it seems to be a duplicate [11:16] What should I do ? [11:16] happy new year lucas [11:24] \sh_away: you overwrote my istanbul package and it depends on python2.3 instead of 2.4 [11:24] \sh_away: malone bug 6925 is yours to check, thanks [11:24] An error has occurred. [11:30] malone 6295, that is :) [11:32] oh yeah ;) [11:32] ok, there's my syncs requested for today.. [11:33] might as well cut down the outstanding merges a bit ;) === Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@CPE-144-136-118-222.nsw.bigpond.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu === ogra [n=ogra@ubuntu/member/ogra] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:38] hi ogra [11:41] hey ajmitch [11:41] happy new year [11:42] salut ogra [11:42] hey Burgundavia [11:43] Burgundavia: tu seulement parles franais toujours? [11:44] happy new year to you also, ogra :) === freeflying [n=freeflyi@61.190.65.36] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:48] dholbach, non [11:52] wow did whiprush even attempted to sleep? === JanC [n=janc@lugwv/member/JanC] has joined #ubuntu-motu === herzi [n=herzi@c183070.adsl.hansenet.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu === raphink [n=raphink@bur91-2-82-231-159-240.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:00] jsgotangco, sleep is for the weak [12:04] tell that to someone past 30 [12:06] that doesn't include me [12:06] heh [12:06] :/ === zyga [n=zyga@ubuntu/member/zyga] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:09] being 23 has it advantages and disadvantages [12:11] sure === Burgundavia finishes the conversion of planet.u.c to planet.corey [12:12] oh dear [12:12] what junk are we getting spammed with today? ;) [12:12] awful things liek getting more people to join MOTU and the doc team [12:16] oh no [12:16] ajmitch, is there a better bittorrent client we coudl ship by default [12:16] we don't want more of them [12:16] preferrablly one that a) a single window [12:16] no idea, I don't use bittorrent [12:16] b)remember torrent files across reboorts [12:17] Burgundavia: what do we ship by default as of now? [12:18] raphink, gnome-bt I think [12:18] hmm [12:18] dunno this one [12:18] on gnome I think I'd use bittornado [12:19] which is light and reliable imo [12:19] and either qtorrent or ktorrent on kde [12:20] somehow it seems on this field qt/kde programs are more user friendly than gtk ones [12:21] I see there's gtorrentviewer [12:21] but I don't think this is actually a bittorrent client [12:25] Burgundavia: good work on the HelpingUbuntu pages :) [12:25] ajmitch, you think they work well? [12:25] yeah [12:25] I think that MOTUGettingIntoIt needs a bit of an overhaul [12:25] it's a bit sparse [12:26] we've got a mailing list now, etc [12:26] so does the doc team stuff [12:31] ajmitch, someone demoed a half finished bittorrent cliento n p.u.c some time ago. Remember who it was? === sebest [n=chatzill@sebest.ovibes.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:31] koke? [12:32] hmm [12:32] I know he had one [12:32] it isn't whiprush [12:33] http://koke.amedias.org/ for his blog [12:34] http://www.amedias.org/~koke/gnome-torrent/ [12:35] yep thats it [12:36] what is koke's real name [12:36] ? === Fuddl [n=fuddl@2001:6f8:9cf:0:20f:eaff:fe4d:d7b7] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:39] ajmitch, & [12:39] ajmitch, ^ (yes, I can type, when the moon is full and the tide is high) [12:40] Jorge Bernal [12:40] it's there on the page [12:40] sivang, thanks for telling me I need to sleep. Is 4am here [12:40] too many bloody Jorges in Ubuntu [12:40] \sh_away, Riddell: what about eric/eric3 packages? eric3 seems to be broken - shouldn't it be removed? [12:40] hehe === Burgundavia goes out to shoot one [12:40] \sh_away, Riddell: please have a look at the eric* malone bugs [12:41] Burgundavia: go to sleep buddy, don't hurt yourself like I do :) [12:42] about time I went to sleep [12:42] got to bed at 7:30AM this morning ;) [12:42] indeed, morning all [12:43] bye [12:43] Burgundavia: night === markuman [n=markuman@p509256B6.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === markuman [n=markuman@p509256B6.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:47] we really need a Universe Bug Day [12:47] bugs just PILED up [12:49] dholbach: i also noticed that some bug are fixed but not closed [12:49] eg, the bug was pending because fixed upstream, and the new upstream version came out, bug the bug is left open [12:50] sebest: if they're fixed for you, make a comment to "reopen, if they occur again" and close the bug. [12:50] thanks for noticing [12:50] i seems there is no way to know the version of the package when the bug was submitted [12:50] yeah, that's something i always ask first [12:50] dholbach: what should i do if the bug is fixed in dapper, but not fixed in breezy? [12:51] then you got yourself a backport :) [12:51] we generally close them. [12:51] if people complain, we can try backports [12:51] if they're serious to -updates [12:52] sebest: it should be mentioned probably on bug filing guidelines that a user should specify what version of the package he opened the package against, and provide him some brief instructions on how to do that. [12:52] until we get something for that in LP [12:53] LP? [12:53] dholbach: when do you want a bug day? next weekend? [12:53] I think it needs to be before UVF [12:53] sivang, in fact there won't be backport because the bug is not critical, so it will never be fixed in breezy [12:53] ajmitch: dunno - we should ask the desktop team as well [12:54] eg bug 3154 [12:54] An error has occurred. [12:54] eg bugnbr 3154 [12:55] there should be a way to say "won't fix in breezy" , "fixed in dapper" [12:55] hyakuhei: https://launchpad.net/ [12:57] sivang: danke === zakame [n=zakame@openwire.metawire.org] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:03] ok, sleep time, night all [01:04] ajmitch: night [01:04] who has the email address loic@dev.erodia.net? (I answered your comment on revu about audio-convert) [01:04] pef [01:05] k, thanks [01:05] gn8 ajmitch === pkern [n=pkern@debian/developer/pkern] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:10] hi pkern [01:10] Hi zakame (: === ealden [n=ealden@ipdial-165-72.tri-isys.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:15] lucas: rubyversionslist is very nice indeed. Looking at the list utnubu would only have to upload three packages from Ubuntu into Debian, almost all other packages are up-to-date. [01:18] pkern: hmm, utnubu! how do I help? :) [01:19] pkern: the lsit is only about ruby-related packages [01:19] also, I don't think the goal is to upload all packages in ubuntu and not in debian [01:20] lucas: Well, depends on the view. Please look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=already-in-ubuntu;users=utnubu-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org [01:20] I saw that === minghua [n=minghua@danube.mems.rice.edu] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:21] wb minghua [01:22] zakame: hello zakame [01:22] but what I'm saying is that a lot of quality checking must take place [01:22] having packages without active maintainers sucks [01:23] dholbach: can we discuss bug #4636 ? [01:23] An error has occurred. [01:23] it renders the package unusable on breezy [01:23] Ubugtu: what error? === greenpenguin13 [n=joseph@user-7279.l1.c6.dsl.pol.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:23] so I think the severity is "major", not "normal" [01:23] (I was the one to set it to major, not the bug reporter) [01:24] hmm [01:25] utnubu is an alioth project aiming to merge ubuntu packages back to Debian when needed, right? [01:25] yes [01:25] ok :) [01:25] thank [01:25] s [01:25] raphink : yeah, "Doing with Ubuntu what Ubuntu does with us. Where it makes sense, at least." [01:25] lucas: I intend to merge libao-ruby to Debian, but as I just found a RFS for it on debian-mentors (dating back to 2004 though), I'll ask the maintainer if he wants to be sponsored. [01:26] pkern: I think it should be removed from ubuntu [01:26] lucas: Reason? [01:26] I mailed ubuntu-motu about this yesterday [01:26] Hmm, I thought utnubu also trys to get ubuntu-only packages in to debian, but I didn't look at utnubu carefully === lucas looking for the mail [01:26] minghua: That's right. [01:27] http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2006-January/000093.html === GanJ_L1Nk1n [n=vaslinki@83.172.28.245] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:27] RFS tend to be ignored, sadly enough. [01:28] then I'll ask the maintainer if he is interested in providing a patch so the pkg-ruby-extras team can pick it up [01:28] === minghua [n=minghua@danube.mems.rice.edu] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:29] Ok. [01:29] [01:29] argh, forgot the scim causing gaim crash bug... === markuman [n=markuman@p509256B6.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:31] anybody here who has time to review http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1282 ? :) [01:32] pkern: your current way of looking for packages in ubuntu not in debian seems broken to me [01:32] GanJ_L1Nk1n: ? [01:32] not all packages in that case have -0ubuntu versions [01:32] lucas: Please explain. [01:33] raphink: What? [01:33] GanJ_L1Nk1n: nothing, just wondering what you mean by ;) [01:34] raphink: it's russian language )) [01:34] GanJ_L1Nk1n: I speak russian so you can't cheat on me on this ;) [01:34] lol no luck ;) [01:35] unless this is a KOI/UTF issue ;) [01:35] ! [01:35] nope [01:35] doesn't look any russian to me ;) [01:36] where are you from?) [01:36] france [01:36] pkern: look at http://ox.blop.info/bazaar/rubyversionslist.html [01:36] ohh cool [01:37] libao-ruby isn't picked by your script since the version isn't -0ubuntuSHING [01:37] ;) [01:37] I'll add a filter to motutools to be able to easily remove packages from the output which have exactly the same version [01:38] then I'll generate the output with the whole of debian+ubuntu [01:38] lucas: By which script? [01:38] lucas: It's in both versiondiff and missing-packages? [01:39] - GanJ_L1Nk1n [01:39] I don't remember [01:39] in UTF-8 [01:39] maybe it was a grep-dctrl based stuff I saw yesterday in the archives === raphink wonders when there'll be keyboards that show the keys when you switch the keyboard type === Yagisan [n=jamie@60-240-9-82-nsw-pppoe.tpgi.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:42] raphink: speaking of russion, there was a russian iirc who designed such a keyboard [01:42] *russian [01:42] zakame: really? [01:42] I meant something like a screen/keyboard [01:42] that would print the characters on the keyboard when you switch kbd type/font [01:43] I think I've seen one actually [01:43] but it was still experimental [01:43] and was to be solf for about $150 or so [01:43] I remember reading about a keyboard that actually have a LCD for each key and will show the character on the LCD that correspond to the current keymap [01:43] mhm [01:43] raphink : yes, that's the one [01:43] oki :) [01:43] probably the same thing raphink is talking about [01:44] I also heard that with the new technology allowing to detect where a sound comes from with 2 or 3 detectors on a board [01:44] it was possible to make just one screen [01:44] and have people type on the screen [01:44] so the position where they typed would be detected [01:45] zakame: that's the one you're talking about, no ? http://www.artlebedev.com/portfolio/optimus/ [01:46] me checks [01:46] yep [01:46] dholbach: ping [01:46] :) [01:47] http://www.artlebedev.com/portfolio/optimus/answers/ [01:47] lol [01:47] It will be an open-source keyboard, SDK will be available. [01:47] :D :D :D [01:48] w00t [01:48] Keys could be animated when needed. === GanJ_L1Nk1n [n=vaslinki@83.172.28.245] has left #ubuntu-motu [] [01:48] huhu [01:48] There's no snow in Moscow in summer. [01:49] useful info [01:49] I love this layout http://www.artlebedev.ru/portfolio/optimus/hi-res/keyb_blank.tif [01:49] very useful [01:49] :) [01:49] and really worth buying such a keyboard :) [01:50] somebody should obviously make it possible to display regular X applications on it. [01:51] hmm [01:51] you mean the shortcuts ? [01:51] just like the show the photoshop commands [01:52] no, you should be able to put your xterms on it. [01:52] that'd be cool [01:52] hahaha [01:52] Mithrandir : w00t [01:52] Mithrandir: hi [01:52] lol [01:52] tseng: hi dude. 'sup? [01:53] Mithrandir: this :) http://david.chalkskeletons.com/openbox.html [01:53] hi tseng && Nafallo [01:53] hiya === markuman [n=markuman@p509256B6.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:53] hi raphink and tseng :-) [01:53] tseng: shiny [01:53] heya tseng Nafallo [01:54] hiya zakame :-) [01:57] Mez: alive? :-) [01:59] Yagisan: pong === irvin [n=irvin@ubuntu/member/irvin] has joined #ubuntu-motu === mhz [n=mhz_chil@moinmoin/fan/mhz] has joined #ubuntu-motu [02:07] wb mhz [02:08] zakame: thx [02:08] dholbach: sorry - was away for a bit [02:08] dholbach: You wanted more info on malone bug 6011 [02:08] Malone bug 6011: "Moves all debs into REJECT if any .udeb was built." Fix req. for: debarchiver (Ubuntu), Severity: Normal, Assigned to: MOTU, Status: NeedInfo http://launchpad.net/bugs/6011 [02:09] Yagisan: yeah, i asked a question, which version you used - could you follow up on the bug? [02:09] dholbach: sure, but it's also affects dapper [02:09] ah ok [02:10] dholbach: I backported dappers to brezzy to see if it fixed it. It didn't :( [02:10] :/ [02:10] dholbach: and not knowing perl, I can really fix it [02:11] crap - got to go - kids are fighting [02:11] Yagisan: have a nice day === greenpenguin13 [n=joseph@user-7279.l1.c6.dsl.pol.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-motu === sanjose [n=joe_alf@pcd552232.netvigator.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [02:28] re: === Yagisan notes he has more typo's then usual today [02:34] dholbach: updated the bug report for you [02:35] Yagisan: for everybody - i just triaged the bug to have more information about the issue :) [02:35] thanks a lot for following up [02:37] dholbach: no problem === Treenaks [n=martijn@thuis.foodfight.org] has joined #ubuntu-motu === toocrazy [n=afhvr@bl8-77-144.dsl.telepac.pt] has joined #ubuntu-motu === toocrazy [n=afhvr@bl8-77-144.dsl.telepac.pt] has left #ubuntu-motu [] [02:52] can i select any packages in universe? :-) === fredix [n=fredix@d213-103-120-108.cust.tele2.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [02:58] segfault: ? [02:58] i mean, i'd like to package RoundCube. [02:59] that sounds great [02:59] you might want to read http://wiki.ubuntu.com/REVU [02:59] that's our current process [03:00] bye === jinty [n=jinty@205.134.224.215] has joined #ubuntu-motu === markuman [n=markuman@p50924F48.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === ogra [n=ogra@ubuntu/member/ogra] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:15] dholbach, bug #6195 is on dapper, not breezy [03:15] Malone bug 6195: "Dependency trouble" Fix req. for: mozilla (Ubuntu), Severity: Normal, Assigned to: MOTU, Status: Fixed http://launchpad.net/bugs/6195 === zakame [n=zakame@ubuntu/member/zakame] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:17] Gloubiboulga: reopened it, thanks. === JohnnyMast [n=rave@cpc2-cosh5-5-0-cust84.cos2.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:17] ok === raphink [n=raphink@bur91-2-82-231-159-240.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:24] is asking elmo on IRC still the way to get stuff moved to morgue? [03:24] email is better. [03:24] e-mail to which address? === Treenaks [n=martijn@thuis.foodfight.org] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:27] james.troup@canonical.com [03:28] ok, groovy [03:28] am I the only one that thinks having psemu plugins in dapper is odd, without having a playstation emulator that can use them ? === Manifold [n=Manifold@88-104-146-98.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:32] Hello. [03:32] hi Manifold [03:32] :) [03:32] This looks complex. [03:33] Hey, is dpkg a ubuntu specific command/. [03:33] ? [03:33] it is a bit complex indeed [03:33] I can't find it here http://www.ss64.com/bash/index.html [03:33] but very interesting when you get to it :) [03:34] nope [03:34] it's a Debian command [03:34] OH. [03:34] Hrm. [03:34] this is not a bash command [03:34] or a linux general command [03:35] its a Debian specific one [03:35] that you'll find on all Debian-based systems [03:35] Debian, Ubuntu, Xandros, Linspire, ... [03:35] dpkg is the core of all debian-based boxen [03:35] "manifold u can the backport depository which will have it" [03:36] Where is this backport depository? [03:36] :) [03:36] The wiki just gives me a list [03:36] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BackportsPackageList?highlight=%28backport%29 [03:36] Manifold: so what you want to do is turn a Debian deb into an Ubuntu one, right ? [03:36] Yeah, raphink [03:36] It's a pretty popular program. [03:36] http://mahogany.sourceforge.net/ [03:37] what program is it? [03:37] Mail checker. [03:37] ok the first steps are [03:37] 1) check it's not in Ubuntu yet (in dapper that is, since breezy is not the dev version) [03:38] 2) if it's not in ubuntu yet, check if it's not in Debian yet (packages.debian.org) [03:38] 3a) if it's already in Debian but not in Ubuntu, we'll have to sync/merge it [03:38] 3b) if it's not in Ubuntu or Debian yet, we'll have to make a new package (or you'll have to ;)) [03:39] but first check the 2 first steps ;) [03:39] for 1), go check on packages.ubuntu.com [03:40] if it's not in Ubuntu and Dapper, also think about why it is so, and check if there was no bug reported about in either distribution in the past. [03:40] Manifold: still with us? [03:40] Yeah [03:41] I'm looking through the debian packages, raphink [03:41] ok [03:41] I've checked the old and new repositories [03:41] Of ubunut [03:41] ok [03:41] ubuntu [03:41] did you look at the ubuntu packages first? [03:41] First thing I did. [03:42] I used Synaptic, [03:42] good [03:42] well then you missed the dapper repositories ;) [03:42] With all the universe and multiverse [03:42] unless you're using dapper now [03:42] ;) [03:42] Hah. :P [03:43] Where are these dapper repositories? [03:43] you should check on packages.ubuntu.com [03:43] to search the dapper packages [03:43] some programs are not available in breezy, but have been added in dapper [03:43] Manifold: packages.ubuntu.com [03:44] StevenK: ping? [03:44] and search in any version [03:44] so you can also see if it existed in warty or hoary === Kilohertz [n=khz@200-208-49-254-mns.cpe.vivax.com.br] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:44] hi slomo_ [03:45] hi raphink :) [03:45] raphink, "You have searched for packages that names contain mahogany in all distributions, all sections, and all architectures." [03:45] "Can't find that package." [03:45] :) [03:45] Argh. [03:45] how do i add my key to the revu keyring? [03:45] ok [03:46] so you didn't find the program in either Debian or Ubuntu [03:46] segfault email a revu admin [03:46] segfault: send a signed message to keyring@tauware.de [03:46] Hold on, the debian search is buggered up, raphink [03:46] if I'm not wrong [03:46] :s [03:47] I'm doing a manual search [03:47] Manifold: is this program open-source? [03:47] ok [03:47] Well, it's on sourceforge.. [03:47] Manifold: no deb called mahogany in either ubuntu or debian. [03:47] "Mahogany is an OpenSource cross-platform mail and news client." [03:47] Yes, it is. === Pygi [n=mario@83-131-254-167.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:48] OK, Yagisan [03:48] So that means.. [03:48] Manifold: you get to package it :) [03:48] A new package is to be made. [03:48] XD. [03:48] And how do I do that? [03:49] raphink: did you get your box fixed ? [03:49] Manifold: is it a recent program ? [03:49] Yagisan: I think so too ;) [03:49] "Latest News [03:49] * September 5, 2004 Progress update" [03:49] Fairly. [03:49] Manifold: first thing for you is to read the New Debian Maintainer's Guide ;) [03:49] Yagisan: didn't recover the files :( [03:50] Yagisan: but I've set a networked backup system [03:50] That one, raphink [03:50] ? [03:50] raphink: that's a shame. Which backup system did you choose ? [03:50] It's three years out of date. [03:50] Manifold: a project that has released the latest update a year ago is not a recent one ;) [03:50] Oh damn. [03:50] XD [03:50] I programmed my own Yagisan [03:51] Is it worth packaging? [03:51] based on ssh with rsa keys, associated with rsync [03:51] so rsync over ssh with rsa keys [03:51] raphink: why? isn't the one on this channel enough? :-) [03:51] my code is available as FOSS of course ;) [03:51] if you want to look at it [03:51] raphink: don't forget to make an offline backup too [03:51] Manifold: if you think it's worth it, then it's worth it [03:52] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/index.en.html <--- Manifold for you [03:52] Yagisan: yep [03:52] raphink: think lightning strike near your place. Instant fried pcs. [03:53] You guys heard of Mercury Messenger? [03:53] http://www.mercury.to/ [03:53] beah === Yagisan is busy with late night work [03:55] Mercury Messenger isn't on the Ubuntu or Debian repositories [03:56] Manifold: If we, or debian don't have it, the general rule is you need to package it and send it to revu [03:56] mercury is not open-source if I'm nto wrong [03:56] Is that a serious obstacle, raphink? [03:56] Manifold: It will become your baby to look after [03:56] But I'm a Linux baby anyway. [03:56] I think mercury is freeware [03:57] Manifold: not to be included in multiverse [03:57] Manifold: well, yes, it makes it very difficult. For starters we can't fix it if it is broken [03:57] but you won't have it in universe if it's not open-source [03:57] So that means it just stays on my HD? [03:57] Manifold: when famous apps are not available, you might wonder why ;) [03:58] Manifold: no, difficult != impossible [03:58] there is often a good reason [03:58] How do people use these famous apps? [03:58] Manifold: you can work on any app if you want to, though [03:58] :) [03:58] Manifold: well, name a famous app - and we can tell you ;) [03:58] Er. [03:58] Manifold: either they install them with the installer provided by the app [03:59] or it's packaged as binary [03:59] I don't know too many Linux ones, raphink. [03:59] such as acroread [03:59] NeoOffice? [03:59] Manifold: never heard of it [03:59] a few non-free apps provide their own .deb as well, e.g. opera [03:59] http://www.mercury.to/index.php?page=Downloads [03:59] Manifold: Ubuntu is made to be and stay an open-source free distribution === doko [n=doko@dslb-084-059-107-216.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [03:59] There's deb there. [04:00] dunno it [04:00] raphink: please don't suggest that acroread. It is now spyware [04:00] Manifold: but acroread is an example [04:00] lol. [04:00] and Opera was one till recently [04:00] raphink: but opera was up front. acroread is not [04:00] minghua: opera is open-source now, isn't it? [04:00] google tells me NeoOffice is a OOo port to OS X [04:00] raphink: uhm, no? Opera has never ever been spyware. [04:00] Manifold: then test this deb [04:01] raphink: no, it's just free as in beer, it's not free. [04:01] Do you know where apt-get puts the programs I download? [04:01] Yagisan: huhu [04:01] OK, raphink . [04:01] Manifold: install lintian and linda [04:01] and run them on the deb file [04:01] raphink: no idea, I don't use opera myself. I doubt it though, last time I heard it goes from adware to freeware [04:01] and see how many errors and warning you get ;) [04:01] never said thta Mithrandir [04:02] Manifold: apt-get downloads the deb files and install them using dpkg routines [04:02] ah ok that must be it minghua [04:02] I don't use opera either [04:02] Manifold: /var/cache/apt/archives [04:02] just heard there was a change in it [04:02] and thought it was open-source now [04:02] I must have misunderstood [04:02] Aha, [04:03] Manifold, why not use gaim? [04:03] Mithrandir: do you have any multi-arch stuff publicly available to test ? [04:03] SEJeff: why not use Kopete? [04:03] 'Cause I think Gaim's UI is too clunky, SEJeff [04:03] Yagisan: no, unfortunately not. [04:03] kopete rulez [04:03] raphink, Because that would require me loading kdelibs and the qt libs into ram [04:03] Well, not too clunky, but too big and friendly, SEJeff [04:04] Manifold, Have you used the latest beta of 2.0? [04:04] oh yes indeed SEJeff same reason why I wouldn't use any gnome app ;) [04:04] I just downloaded it from apt-get [04:04] raphink, To each his own. Do not start a flamewar [04:04] Mithrandir: please give me a heads up when you do, I'd like to help in whatever way I can, even if it's just testing. [04:04] exactly SEJeff :) [04:04] I respect gnome users but I prefer kde :) [04:05] raphink, Fair enough. I REALLY despise the children who bash eachother. It is to the detriment of open source as a whole === rikai [n=gtk2@pool-68-238-63-64.port.east.verizon.net] has left #ubuntu-motu ["later."] [04:05] raphink: gui's are for wusses ;) :-P [04:05] Yagisan, develop a qemu based chroot script :) that would help a lot :) [04:05] totally agreed SEJeff :) [04:05] Yagisan: lol [04:05] Yagisan: sure, will do [04:05] Manifold: did you have a look at the New Debian Maintainer's Guide ? [04:05] raphink, I got lintian with apt-get, but I don't know where apt-get put it [04:06] ogra: It would just choke on the nptl binaries again :( [04:06] I'm still trying to run lintian, raphink [04:06] And that guide is huge, raphink. [04:06] ^^ [04:06] ah ok [04:06] Manifold: tihs guide is the basis [04:06] Manifold: You'll find most people here have memorised that guide [04:06] Debian Policy is the next guide to browser [04:06] browse [04:07] and if NDMG is huge [04:07] Manifold: or at least bookmarked it [04:07] then I don't know what policy is ;) [04:07] Yagisan, yes, the only way i found to bootstrap a ppc ltsp chroot on i386, or a i386 chroot on ppc was nfs mounting the dir from another machine and run the bootstrapping from there ..... [04:07] NDMG and Debian Policy are the docs that make Debian packages the quality they are [04:07] I got lintian with apt-get [04:07] Yagisan, being able to do this from a qemu-ppc binary would rock [04:08] But I can't find where it put it. [04:08] Manifold: and I reckon it's hard to swallow [04:08] :/ [04:08] ogra: I ah bothered the qemu devs to find out why it doesn't work. there is basic nptl support for arm though [04:08] Manifold, dpkg -L lintian | grep bin [04:08] Manifold: ok now run lintian on the deb you got [04:08] lol. [04:08] Manifold: lintian is an automated tool to check for basic errors and mistakes in deb files [04:08] Oh, so I just run the deb now. [04:09] you run [04:09] lintian yourfile.deb [04:09] with the deb you got on the website of the app [04:09] and see what you get [04:09] bash: lintian: command not found [04:09] if you want details, run [04:09] lintian -i yourfile.deb [04:10] ogra: in *theory* we can install ubuntu ppc in a qemu ppc system emulator, set up qemu networking and run the install like that [04:10] did you really install lintian from apt-get ? [04:10] I'll double check. [04:10] sudo apt-get install lintian [04:10] Oh, I got linda [04:10] ogra: but do you really want to add a few hundred mb to the install cd for edubuntu eg to support that ? I wouldn't. [04:10] Apt-get said it was better [04:11] Yagisan, then the nfs method with real hardware is easier ... what i mean is running something like: qemu-ppc ltsp-build-client --arch powerpc [04:11] but deboostrap fails this ... [04:11] hm it's not better, it's different Manifold [04:11] you can test with both lintian and linda [04:11] D/Ling Lintian [04:11] ogra: I know what you meant. It's not possible without nptl support added to qemu userspace emulation [04:12] ogra: qemu systems level emulation supposedly works fine, but I currently lack the bandwidth to test it [04:12] its possible to run qemu-i386 /opt/ltsp/i386/bin/ls ... [04:12] on a ppc [04:13] the sad thing is that it doesnt work for scripts ... [04:13] ogra: it will choke on larger apps such as bash - try it [04:13] i did [04:13] It's in a foreign language, raphink [04:13] >.< [04:13] it chokes on fork() [04:13] haha [04:13] ogra: yep - that is the nptl issue [04:13] yup [04:13] Manifold: paste it to a pastebin === rikai [n=gtk2@pool-68-238-63-64.port.east.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:14] What's that? [04:14] Manifold: http://pastebin.com [04:14] Thanks for helping a new guy, raphink [04:14] Manifold: I used to be a newbie aswell ;) [04:14] and still am in many fields ;) [04:14] :] [04:15] and always happy to get some help :) [04:15] ogra: supposedly, we could grab some of that nptl code from the arm portion, and somehow convert it for the rest of qemu, but that is beyond my current coding skill set [04:15] and beyond my current focus ... [04:15] raphink, http://pastebin.com/pastebin.php?dl=487176 [04:15] i think we should think about it dapper+1 [04:16] hmm [04:16] doesnt look too good Manifold [04:16] I'll run it through a translator [04:16] ogra: what will be the name of dapper+1 ? [04:16] dapper+1 :) [04:16] dizzy elephant ? [04:16] ogra: possibly. could you do me a favour, I'd like some comments on some stuff in revu [04:17] :) [04:17] no idea... mark announces new names some weeks before release normally ... [04:17] raphink: u610 [04:17] haha [04:17] raphink: I'm serious. breezy = u510, dapper = u604, dapper + 1 = u610 [04:18] oh yes [04:18] sorry ;) [04:18] of course [04:18] :) [04:19] ogra: could you give me your opinion on http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1335 [04:19] ogra: I added amd64 support to it [04:20] Meh. [04:20] raphink, it's portugese [04:20] It's just telling you about the messenger itself [04:21] hmm [04:21] oh yes I hadn't noticed [04:21] All we know is that there's a syntax error in section 1 after the tag description [04:21] Manifold: the lintian output just looks like error message on broken .deb description to me [04:21] So, now what can I do, raphink? [04:22] I'd run dpkg-deb --info on said .deb package first [04:22] not much Manifold since you don't have the source package [04:22] Ach. [04:22] Oh well. [04:22] + the description is in portuguese, which is not good [04:22] Screw it then. [04:23] I should go and do something away from the computer. [04:23] Thanks for your help guys, raphink [04:23] See yer later. [04:23] :) [04:23] (I'll be back with more questions.. :D) [04:23] later === kjcole [n=kjcole@dsl092-145-217.wdc2.dsl.speakeasy.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:24] ok [04:25] hopefully we'll be here with more answers ;) [04:26] Yagisan, i see no trace for a ia32-libs-universe package except in the changelog ... [04:28] ogra: sorry - was attending to baby - thats here at http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1329 [04:29] Yagisan, no, i mean you need a dependency anywhere [04:29] ogra: It is in the run-time deps. check control.amd64 [04:30] ah, sorry, call me blind :) [04:31] ogra: I switch it at build time if i'm on amd64. I couldn't get [!amd64] type stuff to work for Depends lines :( [04:31] from a packaging pov it looks fine, but i have no clue about assembler ... and i have no revu login ... [04:32] ogra: ok - it basically uuencoded thei386 deb [04:33] ogra: I was planning to do that for a few greatly desired i386 debs for dapper. eg wine [04:34] ogra: at least until a real multi-arch solution is developed [04:34] talk to the wine guys before, they plana amd64 version since a while [04:35] ogra: will do. [04:35] ogra: no issues with uuencoding i386 debs for amd64 ? === Valandil [n=chrys@dslb-084-056-103-239.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:37] happy new year :) [04:37] Yagisan: they will be 1.5 times bigger... but it works ;) [04:37] Yagisan, its ugly ... [04:38] but i dont know another way to do it to solve your particular prob :) [04:41] Hi there :-) I'd like to work on MaxDB-packages [04:42] thank you ogra and slomo_. I will proceed to upload dapper packages to revu "fixed" for amd64 like that, at least until a better solution is found. [04:43] I've worked on adapting the package from SAP to debian woody, but I never mantained a distribution-package before for public [04:43] slomo_, ogra feel free to advocate any packages fixed like that :) [04:44] What can I do to help on these packgages? === bmonty [n=bmontgom@ubuntu/member/bmonty] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:58] morning everyone [05:00] mornig :) === tvo [n=tobi@5354EA9B.cable.casema.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:01] in */debian/control under section, is that where you put Universe / Multiverse / Main, etc? [05:01] Or is that where you put Something like Security [05:02] SEJeff: you don't have to put anything in control to say a package is universe [05:03] bmonty, Well what goes in the section directive of control? Anything other than Unknown? [05:04] SEJeff: see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html [05:04] bmonty, Thanks. I'm right here now: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ch-dreq.en.html starting off [05:07] in synaptic, I am seeing, System Administration (Universe) as a section, is this valic? [05:07] s/valic/valid/ [05:08] the universe/main separation is decided by the override file AFAIK [05:08] which is a repository thing, not a package thing [05:09] SEJeff: I'd be guessing how synpatic knows which part of the archive a package is in, but the string in synaptic is not a valid section string [05:09] ok. So I would be better off to leave the section as unknown [05:09] I *think* synaptic has been modified to know that anything in the /universe section of the archive is Universe and adds it to the section name [05:10] SEJeff: from the policy manual the "Section" field is optional [05:10] Well I am packaging vsecurity, a kernel module adapted from grsec, openwall, cap_over, and some tpe lsm stuff from ibm. I am just trying to do it correctly and am new to debian packaging [05:10] I read that, I just want to do everything correctly [05:12] SEJeff: bottom line, you don't have to do anything to make a package universe [05:12] ok, thanks [05:13] anyone have any idea why a package I uploaded yesterday wouldn't be built? The package is grass, I got the ACCEPTED email, but the buildd hasn't done anything with it yet. [05:14] bmonty: in NEW queue, perhaps? [05:15] minghua: do you know how I can check? (I don't think it is in NEW) === Sepheebear [n=SepheeBe@cpe-68-175-48-160.nyc.res.rr.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:16] bmonty: the ubuntu NEW queue is invisible from outside AFAIK, I don't really know how this ftp-master/buildd thing works, there should be people that know better here [05:17] minghua: I'm with you on that one :) [05:17] NEW is not visible [05:17] but ACCEPTED != NEW [05:17] bmonty: but if it has been in the archive before, it shouldn't be NEW (not unless you have new binary packages), that I'm pretty sure [05:17] NEW == only if your binary or source name changed or if its really new [05:18] only the version and the diff changed [05:18] for debian there is going to be a "package is NEW" mail sent to the uploader, not sure about ubuntu [05:18] minghua: yes. [05:18] tseng: thanks [05:18] it looks like grass might be in depwait [05:19] then bmonty obviously has a different problem, sorry for the wrong guess :-) [05:19] see the previous version, unresolvable build-deps [05:19] tseng: I fixed the build-deps, that was the main reson to upload [05:19] new uploads dont clear depwait [05:19] according to your changelog it shouldnt be in NEW [05:19] you need lamont [05:19] or infinity [05:19] tseng: where did you check that? [05:20] ..the previous build log as I said [05:20] http://people.ubuntu.com/~lamont/buildLogs/g/grass/6.0.1-1/ [05:20] ahh, missed that, sorry [05:21] tseng: so basically it needs a little kick-start from an admin? [05:21] yes, ask infinity if grass is in depwait and to clear it === rikai [n=gtk2@pool-68-238-63-64.port.east.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:22] rather lamont [05:22] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BuildDaemons [05:22] infinity is on holiday until tomorrow [05:22] tseng: yeah I just saw that [05:22] a little out of date [05:22] item 2 is still relevant [05:23] it will be completely obsolete once gina is ready and we switch everything to launchpad [05:23] ogra: how long for that? [05:23] ogra: please no reminding [05:23] lol [05:23] bmonty, to quote debian ... "if its ready" [05:24] we still havent switched fully to malone yet even afaik [05:24] i'm sure it will happen before dapper [05:24] (malone) [05:24] tseng: motu has [05:24] im (painfully?) aware [05:26] refering to the fact that malone is prolific with email? [05:26] :) [05:26] or the policy of "everything that ever touched our database should be displayed as a ui element on the page" [05:26] among other things [05:27] the things you actually want are hidden and useless stuff is all over === tseng hasnt gotten a chance to speak to brad lately [05:28] I agree that malone needs a bit of a review from a usability standpoint [05:29] hm, i wonder why elmo has synced exactly one of my many merges... ;) [05:29] slomo_: because he likes getting multiple requests for the same package :) [05:30] bmonty: i'll write him a mail now :P [05:30] slomo_, because he's on holiday since one or two weeks [05:30] he'll return this week iirc [05:30] bbl [05:31] hmm... ok, but why does he sync one package then? he should ignore me when he is on holidays ;) [05:32] because he's addicted and needs at least on sync a week ? :) [05:36] Morning MOTU === herzi [n=herzi@d043163.adsl.hansenet.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Fuddl [n=fuddl@2001:638:a00:1e:2e0:81ff:fe58:40b1] has joined #ubuntu-motu === rraphink [n=raphink@bur91-2-82-231-159-240.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:51] cyberix: i'm doing gnunet now... be happy ;) === JanC [n=janc@lugwv/member/JanC] has joined #ubuntu-motu === ogra_ibook [n=ogra@ubuntu/member/ogra] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Seveas [n=seveas@ubuntu/member/seveas] has joined #ubuntu-motu === bpuccio [n=brian@ool-457a9c38.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Kyral sighs [06:14] Back to work === Kyral calls up a terminal and begins working on a metapackage [06:15] http://pastebin.com/487329 I am trying to have my package depend on kernel headers >= 2.6.12 but it is failing, any ideas? [06:16] How do you make a metapackage anyway... [06:17] SEJeff: because there is no package named linux-headers, only linux-headers-2.6-386, for example [06:17] Kyral: just a blank package that depends on other packages. Arch = all [06:17] ah [06:18] and if I wanna throw customizations in? [06:18] minghua, Is there a way to tell it to depend on 2.6.12 + so that it works in breezy AND dapper? [06:18] should I apply then in rules (ie, replacing the default sources.list) [06:18] because linux-headers-2.6.12 and linux-headers-2.6.15 are different packages. Can you do boolean OR in the depends line? [06:18] Kyral: what sort of customisations ? [06:19] Yagisan: for my linux lab [06:19] Yagisan: to help with updates lol [06:19] Hmm, actually linux-headers seem to be a virtual package [06:19] so like I have a default install, then I install this meta and it pulls in the rest of the packages for the build, replaces the sources.list, xorg.conf, AFS things, etc [06:20] Kyral: let me be more clear. Is it overwriting any part of the packages you intend to install ? [06:20] Kyral: use postinst, prerm, postrm, preinst [06:20] to customize your metapackage [06:20] oh [06:20] minghua, So how can I have my package depend on linux-headers-2.6.12-* OR 2.6.15-*? [06:20] a metapackage is a simple package that just installs nothing ;) [06:20] so postinst would overrwrite [06:20] SEJeff: yeah that sounds like a good idea to me [06:20] rraphink: I know, its not proper to call this a Meta then lol [06:21] sure it is Kyral [06:21] in that it installs nothing [06:21] SEJeff: the problem though is there are many -* variants [06:21] it just depends on other packages and tunes some stuff [06:21] yah good point [06:21] ;) [06:21] minghua: ok. Well I guess I will just make it work for the latest dapper kernel, thanks [06:22] I don't have to list EVERY dep do I? Like I can say build-essiential instead of gcc-4.0 bla bla [06:22] no one depends on build-essential [06:22] Its needed on the build [06:23] well every package doesnt depend on gcc [06:23] I mean that we need the compilers lol this is a lab for CompSci students [06:23] Kyral: You'll need to make some careful edits to your package, to allow it to overwrite parts of other packages eg config files [06:23] SEJeff: looking at it more carefully, depending on specific linux-headers-2.6.12-* is probably not a good idea since ABI version is also in the package name [06:23] ... [06:23] SEJeff: so yeah I agree you shouldn't bother [06:23] should i say it one more time for good measure? [06:23] Kyral: I have a sample package, but it's in a 414MB source package [06:24] ick [06:24] Kyral: this is a package that is not to be ubuntu, right? [06:24] fine..I'll list out the contents of Build-Essiential [06:24] right [06:24] just for your lab? [06:24] just a local lab build [06:24] then you do what you want with it ;) [06:24] put the depenencies you want installed by it [06:24] just for me to be lazy about updating it ;P [06:24] if you want build-essential installed automatically by it, then put it [06:24] Yah but I wanna be "right" by it [06:25] haha [06:25] well taht wouldn't be right in the distro [06:25] eh? [06:25] but for a personal use, it just matters that you end up with what you want [06:25] Kyral: pm me, and I'll send you the extracted /debian directory [06:25] minghua, thanks [06:25] and if your goal is to automatize the installation of build-essential, then put it [06:25] Yagisan: what is it? [06:30] minghua, Could you look at this? Makes 0 sense to me as the version numbers are correct and it still fails: http://pastebin.com/487349 === raptoid [n=raptoid@unaffiliated/raptoid] has joined #ubuntu-motu === ptlo [n=senko@83-131-7-250.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [06:32] Kyral: one of my can't-be-in-ubuntu-because-upstream-needs-a-cluebat packages, needs to overwrite files in another package [06:33] lol [06:33] Kyral: It could be an example for you === MagnusR [n=magru@85.194.14.142] has joined #ubuntu-motu === ogra_ibook [n=ogra@ubuntu/member/ogra] has joined #ubuntu-motu === trulux [n=lorenzo@unaffiliated/trulux] has joined #ubuntu-motu === xerxas [n=xerxas@14.173.97-84.rev.gaoland.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Surak [n=ubuntu@20132203141.user.veloxzone.com.br] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Surak [n=ubuntu@20132203141.user.veloxzone.com.br] has left #ubuntu-motu [] [06:43] If upstream doesn't provide an icon for a .desktop file, what can I do ? [06:43] make it myself (:/) or use a 'generic' one or... [06:44] make one or use no icon ;) [06:45] hmm [06:45] I thought an icon was needed [06:45] this gdebi [06:45] I like it...for a GUI tool === lucas [n=lucas@d213-103-255-197.cust.tele2.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [06:48] SEJeff: -9.14, instead of -9-14? ;-) === cassidy [n=cassidy@f1-pc174.ulb.ac.be] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Kyral falls down [07:02] Just as EasyChem gets into the repos, upstream releases a new version [07:02] this is weird, check out http://packages.ubuntu.com/dapper/science/grass, notice the version string mis-spelling of ubuntu [07:02] it is correct in the package's changelog [07:02] wait.... === Kyral blinks [07:03] the GNOMEFiles entry says .5 [07:03] btu the SourceForge download location says .6 (which I packaged) [07:04] and the homepage for the project says .6 === sebest [n=chatzill@sebest.ovibes.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:04] bmonty: it seems the one with typo is -0*, while the correct and most recent one is -1* [07:05] no idea why that happened though [07:05] ah wait thats 2004.. === Kyral reddens [07:05] minghua: yeah, I just thought it was weird [07:05] bmonty: is there an -0* entry in the changelog? [07:06] minghua: yes and no, whoever packaged the -0 version of grass dropped all the ubuntu changelog entries, I put them back in for mine [07:06] maybe the previous upload indeed had a wrong version number === Sepheebear [n=SepheeBe@cpe-68-175-48-160.nyc.res.rr.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:07] minghua: that is it...and the culprit is....\sh! :P === sebest [n=chatzill@sebest.ovibes.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === bpuccio [n=brian@ool-457afde7.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:17] night all === sebest [n=chatzill@sebest.ovibes.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === mez_ [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #ubuntu-motu === sebest [n=chatzill@sebest.ovibes.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === tvo [n=tobi@5354EA9B.cable.casema.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:40] ogra: can you request the sync of libgtk-trayicon-ruby, overriding all ubuntu-specific changes ? [07:41] lucas, done [07:42] thanks === sebest [n=chatzill@sebest.ovibes.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:46] could a MOTU review bug #1299 ? [07:46] An error has occurred. [07:46] bug 1299 [07:46] Malone bug 1299: "ruby (Ubuntu) - Image.read(filename) eats characters from filename" Fix req. for: librmagick-ruby (Ubuntu), Severity: Normal, Assigned to: MOTURuby, Status: New http://launchpad.net/bugs/1299 === FireRabbit [n=FireRabb@c-67-183-18-60.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === SEJeff [n=SEJeff@12-203-76-59.client.insightBB.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === ogra_ [n=ogra@p5089E09C.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === ptolo [n=senko@83-131-9-12.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #ubuntu-motu === psusi [n=phreak@103.202.33.65.cfl.res.rr.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === dholbach [n=daniel@ubuntu/member/dholbach] has left #ubuntu-motu ["Ex-Chat"] === dholbach [n=daniel@ubuntu/member/dholbach] has joined #ubuntu-motu === allee [n=ach@dialin-212-144-128-072.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === marcin [n=user@194.114.146.58] has joined #ubuntu-motu [08:40] dholbach: if you want to answer that is :) [08:40] i'm on the phone [08:40] brb [08:40] :) [08:41] ok === joe_alf [n=joe_alf@pcd254053.netvigator.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === seth_k|lappy [n=seth@ubuntu/member/sethkinast] has joined #ubuntu-motu === marcin` [n=user@194.114.146.58] has joined #ubuntu-motu === poningru [n=poningru@pool-70-110-74-78.tampfl.fios.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === markuman [n=markuman@p50924F48.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:00] rraphink: that's a general patch page for existing packages === ompaul [n=ompaul@A-23-164.cust.iol.ie] has joined #ubuntu-motu === slomo [n=slomo@ubuntu/member/slomo] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Amaranth [n=travis@ubuntu/member/amaranth] has joined #ubuntu-motu === jinty [n=jinty@205.134.224.215] has joined #ubuntu-motu === jpatrick [n=patrick@26.Red-83-50-138.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === joe_alf [n=joe_alf@pcd254053.netvigator.com] has left #ubuntu-motu ["Leaving"] [09:13] rraphink: pingy === sebest [n=chatzill@sebest.ovibes.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === fredix [n=fredix@d213-103-72-97.cust.tele2.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:35] jpatrick: pong [09:35] rraphink: never mind now [09:35] hmm ok [09:35] :) [09:35] happy new year anyway [09:35] :) [09:35] I've changed 0ubuntu1 -> 1ubuntu1 [09:36] hmm ok [09:36] in what package? [09:36] and libaqbanking0-dev isn't working [09:36] kmymoney2 [09:36] oki [09:36] ah [09:36] in dapper? [09:37] no in REVU [09:38] (dapper) [09:38] hmm ok [09:38] what is libabanking0 for? [09:38] banking I guess but apart from that ;) [09:38] slomo: hurray! [09:38] :-D [09:41] jpatrick: are you getting it sponsored in Debian? [09:42] yeah [09:42] ok good :) [09:43] slomo: Some distros have political issues with GNUnet, I've heard. :-( [09:44] slomo: Some non Debian derivatives. [09:44] cyberix: "political" issues with gnunet? huh? [09:44] slomo: But it is great that Debian and derivatives have it. Makes them superrior [09:44] cyberix: what exactly? [09:45] slomo: https://gnunet.org/drupal/?q=node/150 [09:47] cyberix: sorry, i can't find it ;) please tell me about it :) === rraphink is having fun listening to free music on musique-libre.org :D [09:50] cyberix: ? [09:50] slomo: I don't know more about it [09:51] slomo: They probably think they will be attacked by some evil media giants, if they have p2p software. [09:51] slomo: Or something like that [09:51] slomo: I don't know. Just read about it there. [09:52] hm, they don't have mldonkey, nicotine, dc++, etc? [09:52] I don't know [09:52] Maybe it is the anonymity thing [09:52] hm, ok... nevermind :) i like the idea of freenet and gnunet... === markuman [n=markuman@p50924F48.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === macgyver2 [n=eric@pdpc/supporter/student/macgyver2] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:55] "SuSE has political issues with making a GNUnet package, and RH maybe the same. Still, that's nothing that we can fix -- bug them!" was the line I was talking about. === dr_kabuto [n=dr_kabut@host52-0.pool80104.interbusiness.it] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:08] morning all === torkel [i=torkel@69-188.umenet.t3.se] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:10] hi ajmitch === ogra [n=ogra@ubuntu/member/ogra] has joined #ubuntu-motu === hunger [n=hunger@p54A633FA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:24] Is it possible to remove the eric3 deb from universe? It is broken (see lp#6042) [10:24] Yah I was about to say [10:24] the eric package provides [10:25] Kyral: Yes, the eric package works... but eric3 looks newer. And why should known to be broken stuff hang around? [10:26] hunger: the eric3 package is the same as eric it seems [10:26] Kyral: eric works, eric3 coredumps... so eric3 should get removed IMHO. [10:27] I know [10:27] I'm agreeing with you dude ;D [10:27] Kyral: Hey, great;-) [10:30] Hey, eric is even newer then eric3! [10:30] yah [10:30] someone ping someone to purge eric3 [10:30] Man! that is really confusing! [10:34] no kiddn [10:38] good night [10:38] cya dholbach [10:41] night dholbach [10:44] http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1365 can be archived; it's been uploaded [10:44] http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1257 can be archived; it's been uploaded too [10:48] can someone unarchive http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=840 [10:48] it hasn't been uploaded [10:49] hub, if you make a new upload it'll auto-unarchive [10:49] (new upload to REVU that is) [10:49] seth_k|lappy: yeah, but I have no reason to do one :-/ [10:49] unless someone can explain what's wrong according to the latest comments [10:50] ahh [10:55] Does anybody have some time to review one of my packages? (http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1282) === crimsun [n=crimsun@66.248.140.183] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:58] Damn... so many IDEs and still nothing that beats emacs:-( === crimsun gently sidesteps the $IDE war ;) === lucas [n=lucas@d213-103-255-197.cust.tele2.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:02] hunger: people look at me when I use Emacs instead of KDevelop or Kate at the office === hunger_ [n=hunger@p54A64798.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:02] hunger, Except for vim of course :) [11:02] hunger: fortunately there are vi users that understand me :-) [11:03] hub: Sorry, got disconnected... Oh... yes, I forgot about vi:-) [11:03] hunger: that was not a vi vs emacs war. it is just vi/emacs vs the rest [11:04] hub: Right. Vi works well, too. The rest is just too crashy to use:-( [11:04] hunger: or not that convenient [11:05] vi + screen makes /me drool [11:05] hub: I never get to the point where I find out about inconvinient stuff:-( [11:05] they use KDE so they are used to ;-) [11:06] Just tested eric(3): Displays newly created files only, does nothing when trying to open files. [11:06] kdevelop crashes whenever I touch anything, eclipse is not really stable for me either. [11:07] hunger, Scite is decent [11:07] SEJeff: I wanted to see what the fuss about IDEs is about. Scite is more of a texteditor, isen't it? === yann_ [n=Yann@alcyone.pleiades.fr.eu.org] has joined #ubuntu-motu === chninkel [n=Yann@alcyone.pleiades.fr.eu.org] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:08] Scite is more of a proof of concept app to showcase Scintilla. But it is a great programmers ide [11:08] hunger, fast, stable, and a decent featureset === hunger_ wants to do that every 6 weeks or so and so far couldn't get to like it. [11:10] SEJeff: I use scite on windows, I know what it does (there). [11:10] SEJeff: I was hoping to find something which supports unittests of ruby/python scripts. [11:11] Guess I'll stick with whatever texteditor is available plus several terminals. [11:11] yep [11:13] hunger_: pyunit ? === ogra_ibook [n=ogra@ubuntu/member/ogra] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:14] lifeless: Guess that is what it is called in python. [11:15] lifeless: I was hoping to some frontend for whichever system used. [11:15] hunger_: vim.org has scripts to parse pyunit error and failure putput [11:15] *output* [11:15] lifeless: Somewhat like the proprietary rational robots (which is not too good but nice to look at;-) [11:16] I dont know what that does [11:16] so the analogy is useless === Hieronymus [n=jeroen@cp413115-a.tilbu1.nb.home.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:16] if I fix a bug in a package, how do I want to use dch? --increment or --newversion? -a? [11:17] dch -i [11:17] err [11:17] increment the Ubuntu Revision [11:17] so use -i and -a? [11:18] ahh, ok... looks like just -i [11:19] unless it's from a sync, in which case you'll want to use -vfoo [11:20] doesn't really matter. You could just edit the version manually, too. === bmonty [n=bmontgom@wsip-68-15-230-31.om.om.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:29] hrm... [11:29] I used dch -i to bump the rev and add a changelog entry, but it did not change the rev... the package is built using the old revision [11:30] psusi: did you rebuild the source package? [11:30] well, the old rev is in the name of the dir and the .dsc... I did pbuilder build *.dsc [11:31] psusi: in the package source directory run "debuild -S", that will make a new source package [11:32] hrm... ok... then I will need to extract that source deb and pbuild the new .dsc? [11:32] no, just run the pbuilder with the new .dsc [11:33] hrm... could not find a signing program [11:34] psusi: that is only needed if you want to be able to upload the package [11:35] oh, ok... it did build the new files === plugwash [i=plugwash@p10link.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === jinty [n=jinty@205.134.224.215] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:44] if a package is in universe and it's maintainer is @debian.org, does that mean it was just synced over and there is no ubuntu maintainer? [11:44] it may. [11:44] usually [11:44] the only way to tell for sure is to look at the version. [11:44] we don't change the maintainer field when we make changes [11:44] how do you tell from the version? [11:45] does it have 'ubuntu' in it ? [11:45] and if you are making ubuntu specific changes, aren't you maintaining it? [11:45] if it has ubuntu in the version number [11:45] hey lifeless [11:45] hola ajmitch [11:45] nope... no ubuntu in the version... [11:45] lifeless: opensync got rejected? [11:45] I saw it in NEW, but nothing after that [11:46] ajmitch: yeah, I need to fix the copyright file [11:46] it mixes GPL and LGPL code [11:46] and maybe more. As the doco is incomplete on it I need to audit the entire freaking thing [11:46] ah [11:46] nasty [11:46] indeed [11:46] its /README,/COPYING etc give no clue [11:46] thank god for ftp-master ;) === thierry [n=thierry@modemcable232.48-131-66.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:48] anyone can explain me why my package (http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1299) doesn't install any binary? I'm using cdbs [11:49] also the same problem with http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1293 (in wich I'm using debhelper) [11:50] ajmitch: do you have some time to review a package? (http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1282) [11:50] maybe [11:51] should be fast to do, it's just a small shell script, and i am the upstream author ;) [11:52] lfittl: small shell scripts aren't always a good idea to package, having lots of clutter from many packaged shell scripts can be a pain [11:53] ajmitch: well since we had some packaging requests for nautilus scripts, I wrote this as a little "installer" for them, as we can't install to user dirs [11:53] thierry: no relative paths to the build dir in .install [11:53] lfittl: maybe talk to #ubuntu-desktop guys about getting something included with nautilus itself? [11:55] thierry: err, wait a sec. [11:55] thierry: does it even build a shared library? [11:56] http://revu.tauware.de/revu1-incoming/libfxscintilla1.6-0512241230/libfxscintilla1.6_1.63-0ubuntu1.buildlog has the build log [11:57] ajmitch: good idea, do you think it's realistic that a patch for this could go in fast enough? (as we only have less than 3 weeks left until UVF) [11:57] sure [11:57] I saw seb around earlier [11:58] it doesn't actually build a shared lib that I can see [11:58] ajmitch: thanks :) [12:02] thierry: you don't appear to be passing --enable-shared=yes