[12:02] libnotify-dev is in main, actually [12:02] and you might want to file a bug on it [12:03] ajmitch, Yes, I do, but I also wanted to submit a patch with the bug === mgalvin [n=mgalvin@ubuntu/member/mgalvin] has joined #ubuntu-motu === ogra_ibook [n=ogra@ubuntu/member/ogra] has joined #ubuntu-motu === LaserJock [n=mantha@ubuntu/member/laserjock] has joined #ubuntu-motu === bmonty [n=bmontgom@ubuntu/member/bmonty] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:25] hi bmonty [12:25] hey LaserJock [12:26] bmonty: how's the little one? [12:31] Back to work === jaldhar [n=jaldhar@pcp04197965pcs.crosky01.pa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [12:36] LaserJock: sorry, got distracted....the baby has a cold this week [12:36] I'm finally getting LDAP/Kerberos single sign on to work on my network :) [12:36] bmonty: how old is he? [12:37] LaserJock: he is almost 3 months old now [12:38] bmonty: well, he better get over his cold before UVF ;-) [12:38] bmonty: cause he'll start doing bug fixes before you know it [12:39] heh, yeah I've already showed him dpkg :) [12:39] lol [12:40] unfortunately he was more interested in sucking on his fist, so I don't think he will be up to speed to help out on dapper :( [12:41] good night everybody. [12:41] night dholbach [12:41] gn8 dholbach [12:41] bmonty: hmm, I guess you could have him join in on debian-devel. He should fit in over there (just kidding of course) [12:41] bye lfittl, ajmitch [12:41] cy dholbach [12:41] cya I mean [12:41] bye LaserJock [12:42] bya dholbach [12:42] bye bmonty === Des_MM [n=des@200.115.206.87] has left #ubuntu-motu ["Abandonando"] [12:45] C...ick [12:45] damn Printf [12:46] Why people don't use C++ is beyond me... [12:46] because c++ is nasty & evil [12:46] damn right === bmonty agrees with ajmitch for most cases === tseng throws cout right c out the window at Kyral [12:46] puts for life [12:49] No I'm cursing at printf :P [12:50] hmm, I find for me the problem is hardly ever in the programming language but the one using it [12:56] lol [12:56] I <3 Python === jcape [i=jcape@71.194.176.102] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Amaranth [n=travis@ubuntu/member/amaranth] has joined #ubuntu-motu === ogra_ [n=ogra@p5089EC60.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:20] Malone 5777 [01:20] Malone bug 5777: "gpsim not installable in Dapper" Fix req. for: gpsim (Ubuntu), Severity: Normal, Assigned to: MOTU, Status: Confirmed http://launchpad.net/bugs/5777 === marcin [n=user@194.114.146.58] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:20] I can fix it... [01:21] then do so.. [01:22] Kyral: I started working on that, but you can do it if you want ;) === ogra_ [n=ogra@p5089E703.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:23] ajmitch: I'm at a text console lol [01:24] lfittl: It should be easy as changing a dep [01:24] Kyral: so? [01:24] meh [01:24] Kyral: sure but there is also a new upstream version :) [01:24] lfittl: for gpsim? [01:25] Kyral: yep (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2341) === ealden [n=ealden@ipdial-189-163.tri-isys.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:31] okay [01:31] I'll diff it === ajmitch_ [i=ajmitch@203.89.167.29] has joined #ubuntu-motu === azion [n=azion@194.46.170.136] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:39] Hey all, was wondering if there's any help need at the moment? [01:40] azion: lol there is always help needed [01:41] Sorry the stupid question, just wondering how abouts I go helping with motu [01:41] no, it's not a stupid question === sistpoty [n=sistpoty@ubuntu/member/sistpoty] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:41] it's just right now there is actually a lot going on because we have a deadline tomorrow [01:41] hi folks [01:41] Ah for what? [01:42] Hi sistpoty [01:42] upstream version freeze [01:42] I see [01:47] did anyone request scapy sync yet? [01:47] Ye've finished the main branch? [01:47] Or is bug fixes? [01:47] well, we are trying to get everything merged/synced from Debian unstable [01:47] Though job [01:47] *Tough job [01:47] LaserJock, How can I go about helping with MOTU? [01:47] hey sistpoty [01:47] huhu siretart [01:47] sistpoty: how are you? are you feeling better? === hub [n=hub@toronto-hs-216-138-231-194.s-ip.magma.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu [01:47] azion: well have you seen the MOTU wiki page : wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU ? [01:47] azion: start by reading the topic [01:47] hi siretart, sistpoty, hub, et al :) [01:47] siretart: still a little bit ill, but much better already :) [01:47] hi ajmitch [01:47] LaserJock, Ya have it infront of me [01:47] hi [01:47] sistpoty: I'm happy to hear that :) [01:47] hi ajmitch [01:47] hi hub [01:48] azion: do you have any packaging experience? [01:48] sistpoty: tomorrow 1400? [01:48] siretart: I'll be there ;) [01:48] same here :) [01:48] LaserJock, Only learning now really [01:48] but I need some sleep now. gn8 folks! [01:48] gn8 siretart [01:48] gn8 siretart [01:50] azion: ok, then maybe you could look at MOTUBugFixing and DeveloperResources [01:51] LaserJock, Afraid haven't had any bug so far with Ubuntu. lol! Good thing! [01:52] azion: well, then start fixing the ones other people have found ;-) [01:52] LaserJock, I would be interested in doing Developer Resources [01:52] azion: just hanging out here for a while will help [01:53] LaserJock, Okay [01:54] LaserJock, Cheers [01:58] Is Azureus going to be included in Ubuntu? [01:59] doubtful. Does it run with gcj? [02:00] Not sure, have to check it out [02:06] someone from fedora blogged about how they just got it working with gcj [02:10] Must have a looksie [02:14] anyone have a clue what's going on with gl/glu header packages? seems the one listed in motuglutransition point to x11-proto-gl [02:15] hm... just found libgl1-mesa-swrast-dev which seems to do the trick... strange [02:19] nope, fails when linking... I guess s.th. with the gl/glu-stuff is broken atm === ogra_ibook [n=ogra@ubuntu/member/ogra] has joined #ubuntu-motu === jaldhar [n=jaldhar@pcp04197965pcs.crosky01.pa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [02:23] The forums down? === ajmitch shrugs [02:24] they could be, I guess [02:24] Can't get in [02:25] Could be just busy too I guess === ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@trider-g7.fabbione.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Topic for #ubuntu-motu: Ubuntu Masters of the Universe: Ubuntu Universe Repository Maintainers | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTUTodo | How To Track Merge Status -> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTUToMerge | Grab your merge here: http://tiber.tauware.de/~sistpoty/MoM/index.py?state=new | sign up for ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com now! | Merges to review & upload: http://tinyurl.com/a3qjh === Topic (#ubuntu-motu): set by ajmitch at Wed Jan 18 23:05:17 2006 === psusi [n=phreak@54.161.205.68.cfl.res.rr.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === lotusleaf [n=lotuslea@unaffiliated/lotusleaf] has left #ubuntu-motu ["o_o"] [04:48] hub: New upload: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1545 [04:48] i saw === minghua [n=minghua@69-153-139-23.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:53] hi minghua === rajasun [n=maximusp@bb220-255-204-181.singnet.com.sg] has joined #ubuntu-motu [04:53] hi sistpoty [04:53] are we in UVF already? [04:53] nope, tomorrow [04:53] or rather "in some hours" [04:54] hehe [04:54] I remember something like "one week grade period for universe packages that don't require new dependencies", is that true? === ogra wonders why nobody thinks that *we* can be upstream for debian packages [04:55] I am thinking what to do with my scim packages [04:55] I have them ready now, but I need to wait for my sponsor [04:55] if there is no grace period, should I try to get them uploaded today? [04:55] i'd say yes [04:55] minghua: that would be new to me... I only know of a later date for merges to be finished (that are still on the list) [04:56] hub: You finished with reviewing? :) [04:56] okay, in that case, I should repackage the source as -0ubuntuX version, right? [04:56] nope [04:56] minghua, if they're ready, get them in [04:56] sorry I was doing something else [04:57] done [04:57] ogra: can you sponsor? I think I can get the repackaging done in half an hour. [04:57] hub: thanks :) [04:58] i cant sponsor debian stuff minghua [04:58] ogra: I mean sponsoring ubuntu stuff, I am not MOTU yet [04:58] what is the MOTU term for that... upload? [04:58] minghua, oh, surem but not tonight anymore, send me a mail (ogra@ubuntu.com) [04:59] (its 5am here, my GF kills me if i dont come to bed now) [04:59] any other MOTU willing to upload two universe package for me? otherwise I'll wait for ogra [04:59] ogra: sure, go to bed, hurry :-) [05:00] minghua, nah, i'll finish my glass of wine :) [05:00] minghua: sorry, I should have been in bed for a long time already... (same TZ as ogra)... so I can't promise right now === minghua goes repackaging [05:00] hehe [05:00] I'm off to bed now (also 5am here..), gn8 all [05:01] gn8 lfittl [05:01] sweet dreams, european MOTUs :-) [05:01] thanks :) [05:02] Ng [05:02] Night [05:02] gn8 azion [05:02] Im not gone yet [05:03] oh... sleepiness in my brain already ;) [05:03] sistpoty,Do u have MSN or anything [05:04] azion: nope... I used to be on icq, but now I almost exclusively use irc [05:04] azion: use jabber :-) [05:04] sistpoty, Arr ok, whats that? [05:05] azion: icq? [05:05] sistpoty, Ah IM [05:05] yep [05:05] sistpoty, You have ICQ? [05:05] azion: had... I didn't launch it for half a year now... [05:06] azion: what's wrong with IRC? [05:06] sistpoty, What time will you be on tomorrow at? [05:06] minghua: you around? [05:06] Hmm... [05:06] LaserJock: yeah [05:06] minghua: I was just reading your -motu email [05:06] hello guys [05:06] Hey [05:06] azion: don't know yet, if I'll be on... probably later in the evening (23 utc) or so [05:06] sistpoty, What time will you be on tomorrow at === minghua just got the ACCEPT mail from Debian, yeah! [05:07] sistpoty, Ah, Im in GMT, got email? [05:07] I want to send signed mail to revu - asking to add me to keyring [05:07] LaserJock: any comments? [05:07] minghua: how do we keep in good communication with Debian, I mean we touch a lot of packages so we would have to talk to a lot of DDs [05:07] and howto says that I should send my GNUPg KeyID in this mail... [05:07] azion: gmt, yes, but that's just a rough guess... and didn't get email yet [05:07] could someone tell me what is exactly this gnupg KeyID? [05:08] sistpoty, So how do I contact you, lol!!! [05:08] real name + comment + mail address? [05:08] azion: stay around in -motu... and I'm not the only helpful motu ;) [05:09] sistpoty, True, just I need to be spoon fed this stuff [05:09] minghua, as i said above, i disagee, if we have introduced a package,m why should we ask the debian maintainer before putting new stuff up ? [05:10] anyone know of a debian-installer guru? I'm trying to udebify the dmraid package and integrate it into the setup cd [05:10] hello guys - can someone help me with this gpg stuff? [05:10] LaserJock: I personally would (1) let the Debian maintainer know that we are modifying his/her package (2) let him/her know if we have non-ubuntu-specific changes [05:10] minghua, i'm upstream for ltsp and ltspfs as well as ltspfsd for debian ... i wont ask them if i adopt new stuff from upstream [05:10] marcin: maybe that'll explain what gnupg is better than I can: http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/documentation/faqs.html [05:11] sistpoty: got this manual in another window [05:11] ogra: are you talking about packages already in debian or packages that get into ubuntu first then merged into debian? [05:11] sistpoty: but I'm just not sure what KeyID should I send to REVU [05:11] minghua, i talk about packages where ubuntu is upstream [05:11] marcin: the one with which you sign emails [05:12] sistpoty: because it can be just few letters and numbers I get after gpg --list-keys [05:12] minghua, and imho debian should accept us as such [05:12] ogra: then of course you don't need to :-) [05:12] Ok, guys, I'm off. Thanks for all your help, talk to ye tomorrow [05:12] sistpoty: or it can be name+comment+mail [05:12] minghua, and imho that applies to all 0ubun tu1 packages [05:12] marcin: basically you don't explicitely need to state the gpg-id, just sign the message with it [05:12] ogra: in that case I think it's the debian maintainer's responsibility to keep the communication [05:12] sistpoty: ok thanks - sending [05:13] ogra: I disagree (the apply to all 0ubuntuX part) [05:13] minghua, we communicate very well .... but it think its important that debian also accepts that there are packages where *we* are upstream [05:13] minghua, why ? [05:13] ogra: I don't want to make a big fuss about it, but when I wrote the mail I was thinking of my own debian packages [05:14] my scim packages got uploaded as -0ubuntu1 in dapper twice, neither of them has a prior notice to me [05:14] minghua, sure, but 0ubuntuX packages *are* not in debian ... why shouldnt *we* be upstream for *them* ? [05:14] I didn't even know the ubuntu uploader was planning to do that [05:15] and I actaully explicitly expressed that I "will try to take care of the packages in ubuntu" on ubuntu-devel [05:15] yes, thats bad ... in case a package exists in debian, debian is indeed the upstream [05:15] and in the second case, there should be some documentation change/warning when packaging the new upstream version [05:16] ogra: yeah, then we more or less agree [05:16] but for 0ubuntuX packages that really deserve that versioning, i see no reason why we shouldnt be upstream [05:16] for ltsp debian accepted that so this far, that they put a XdebianX version up ;) [05:17] ogra: my point was that, as MOTU we shouldn't upload a new upstream version without a wishlist bug in debian just because the debian maintainer hasn't get to it yet [05:17] unless we are quite confident about the packaging ourselves [05:17] for existing packages i totally agree [05:17] for new packages i dont ... [05:17] in my case, if the ubuntu upload had asked, I can at least give him a patch that fix an important typo [05:18] simply because i expext to be respected as a distro from debian [05:18] *expect [05:18] ogra: I haven't thought about new packages carefully yet, but my mail mainly refer to packages already in debian (in your words, MOTU being downstream) [05:18] yup [05:19] as i said, there i totally agree [05:19] great to clear all these up :-) [05:19] :) [05:19] I'll probably follow up in list for more clarification [05:21] minghua: take in account that ubuntu development goes a little bit other than debian. In the early phase usually the repo get's broken pretty hard, so I guess at that time waiting for response from DD wouldn't need to be necessary [05:21] sistpoty: my personal opinion is "we should at least try" [05:21] minghua: however the DD should be notified in all cases... that's at least what I think ;) [05:22] sistpoty: a mail to the debian maintainer definitely won't hurt [05:22] sistpoty: exactly, if the DD won't reply our notification mail, it's him/her not willing to communicate, not us :-) [05:23] :) [05:23] and I think Lucas's point on the "new upstream" wishlist bug is quite good [05:23] yes, it is [05:27] can I ask for sync from incoming? [05:27] my scim package just got uploaded by my sponsor :-) === azion [n=azion@194.46.170.136] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:28] sorry, was away for a second. So what about bugs? How do we communicate with Debian about bugs? [05:29] whenever we get a bug that isn't Ubuntu specific what should we do? [05:29] minghua: don't know... maybe ask elmo about it? [05:29] LaserJock: if I can fix it, I do and report it back to BTS with patch [05:30] LaserJock: I would first ask if the debian maintainer to subscribe to said package in manlone [05:30] seems like we have to do the work of 2 distros :( [05:31] LaserJock: if he is not willing to (maybe because the change in ubuntu is too large), I'll ask him if it's okay for me to forward the bug to debian BTS if I _think_ it applys to debian as well [05:31] but I guess we get a lot of packaging from Debian so it evens out [05:31] LaserJock: if he is still not happy, I'll have to try to reproduce the bug in debian and then report [05:32] LaserJock: an important point is that the Debian maintainer may know better than we do about the package [05:32] LaserJock: and as I've been saying these are my personal opinions [05:33] but I think we could literally spend all MOTU time just communicating with Debian, or is it not that bad? [05:35] minghua: I agree with what your saying, I'm just trying to figure out how I can do it in a pratical and effective way [05:35] LaserJock: we could spend all motu-time with merging, if we didn't communicate back to debian [05:36] sistpoty: true, true [05:36] we do spend a lot of effort merging [05:38] I'm just wondering if we can create some tools to help [05:39] something like a button in Malone to send an email to BTS or at least a template for common things [05:41] at this point I'm a bit overwhelmed and shell shocked by Debian so anything to make it easier would be nice ;-) [05:44] LaserJock: with an unstable chroot, you can just use reportbug (I guess I'm faster with it, since I'm used to shell) [05:45] not to mention reportbug adds ton of useful information for debugging as well :-) [05:46] that's what I really dislike from malone... not even the version of the package installed [05:46] I used reportbug to do an ITP the other day :-) [05:46] but I had to get exim4 installed first [05:47] Emacs has an ITP Mode lol [05:47] sistpoty: do I need to be in a sid chroot for reportbug? I used dapper but sent it to Debian [05:48] LaserJock: use "reportbug -f file" then post it into your email client [05:48] LaserJock: didn't look at the changes of reportbug... and I only have unstable around (even a real system, that I use for chroot) [05:48] anyway, something in Malone would be nice because that is where the Ubuntu bug info is [05:48] LaserJock: for ITP it's okay, but probably not good for a real bug [05:48] oh, that makes sense [05:49] it sense system info doesn't it === sistpoty is just smoking one last cigarette for tonight [05:53] ok, so does anybody know what "Request fix: + Upstream + In Distribution" are for? === freeflying [n=freeflyi@61.190.65.8] has joined #ubuntu-motu === siretart [i=siretart@ubuntu/member/siretart] has joined #ubuntu-motu [05:58] gotta go, cya MOTU [05:58] cya LaserJock === sistpoty is off to bed as well [05:58] gn8 everyone [05:58] cy sistpoty [05:58] cya I mean === Burgundavia [n=corey@S0106000000cc07fc.gv.shawcable.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === SEJeff [n=SEJeff@12-203-76-59.client.insightBB.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === freeflying [n=freeflyi@61.190.65.8] has joined #ubuntu-motu === freeflying is away: Away at the moment === hub [n=hub@toronto-hs-216-138-231-194.s-ip.magma.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu === highvoltage [n=Jono@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-motu [06:25] The HURD is in Ubuntu now? === robitaille [n=robitail@d154-5-117-228.bchsia.telus.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === siretart [i=siretart@ubuntu/member/siretart] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Gloubiboulga [n=gauvain@84.5.65.217] has joined #ubuntu-motu === bur[n] er [n=burner@c-67-173-243-73.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:19] anyone know where to report a bug about the gnome run dialog? [07:23] hub, ping [07:25] bur[n] er, have a look at https://launchpad.net/malone [07:25] yeah, but know what package the run dialog is part of? [07:27] I don't know [07:28] bur[n] er: by "run dialog", do you mean the one that pops out when you press alt-F2? [07:31] yeah [07:31] or "doesn't" ;) [07:31] hence my bug [07:31] (it stays behind any open windows for some odd reason) [07:32] bur[n] er: then gnome-panel, I believe [07:32] danke [07:32] I am not positive, but even if it's wrong, I don't think the maintainer will be unhappy [07:33] should be close enough [07:34] that would make sense, that was one of the new packages I received today === moquist [n=moquist@pool-70-20-59-246.man.east.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === raphink [n=raphink@c529d3992.cable.wanadoo.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu === viviersf [n=cain@196.44.1.98] has joined #ubuntu-motu === raphink [n=raphink@c529d3992.cable.wanadoo.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:48] mornin [07:48] yo @ ajmitch [07:49] hub: don't get your comment on http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1482 ... There's no orig.tar.gz . How then did you review the package? [07:49] hi viviersf [07:50] lo === rikai-2 [n=gtk2@pool-70-105-231-88.port.east.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [07:53] hi viviersf [07:53] hi ajmitch [07:53] hello raphink === ealden [n=ealden@ipdial-167-236.tri-isys.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === highvolt1ge [n=Jono@196.36.161.235] has joined #ubuntu-motu === sedak [n=fred@APuteaux-151-1-58-149.w82-120.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu === ptlo [n=senko@83-131-78-44.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #ubuntu-motu === lbm [n=lbm@cpe.atm4-0-1301006.0x50a0824e.vgnxx6.customer.tele.dk] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Czessi [n=Czessi@dslb-084-059-002-255.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Czessi [n=Czessi@dslb-084-059-002-255.pools.arcor-ip.net] has left #ubuntu-motu ["Kopete] [08:29] ajmitch: could you give me your opinion on this package ? http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1545 [08:29] if you think my remark is correct or not? === nnonix [n=nnonix@t42.bkjohnson.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu === minghua [n=minghua@69-153-139-23.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === rikai-2 [n=gtk2@pool-70-105-231-88.port.east.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === jinty [n=jinty@Gb081.g.pppool.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:00] I still can't login to REVU, although I can decrypt the recover-message, duh [09:08] tepsipakki: ping a REVU admin === irvin [n=irvin@ubuntu/member/irvin] has joined #ubuntu-motu === minghua [n=minghua@69-153-139-23.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Gervystar [n=gervysta@62.94.208.119] has joined #ubuntu-motu === rikai [n=gtk2@pool-70-105-231-88.port.east.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === dholbach [n=daniel@i577B2F23.versanet.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:23] good morning [09:23] ok, any revu-admins around?-) [09:24] morning dholbach [09:24] hey Gloubiboulga === koke [n=koke@ubuntu/member/koke] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:39] hi dholbach && Gloubiboulga [09:39] hellas raphink [09:39] dholbach: could you give me your opinion on http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1545 please? [09:39] hello raphink [09:39] dholbach: it's not a review, just an opinion on the status of the package [09:41] I personally don't like patchsets in the orig.tarball. [09:42] dholbach: it's mostly about the merging stuff actually [09:42] It's a maintainer decision to ship patches or not, so if there'd be a bunch of patches in debian/patches (however big they are) and people are notified that it's the Nicotine DA version (or whatever), I'm fine with it. [09:42] I'm worried we have to carry around such a huge patch [09:43] well dholbach then it should be a new package [09:43] and should not use the existing changelog I guess [09:43] If the package uses a nice build/patch system, that's 'easy' to do. [09:43] If it improves the package... === ealden [n=ealden@ipdial-167-25.tri-isys.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:45] hmmm [09:47] dholbach: I found some packages that were advocated twice a long time ago and never uploaded [09:47] could you check them? [09:47] I'd prefer if somebody else could do this. [09:47] I checked there is no newer version available, so they are ready to go but I havn't got upload rights yet [09:47] I'm *very* busy. [09:47] hmm ok [09:47] sorry then :) [09:47] Don't worry. [09:47] If it's urgent, I can do it. [09:48] well it's not urgent, but these packages have been advocated months ago for some of them [09:48] http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1258 this one was ready to go before xmas [09:49] and this one aswell http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1238 [09:50] and they did not just ftbfs? [09:50] hmmm [09:51] where shall I check ? :s [09:51] I don't remember the url to the buildd logs [09:51] http://people.ubuntu.com/~lamont/buildLogs/ [09:52] ty [09:53] there's no entry in the build logs for these packages :s [09:53] Ok. [09:53] then it's up to elmo to ask him, if he maybe rejected them because of one reason or the other [09:53] pretty normal since they were not uploaded [09:53] I can check if they build on a pbuilder now [09:53] dholbach: I think they were not uploaded, at all [09:53] from REVU [09:54] the comments say : ok twice [09:54] but not uploaded [09:54] Hm. === irvin [n=irvin@ubuntu/member/irvin] has joined #ubuntu-motu [09:56] <\sh> moins [09:56] hi \sh [09:57] dholbach: checking if they FTBFS or not === womble [n=mpalmer@eth359.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === minghua_laptop [n=minghua@69-153-139-23.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:09] <\sh> oh well..some problems are resolving magically [10:10] <\sh> from a company employee to a freelancer in less then one month.. === ptlo [n=senko@83-131-89-72.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:13] \sh: you have some work now? === ompaul [n=ompaul@A-96-16.cust.iol.ie] has joined #ubuntu-motu === ajmitch really really wants those requested syncs to go through [10:14] <\sh> ajmitch: not really I'll do some monitoring and sysadmin job for a company as freelancer. A friend who is doing that normally can't right now, because he has troubles with his other company, and he and I worked before that for ISH...so I step in, and earn some money for some weeks [10:15] <\sh> ajmitch: yeah..I'm just waiting for some syncs as wlel [10:16] about a week I've been waiting now === ajmitch is stuck on somewhere between 64-128Kbps until next week [10:20] went over my traffic allowance === tvo [n=tobi@5354EA9B.cable.casema.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:39] sigh, 116 merge bugs still open === selinium [n=selinium@82-45-118-133.stb.ubr02.sout.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-motu [10:40] ls -alrt [10:40] EWIN [10:40] :) [10:41] <\sh> dholbach: don't merge wesnoth 1.1-2, I beg you not to do it :) [10:41] sigh [10:41] zope-extfile_1.4.4-1ubuntu1_source.changes REJECTED [10:41] \sh: It's not assigned to me, I won't do it - I have enough to do atm. [10:42] <\sh> dholbach: [10:42] <\sh> wesnoth daniel.holbach@ubuntu.com ASSIGNED [10:42] <\sh> whysoever :) [10:43] it's probably a mistake [10:43] <\sh> yes but I'm careful :) [10:43] \sh: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/wesnoth/+bug/6559 [10:43] Malone bug 6559: "wesnoth: merge new debian version" Fix req. for: wesnoth (Ubuntu), Severity: Normal, Assigned to: Stephan Hermann, Status: Unconfirmed [10:43] <\sh> bah....sistpoty :) [10:44] <\sh> dholbach: and yes I know the bug :) === ajmitch wonders if zope-ttwtype works with a current zope-cmf [10:44] hm, last released in 2003 [10:45] hi folks [10:45] any news about syncs? [10:45] \sh: It's assigned to you, man. [10:46] siretart: none at all [10:46] <\sh> dholbach: I know the bug is assigned to me, I just was suprised that the list had your name :) [10:46] ajmitch: I've seen one from infinity yesterday [10:46] siretart: was it really a sync? [10:46] it might have been done on the spot [10:46] as elmo has done that for me before [10:47] it looked like the sync [10:47] php4, looks synced [10:47] unless he faked it :) [10:47] but mdz mentioned the last tb meeting we will be on soyuz next week anyway... [10:47] opensync is getting close to top [10:47] :[ [10:47] yes but we don't know if that changes sync processes [10:47] .. perhaps thats why elmo has no time to do it. but thats just a guess :( [10:48] lifeless: we can probably get it in - new packages can still get in universe until feature freeze [10:48] I hope [10:48] heh [10:48] I hope that results that we can request syncs directly. but thats just a hope [10:48] siretart: probably not, to start with [10:48] oh good [10:48] my upload to debian yesterday is on the autosync list [10:49] no sign of zope3 being synced [10:50] perhaps anyone should raise this topic on #ubuntu-devel, but I'm too busy atm with work === tvo [n=tobi@5354EA9B.cable.casema.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:09] sigh, why does this install into /usr/lib/zope/Products? [11:09] broken thing [11:17] my bad, not broken, the package has .so files in it === tvelocity [n=tony@ipa135.1.tellas.gr] has joined #ubuntu-motu [11:21] if you need it broken, just break it :P === ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@trider-g7.fabbione.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Topic for #ubuntu-motu: Ubuntu Masters of the Universe: Ubuntu Universe Repository Maintainers | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTUTodo | How To Track Merge Status -> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTUToMerge | Grab your merge here: http://tiber.tauware.de/~sistpoty/MoM/index.py?state=new | sign up for ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com now! | Merges to review & upload: http://tinyurl.com/a3qjh === Topic (#ubuntu-motu): set by ajmitch at Wed Jan 18 23:05:17 2006 === Hieronymus [n=jeroen@cp413115-a.tilbu1.nb.home.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu === janm [n=jm__@ppp4592.dsl.pacific.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu === darkStar [n=raptoid@81.213.131.144] has joined #ubuntu-motu === Gloubiboulga is now known as Gloubi_Aw === migma [n=migma@unaffiliated/migma] has joined #ubuntu-motu [02:26] hi MOTU [02:27] got a problem - I'm propably just dumb... but... could someone help me anyway? [02:27] I got gpg key that I sent to REVU [02:27] and it's accepted so I got mail that I can upload my packages to REVU [02:27] I also got package in pbuilder/results directory [02:28] and I would like to upload it's *.changes file to REVU [02:28] the problem is that it says that my package is not signed [02:29] could someone help me and tell how to sign *.changes file? [02:29] <\sh> marcin`: only source uploads :) so *_sources.changes has to be used for dput [02:29] marcin`: Create a source package by using dpkg-buildpackage -S -sa -rfakeroot [02:29] <\sh> or just shortways debuild -S -sa [02:30]