[01:16] <mpt> ugh, the Code of Conduct is practically impossible to read
[07:11] <gloin> ok
[07:11] <gloin> I'm not getting a reg emial
[07:11] <gloin> email*
[07:12] <gloin> is there any known issue with greylisting?
[07:15] <gloin> is this room containing anyone who's not AFK?
[07:20] <gloin> bloody hell
[07:20] <gloin> it hasn't even touched my mailserver
[07:21] <gloin> aye wait
[07:21] <gloin> it's touched it
[07:21] <gloin> but didn't call back
[07:21] <gloin> lame...
[07:24] <gloin> http://greylisting.org/
[07:25] <gloin> fix yer MTU, for frick's sake
[07:25] <gloin> err, MTA
[07:26] <Lathiat> try wiating more than 10 minutes for it to call back
[10:05] <SteveA> https://launchpad.net/products/launchpad/+bug/4009
[10:05] <Ubugtu> malone bug 4009 in launchpad "Page needed explaining why greylisting may cause delayed Launchpad mail" [Normal,Confirmed]  
[10:06] <SteveA> the question is how *your* mail server can tell the difference between launchpad and a spammer.
[10:07] <SteveA> and also... why do people turn up, as a question, and then not wait around... on a Sunday?
[10:33] <Lathiat> hahaha
[11:02] <fabbione> SteveA: i would close bugs like that without even an answer.. at the most a pointer to some RFC :)
[11:12] <SteveA> fabbione: the bug is "we need to add this to the FAQ"
[11:12] <SteveA> so, i agree with what you say
[11:12] <fabbione> SteveA: yes, it's not an LP FAQ. that's what i mean
[11:13] <SteveA> seems many people who set up greylisting don't really understand what they are doing
[11:13] <fabbione> -> REJECTED
[11:13] <SteveA> hahah
[11:13] <fabbione> or please add RTFM as bug closer
[11:13] <SteveA> that will do for the FAQ answer
[11:13] <fabbione> the latter is better :)
[11:13] <fabbione> Bug status: RTFM and enable a comment with URL to FM
[03:41] <miles>  !
[03:41] <miles>   ?
[03:41] <miles> 
[03:41] <miles> 
[03:42] <miles> 
[03:42] <miles> pidorasi
[03:43] <miles> vse 
[03:43] <miles> nahui
[03:43] <miles> sosite hui
[03:43] <miles> pidori
[03:43] <miles> chmishniki
[04:07] <Oublieuse> Hello
[04:08] <Oublieuse> I'd like to know if when we translate gnome 2 with rosetta, the changes will be used only for Ubuntu?
[05:04] <mdke> Oublieuse, gnome translation is done by the various translator groups in cvs. If you want to translate gnome modules in Ubuntu, you have to translate in the Ubuntu section of Rosetta
[05:05] <Oublieuse> ok, so changes in rosetta won't be used in cvs?
[05:05] <mdke> Oublieuse, no, unless the specific gnome translator group uses rosetta to manage their translations
[05:06] <mdke> most don't, I think
[05:06] <Oublieuse> that's what i'd like to do
[05:06] <Oublieuse> cause I don't want to make two times the same job
[05:07] <mdke> are you part of the gnome translator team for your language?
[05:09] <mdke> afk
[05:09] <Oublieuse> yes
[05:57] <mdke> Oublieuse, then you can discuss with your team the possibility of using rosetta for translations, and if they all agree, then you can use it
[05:57] <Oublieuse> ok
[05:58] <Oublieuse> I did it (we're only two :D )
[05:58] <Oublieuse> but problme is, the version on rosetta is gnome 2.0
[05:58] <Oublieuse> and on the official site for gnome
[05:58] <Oublieuse> we translate 2.14
[06:06] <Oublieuse> mdke> ?
[06:07] <mdke> Oublieuse, I think you'll have to write to the mailing list about that. I don't know whether all the modules are set up correctly
[06:07] <Oublieuse> ok
[06:36] <pmjdebruijn> hi
[06:36] <pmjdebruijn> hi
[06:36] <pmjdebruijn> I want to report a bug, which possibly is relevant to two packages, what do I do?
[06:36] <pmjdebruijn> file two seperate bugs?
[06:37] <pmjdebruijn> on each package
[06:43] <mdke> pmjdebruijn, file one bug, and request a fix in both packages
[06:57] <pmjdebruijn> mdke, how do I do that? just list both packages in the 'Package Name' field?
[06:58] <mdke> pmjdebruijn, click on Request Fix In:
[06:58] <mdke> then upstream/distribution, depending on where your bug is
[07:01] <pmjdebruijn> mdke, thankyou
[07:04] <mdke> np
[11:57] <ddaa> From "DHTML Utopia" by Stuart Langridge:
[11:57] <ddaa> > Let's imagine an online system through which people can sign up themselves, and any number of their friends, for free beer[1] .
[11:57] <ddaa> Footnote 1: Maybe there's a mad millionaire philantropist on the loose. No, I can't give you a URL at which this system is running for real!
[11:58] <ddaa> Funny that I should feel concerned :)