/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2006/03/10/#ubuntu-motu.txt

=== TMM [n=hp@c51471f2c.cable.wanadoo.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== StevenK [n=stevenk@14.5.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Jeds [n=jonas@c-bb6fe055.56-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@trider-g7.fabbione.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== rcliii [n=rcliii@cpe-65-26-158-102.cinci.res.rr.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== viyyer [n=viv@59.176.4.3] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== fredix [n=fredix@85.65.97-84.rev.gaoland.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== bpuccio [n=brian@ool-457a9c38.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== dooglus [n=dooglus@rincevent.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== netzmeister [n=netzmeis@84.159.158.163] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Seveas [n=seveas@seveas.demon.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== doko [n=doko@84.59.68.60] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== slomo [n=slomo@p5486D8E2.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Lure [n=luka@153.5.60.234] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== janm [n=jmalonzo@ppp4592.dsl.pacific.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== raphink [n=raphink@82.239.88.236] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Arrogance [n=aks@ottawa-hs-206-191-39-20.d-ip.magma.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== tonio__ [n=tonio@82.226.229.51] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== marcin` [n=user@194.114.146.58] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== jaldhar [n=jaldhar@68.80.95.221] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== zenrox [n=zenrox@71.115.198.118] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Mithrandir [n=tfheen@81.0.188.99] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== lakin [n=lakin@dsl-hill-66-18-228-60-cgy.nucleus.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Gazer [n=nngazer@200.59.78.175] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== StevenK [n=stevenk@14.5.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== TMM [n=hp@c51471f2c.cable.wanadoo.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu
netzmeisterlol?12:08
=== StevenK [n=stevenk@14.5.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu
TMMbad split :)12:09
netzmeisterhrhr12:09
netzmeisterhow can i setup a local apt repository?12:10
netzmeisterany howtos?12:10
=== Jeds [n=jonas@c-bb6fe055.56-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== ajmitch [n=ajmitch@port161-21.ubs.maxnet.co.nz] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@trider-g7.fabbione.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Topic for #ubuntu-motu: Ubuntu Masters of the Universe: Ubuntu Universe Repository Maintainers | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Documentation | We are in feature freeze now. Focus on fixing bugs, malone is full of them.
=== Topic (#ubuntu-motu): set by siretart at Fri Feb 24 15:35:58 2006
=== rcliii [n=rcliii@cpe-65-26-158-102.cinci.res.rr.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== fredix [n=fredix@85.65.97-84.rev.gaoland.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== tonio__ [n=tonio@tonio.planetemu.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== sivang [i=sivan@muse.19inch.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Gazer [n=nnngazer@ADSL-200-59-78-175.capfed2.sinectis.com.ar] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== doko [n=doko@dslb-084-059-068-060.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Marticus [n=demart01@12-210-128-9.client.insightBB.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== bpuccio [n=brian@ool-457a9c38.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== TheMuso [n=luke@dsl-202-173-132-131.nsw.westnet.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== jamessan [n=jamessan@c-24-218-220-129.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== netzmeister [n=netzmeis@84.159.158.163] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== chninkel_away [n=yann@alcyone.pleiades.fr.eu.org] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== moquist [n=moquist@pool-70-20-59-246.man.east.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== viyyer [n=viv@59.176.4.3] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Lathiat [i=lathiat@gasp.bur.st] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Seveas [n=seveas@ubuntu/member/seveas] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== slomo_ [n=slomo@ubuntu/member/slomo] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== marcin` [n=user@194.114.146.58] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== jaldhar [n=jaldhar@c-68-80-95-221.hsd1.nj.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== tseng [n=tseng@brandonhale.us] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== TheMuso [n=luke@dsl-202-173-132-131.nsw.westnet.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== sladen [i=paul@193.28.45.41] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== janm [n=jmalonzo@ppp4592.dsl.pacific.net.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== whiprush [n=jorge@64.62.190.212] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== TheMuso_ [n=luke@dsl-202-173-132-131.nsw.westnet.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Mithrandir [n=tfheen@c5100BC63.inet.catch.no] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== raphink [n=raphink@raphink.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== TMM [n=hp@81.71.31.44] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== zenrox [n=zenrox@71.115.198.118] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== azeem [n=mbanck@host45.natpool.mwn.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== lakin [n=lakin@dsl-hill-66-18-228-60-cgy.nucleus.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Kyral [n=kyral@hamlin-186-1878.hamlin.clarkson.edu] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== patrikjj [n=patrikjj@c83-252-238-249.bredband.comhem.se] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== StevenK [n=stevenk@14.5.233.220.exetel.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== TheMuso [n=luke@dsl-202-173-132-131.nsw.westnet.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Seveas [n=seveas@ubuntu/member/seveas] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Amaranth [n=travis@ubuntu/member/amaranth] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Jeds [n=jonas@c-bb6fe055.56-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== ajmitch [n=ajmitch@port161-21.ubs.maxnet.co.nz] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== dooglus [n=dooglus@rincevent.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Riddell [i=jr@muse.19inch.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== trappist [i=trappist@tra.ppi.st] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== cassidy [n=cassidy@148-192.242.81.adsl.skynet.be] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== floam [n=nnnnfloa@sh.nu] has joined #ubuntu-motu
netzmeisterhow can i setup a local apt repository?12:21
netzmeisterany howtos?12:21
=== asw [n=asw@karuna.med.harvard.edu] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== ptlo [n=senko@vipnet8-165.mobile.CARNet.hr] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== LaserJock [n=mantha@ubuntu/member/laserjock] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Seveas [n=seveas@ubuntu/member/seveas] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== tritium [n=tritium@ubuntu/member/tritium] has joined #ubuntu-motu
LaserJockhi tritium12:24
tritiumhi LaserJock12:24
tritiumLong time no see.12:24
LaserJocknetzmeister: hallo12:24
LaserJocktritium: yeah, how's it going?12:25
tritiumLaserJock: not bad.  Yourself?12:25
raphinknetzmeister: see apt-ftparchive12:25
LaserJocktritium: ok, I made MOTU so I'm pretty happy about that. I just wish I had enough time to do everythin I want12:25
LaserJockhi raphink <><!12:25
raphinkhi LaserJock <><12:25
tritiumLaserJock: congratulations!  I hear you about not having enough time...12:25
=== JohnnyMast [n=rave@82-170-225-221.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu
netzmeisterLaserJock:  hi :)12:27
netzmeisterraphink:  thx..12:27
raphinknetzmeister: why do you need a repo?12:27
=== chx [n=chx@unaffiliated/chx] has joined #ubuntu-motu
netzmeisterto test my packages on my nootebook with apt-get..12:28
chxhttp://winehq.com/?announce=1.113 will there will be a Breezy package for this? (Wine 0.9.9 )12:28
netzmeisterand for the nightly builds of the codeblocks IDE..12:28
=== Amaranth [n=travis@ubuntu/member/amaranth] has joined #ubuntu-motu
raphinkchx: breezy is frozen12:29
raphinkchx: even dapper is12:29
LaserJockchx: I wouldn't think so, Dapper is getting pretty close to release and dapper is at 0.9612:29
netzmeisterbecause i don't upload the nightly builds to / on revu (LaserJock whats right.. "to" or "on")12:29
LaserJocknetzmeister: to12:29
netzmeister:)12:29
raphinkchx: so if you want that program in, you'll have to get it in dapper+112:30
netzmeisterraphink:  have you time to take a look on my revu upload?12:30
raphinknetzmeister: did you review it ?12:30
raphinkI saw you upload it many times today12:30
raphinkare you happy enough with the current version?12:30
netzmeisteryes.. slomo helps me..12:31
raphinkok12:31
raphinklet's see12:31
raphinkgive me the link please12:31
raphinkI'll run a report on it12:31
LaserJocknetzmeister: I don't think you are supposed to advocate your own package :-)12:31
netzmeisterraphink:  http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=209612:31
netzmeisterLaserJock:  That was a test.. :)12:31
raphinkhave you got a link to the original tarball netzmeister?12:32
netzmeisterraphink:  there is no original tarball.. it's the code from the svn revision 209412:33
raphinkah ok12:33
netzmeisterbecause..12:33
raphink:)12:33
netzmeisterand thats really funny12:33
raphinksorry12:33
netzmeisterthe makefiles of the orig.tarball (version 1.0-RC2 ) are bad..12:34
netzmeisterso i cant compile it12:35
netzmeister:) thats the issue why i use the svn version12:35
raphinkic12:35
netzmeisterissue => reason12:36
netzmeister:-/12:36
raphinkgerade12:37
netzmeisterhehe, what would you say?12:37
LaserJocknetzmeister: Sie sollten die .svn akten entfernen, ich denken.12:37
netzmeisterLaserJock:  95% correct..12:38
raphinks/ich denken/denke ich/12:38
netzmeister"Sie sollten die .svn Verzeichnisse entfernen"12:38
netzmeisterraphink:  Do you speak german?12:38
LaserJockok12:38
raphinknetzmeister: ja, gerade :)12:38
raphinkich habe Deutsch 7 Jahren gelernt12:39
=== chx [n=chx@unaffiliated/chx] has left #ubuntu-motu ["Konversation]
netzmeisteroh schn12:39
raphink:)12:39
netzmeisterand were do you come from?12:39
netzmeisteratm12:39
raphinkaber ich spreche sehr slecht12:39
raphinkFrankreich12:39
netzmeisterno, i looks pretty good..12:39
raphink:)12:39
netzmeisterslecht = schlecht ;-)12:39
raphinkdanke12:39
netzmeisterbitte12:39
raphinkah ja :)12:39
netzmeisteri play sometimes a nice game with a friend.. when i ask a question he must answer in engish-language..12:40
LaserJocknetzmeister: what is the difference between Verzeichnisse and Akten ?12:40
raphinknetzmeister: I do that with a peruvian friend of mine, too. She speaks in spanish and I answer in english12:41
netzmeisterLaserJock:  Verzeichnisse = Directorys12:41
netzmeisterAnd "Akten" uhh..12:41
netzmeistermoment..12:41
raphinknetzmeister: I'm afraid your package FTBFS12:42
netzmeister"Akten" are the briefcase  where a Lawyer save his papers..12:42
bmontynetzmeister: how do you say "I added a comment to your upload" in german :)12:42
LaserJockhmm, I was thinking files12:42
netzmeisterbmonty:  "Ich habe ein Kommentar zu deinem Upload verfasst"12:43
LaserJockIch fgte eine Anmerkung Ihrer Antriebskraft hinzu12:43
LaserJockhmm, not quite I guess ;-)12:43
netzmeisterhehe12:43
=== DapperDrake [n=seveas@ubuntu/member/seveas] has joined #ubuntu-motu
netzmeisterwhat does "FTBFS" mean?12:44
bmontyfails to build from source12:44
netzmeisterhmm..12:46
netzmeisterhow can i reproduce this error on my local maschine?12:46
raphinkmeans if I build it in a pbuilder it fails12:46
netzmeisterokay i understand..12:46
raphinkby trying to pbuild the package in a recent dapper pbuilder12:46
raphinkcheck the buildlog on the REVU page12:46
raphinkhttp://revu.tauware.de/revu1-incoming/codeblocks-0603041055/codeblocks_1.0+svn2094-0ubuntu1.buildlog12:46
netzmeisterokay..12:47
raphinkseems quite clear12:47
raphinkyou haven't put zip as a build-dep12:47
LaserJockopps, somebody missed a build-dep ;-)12:47
bmontynetzmeister: you probably need to add a build dep to get zip, but you should test in a pbuilder12:47
netzmeisterokay i test it with pbuilder12:47
netzmeisterare you still here, test it later again?12:48
netzmeister(uhh LaserJock, was this sentence right=)12:48
netzmeister"....to test it...."12:48
LaserJockmaybe "will you still be here later to test it again?"12:48
LaserJockor "will you be here later to test it again" I suppose12:49
netzmeisterokay thx..12:50
netzmeisterand will you? :-D12:50
LaserJockyep12:50
netzmeistergreat..12:50
=== asw [n=asw@karuna.med.harvard.edu] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Kyral [n=kyral@ubuntu/member/kyral] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== KillerKiwi2005 [n=jason@203.109.215.2] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== plugwash [i=plugwash@p10link.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== TerminX [n=terminx@64.62.190.212] has joined #ubuntu-motu
LaserJockhi Hobbsee01:13
=== minghua [n=minghua@69-153-139-36.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
Hobbseehey LaserJock01:13
netzmeisterpbuilder is a great tool.. wow01:15
marcin`hi all01:17
marcin`could someone review at least one of my packages in revu?01:17
LaserJockmarcin`: how many have you got?01:23
=== bmontgom_ [n=bmontgom@wsip-68-15-230-31.om.om.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
marcin`LaserJock: 5 propably or 601:25
marcin`LaserJock: I got more but would like to upload when I get reviews on already uploaded packages01:25
=== crimsun [n=crimsun@pdpc/supporter/silver/crimsun] has joined #ubuntu-motu
marcin`LaserJock: for example this: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=209201:26
LaserJockmarcin`: why is the diff.gz so large?01:28
hubLaserJock: he didn't make clean the documentation?01:30
marcin`LaserJock: hmm strange...01:33
marcin`LaserJock: what should I do to reduce this diff?01:33
hubmarcin`: make sure the generated document is cleaned :-)01:34
marcin`hub: where - in rules?01:35
hubyep01:35
marcin`hub: hmm I use cdbs so docs should be cleaned automagically right?01:35
hubno01:36
hubif the makefile do not01:36
hubadd a clean:: rule01:36
huband rm -f the files01:36
marcin`ok01:36
LaserJockmarcin`: you also need a little work on debian/copyright . You need a copyright statment with the year and copyright holder01:36
LaserJockminghua: ping?01:38
netzmeisterbmonty:  which package contained "zip"??01:38
minghuaLaserJock: pong01:38
crimsundebian/copyright also needs to give a URI for the download location.01:38
LaserJocknetzmeister: zip I'm gessing01:39
LaserJockminghua: I got an email from the plotdrop author, he would like to get in touch with you about testing some stuff. Is that ok? Can I give him your email address?01:40
minghuaLaserJock: of course.  Give him the address minghua@ubuntu.com though, please01:41
minghuaLaserJock: I am getting my school email address out of the debian/ubuntu work01:41
crimsunmarcin`: clean up debian/control syntax, too01:41
crimsunBuild-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), cdbs,   <--01:42
=== desrt [n=desrt@71.19.9.154] has joined #ubuntu-motu
desrt'sup.  anyone have a few mins?01:42
marcin`crimsun: sorry I cleaned this but not uploaded yet01:42
nomedwhile using cdbs + rules/tarball.mk it will not be used the orig.tar.gz true ?01:43
crimsundesrt: between us all, we should have a few01:43
nomedi mean i'll not get any diff.gz ...01:43
desrti want to upload a new package to the universe01:43
=== tritium [n=michael@ubuntu/member/tritium] has joined #ubuntu-motu
crimsundesrt: is it on revu?01:43
desrtno.01:43
desrtis revu mandatory?01:43
LaserJockminghua: ok, will do01:44
marcin`LaserJock: what do you mean by 'the year and copyright holder' ?01:44
crimsunit's mandatory unless it's already in Debian.01:44
desrti see.01:44
desrtafaik, it is not.01:44
=== desrt was sort of hoping to directly upload it :)
LaserJockmarcin`: you don't say who the copyright holder is. It should have a " Copyright (C) <years> <author> " type statment01:44
desrtin any case, how would i go about the process of .tar.gz -> .deb01:44
crimsunmeet jordan's packaging guide!01:45
marcin`LaserJock: ok01:45
KyralHere goes!01:45
=== Kyral fires up the firsty XenGuest and crossses his fingers
LaserJockcrimsun: have you looked it over btw?01:45
crimsunLaserJock: I started, and then $crap (literally) happened01:45
LaserJockdesrt: doc.ubuntu.com has the Ubuntu Packaging Guide01:45
netzmeisterLaserJock:  when i change the control file in the depends line, is there an "debuild -S -sa -kxxxx" sufficiently ?01:45
LaserJocknetzmeister: after you change anything you should run debuild and then test in a pbuilder01:46
LaserJocknetzmeister: so yes01:47
netzmeisterk01:47
crimsunforgive me if Ubuntu catch-up takes circa 1 day; I have a hundred forms to process before Monday01:47
nomedanyone knows if when including rules/tarball.mk  in cdbs i should expect a diff.gz ?01:48
LaserJockcrimsun: np, I know you were sick, I just wondered if you had even gotten the chance to start01:48
crimsunyep, I did.01:48
crimsunnomed: for the package or inside? You shouldn't [in 99.9% of the cases]  have one inside, but non-native packages will have a diff.gz.01:51
nomedcrimsun, i have the dwlded tar.gz as it was01:52
nomeddebian xxx.tar.gz01:52
nomedi run pdebuild from within this dir01:52
nomedi have then ../xxx.orig.tar.gz01:53
nomedbut it doesn't generate any diff.gz :/01:53
crimsunnomed: ...did you download the diff.gz and dsc along with the orig.tar.gz?01:53
crimsun(brb, phone)01:54
nomedcrimsun, it's a new pkge01:54
nomedi would get for dapper + 1 ...01:54
minghuanomed: then most of the case you need to rename the xxx.tar.gz to xxx_version.orig.tar.gz before start packaging01:55
nomedminghua, yes ...01:55
nomedit's xxx_version.orig.tar.gz01:56
netzmeisterargh "/bin/sh: zip: command not found"01:56
nomedminghua, i was thinking it something related to the include rules/tarball.mk ...01:57
crimsun/usr/bin/zip is in 'zip'02:01
netzmeisteryes i see..02:01
netzmeisteri write it in the build-depends line02:01
crimsunit build-depends on zip?02:02
slomocrimsun: thanks for the comment on the musepack bug :)02:02
crimsunslomo: np :)02:03
netzmeisterduring the build process..02:03
netzmeisterPWD=`pwd` cd . && zip -j /tmp/buildd/codeblocks-1.0+svn2094/src/sdk/resources/manager_resources.zip *.xrc images/*.png > /dev/null02:03
netzmeister/bin/sh: zip: command not found02:03
netzmeisterhi slomo02:03
slomohi netzmeister... hm, so zip is in b-d but isn't found? is the codeblocks buildsystem doing something strange with PATH?02:04
netzmeisterhmm maybe02:05
netzmeisterPATH are in rules?02:05
slomois there a buildlog somewhere?02:06
bmontyslomo: there is one on REVU02:07
netzmeisterhttp://revu.tauware.de/revu1-incoming/codeblocks-0603041055/codeblocks_1.0+svn2094-0ubuntu1.buildlog02:07
slomohm... and there's definitely no zip installed02:08
desrtSeveas; ping?02:18
netzmeisteryeah..02:20
netzmeisterpbuilder builds the package..02:20
netzmeisterand now, upload it to revu again?02:23
netzmeister?02:26
desrtwhat is this 'compat' file?02:27
crimsundesrt: states the debhelper level02:27
desrti'm deviating a bit from the instructions here, because i want to use debhelper02:28
desrtafter i modify the stuff in debian/ do i just kick off a dpkg-buildpacakage?02:28
crimsun``debuild -S'' is probably what you want02:29
desrtarf02:29
desrtgpg: skipped "Ryan Lortie <desrt@ubuntu.com>": secret key not available02:29
crimsunbut yeah, that calls dpkg-buildpackage and friends02:29
desrthmmm02:29
desrtright.  so desrt@ubuntu.com is my ubuntu email address02:29
desrtbut my key only has desrt@desrt.ca as a UID that has been signed02:29
desrtwhat to do?02:30
crimsunpass -k02:30
crimsun-k'Ryan Lortie <desrt@desrt.ca>'  for instance02:31
desrt-kafaa6ff602:31
netzmeister"lintian0 Bytes" thats nice ;-)02:32
desrtok.  lintian has nothing to say about my source.changes02:34
netzmeisterLaserJock:  Are you there?02:36
netzmeisterbmonty:  juhu?02:37
crimsunnetzmeister: what do you need?02:38
netzmeisterrevu..02:38
crimsunurl?02:38
netzmeisterhttp://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=209802:38
crimsunpurge some of the binary package codeblocks's Depends02:40
crimsuncoreutils, libc6, ...  are all core02:40
netzmeisterah okay..02:41
crimsunyou should also use debhelper v5 by default02:41
netzmeisterk02:41
netzmeistermom02:41
netzmeistermoment02:41
netzmeisterbinutils, libgcc1 also core02:43
crimsunyep.02:43
crimsunand don't strip debian/copyright of the GPL header02:44
netzmeisterwhat?02:44
netzmeisterstrip?02:44
netzmeister(i'm german.. :-( )02:44
crimsun"don't remove"02:45
netzmeisterdid i?02:45
crimsunit appears so02:46
netzmeisterhmm02:46
netzmeisteryou mean the copyright file?02:46
crimsundebian/copyright is missing the GPL header, yes02:47
netzmeisterhmm02:47
netzmeisterthat gives an error with lintian02:48
crimsunan error?02:48
crimsunit shouldn't02:49
netzmeisteri sure.. moment i try with the full GPL in copyright file..02:49
netzmeisteri'm02:49
crimsunyou don't need the full contents02:50
netzmeisterno it's okay..02:51
netzmeisterbut..02:51
=== reggaemanu_ [n=manu@ARennes-257-1-105-23.w86-210.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu
netzmeisterE: codeblocks source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 502:51
netzmeisterhmm thats new with "compat" "5"02:51
minghuanetzmeister: if you have 5 in debian/compat, you need to build-depend debhelper (>= 5)02:51
crimsunexactly02:52
crimsunnote your Build-Depends doesn't have that02:52
netzmeisteruhh thx mingua..02:52
netzmeistergreat..02:54
netzmeisterdebuild with no errors..02:54
netzmeisterpbuilder..02:54
netzmeisterand then upload..02:54
crimsunnote that ~70% of your diff is still auto* cruft02:55
netzmeistercruft02:55
netzmeisterwhat is cruft? google translator failed02:56
crimsunoh, automake* junk02:56
netzmeisterand how can i prevent this02:57
desrtso could someone look at my package before i upload it and tell me if anything is evil?02:59
crimsunwell, you called bootstrap, so I suppose it's unavoidable02:59
netzmeisteryes..02:59
crimsunpersonally, since the version of automake* junk that ships with codeblocks is newer than what you patched it, I'd use filterdiff on your diff (for only debian/* stuff)03:00
crimsuns/patched it/patched in/03:01
crimsundesrt: that's REVU's purpose :)03:02
desrtrevu would be embarassing at this point03:02
netzmeisterwhat means that now?  can i upload the sources?03:02
desrti'd prefer if you could just give me a bit of one-on-one time :)03:02
=== bmontgom_ [n=bmontgom@wsip-68-15-230-31.om.om.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
crimsunnetzmeister: if you'd prefer, sure. It's acceptable to say "Initial packaging" for the changelog entry, too.03:03
crimsundesrt: URL?03:03
desrtplz wait03:04
desrthttp://desrt.mcmaster.ca/random/please-inspect.tar.gz03:04
bmontgom_minghua: do you have a lot of experience with SCIM?03:05
minghuabmonty: being the Debian maintainer of scim, I probably have more than everyone else in this channel :-P03:07
minghuabmonty: whether that counts as "a lot" or not, I am not sure03:08
bmontyminghua: its more than I have, so thats good for now :)03:08
bmontyminghua: I put in a UVF exception request for m17n-db this morning, is there other parts of SCIM that need to be updated?03:08
minghuabmonty: scim-m17n build-depends on m17n-db stuff, scim-uim indirectly links to libm17n through libuim as well03:09
minghuabmonty: is said UVF exception including a SONAME bump?03:10
bmontysyncing in the new version of m17n-db brings in some bug fixes for tamil03:10
bmontyminghua: no03:10
minghuabmonty: then I suppose it's good03:10
minghuabmonty: I saw m17n-db 1.3.0 in Debian NEW, I don't know exactly what it is about though03:11
bmontyminghua: mostly bugfixes for tamil, which is why there was a user here asking about it several hours ago03:11
crimsundesrt: targetted for sid?03:11
bmontyminghua: malone #3370603:12
desrtdapper03:12
Ubugtumalone bug 33706 in m17n-db "UVF exception request" [Normal,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/3370603:12
minghuabmonty: can I have the UVF exception bug number?03:12
minghuaoh good :-)03:12
crimsundesrt: also, debhelper v5 [unless the rest of the muine*/mono* packages use v4 specifically] 03:12
desrtcrimsun; i just did dh_make ...03:12
crimsundesrt: make sure the distribution header is dapper in debian/changelog03:12
minghuabmonty: does m17n-db 1.3.1 work with m17n-lib 1.2.0?03:14
minghuabmonty: the thing I saw in Debian NEW is actually m17n-lib 1.3.1-103:14
bmontyminghua: it appears so03:14
LaserJocknetzmeister: sorry, was away for a while03:14
=== JohnnyMast [n=rave@82-170-225-221.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu
crimsundesrt: (changes therefore needed in debian/co{mpat,ntrol}). In debian/copyright, make sure Holders: is plural03:14
bmontyminghua: it is hard for me to verify though03:14
netzmeisterLaserJock:  np03:15
desrtso just change 4 to 5?03:15
netzmeisterLaserJock:  crimsun was here.. ;-)03:15
bmontythe users who were asking about it said that the new package works03:15
crimsundesrt: yes, in both03:15
minghuabmonty: I would preper to ask for Debian maintainer's opinion, but I don't insist03:15
desrtcrimsun; in the build-dep in control?03:15
minghuabmonty: your question here is actually about m17n, which I am not familar with03:15
crimsundesrt: yes03:16
desrt>= 5.0?03:16
crimsunyes03:16
netzmeistercrimsun:  it's done..03:16
desrt5.0 or 5.0.0?03:16
crimsundesrt: even >= 5 is fine03:16
desrtleet.03:16
minghuabmonty: I can only tell you which SCIM packages will likely be affected, but I can't judge either (I don't use scim-uim or scim-m17n myself)03:16
bmontyminghua: ok, I thought SCIM used m17n as a depend03:16
desrtis there some flag i can give to dh_make to have it use 5?03:16
minghuabmonty: not scim proper, but only some of its modules, which are in separate packages03:17
bmontyminghua: it is my understanding that the latest m17n-db package fixes the issue that was brought up on ubuntu-devel03:17
crimsundesrt: not off the top of my head, but I generally don't use dh_make03:18
crimsundesrt: you probably want to preface the URL in debian/copyright where you downloaded it with "The source code was downloaded from "...03:18
minghuabmonty: which mail in ubuntu-devel are you refering to?03:19
minghuabmonty: I only see a mail saying scim-m17n not working for breezy03:19
minghuabmonty: then later the same user says scim in flight 4 is working without problems03:20
=== slomo_ [n=slomo@ubuntu/member/slomo] has joined #ubuntu-motu
bmontyminghua: the SCIM in 6.04 thread03:20
minghuabmonty: it would be great if such things are reported as bugs, I am subscribed to scim-m17n in launchpad03:20
bmontyminghua: there is a bug open against m17n-db (though not a very descriptive one)03:21
bmontyminghua: and you replied to the thread, which made me think to ask you about it here :)03:22
desrtcrimsun; ok.  made those changes03:22
desrtcrimsun; upload to revu now, i guess?03:22
crimsunsure03:22
desrtok.  what do i need to type to do that?03:23
desrtbtw: if i override the key using -k i get errors03:23
crimsunwhat are you passing to -k?03:23
desrt-kafaa6ff603:23
crimsundid you try passing your name & e-mail?03:23
crimsun-k'Foo Bar <foo@bar>'03:23
desrtdebsign: gpg error occurred!  Aborting....03:24
desrtdebuild: fatal error at line 791:03:24
desrtrunning debsign failed03:24
minghuabmonty: you are talking about malone #32573, right?03:24
Ubugtumalone bug 32573 in m17n-db "upstream bugs " [Normal,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/3257303:24
bmontyminghua: yes03:24
minghuabmonty: in that case I would say let's go ahead and sync since it's ack'ed by Debian maintainer03:24
bmontyminghua: ok, need to get the UVF exception approved though03:25
=== lakin [n=lakin@dsl-hill-66-18-228-60-cgy.nucleus.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu
bmontynice to have the extra sanity check though :)03:25
minghuabmonty: thanks for working on this03:26
desrtcrimsun; gnupg was being a prat.03:26
desrtcrimsun; working now :)03:27
bmontyminghua: there was some very convincing persuasion this morning (i.e. begging) :)03:27
minghua:-)03:28
netzmeisterupload finished..03:29
netzmeisterhttp://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=209903:29
=== Kyral does his happy dance
KyralXen, running perfectly :D03:30
netzmeisterKyral:  congratulationi..03:31
desrterm03:31
netzmeister-i03:31
desrtwhere do revu accounts come from?03:31
=== Kyral dances
desrtthe sky?03:31
netzmeisterLaserJock:  can you look at my revu upload?03:32
=== mxpxpod [n=bryan@unaffiliated/mxpxpod] has joined #ubuntu-motu
crimsunnetzmeister: you still have those redundant depends in your binary package03:32
LaserJocknetzmeister: sure03:32
netzmeisterwhat?03:33
bmontydesrt: are you trying to log in?03:33
LaserJockdesrt: revu accounts come from the revu admins. wiki.ubuntu.com/REVU has instructions I believe03:34
desrtbmonty; i want to submit something for revu03:34
desrtexcellent.03:34
bmontydesrt: you need to email your gpg key to the REVU admins03:34
desrti see this03:34
KyralNow to setup Apache in the first Domain :D03:35
netzmeistercrimsun:  how can i see this?03:35
crimsunnetzmeister: Depends line of codeblocks package on http://revu.tauware.de/revu1-incoming/codeblocks-0603042125/codeblocks_1.0+svn2094-0ubuntu1.diff03:36
netzmeisteris that an error..03:38
crimsunyou shouldn't include libgcc1, it's a given03:39
netzmeisterk03:39
crimsunsame with libstdc++6, really. They're pulled in if necessary automatically. with shlibs.03:40
=== dolson [n=dana@d235-185-252.home1.cgocable.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
netzmeisterahhh03:41
netzmeisterthx crimson03:41
netzmeisterthats things i dont know..03:41
LaserJocknetzmeister: debian/copyright still needs a copyright year and just the preamble for the GPL, you don't have to put the whole thing03:41
netzmeisteruhh what is y preamble03:41
ogranetzmeister, file already depends on libmagic1 ... no need for a separate dependency ...03:42
ogra(additionally i doubt there are linux systems without file installed, i guess that can be dropped as well)03:42
LaserJocknetzmeister: its just the basic info, see http://revu.tauware.de/revu1-incoming/plotdrop-0512311315/plotdrop-0.5/debian/copyright for an example ;-)03:43
=== Se7h [n=MUAHAHAH@bl4-82-42.dsl.telepac.pt] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Se7h is now away
=== Se7h is now away
netzmeisterokay it's done..03:46
azeemogra: well, file is on Priority: standard, no?  There might be some crazy people with totally stripped down systems03:46
ograazeem, but i doubt they will use an IDE on these systems :)03:47
azeem:)03:47
netzmeisterLaserJock:  upload?03:47
LaserJocknetzmeister: if you have made all the changes03:47
netzmeisteryes03:48
LaserJocktun Sie ihn03:48
netzmeister"tun sie es" ;-)03:49
netzmeisterbut thats not 100% correct..03:49
nomedhow can i use a deb file:/  entry in pbuilder ?03:49
nomedsimply adding it to other_mirrors doesn't work ...03:50
netzmeisterLaserJock:  that is when you say "they" "Tun *sie* es.."03:50
minghuahey ogra, one of my sarge box doesn't have file installed ;-)03:50
netzmeisterLaserJock:  that is when you say "you" "Tue es.."03:50
netzmeistercrazy language i know..03:50
netzmeisterif i can good talk german, i learn another language.. LOOL03:51
ograminghua, do you use IDEs on this box ?03:51
minghuaazeem: it's actually trival to avoid installing extra priority:standard in debian-installer, so no stipping-down needed03:52
netzmeisterLaserJock:  http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=210003:52
minghuaogra: no, of course not.  there is not even X :-)03:52
ograheh :)03:52
netzmeisterhm03:55
LaserJocknetzmeister: debian/copyright schaut gut03:55
netzmeisteryes, it sounds good..03:56
netzmeisterLaserJock:  "debian/copyright sieht gut aus" ;-)03:56
netzmeisterLaserJock:  Do you start the build process?03:58
=== poningru [n=poningru@n128-227-48-188.xlate.ufl.edu] has joined #ubuntu-motu
LaserJocknetzmeister: the only thing is maybe the year03:59
LaserJocknetzmeister: some of the code has "Copyright (C) 2003"03:59
netzmeisterups.. yes i dont know which is the right year..04:01
netzmeisterthe main developer have no year in his control file..04:01
LaserJockhmm, I'm not entirely sure. I would think 2003-2006 but I could be wrong04:02
minghuaquite some upstreams don't upgrade their copyright year that often :-(04:02
netzmeisterhmm and now..04:03
netzmeisterno year?04:03
netzmeisteror 2003-200604:03
netzmeisteri delete the year..04:06
=== Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #ubuntu-motu
LaserJockno, no year is worse I think04:07
netzmeisterthe main developer have no year in his control file..04:07
netzmeisternot control04:07
netzmeisteri mean copright04:07
LaserJockthey usually don't in COPYING because it is usually just the GPL04:08
LaserJockyou have to look at the actually source code04:08
netzmeister200304:08
netzmeisterin three files i see "2003"04:09
LaserJockright, and I assume they still have the copyright so I would thing 2003-2006 but I don't know for sure04:10
LaserJocks/thing/think/04:10
minghuaLaserJock: in my opinion having only in copyright line doesn't mean you don't have copyright in 200604:11
minghuaLaserJock: it just means the work was done in 2003, but of course, I am not sure either04:11
LaserJockhmm, good point04:11
minghuas/only/only 2003/, but apparently LaserJock got it :-)04:12
LaserJockbut I think it should at least have some year04:12
netzmeisterokay i use 2003 - 200604:12
minghuaLaserJock: agreed04:12
netzmeisterwell done..04:13
netzmeisterI dare not more to ask. :-/  Upload?04:14
LaserJocknetzmeister: go for it ;-)04:17
netzmeisterupload is running..04:18
netzmeisteri did it..04:20
netzmeisterhttp://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=210104:22
netzmeisterLaserJock:  it looks good?04:24
LaserJocknetzmeister: I'm building it on my machine currently04:26
minghuanetzmeister: I wonder why their is so many changes about Makefile.in in the diff, did you relibtoolize it?04:26
netzmeisterdebuild -S -sa04:27
netzmeisternot more04:27
LaserJocknetzmeister: but you ran some sort of bootstraping, right?04:29
netzmeisterahm... one time i run bootstrap04:30
netzmeisterthree days ago04:30
LaserJockdebian/copyright says "The only extra thing performed before debianization, was to run bootstrap to generate the autotools build configuration."04:31
netzmeisterjep..04:32
netzmeisterthats right..04:32
netzmeisteri've not started configure or so..04:32
LaserJockbut is that the answer to minghua's question?04:33
minghuabecause this is actually an svn checkout instead of a release?  then I suppose the Makefile.in's should be in .orig.tar.gz instead of .diff.gz04:33
minghuaLaserJock: yes it answered, but I have a new question now :-)04:34
LaserJocksure04:34
minghuaeither that, or getting all the autotools-generated stuff in .diff.gz04:35
minghuathere is no point shipping a Makefile.in in .orig.tar.gz then patch it in .diff.gz04:35
netzmeister?04:36
netzmeisteri'm very tired.. it's 4:38..04:38
netzmeisterthx for your help LaserJock & minghua & crimsun...04:38
netzmeistermaybe i will fix the bugs tomorrow or i forget the package..04:39
netzmeisterthree days at one package.. i don't know..04:39
netzmeister:-(04:39
netzmeistergn804:39
=== netzmeister is now known as netzmeister_afk
LaserJocknetzmeister_afk: np, see you later04:40
bmontyLaserJock: all the other people with packages waiting in REVU are going to be jealous :)04:43
LaserJockbmonty: lol, I just wish I was faster at reviewing. I'm not very confident about advocating yet.04:46
bmontyLaserJock: I'm not either04:46
LaserJockbut it is fun to atleast go over stuff here04:47
=== freeflying [n=freeflyi@61.190.65.25] has joined #ubuntu-motu
bmontyLaserJock: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=2089 ....I think it should be nuked, this is just adding a .desktop file, agree?04:50
LaserJockbmonty: actually that might be for a bug04:51
bmontyLaserJock: it is for a bug, Malone #3115204:51
Ubugtumalone bug 31152 in gtick "Missing .desktop file" [Normal,Confirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/3115204:51
bmontyREVU is for new packages, right?04:51
LaserJockbmonty: no, it is mostly used for that but not exclusively04:52
LaserJockbmonty: when you look at the icons the lightbulb is for new ones04:52
LaserJockbmonty: but the ones with just a hammer should be for existing packages04:53
bmontyLaserJock: ahh, ok...that makes sense04:53
LaserJockwell, I think attaching a debdiff to the bug report is easier in a way04:53
bmontyLaserJock: I thought we were attaching debdiffs to malone bugs, that is what I did before I could upload04:55
bmontycourse REVU makes the debdiff for you, so maybe its better04:56
LaserJockright04:56
=== Arrogance [n=aks@ottawa-hs-206-191-39-20.d-ip.magma.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu
LaserJockit is just a matter of what MOTUs are going to look at04:57
LaserJockfor me the REVU list is a little overwhelming04:57
minghuaLaserJock: you are a reviewer already?04:59
bmontyLaserJock: just like every other MOTU list of stuff to do :)04:59
LaserJockminghua and bmonty : yeah05:00
=== minghua wants to be a reviewer as well but the wiki says being a MOTU is prerequisite :-(
LaserJockwell, codeblocks builds and works good for me but there are quite a few things I'm not sure about when I do dpkg -c05:01
LaserJockminghua: then you just need to fix that ;-)05:01
LaserJockminghua: btw, my merging of the two bugs yesterday with bts didn't work. I'm going to try it by email instead05:03
LaserJockminghua: I think that just not using reportbug or bts might be the answer for me05:03
=== crimsun [i=nobody@pdpc/supporter/silver/crimsun] has joined #ubuntu-motu
bmontyok, enough ubuntu for me today....time for bed05:05
bmontygood night everyone05:06
minghuaLaserJock: I am not aware that reportbug can merge bugs.  And I never used bts, email always works great for me05:06
minghuabmonty: good night05:06
LaserJockcya bmonty05:06
LaserJockminghua: supposedly bts can do it so I tried it and it didn't give me any errors, but it didn't work either. I think email is the key05:07
minghuaLaserJock: I think bts need a well-configured MTA (which I never have)05:08
minghuabut I can always use SMTP for my email05:09
minghuaLaserJock: by the way I never knew when you became an MOTU, so late congrats :-P05:10
LaserJockminghua: thanks, you should be one too. You know quite a bit more than I do05:12
LaserJockI have the same problem as far as lack of MTA but I can always use SMTP05:13
minghuaLaserJock: I lack your dedication05:14
LaserJockdedication? I just ignore my PhD and wife ;-)05:14
crimsunyour scim* maintainership belies you :p05:15
LaserJockyes05:15
=== minghua finishes looking up "belie"
minghuacrimsun: dedication to ubuntu, I probably should add :-P05:18
minghuathere are quite some people unhappy with my maintainership of scim* packages in debian05:19
LaserJockcould you guys check out the output of dpkg -c for codeblocks at http://chem.unr.edu/~mantha/ubuntu/codeblocks_dpkg.txt05:19
minghuaand from what I see they are taking actions in ubuntu05:20
LaserJockat the bottom are some symlinks05:20
=== minghua sighs
LaserJockone problem with being a package maintainer is it seems like it ends up being a "us against them" when there are thousands of users and one maintainer because of course all of the users have an opinion of how things should be run05:22
minghuaLaserJock: the /usr/lib stuff?  those symlinks look fine to me.  whether they should be in codeblocks package or not is another question though05:22
crimsunyeah, I'd split those libs out05:22
crimsunthose zipped files may be another thing to look at05:23
crimsunlocation-wise, that is05:23
crimsunLaserJock: well, we can skirt the maintainership issue with the whole MOTU bit05:23
LaserJockbut where is the /usr/lib stuff being symlinked to? to me it looks like / but I'm not sure05:24
LaserJockcrimsun: sure05:24
minghuaLaserJock: no, in the same dir (/usr/lib)05:24
crimsunno, they're pointing to the correct locations05:24
LaserJockcrimsun: it is just an observation of what I've seen since starting working with Ubuntu and Debian05:24
LaserJockah, thanks guys. I was wondering if I was reading that wrong05:25
freeflying<minghua> and from what I see they are taking actions in ubuntu  --< none cares  the maintainership of scim05:25
minghuafreeflying: I mean the packaging practice05:26
minghuafreeflying: there is no maintainership in ubuntu05:26
freeflyingminghua: I do these stuff for chinese users , hope they use scim easuly05:27
freeflyingminghua: I don't care if I can maintain scim or other things05:27
minghuafreeflying: and if you do them wrong, the users will be hurt eventually05:28
freeflyingminghua: you may point out my errors , but you needn't say like above .05:29
=== firehare [n=firehare@60.180.171.42] has joined #ubuntu-motu
LaserJockcrimsun: where would be a better place for the .zip files?05:30
crimsunLaserJock: what are the zipfiles' contents?05:31
minghuafreeflying: oh sorry, I assume you've already received my email05:31
minghuafreeflying: the one replying to Colin Watson about scim-pinyin 0.5.91 UVF exception05:31
minghuafreeflying: did you?05:31
freeflyingminghua: sure , I recieve your mail , and reply u05:31
minghuafreeflying: well, then I did point out your errors05:32
freeflyingminghua: also I've reupload it05:33
minghuafreeflying: and I just read you reply, so you admit two of my comments are correct?05:33
crimsunLaserJock: my intent is if the zipfiles contain documentary examples, resources, etc., they could be contained in a foo-doc05:33
LaserJockcrimsun: sure, I'm trying to figure out what they are05:34
minghuafreeflying: and if you use the launchpad to submit your patches (or notify me when you upload to REVU), I don't need to write those mails05:34
freeflyingminghua: if you re right , i'll admit u05:35
minghuafreeflying: but you still think you don't need to ask for my opinions about your patch before uploading?05:36
freeflyingminghua: after all , we are not paid employee of canonical , so I can not mail u as soon as I finish those .05:36
freeflyingminghua: upload to REVU just want MOTU review the package itself05:37
minghuafreeflying: well, I prefer posting the debdiff before uploading/asking for sponsor, how you do it is up to you05:37
freeflyingminghua: and it need more to do before upload05:37
minghuafreeflying: you didn't notify me after your REVU upload either05:37
freeflyingminghua: and I've not ask for sponsor yet , I just ask kamion how to solve this UVF05:37
minghuafreeflying: okay, fair enough05:38
minghuafreeflying: I only ask for a notification before the upload, as I've told you05:38
minghuafreeflying: if you want to send me a notice about you REVU upload, I would be happy to review.  but if you don't want to send me notices, that's fine too05:39
minghuafreeflying: I can't promise fast review though05:40
freeflyingminghua: I really really have not any interesting on becoming maintainter of scim and relate stuff05:40
freeflyingminghua: so you need not worry about what I've done about scim05:42
minghuafreeflying: then I don't know what you are interested in.  just some random upload?  and don't care about the consequences?05:42
minghuafreeflying: oh really.  who is responsible for the bug reports in scim then?05:43
minghuaor scim-pinyin in this case05:43
LaserJockcrimsun: they are example files I think that can be opened by codeblocks05:43
freeflyingminghua: I wanna ubuntu/kubuntu can support CJK better05:43
minghuafreeflying: so do I.  what is the point?05:43
minghuafreeflying: I keep saying a careless upload now will cause much more headache later.  You don't seem to understand.05:44
freeflyingminghua: so I will focus on what I've done , also other CJK-tester-teams member will do like this05:44
freeflyingminghua: upgrade 1.0.2 to 1.4.x of scim give u how much ?05:45
minghuafreeflying: took me at least extra two hours for comparing diff.gzs, asking for a sync (instead of getting done automatically)05:46
crimsunLaserJock: ah, probably makes sense to have them in a separate -doc package05:47
LaserJockcrimsun: ok, I'm going to make a comment suggesting splitting out the libs and examples05:48
crimsunok05:49
=== iceloki [i=nobody@ua-83-227-153-76.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== iceloki [i=nobody@ua-83-227-153-76.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se] has left #ubuntu-motu ["Ex-Chat"]
=== Fade [n=fade@outrider.deepsky.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu
LaserJockhi Fade ;-)06:11
Fadehullo06:11
LaserJockso it is in Debian?06:11
crimsunFade: what do you mean sbcl has no candidate in dapper? It does on both i386 and amd64 that I can see.06:12
crimsun  Version table:06:12
crimsun     1:0.9.2.0-3 006:12
crimsun        500 http://archive.ubuntu.com dapper/universe Packages06:12
Fadewell, I'm on an amd64 box, and I have sbcl-common, but no sbcl. ;)06:12
crimsunhmm, ftbfs06:13
Fadecan you expand that plz? :)06:14
Fadesbcl is in debian.06:14
Fadeit can be a PITA to bootstrap, though. it requires a common lisp to compile it. clisp works.06:14
LaserJockFailed To Build From Source06:14
Fadeclisp is in the pool.06:15
Fadecan you tell where the build failed?06:15
=== tambaqui [n=patricia@200-247-27-144-mns.cpe.vivax.com.br] has joined #ubuntu-MOTU
LaserJocklaunchpad should have it06:15
=== tambaqui [n=patricia@200-247-27-144-mns.cpe.vivax.com.br] has left #ubuntu-MOTU ["Fui]
FadeI'm not familiar with the ubuntu process..06:16
Fadebeen in debian land for yonks. ;)06:16
Fadeah..06:18
=== Fade finds launchpad
LaserJocksays it's got a dep wait06:18
Fadecan you pass me the url for the report?06:19
LaserJockhttp://librarian.launchpad.net/1601974/buildlog_ubuntu-dapper-amd64.sbcl_1%3A0.9.8.0-1_MANUALDEPWAIT.txt.gz is one I found06:19
crimsunyeah, 0.9.2 is really old06:20
LaserJockthat build log seems weird to me though06:21
Fadelooks like the build configuration is calling sbcl to configure sbcl, and this is the first time it has been packaged, so the build fails.06:22
Fadeyou can tweak the configure so it calls on clisp instead.06:22
Fadeit will use clisp to bootstrap itself.06:23
Fadehttps://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/dapper/+source/sbcl06:27
Fadesbcl is listed as a build dep, but sbcl or clisp or gcl will do.06:28
LaserJockhmm06:32
KyralFINALLY got my Blog Transferred06:35
Fadeat any rate, I have to jet. I'm willing to help with this package if the hands are needed.06:37
LaserJockFade: a bug should at least be opened06:43
LaserJockFade: ah, there is one already06:44
=== firehare [n=firehare@60.180.171.42] has left #ubuntu-motu []
LaserJockFade: malone bug #3109706:47
Ubugtumalone bug 31097 in sbcl "Build-Depends dependency for sbcl cannot be satisfied" [Normal,Confirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/3109706:47
KyralWhee06:58
KyralShould I write up a Xen Ubuntu thing for the DocTeam?06:58
crimsunsure06:59
LaserJockKyral: check out the wiki, if there isn't anything just create a new page06:59
KyralWell, HowTo Forge has a nice one, but tis tailored for Debian07:00
=== G0SUB [i=ghoseb@unaffiliated/gnulinuxer] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== fbond|away [n=fab@pool-71-161-210-173.burl.east.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
dolsonhey fbond|away07:20
LaserJockhi dolson07:22
dolsonhey LaserJock07:22
dolsoncould you answer something for me?07:22
dolsonwhy are other people fixing bugs in my packages? :P07:22
dolsonand how come there are bugs on some of my packages, but I didn't get emails on them?07:22
LaserJockdolson: what packages?07:24
dolsonqmidiroute I think, or maybe qmidicontrol07:24
dolsonand qamix had a desktop file bug on it that I didn't get an email for07:24
dolsonand some other packages too07:24
=== poningru [n=poningru@n128-227-48-188.xlate.ufl.edu] has joined #ubuntu-motu
dolsonI am just trying to understand how this system all works07:25
crimsundolson: you don't own any packages in ubuntu07:25
crimsuntherefore, Benjamin's fixing of your packages is perfectly acceptable07:25
crimsunremember, though you're listed in the maintainer field, that's only a primary contact point.07:25
crimsunANYONE with upload rights may make changes to "your" packages07:26
LaserJockcrimsun: but he should get any email shouldn't he?07:26
crimsunon the upload?07:26
crimsunI haven't07:26
LaserJockno, on the bug07:26
crimsunis he the owner?07:26
crimsunotherwise it would be an LP issue, #launchpad07:27
crimsungrumbles at bonjour.c07:28
LaserJockdolson: so you might want to talk to #launchpad about getting bug reports07:31
dolsoncrimsun: I'm not mad that someone else is fixing my bugs.. I don't really care07:33
dolsonI just want to understand how this stuff works07:33
crimsun"this stuff" meaning maintaining or bug triaging?07:36
crimsunnot that either is mutually exclusive07:36
dolsonwell, you've already explained that anyone with upload rights can and will change the packages I have uploaded07:37
dolsonyou've explained that the work I did is not "mine" because I'm not an Ubuntu Maintainer07:37
dolsonthese are things that I didn't know. and now I do07:38
crimsundolson: no, it doesn't change when you have upload rights. When you become a maintainer, you also gain the {awesome} responsibility of other packages, too.07:39
LaserJockdolson: no, it isn't because you aren't an Ubuntu Maintainer. it is because we don't have maintainership in Ubuntu, we have team maintainership07:39
dolsonok07:39
crimsunliterally, there are about a dozen of us actively maintaining stuff in universe07:40
crimsunthat's ~16000 packages, so it makes sense07:40
crimsun[and when merge time comes, it makes nonsense] 07:41
dolsonok, so should I bother writing these other missing manpages? or will someone else duplicate that work before I have a chance to upload the fixes? or should I not work on those?07:41
crimsunyou should07:41
LaserJockdolson: but as the person in the Maintainer field I would think it would make sense that you would get emailed bug reports07:41
dolsonLaserJock: I did on some, but these other ones have a button that says the bugs weren't reported in Ubuntu. I assume that's the difference, although I'm not sure why that is07:42
crimsundon't feel like your work is wasted or neglected. It's just that there's a LOT more work because there aren't that many of us.07:42
dolsoncrimsun: no, I don't feel that way, I'd rather be on a bigger team than worry about my couple packages. I think that's a better way, honestly.07:42
dolsonfor me, it's good enough that there is new software in ubuntu, who gets credit I don't care, who works on it, I don't care. I just want to contribute where I can. but I had been working on manpages for some of those bugs, but then Benjamin fixed one, so I was asking because of that07:44
=== jcape [i=jcape@71.194.176.102] has joined #ubuntu-motu
crimsunthe classic scalability problem of lock-holding07:49
crimsunwherein we could say that we're fixing something, fix it, say that we're done, etc.07:49
dolsonI know, you guys are infinitely more busy than I am07:50
crimsunno no07:50
crimsunI'm just musing, because if we did that (which is essentially what we've done for merges), we'll still have some stepping-on07:51
dolsonon an unrelated note, I was asked to put those packages into Debian07:52
crimsunthat will certainly make maintaining them in Ubuntu easier07:53
dolsonyeah, now I have to learn their system on top of what I'm learning about Ubuntu's system07:53
dolsonbut it'll be worth it to improve both distros, IMO07:54
LaserJockdolson: I went through the same thing. I found that it wasn't to bad to get used to the Debian system. If you need some help I can help07:55
dolsonLaserJock: I appreciate that. :) dancerj joined my channel and started talking to me. He (I assume male) said for me to post on the multimedia list, as a start, so I did. he wants me to use SVN or something for packages, I guess because there is no REVU for Debian07:56
dolsondancerj is basically on a crusade to get all the stuff from DeMuDi into Debian proper07:58
crimsunthat's a good crusade, because demudi is quite fine07:58
dolsonfor sure07:58
crimsunpersonally I'd be happier if planet went debian-based, but I can dream on07:58
dolsonheh, me too. I could never go back to an RPM-based distro07:59
dolsonI guess some of the apps I did for Ubuntu weren't in DeMuDi, so he sought me out on IRC07:59
LaserJockdolson: #debian-mentors and the debian-mentors mailing list were helpful for me08:00
=== zakame [n=zak@ubuntu/member/zakame] has joined #ubuntu-motu
dolsonLaserJock: I'll keep that in mind :)08:02
=== robitaille [n=daniel@ubuntu/member/robitaille] has joined #ubuntu-motu
dolsonhey zakame :D08:02
dolsonhey robitaille :D08:03
robitaillehi dolson08:03
=== minghua [n=minghua@69-153-139-36.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== lakin [n=lakin@dsl-hill-66-18-228-60-cgy.nucleus.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu
G0SUBdolson :)08:14
dolsonhey G0SUB08:14
LaserJockhi minghua08:16
minghuahello LaserJock08:17
minghuaLaserJock: good work done today?08:17
LaserJock?08:18
=== minghua just finished some automatic start support for input methods
minghuaLaserJock: never mind.  you were reviewing and helping others when I left the channel, basically I just wanted to ask "how was your day"08:19
LaserJockoh, it is going08:19
LaserJockI was just going to try to send the merge bug email. I'm still confused as to what elements I need08:20
minghuaoh poor LaserJock08:20
minghuaLaserJock: still can't get the merging done?08:20
LaserJockso do I just send "merge bug#1 bug #2" in the body to contro@bugs.debian.org?08:21
LaserJocklol08:21
minghuaLaserJock: first make sure the bugs are against the same package, with the same severity, then a two line email to control@bugs.debian.org should get the work done08:22
LaserJockwhat 2 lines though?08:22
minghuafirst line "merge XXXXXX YYYYYY", second line "thanks"08:22
minghuaLaserJock: no "bug#" stuff08:22
minghuajust the digits08:23
StevenKOr 'kthxbye' :-P08:23
LaserJockso the second line is a comment?08:23
minghuaand the email address is control@ not contro@, hope that's your typo on irc08:23
LaserJockyep08:24
minghuaLaserJock: no, it's "thanks", "quit", or "stop".  though "kthxbye" is a recent addition as well :-)08:24
LaserJockhmm, ok08:24
minghuaLaserJock: what are your bug numbers?08:25
LaserJock355207 and 35520808:25
minghuaLaserJock: nah, apparently your merging effort isn't working yet08:26
LaserJockjust a sec, I haven't sent the email yet ;-)08:27
=== Hiawatha [n=hugo@ip56503e76.direct-adsl.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu
Hiawathahi there. can anybody help me with some package-building questions?08:31
LaserJocksure08:31
G0SUBHiawatha sure!08:31
Hiawathaoke, I've some software I wrote and want to upload to Ubuntu08:31
Hiawathabut whatever I do, there's no .diff.gz file08:32
G0SUBHiawatha umm? have you debianised the source package?08:32
Hiawathaand I got some mail from some MOTU guys telling me a 'package' should also have .diff.gz file08:32
Hiawathaoke, what is 'debianised'?08:33
G0SUBHiawatha what are you using for the packaging? cdbs, debhelper, which one?08:33
HiawathaI use autotools. And I can create a .deb file from the source08:33
Hiawathadpkg-buildpackage08:33
LaserJockHiawatha: the .diff.gz should contain all the changes that you make to the original tarball so there is a clear seperation between what has been done for packaging and the source08:34
G0SUBHiawatha and it builds fine?08:34
Hiawathayes, building is fine08:34
=== KillerKiwi2005 [n=jason@203.109.215.2] has joined #ubuntu-motu
G0SUBHiawatha then you can probably try creating the diff.gz by hand ...08:34
Hiawathathe .deb files install on my Debian server with no error08:34
LaserJockHiawatha: so do you have a .orig.tar.gz file?08:35
Hiawatha'contain all the changes'.... There are no changes. It's just a release of my software I want to package....08:35
Hiawathano .orig. just <name>.<version>.tar.gz08:35
G0SUBHiawatha the changes are like the copyright, control, and rule files inside the debian/ dir.08:35
LaserJockHiawatha: where is the debian/ directory?08:35
Hiawathain the source dir.08:35
G0SUBHiawatha _those_ are the changes08:36
Hiawathaoke :)08:36
HiawathaHow do I get them in a seperate file?08:36
Hiawathaso, if I tar that dir and add it manually to my .dsc file, all should be fine?08:37
G0SUBHiawatha diff -Naur pristine-source/ debian-package-source/ > package.diff08:37
G0SUBHiawatha no08:37
Hiawathaoke, guess that would be too easy :)08:38
G0SUBHiawatha what I don't understand, is that why the diff.gz is not being generated08:38
LaserJocktake your original source and create a .orig.tar.gz and then add the debian/ to the source directory and then do debuild -S -sa08:38
Hiawathame either :)08:38
LaserJockG0SUB: because it is being created as a debian native package08:38
G0SUBLaserJock aah!08:38
Hiawathathat's one of my problems/questions08:38
LaserJockminghua: it worked ;-)08:39
minghuaLaserJock: glad to hear that :-)08:40
minghuaHiawatha: usually it is encouraged that you separate your debian packaging stuff from your software release08:41
minghuaHiawatha: so you release a tarball without the debian/ dir, and use that as .orig.tar.gz08:41
=== AstralJava [n=jaska@cm-217-078-207-6.lohjanpuhelin.fi] has joined #ubuntu-motu
minghuaHiawatha: then add you debian/ dir when packaging, and you should get a .diff.gz automatically08:42
Hiawathano, my source tarball has a debian/ dir08:42
minghuaHiawatha: this way users of other distros aren't affected by the debian specific changes08:42
Hiawathaoke08:42
minghuaHiawatha: is your software useful for other distros?08:42
Hiawathayes, with autotools08:43
=== GNULinuxer [i=ghoseb@unaffiliated/gnulinuxer] has joined #ubuntu-motu
Hiawathathe usual configure make make install stuff08:43
minghuaHiawatha: yeah, so for the reasons I said above, it's usually encouraged that you don't have debian/ dir in your source tarball08:44
Hiawathaoke, so I should break-up my source tarball. one with ONLY source, and one with the debian/ dir08:44
minghuaHiawatha: if you want, you can always release a .diff.gz with your tarball instead08:45
minghuaHiawatha: yes, that would be the way to go08:45
Hiawathaoke. my source tarball contains a dir <packagename>/ and in there all the source. and the .diff.gz contains a <packagename>/debian/ dir and all the debian files08:46
Hiawatharight?08:46
LaserJockHiawatha: yes, but the .diff.gz will be created automatically for you once you have the .orig.tar.gz file right08:48
Hiawathathere is no .orig.tar.gz :) just my source tarball which includes the debian dir08:48
LaserJockHiawatha: right, so take the debian dir out and use that source as the .orig.tar.gz08:49
Hiawathait also includes a gentoo/ dir. all in one file :)08:49
LaserJockbed time, cya all08:54
minghuanight LaserJock08:55
=== sevrin [n=sevrin@202.75.186.154] has joined #ubuntu-motu
HiawathaI've change my Makefile.am. a 'make dist' doesn't include the debian dir anymore. but when I do 'dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -S -sa', a tarball is created which includes the debian/ dir.... darn09:00
minghuaHiawatha: you already had a source tarball (without debian/ dir) when you run dpkg-buildpackage, right?09:03
Hiawathanope. But I will just delete this whole debian dir and try again09:03
minghuaHiawatha: first generate the source tarball, put it outside of your build dir (name-version) as name_version.orig.tar.gz, then run dpkg-buildpackage09:05
minghuaHiawatha: and you should get you .diff.gz09:05
Hiawathaoke, will try09:05
Hiawathaoke, now I have: .dsc .orig.tar.gz, _source.changes and !!! a .diff.gz09:08
Hiawathathis .diff.gz file only contains my ChangeLog.....09:09
Hiawathanot good I think09:09
minghuaHiawatha: looks something is still wrong :-)09:11
Hiawathayup :)09:11
minghuaHiawatha: are you sure you don't have a debian/ in your .orig.tar.gz?09:12
Hiawathano :) Oke, delete all. try again (man, what a hell)09:12
HiawathaThis packaging is just like autotool. When it works, it's cool. But what a hell to get it working......09:13
=== littlepaul [n=littlepa@p5084D69F.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
Hiawathaoke, think I have it now.09:17
Hiawathahave .orig.tar.gz with source09:18
Hiawatha.diff.gz with some debian/ dir build patch stuff09:18
Hiawatha.dsc file with file info and MD5 hashes09:18
Hiawathaand a _source.changes file09:19
=== Gloubiboulga [n=gauvain@ubuntu/member/gloubiboulga] has joined #ubuntu-motu
Hiawathaoke, uploaded the files with dput. let's see what this will bring me :)09:21
GloubiboulgaHiawatha, hi, you're Hugo Leisink, right?09:24
Hiawathayup :)09:26
GloubiboulgaI'm Gauvain Pocentek09:27
GloubiboulgaWe've discussed a little by mail09:27
HiawathaYes, saw that in the 'joined' message09:27
HiawathaI know. A few minutes ago I uploaded my files with dput09:28
HiawathaHope I got it right this time09:28
GloubiboulgaIt look much better than the first package :)09:28
Gloubiboulgas/look/looks09:28
Hiawathagood! :)09:28
HiawathaFinally understands this diff.gz file issue09:29
=== Lure [n=luka@clj46-234.dial-up.arnes.si] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== _jaldhar [n=jaldhar@c-68-80-95-221.hsd1.nj.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== zyga [n=zyga@ubuntu/member/zyga] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== JohnnyMast [n=rave@82-170-225-221.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== lbm [n=lbm@x1-6-00-13-10-7a-d1-e4.k233.webspeed.dk] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== zakame [n=zakame@ubuntu/member/zakame] has joined #ubuntu-motu
zakamehi MOTUs10:26
Gloubiboulgahi zakame10:29
zakamehi Gloubiboulga10:29
=== freeflying [n=freeflyi@61.190.65.22] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== cassidy [n=cassidy@7.201-136-217.adsl.skynet.be] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Hirion [n=hirion@draugr.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== cassidy_ [n=cassidy@7.201-136-217.adsl.skynet.be] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Hirion [n=hirion@draugr.de] has left #ubuntu-motu []
=== Hirion [n=hirion@draugr.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== ealden [n=ealden@203.76.212.213] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Hobbsee_ [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Fuddl [n=fuddl@2001:6f8:9cf:0:20f:eaff:fe4d:d7b7] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== tvo [n=tobi@5354EA9B.cable.casema.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Lure [n=luka@clj46-234.dial-up.arnes.si] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== trulux [n=lorenzo@unaffiliated/trulux] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== netzmeister_afk is now known as netzmeister
netzmeisterre11:43
=== netzmeister_ [n=netzmeis@p549FA8C0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== netzmeister_ is now known as netzmeister
=== raphink [n=raphink@ubuntu/member/raphink] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== freeflying [n=freeflyi@61.190.65.22] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== freeflying [n=freeflyi@61.190.65.22] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== MagnusR [n=magru@c83-250-59-127.bredband.comhem.se] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== TheMuso [n=luke@dsl-202-173-132-131.nsw.westnet.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== trulux [n=lorenzo@unaffiliated/trulux] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== nomed [n=nomed@host222-58.pool8260.interbusiness.it] has joined #ubuntu-motu
nomedhi all01:08
=== freeflying [n=freeflyi@61.190.65.22] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== gusaweb [n=gusaweb@lns-bzn-37-82-253-21-8.adsl.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
nomedcould u suggest me what should i do in a case like this ?01:31
nomedhttp://phpfi.com/10571801:31
nomedshould i patch the Makefile ?01:31
nomedi can't ose --opt for those files in share/doc/omega01:31
=== Se7h [n=MUAHAHAH@81.193.82.42] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== _jaldhar is now known as jaldhar
=== Hobbsee [n=user@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #ubuntu-motu
Hiawathaquit01:54
Hiawathaexit01:54
=== Gervystar [n=alessand@ip-124-244.adsl.cheapnet.it] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== xophEr [n=xopher@a84-230-124-206.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== ptlo [n=senko@83-131-13-251.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== katzor [n=udssr@p54BA454C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu
katzorhi all is anyone familiar with glib coding here?02:23
lifelesswell I'm never serious02:25
lifelessso you can say I do glib coding all the time ;002:26
=== toma [i=toma@ip83.kovoks.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== ogra [n=ogra@ubuntu/member/ogra] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== freeflying [n=freeflyi@61.190.65.22] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== zyga [n=zyga@ubuntu/member/zyga] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== gouchi [n=gouchi@ASt-Lambert-153-1-78-114.w83-204.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu
gouchiHi02:56
=== bmonty [n=bmontgom@ubuntu/member/bmonty] has joined #ubuntu-motu
katzorlifeless, could you have a look at http://www.ubuntuusers.de/paste/333/ please?02:59
katzorim pretty new to this stuff and i just cant figure out why it wouldnt work03:00
=== doko [n=doko@dslb-084-059-116-072.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== marcin` [n=user@194.114.146.58] has joined #ubuntu-motu
bmontykatzor: are you sure the call to timer->connect is correct, shouldn't that be a cast? (just guessing)03:09
bmontykatzor: this is off-topic for this channel though03:09
katzorhi, i know and im sorry but theres no glib-noob mailinglist :-)03:09
katzor:-) what is a cast?03:10
netzmeisterre03:10
netzmeisterhello03:10
bmontykatzor: yes, but there are gtk/glib channels on freenode03:11
bmontyhi netzmeister03:11
katzorkool03:12
=== mastersam [n=Samuel@ppp-31.net-551.magic.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu
bmontykatzor: a cast is telling the compiler to treat a variable that you defined as one type as another type, google for "C++ type casting"03:13
netzmeisterhi bmonty :)03:13
=== mastersam [n=Samuel@ppp-31.net-551.magic.fr] has left #ubuntu-motu []
katzorso its sth like int a  = 0; bool b = (bool)a; ?03:14
bmontykatzor: yes03:16
=== MarioMeyer_ [n=meyer@ubuntu/member/mariomeyer] has joined #ubuntu-motu
katzorcool so what would i cast my function to? the glib doc says it works like connect (const sigc::slot<bool>& slot)03:20
katzorah i guess the problem is that the connected function is supposed to reurn a bool03:21
=== G0SUB [i=ghoseb@unaffiliated/gnulinuxer] has joined #ubuntu-motu
katzor!yay! it compiles03:22
katzorok, ill stop spamming this channel now :-)03:22
=== freeflying [n=freeflyi@61.190.65.22] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== gouchi [n=gouchi@ASt-Lambert-153-1-78-114.w83-204.abo.wanadoo.fr] has left #ubuntu-motu ["Quitte"]
netzmeisterbmonty:  are you there?03:35
bmontynetzmeister: yes03:36
netzmeisterwhat does daemon@poleboy mean in his comment? ( http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=2101 )03:36
netzmeisterfirst look at the "manpage..." line03:36
=== zyga [n=zyga@ubuntu/member/zyga] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Tonio_ [n=tonio@tonio.planetemu.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
netzmeisterwhen i compress the manpage debuild stop with an error..03:37
netzmeisterdpkg-source: cannot represent change to debian/codeblocks.1.gz: binary file contents changed03:37
=== irvin [n=irvin@ubuntu/member/irvin] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== mxpxpod [n=bryan@unaffiliated/mxpxpod] has joined #ubuntu-motu
bmontynetzmeister: you are trying to compress it before or after you build the pacakge?03:39
netzmeisterbefore03:41
=== Lure [n=luka@clj46-234.dial-up.arnes.si] has joined #ubuntu-motu
bmontynetzmeister: you should compress the manpage as part of your package building process03:42
bmontyyou should not modify files from the upstream tarball03:42
netzmeisterhmm, "rules"?03:42
bmontynetzmeister: yes03:42
bmontyLaserJock's packaging guide has a good explanation of why you should not modify the upstream source tarball (doc.ubuntu.com)03:43
=== koke [n=koke@ubuntu/member/koke] has joined #ubuntu-motu
netzmeisterokay manpage is fixed..03:53
netzmeisterbut what is "library packaging style"03:54
bmontynetzmeister: basically the shared libs are in a package called "libfoo" and the static libs an headers are in "libfoo-dev"03:55
netzmeisteraha03:56
bmontycheck out the debian developers docs at www.debian.org/devel03:56
bmontyslomo_: ping03:59
netzmeisterbmonty:  slomo_ is in Jabber "away"04:02
bmontynetzmeister: yeah, but he will respond when he comes back :)04:03
netzmeisterah okay..04:04
=== koke_ [n=koke@adsl229-164.unizar.es] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== herzi [n=herzi@d042167.adsl.hansenet.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== koke [n=koke@ubuntu/member/koke] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== nomed [n=nomed@host222-58.pool8260.interbusiness.it] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== _jaldhar [n=jaldhar@c-68-80-95-221.hsd1.nj.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== _jaldhar is now known as jaldhar
=== freeflying-ibook [n=freeflyi@61.190.65.22] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Seveas [n=seveas@ubuntu/member/seveas] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== dooglus [n=dooglus@rincevent.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== G0SUB [i=ghoseb@unaffiliated/gnulinuxer] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== herzi [n=herzi@c141165.adsl.hansenet.de] has joined #ubuntu-motu
Seveashow can I persuade diffstat and debdiff to cooperate?05:47
=== MrRio [n=rio@88-107-49-151.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu
MrRiohey05:54
MrRioim packaging someone else's python game, need a few pointers05:54
MrRiodo i need to put all the files into /usr/share/games/<gamename>, then put an executable shell script in /usr/bin/<gamename> to start python and start the game?05:55
MrRiois this the best way of doing it?05:56
=== zenrox [n=zenrox@71.115.198.118] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== koke [n=koke@ubuntu/member/koke] has joined #ubuntu-motu
bmontyMrRio: there is a python packaging guide at www.debian.org/devel06:03
desrtSeveas; poke.06:05
Seveasdesrt, bang06:05
desrtSeveas; keyboardcast finally got approved for upload.  congrats.06:05
Seveasyay :D06:05
Seveascongrats to you too 06:06
MrRiobmonty: cheers06:06
desrtanyway.  i'm trying to upload another of my projects to revu06:06
desrti pacakged it last night and sent crimsun a tarball to look over... he told me what to change... then i applied to have my key added to revu06:06
desrt(which i did)06:06
desrtso now i need to know how to actually upload06:06
Seveasdput 06:07
Seveashttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU06:07
desrtyour kana smiles are amusing :)06:08
desrtk.  that seemed easy.06:11
=== desrt waits :)
desrtbbiab.06:13
desrtuh.  something really weird happened with my upload.06:21
=== zyga [n=zyga@ubuntu/member/zyga] has joined #ubuntu-motu
desrtcan i get some help?06:31
desrtmy upload is zonked06:31
desrthttp://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=210606:31
desrtfor some reason it copied the entire source into itself06:31
desrtresulting in a gigantic diff06:31
=== Arrogance [n=aks@ottawa-hs-206-191-39-20.d-ip.magma.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu
MrRiocan i follow bedian instructions to the letter then for making ubuntu packages>06:41
=== _jaldhar [n=jaldhar@c-68-80-95-221.hsd1.nj.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
MrRiobedian?? i mean debian06:41
hubdesrt: if you could remove config.sug and config.guess from the diff it would be nice06:46
hubdesrt: for that you need to move the rule that update them to the configure rule and rm them in the clean rule06:46
hubor just use cdbs :-)06:46
desrtis that the one that stores the tarball of the app inside of the .deb?06:47
desrtlike... when you unpack it, there's a tarball sitting there06:47
hub?06:48
desrtuh06:48
desrtwtf06:48
desrtifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""06:48
desrt        cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub06:48
desrtendif06:48
desrtifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.guess)" ""06:48
desrt        cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess06:48
desrtendif06:48
hubthis06:48
hubit is in the clean rule06:48
desrtit is.  it seems to be a bit of nonsense?06:48
hubshould be in the config.status: rule, just before calling configure06:49
hubit is debian non sense06:49
hubcdbs does not do that06:49
desrtso just after dh_testdir i guess06:49
desrtnow can you explain to me why i have a muine-shell-0.6.0 subdirectory here?06:50
hubyep06:50
hubdesrt: on REVU?06:50
desrtactually.. it might help if i understood what debuild used for the 'original tarball' to generate the diff against06:50
desrthub; yes.06:50
desrthttp://revu.tauware.de/revu1-incoming/muine-shell-0603051210/muine-shell-0.6.0/muine-shell-0.6.0/06:50
desrthub; also see my diff which now contains a complete copy of the source of the entire package06:51
hubdesrt: it is revu that does that06:51
hubit does not06:51
desrtwanna bet?06:51
desrthttp://revu.tauware.de/revu1-incoming/muine-shell-0603051210/muine-shell_0.6.0-1.diff06:51
hubit only has debian files and the config*06:52
desrtoh whacky06:52
desrti thought that was the text of ./configure06:52
desrtahah06:52
desrtwhy did revu do that to me but not to others?06:52
=== desrt tries again
desrtso i take it copying those config.guess files in from /usr/share causes ./configure to go faster06:54
desrtsince it doesn't have to check everything06:54
desrtweird07:00
desrtdo now i have07:00
desrt*.diff                0 Bytes07:00
desrtbut my debian/ files are all there07:00
=== desrt shrugs?
desrtuh.  my old debian/ files are there from the previous upload (ie: my rules script is unchanged)07:01
=== jaldhar_ [n=jaldhar@c-68-80-95-221.hsd1.nj.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== desrt becomes confused by revu, unconfuses himself, still left wondering why *.diff is 0 bytes, but whatever :)
Gloubiboulgadesrt, you don't have an orig tarball, so no diff.gz07:03
desrtok.  so this is the question i asked hub07:03
desrtwhere does it look for the original tarball?  i just have it in the obvious place (parent directory)07:04
desrtand i'm using debuild -S -sa07:04
Gloubiboulgawhat's the name of your tarball?07:04
=== asw [n=asw@karuna.med.harvard.edu] has joined #ubuntu-motu
desrtmuine-shell-0.6.0.tar.gz07:04
Gloubiboulgait should be muine-shell_0.6.0.orig.tar.gz07:05
=== desrt raises eyebrow
desrtin the parent dir?07:05
Gloubiboulgaoutside muine-shell-0.6.0/07:05
desrtright.07:05
desrtok.  thanks much.  i think i got it right this time :)07:07
Gloubiboulganp :)07:08
desrtso i think i've confused revu.... since it's not emailing me a password07:11
Gloubiboulgahe doesn't mail passwords07:12
desrtmy packages are by desrt@ubuntu.com but signed by desrt@desrt.ca :)07:12
hubdesrt: if the uid is in the key, no problem07:12
desrtoh.  i read on the wiki that your first upload would trigger the system to email you an initial password07:12
desrthub; the uid is not in the key :)07:12
hubdesrt: then add it and update the servers :-)07:12
desrthub; bah. i'm trying to keep my key minimal07:13
hubdesrt: you have no choice07:13
hubdesrt: or emit a new key nobody has signed07:13
hubdesrt: or something07:13
desrtif i add some of my aliases i'm going to want to add all of them07:13
hubdesrt: add the one you need07:13
hubdesrt: you can still revoke later :-)07:13
desrtdesrt.ca, mcmaster.ca, gnome.org, ubuntu.com, freedesktop.org, haskell.org, linux.ca, ...07:14
desrtwouldn't want to show preference to one over the others :p07:14
desrt('cept desrt.ca of course)07:14
desrtanyway.  my upload looks pretty good.  thanks guys07:15
desrtanyone want to revu it? :)07:15
hubdesrt: then put the desrt.ca address for the packager/changelog07:16
desrthub; you've signed my key, right?07:19
hubdesrt: yeah I did07:21
desrtwill you sign my new uid for me?07:21
hubdesrt: afaa6ff607:21
desrtcorrect.07:21
hubdesrt: no need to sign the new uid07:22
desrtfor some reason gpg now thinks my primary uid is desrt@ubuntu.com07:22
desrtk.07:23
=== Fuddl [n=fuddl@2001:6f8:9cf:0:20f:eaff:fe4d:d7b7] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Arr0gance [n=aks@ottawa-hs-209-217-123-80.d-ip.magma.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== reggaemanu [n=manu@ARennes-257-1-105-23.w86-210.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== Toadstool [n=jcorbier@maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu
MrRioive been reading the debian guide for making deb files for ages07:49
MrRioim just getting more and more confused07:50
MrRioits a simple python game07:50
MrRioand i know where everything needs to go, and all its dependencies07:50
MrRioit has no make file, is the main problem, and i need to change 1 line of code from the original package so it saves settings in the users home dir07:50
MrRiobeen reading thru it on and off since for 4 hours07:51
MrRioim using dh_make07:52
=== jcape [i=jcape@71.194.176.102] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== MrRio [n=rio@pdpc/supporter/sustaining/MrRio] has left #ubuntu-motu ["Leaving"]
=== phanatic [n=Szilvesz@dsl51B664BC.pool.t-online.hu] has joined #ubuntu-motu
phanatichi people08:20
phanaticsiretart: got my mail?08:21
nomedif i write a missing desktop file where should i put it ?08:22
phanaticnomed: i think you should attach it to the appropriate malone bug08:24
siretartphanatic: which email? /me got an awful lot of mails this weekend08:24
siretarthi folks! (just arrived at home)08:24
nomedphanatic, that pkge is not in malone ... i would try to have it for dapper + 108:25
=== JohnnyMast [n=rave@84-104-9-27.cable.quicknet.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu
phanaticsiretart: i asked you to support me @ cc meeting (mail dated 01/03)08:27
siretartphanatic: oh, yes. I remember08:27
siretarthm, it is 12 UTC, thats probably a bit unconvinient on saturday for me, but I'll try to make it, I promise08:28
phanaticsiretart: it'll be on tuesday08:28
siretartyes08:29
phanaticsiretart: you said saturday :) anyway, thanks for your support08:29
siretarterr, right, sry. I'm quite tired after CLT now, will go to bed early08:30
siretartnow for some keysigning08:31
phanaticsiretart: i understand...08:31
Gloubiboulganomed, put it the debian/ dir08:32
nomedk thanks08:32
phanatichey Gloubiboulga :)08:33
Gloubiboulgahi phanatic :)08:34
siretartphanatic: https://launchpad.net/people/phanatic/+packages looks nice, though. That'll be more than enough for membership :)08:34
netzmeisterre08:36
=== minghua [n=minghua@69-153-139-36.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
phanaticsiretart: thanks, but i have several more contribs too (related to hungarian ubuntu community) :)08:42
=== zyga [n=zyga@ubuntu/member/zyga] has joined #ubuntu-motu
siretartphanatic: great :)08:46
phanaticsiretart: then i hope to see you at the meeting ;)08:48
siretartI'll try to make it08:48
phanaticthanks a lot in advance08:49
=== lionelp [n=lionel@ip-128.net-82-216-65.rev.numericable.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== lakin [n=lakin@dsl-hill-66-18-228-60-cgy.nucleus.com] has joined #ubuntu-motu
hubdesrt: since you are upstream, maybe you could fix these C warnings in muine-shell08:57
desrtwhat are they?08:57
desrtmuine-shell.c:140: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function strlen08:57
desrtahah08:58
desrtthanks for the tip.  totally missed that before08:58
desrtjust those two?08:58
=== tvo [n=tobi@5354EA9B.cable.casema.nl] has joined #ubuntu-motu
hubdesrt: see REVU for the review :-)09:00
desrthub; thank you much :)09:01
=== desrt doesn't want to write a manpage :p
tsengdesrt: i like the package, but i never remember my login to this stupid thing09:01
desrthub; was it just those two warnings?09:02
desrthub; if so, i hope you don't mind if i don't want to do a new upstream release... maybe i could just add a patch to the package?09:02
hubdesrt: read on REVU the review comments first09:02
desrthub; i have.09:02
hubdesrt: the warning are to go to upstream09:03
desrthub; i've committed the fix to gnome cvs already :)09:03
hubdesrt: otherwise no biggie, at least I hope09:03
desrtk.09:03
hubdesrt: I just dislike things with warnings like that09:03
=== desrt needs to look for a feature or something to add to have an excuse for a 0.6.1 release :)
hubdesrt: man and --help09:04
desrtit has --help09:04
hubdesrt: that would work for a new releas09:04
hubdesrt: ni09:04
hub./muine-shell --help09:04
hubMuine isn't running09:04
desrtoh.  that's lame.09:04
desrtit must try to connect to muine before parsing the arguments o ut09:04
hubdesrt: and add a "Recommends:" on Muine for the package09:05
desrtgood call09:05
desrtbtw: when i run lintian i get no output09:05
desrtdo you somehow enable more warnings?09:05
hubdesrt: no09:05
hubdesrt: I just debuild09:05
hubdesrt: btw look at help2man09:06
hubdesrt: should be able to generate a man page out of that :-)09:06
desrtsweet :)09:06
hubdesrt: that is the lazy option09:06
desrtor at least a good start09:06
desrtok.  gonna work on upstream for a bit, then09:07
desrtthanks for the pointers09:07
netzmeisterdoes anybody know the link to the "library packaging guide" ?09:24
tsenggoogle does09:25
tsenghttp://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html09:25
netzmeisteromg thx tseng09:25
tseng"I'm feeling lucky" :)09:26
netzmeisterWhat does this mean? "youll need library packaging style (-dev, lib* packages), if you install shared objects into /usr/lib. "09:29
tsengit means what it says, really09:29
tsengif you install shared objects (.so) into /usr/lib09:29
tsengyou need libfoo09:29
tsenglibfoo-dev09:29
minghua"shared objects" means *.so* files, if you don't know that09:29
minghuabut you really need to understand those better before start packaging libraries09:30
=== Tonio_ [n=tonio@tonio.planetemu.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== fredix [n=fredix@85.65.97-84.rev.gaoland.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
netzmeisterhm09:34
=== theCore [n=alex@Toronto-HSE-ppp3774155.sympatico.ca] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== lucas2 [n=lucas@d83-177-195-129.cust.tele2.fr] has joined #ubuntu-motu
=== KillerKiwi2006 [n=chatzill@219-89-202-222.adsl.xtra.co.nz] has joined #ubuntu-motu
desrtk.. so i just did a new upstream release addressing your requested changes, hub09:42
desrthub; should i start from scratch with the packaging or should i add a second changelog entry?09:42
=== marcin` [n=user@194.114.146.58] has joined #ubuntu-motu
Gloubiboulgadesrt, one changelog entry is enough09:49
desrtGloubiboulga; do you know how hub got these lintian warnings?09:50
desrtoh.  nm09:51
=== desrt just figured it out
Gloubiboulgarunning lintian on the deb package I guess09:51
desrtquite :)09:51
=== zyga [n=zyga@ubuntu/member/zyga] has joined #ubuntu-motu
minghuarunning lintian on the .changes file would be a better idea, because it checks both the source package and the binary package(s)09:53
Gloubiboulgaminghua, I didn't know that09:56
GloubiboulgaI always run it on .dsc and .deb09:56
minghuaGloubiboulga: read lintian(1) man page ;-)09:58
Gloubiboulgait's just what I'm doing :)09:58
desrthmm.  weird10:09
desrtif i buildpacakage then it modifies the dsc in a way which causes my checksums to no longer match up10:09
=== desrt thumbs down
desrttseng; ping10:10
desrtactually.  not here.10:10
minghuadesrt: your checksum of .orig.tar.gz or .diff.gz?10:13
minghua.diff.gz is supposed to be different for every build10:13
minghuaeven if nothing was changed10:13
desrtwhen i went to upload it said that my checksums didn't match10:13
desrtredoing debuild -S helped10:13
=== MrRio [n=rio@pdpc/supporter/sustaining/MrRio] has joined #ubuntu-motu
MrRiohey10:16
MrRiook, ive finished that python game package i was working on earlier10:16
MrRioit all made sense when i read a little howto about makefiles10:16
MrRiowould/could someone try it out http://amusd.com/debs/nannoid_1.0-1_i386.deb10:16
MrRioanyone? :(10:19
minghuaMrRio: usually people paste _source_ packages here for review, not binary packages10:22
MrRiominghua: but since its python, that doesnt really apply does it?10:25
=== tritium [n=michael@ubuntu/member/tritium] has joined #ubuntu-motu
minghuaMrRio: it still does, because people here want to see how the packaging is done10:26
minghuaMrRio: if you just want testers for the game, I suppose #ubuntu is a better place to ask10:27
MrRiominghua, ah ok, so i need to write a make target for 'source'10:27
MrRiono, its testing for the package, since its my first10:28
minghuaMrRio: if you want other people's comments on your packaging (not just test if the package works or not), always show the source package10:29
phanaticMrRio: upload it to REVU: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU10:29
MrRiominghua, didnt know that, thought it would have all the same files inside of it10:29
MrRiominghua, when I run debian/rules source it says "No rule to make target `source'"10:33
MrRioI'm not sure what to put in my makefile for source.10:33
=== cassidy [n=cassidy@f1-pc174.ulb.ac.be] has joined #ubuntu-motu
minghuaMrRio: read more documenatation about packaging.  The one at http://doc.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/packagingguide/C/index.html, for example10:34
MrRiominghua, Cheers, ive done one now, just uploading it10:35
MrRioneed to wait for an email for upload rights10:39
MrRiominghua, in the meantime if you could have a quick look at http://amusd.com/debs/ to see if ive done the source package right10:40
MrRioive done it as a diff of the original10:40
=== Hirion [n=hirion@draugr.de] has left #ubuntu-motu []
siretartMrRio: for revu?10:41
MrRiosiretart: yeah, the wiki said i need to email to get added to the uploaders keyring10:42
siretartMrRio: whats your keyid?10:43
MrRiosiretart, 215E0FE410:45
desrthmm.  siretart is here.10:46
tomasiretart: thanks for the comment on rsibreak, I have two pending debian patches uploaded to debians alioth (for gnome there are two Quits in the context menu and the welcome text states something which is not true), is it ok, if we upload a new package to revu tomorrow evening?10:46
desrtsiretart; revu isn't sending me my "thanks for your first upload, welcome" email10:46
siretartMrRio: done10:47
siretartdesrt: right. the code responsible for that isn't written yet10:47
desrthahahah10:48
desrthow do i login to the website, then?10:48
siretartuser your email adress as login, and use the recover password link10:49
desrtk10:50
siretarttoma: err, better get your package to debian, then we can sync from there. I think thats less work for all10:50
minghuaany MOTU around to upload a UVF exception package?  the exception was granted.  #2926710:51
minghuabug #2926710:51
Ubugtumalone bug 29267 in apt-proxy "apt-proxy crashes after upgrading" [Normal,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/2926710:51
desrtsiretart; the message contains (only) the word "None"10:52
tomasiretart: 0.5.0  is already in debian, but without these patches10:52
=== marcin` [n=user@194.114.146.58] has joined #ubuntu-motu
siretarttoma: get those patches to debian and ask for the specific package version to be synced10:53
siretartdesrt: damn. you didn't use your primary userid for signing your package, did you?10:53
tomasiretart: ok! thanks for the info. I will take care of that.10:53
siretartthat part of revu really sucks10:53
desrtsiretart; well, i did.  but it didn't match the email address i used to upload the package10:54
desrtie: i 'debianised' with desrt@ubuntu.com but signed with desrt@desrt.ca10:54
desrtrevu appears confused :)10:54
siretartyes, it is10:54
desrti do not have a desrt@ubuntu.com uid10:54
desrtand if i did it wouldn't be signed by anyone10:55
siretarttechnically, your login is the email which is in the Changed-By field of your changes file10:55
siretarttry that email10:55
desrtright.. it doesn't even know that one at all10:55
desrthttp://revu.tauware.de/lostpw.py?email=desrt@ubuntu.com10:55
siretartI'm mailing your password later10:59
siretartneed to write some other mails first10:59
desrtk.  thanks.10:59
=== plugwash [i=plugwash@p10link.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
MrRiohow do i use dput, its saying its not a '.changes' file11:05
netzmeisterdput revu .......source.changes11:07
MrRioi wasnt running debuild11:08
MrRiowell, finally, my first package on revu, making a package should hopefully be much less painful next time11:09
MrRiosiretart: its telling me my password is 'None' too11:14
ajmitchmorning11:17
desrtajmitch; cheerio.11:18
ajmitchhey desrt, what's up?11:18
desrtmade my first revu upload today :)11:19
ajmitchheh nice, what was it?11:19
desrtmuine-shell11:19
desrtjust a little one :)11:19
desrthub was being harsh... he's all "fix compile warnings!  write a manpage!"11:20
ajmitchas he should be11:20
=== lifeless_ [n=robertc@dsl-19.27.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au] has joined #ubuntu-motu
desrt:)11:20
desrti ended up making a new upstream release just to satisfy all his demands :p11:20
ajmitchyou're the unfortunate upstream as well?11:21
=== bpuccio [n=brian@ool-457afde7.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #ubuntu-motu
desrtnod11:21
desrtif anything, this is a vaguely fortunate situation to be in11:21
desrti don't have to fight with anyone to get patches accepted :)11:22
MrRiolol11:22
=== LaserJock [n=laserjoc@ubuntu/member/laserjock] has joined #ubuntu-motu
minghuaajmitch: I remember you use apt-proxy?11:23
theCorehello LaserJock!11:24
LaserJockhi theCore11:24
MrRioits been 10 mins and my package still isnt on the revu site, is everything ok with it?11:24
theCoreoups, wrong channel :P11:24
ajmitchminghua: yes11:25
desrtMrRio; did you get an email saying your key had been added to the revu keyring?11:25
ajmitchMrRio: you did a binary upload, not a source-only upload11:26
minghuaajmitch: good, my memory didn't let me down. :-)  then I suppose you would be willing to sponsor my upload for bug #29267 then?11:26
Ubugtumalone bug 29267 in apt-proxy "apt-proxy crashes after upgrading" [Normal,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/2926711:26
minghuaajmitch: the UVF exception was granted, and I updated the patch11:26
minghuaajmitch: built in pbuilder and tested locally11:27
MrRiodesrt: no i didnt get an email, but i told siretart asked for my keyid and he said it was 'done'11:27
desrtMrRio; same diff :)11:27
ajmitchMrRio: you tried to upload nannoid, right?11:28
MrRioajmitch: yeah11:28
ajmitchMrRio: then please build it as a source package & reupload11:28
ajmitchdebuild -S -sa11:28
ajmitchminghua: I can't test this, as I'm away from my home computer11:29
=== ajmitch is *still* over in .au, at work
minghuaajmitch: oh okay, I'll ask around later for other MOTUs, then11:30
MrRioajmitch, thanks :)11:30
siretartpoor ajmitch11:33
siretarthi ajmitch :)11:33
ajmitchhi siretart11:36
ajmitchhow's it going?11:36
LaserJockhi ajmitch and siretart and minghua11:38
siretartajmitch: I just returned from Chemnitzer LinuxTag. Was a great conference11:39
minghuahi LaserJock11:40
MrRiowhat are the packages ordered by on revu?11:48
MrRioive noticed a problem with my package, the .ex files are still in there11:52
MrRioi've removed them, does this mean i have to make a new revision?11:52
MrRioand how would i do that?11:52
=== KillerKiwi2006 [n=chatzill@219-89-202-222.adsl.xtra.co.nz] has joined #ubuntu-motu
slomo_bmonty: pong?11:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!