[12:28] <netzmeister_> mjg59:  The problem  further  exists :-(
[12:29] <netzmeister_> all the examples are with one file..
[12:30] <mjg59> Just list both files
[12:31] <netzmeister_> uguru.c    ugurufunc.c
[12:31] <mjg59> No, in the makefile
[12:31] <netzmeister_> how? ;-)
[12:34] <netzmeister_> obj-m += uguru.o
[12:34] <netzmeister_> uguru-objs := ugurufunc.o
[12:34] <netzmeister_> all:
[12:34] <netzmeister_> 	make -C /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build M=$(PWD) modules
[12:34] <netzmeister_> cleanall:
[12:34] <netzmeister_> 	make -C /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build M=$(PWD) clean
[12:34] <netzmeister_> sorry for spamming..
[12:34] <netzmeister_> thats my makefile
[12:35] <mjg59> uguro-objs := ugurufunc.o uguru.o
[12:38] <netzmeister_> i have the problem...
[12:38] <netzmeister_> yeah...
[12:38] <netzmeister_> uguru.c  must renamed to uguru_core.c (or anything else..)
[12:38] <netzmeister_> yes baby..
[01:04] <netzmeister_> mjg59:  Can i create a procfs File in a usermode programm?
[04:19] <netstar> interested?
[04:20] <netstar> I was speaking to benh about it the other day, I was kinda hoping windfarm would be working for dapper, but if not this could be a temporary solution
[04:21] <BenC> the daemons are already on the system
[04:22] <netstar> they are?!?!?
[04:22] <BenC> or installable, I would guess
[04:23] <BenC> no, there is pmu
[04:23] <netstar> this is different
[04:23] <netstar> pmu is older macs
[04:23] <BenC> I know that
[04:23] <BenC> no, it's not
[04:23] <BenC> my brand new powerbook has pmu
[04:23] <netstar> :P okay my bad
[04:24] <BenC> if there are tools, find out what they are and make sure it works as you expect
[04:25] <netstar> I have 6 months testing with it
[04:25] <netstar> It's not quite as quiet as windfarm
[04:26] <netstar> what should I do then?
[04:26] <netstar> file a report?
[04:27] <BenC> you could start by telling me the name of the tool and where you got it from :)
[04:28] <netstar> OKay this is a problem, I got it from ppc mailing list AGES ago.. The author's name is long gone (sadly) even benh has no recollection of it, but it;s a python script named simpleTemp.py
[04:29] <netstar> would you like a copy?
[04:31] <netstar> google now has no references to it
[04:32] <BenC> hmm, ok
[04:33] <netstar> it works VERY well
[04:33] <netstar> even turns on the light :P
[04:35] <fabbione> hey guys
[04:37] <netstar> How should I send it to you?
[04:57] <fabbione> BenC: can you please pull from me?
[04:58] <fabbione> BenC: i have only the linux-kernel-devel meta package
[04:58] <fabbione> we should also get git-core in main
[04:58] <BenC> ok
[04:58] <netstar> BenC: Found it!
[04:58] <netstar> http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc64-dev/2005-September/005307.html
[04:59] <fabbione> BenC: thanks dude
[04:59] <BenC> netstar: thought you said "AGES ago" :)
[04:59] <netstar> :P
[05:00] <netstar> I'm new to this kernel timeline
[05:00] <BenC> hehe
[05:01] <Petaris> does the x86 kernel support smtp and greater then 4 GB of ram?
[05:02] <Petaris> er, smp not smtp
[05:02] <netstar> it can support 64GB
[05:02] <netstar> "CAN"
[05:03] <netstar> newer models anyway, but I think it's a complete hack
[05:03] <Petaris> I'm downloading drapper 5 for an edubuntu ltsp server
[05:03] <Petaris> I have a dual opteron box with 8 GB ram
[05:04] <Petaris> will it work out of the box?
[05:04] <mjg59> Petaris: The server kernel supports more than 4GB of RAM
[05:04] <mjg59> The others don't
[05:04] <Petaris> ok
[05:04] <Petaris> Are there any issues with building a custom kernel?
[05:05] <mjg59> As long as you keep much the same config, no
[05:05] <Petaris> ok, cool
[05:05] <Petaris> thanks, I might be asking more questions in a bit
[05:07] <Petaris> mjg59J: I assume the server kernel also supports smp?
[05:10] <mjg59> Petaris: Yes
[05:10] <Petaris> ok, thanks
[05:52] <ppd> hi. can it be that current lirc-modules-source cannot be compiled with the current kernel?