[12:09] <Fujitsu> This is a bit not good.
[12:10] <kbrooks> ?
[12:13] <Fujitsu> If the media get hold of this...
[12:18] <mordof> why didn't they put encryption on it??
[12:19] <Fujitsu> d-i records all of the answers in the answers file. Raw.
[12:20] <Fujitsu> However, fixes have been released.
[12:20] <Fujitsu> 8 hours between bug report and fix. Pretty good, I think.
[01:03] <Eleaf> Fujitsu, where are the fixes?
[01:05] <Fujitsu> Eleaf, breezy-security, I believe.
[01:06] <Eleaf> hmm
[01:06] <Eleaf> I haven't noticed the update
[01:07] <Fujitsu> Strange.
[01:26] <FunnyLookinHat> Sure, it's good that they fixed that quickly.  But to have that at all??  wow,
[01:37] <Fujitsu> It was an oversight in Breezy only that appeared in the release, and apparently wasn't in the preview... Very interesting.
[01:40] <FunnyLookinHat> I think it's things such as this that make me feel the same way as mark shuttleworth on the proposed 6week extension
[01:45] <Fujitsu> Yes.
[01:45] <Fujitsu> Exactly.
[01:45] <Fujitsu> Polish.
[01:45] <Fujitsu> Breezy was rushed!
[01:51] <FunnyLookinHat> I can't wait for dapper   ^_^
[01:56] <Stormx2> Well you'll have to
[01:56] <Stormx2> and an extra 6 weeks by the looks of things
[01:56] <Kyral> It will be worth it :D
[01:56] <Stormx2> :P ah ha
[01:56] <Kyral> Oh wait...
[01:56] <Kyral> my desktop already runs Dapper :P
[01:57] <Eleaf> lol
[01:57] <Stormx2> I say they just release dapper on 20th april as a "semi-release", then the fully fledged dapper drake 6 weeks later, if thats what mr. shuttleworth things is necessery
[01:57] <Kyral> It just needs a clean reinstall from all the crap I do to it lol
[01:57] <Eleaf> lol.
[01:59] <Whatsisname> I just want gnome 2.14 lol
[02:01] <Whatsisname> one of these days I need to plead with the ubuntu designers to include a feature I think would be really awesome
[02:07] <Fujitsu> What is said feature?
[02:07] <Fujitsu> I've been running Dapper here since Flight 3, and it's been absolutely stable...
[02:07] <Whatsisname> modifiy the kernel to allow for dual legged machines
[02:08] <Kyral> ...
[02:08] <Whatsisname> two keyboards, two mice, two video cards, with one box
[02:08] <Whatsisname> two workstations on a single machine
[02:08] <Kyral> KVM?
[02:08] <Whatsisname> no, not kvm
[02:08] <Whatsisname> run two instances of X
[02:08] <Fujitsu> multiseat?
[02:09] <Whatsisname> one on each set of kvm
[02:09] <Whatsisname> yeah multiseat i suppose is another way to describe it
[02:09] <Fujitsu> It can be done pretty easily.
[02:09] <Fujitsu> Using the multiseat package.
[02:10] <Whatsisname> i've tried it before and it was wonky as hell
[02:10] <Whatsisname> maybe they've lately fixed it but I haven't heard of it yet
[02:10] <Fujitsu> OK.
[02:10] <Fujitsu> I've heard of people using it, on #ubuntu./
[02:10] <Whatsisname> i also know theres commercial packages
[02:11] <Whatsisname> it also usually has problems when you aren't in X
[02:12] <Whatsisname> there was once a kernel patch for 2.4 that worked great but nothing for 2.6
[06:00] <andrewPCT> blist
[06:00] <andrewPCT> arr
[06:00] <andrewPCT> woops
[08:29] <BlueT_> expecting the meeting tomorrow.... :)
[11:01] <RAPIST> !rape
[11:01] <Project318> me2
[11:01] <RAPIST> no
[11:02] <RAPIST> so lets talk about dapper
[11:02] <RAPIST> is it filled with porn?
[11:02] <Ju> ?
[11:02] <RAPIST> huh
[11:02] <RAPIST> what?
[11:02] <dholbach> RAPIST: please find another channel to talk about that.
[11:03] <RAPIST> wat u say?
[11:03] <RAPIST> oh
[11:03] <RAPIST> ok
[11:03] <RAPIST> sorry
[11:03] <dholbach> Thanks.
[11:03] <cached> Will there be a meeting at a different time?
[11:03] <Ju> cached: /topic
[11:03] <Seveas> cached, please see the topic for meeting times
[11:04] <Seveas> and please keep quiet in here when there is no meeting - it clutters up the logs
[11:04] <cached> What is meant by Technical Board?
[11:04] <Seveas> cached, http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/techboard
[11:05] <cached> Thank you, Seveas
[11:12] <leon_b> exit
[11:15] <ReadTopicForTime> "<leon_b> exit" well that was interesting