| mjg59 | doko: binutils_2.16.1-2ubuntu7_i386.deb works, binutils_2.16.1cvs20051109-1ubuntu1_i386.deb doesn't | 05:10 |
|---|---|---|
| === chmj [n=chmj@196.44.1.98] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| === doko_ [n=doko@dslb-088-073-096-073.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| fabbione | hey doko_ | 08:42 |
| doko | hi fabbione | 09:49 |
| fabbione | doko: hey... | 11:01 |
| fabbione | doko: do you think it is possible to switch default gcc build option for sparc? | 11:02 |
| doko | fabbione: sure, should be possible | 11:03 |
| fabbione | doko: --with-cpu=v7 -> --with-cpu=v8 | 11:03 |
| fabbione | when do you think that could be done? | 11:03 |
| fabbione | or sort of.. when do you plan to upload the next version of gcc? | 11:05 |
| doko | as long as I can add hppa specific fixes, so that lamont doesn't glare ... | 11:05 |
| doko | today | 11:06 |
| fabbione | ok great! | 11:06 |
| fabbione | that's fine | 11:06 |
| === jbailey [n=jbailey@modemcable139.249-203-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-toolchain | ||
| lamont | doko: LP is building dapper/hppa now, so I don't care so much... 'twould be nice to let it catch up sometime soon, though... :-) | 02:30 |
| jbailey | lamont: Meh. You have 3 buildds, don't you? =) | 02:31 |
| doko | yes, one for gcc-4.0, gcj-4.0, gcj-4.1 ;-P | 02:31 |
| lamont | jbailey: not sure how many of them are online yet | 02:32 |
| lamont | jbailey: I see 2 so far (primero, kohnen) | 02:34 |
| lamont | and yes, primero is building gcj-4.0 | 02:34 |
| lamont | er, 4.1 | 02:34 |
| jbailey | Well, it'll be nice to maybe see the 'pending' list in Soyuz actually get down to zero. =) | 02:35 |
| infinity | jbailey: That won't happen until backports is sorted, unfortunately. | 02:44 |
| infinity | (Which I should get on, I guess) | 02:44 |
| infinity | jbailey: Also, didn't you say you had some breezy-updates uploads pending? | 02:45 |
| jbailey | infinity: I did. Colin asked me to resubmit them, and I haven't. | 02:45 |
| infinity | jbailey: I could be on crack, but I'd swear someone else set up breezy-updates chroots wen I wasn't looking, cause I see some successful builds in that pocket. | 02:45 |
| jbailey | I also have glibc timezone updates for our three live ones. | 02:45 |
| jbailey | Yeah, breezy-updates is working now. | 02:45 |
| infinity | glibc timezone updates kinda need to happen NOW. | 02:46 |
| infinity | We're dangerously close to that being a problem here in Melbourne. | 02:46 |
| jbailey | Oh right. Aussie's and their screwed up timezone bits. | 02:46 |
| infinity | Like, the bug hits in a week or something. | 02:46 |
| jbailey | Okay. I'll try to send through warty, hoary and breezy sometime today. | 02:46 |
| jbailey | BEWARE THE IDES OF MARCH | 02:47 |
| infinity | (Don't feel too bad, I only saw the update come in on Windows Update a week or so ago...) | 02:47 |
| infinity | jbailey: Ping Kamion and I both when you've uploaded them, so he can approve them immediately, and I can babysit and make sure all three pockets actually work (I suspect only breezy-updates does, and even that I'm suspicious of) | 02:49 |
| jbailey | I've used packages from breezy-updates. =) | 02:49 |
| infinity | Yeah, I'm more suspicious of the chroots than of the publishing. :) | 02:49 |
| infinity | It does seem to more or less work right. | 02:49 |
| jbailey | https://launchpad.net/+builds/+build/174707 | 02:50 |
| mjg59 | doko: Are there any binutils packages earlier than the November CVS? | 02:51 |
| jbailey | mjg59: Probably breezy-final | 02:51 |
| jbailey | There was only what, 3 weeks in there? | 02:52 |
| infinity | Which was non-CVS. | 02:52 |
| infinity | jbailey: Lots more than 3 weeks upstream.. :/ | 02:52 |
| jbailey | Yeah, point. | 02:52 |
| doko | mjg59: no have to build these myself | 02:56 |
| mjg59 | doko: Ok | 02:57 |
| infinity | mjg59: http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2005/09/06/debian/pool/main/b/binutils/binutils-dev_2.16.1cvs20050902-1_i386.deb | 02:57 |
| infinity | mjg59: Looks like snapshot's back up. :) | 02:57 |
| infinity | mjg59: That may help give you a small window to search in. | 02:58 |
| mjg59 | Hurrah | 02:58 |
| infinity | Err, s/-dev// | 02:58 |
| infinity | http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2005/09/06/debian/pool/main/b/binutils/binutils_2.16.1cvs20050902-1_i386.deb | 02:58 |
| infinity | Better. | 02:58 |
| jbailey | mjg59: Binary searching for the EFI build breakage? | 02:59 |
| infinity | mjg59: You've rebuilt the binutils 2.16.1 package with our current toolchain to make sure that it's not some scary "GCC started miscompiling binutils recently" bug, right? | 02:59 |
| mjg59 | infinity: Yes | 02:59 |
| infinity | (Though, given your initial findings in the binary diff, I suspect it's binutils alone at fault) | 02:59 |
| mjg59 | jbailey: Yup | 02:59 |
| mjg59 | 20050902 works, 20051109 doesn't | 03:06 |
| mjg59 | doko: 20051001 works | 03:29 |
| mjg59 | Given a CVS checkout from a certain date, can I just update it to a later date? | 03:30 |
| mjg59 | (Or, indeed, revert it to a previous date?) | 03:30 |
| infinity | Assuming it has the CVS dirs in it, sure. | 03:30 |
| mjg59 | How? update -D? | 03:31 |
| infinity | -D or -d, I don't recall. | 03:31 |
| infinity | -D | 03:31 |
| infinity | cvs up -D 2005-10-13 | 03:32 |
| infinity | Or so. | 03:32 |
| mjg59 | Ok | 03:32 |
| mjg59 | Breakage was between the 22nd and 27th of October | 03:57 |
| infinity | That's getting much more narrow. | 03:57 |
| mjg59 | Yes | 03:57 |
| mjg59 | I'm doing the 25th now, then I'll just diff the trees | 03:58 |
| mjg59 | 25th is broken | 04:01 |
| mjg59 | 24th works | 04:09 |
| jbailey | \o/ | 04:11 |
| jbailey | Now to figure out if it's opcodes, bfs, binutils, gas... | 04:11 |
| mjg59 | Hm. 2773 lines of diff. | 04:15 |
| mjg59 | Pile of changes in bfd | 04:16 |
| mjg59 | And also in gas | 04:16 |
| mjg59 | And in ld | 04:16 |
| mjg59 | Ho-hum | 04:16 |
| infinity | 2773 lines isn't so bad, in binutils land. | 04:19 |
| mjg59 | Ok, it's either the ld or bfd changes | 04:24 |
| mjg59 | Which takes us down to 1312 lines | 04:25 |
| mjg59 | I blame bfd. | 04:26 |
| mjg59 | Since the ld changes are just down to changes in bfd | 04:26 |
| mjg59 | doko: It's either H.J. Lu's changes on 2005-10-23 or one of the changes on 2005-10-24 | 04:27 |
| mjg59 | doko: Does that narrow things down enough for you? | 04:28 |
| doko | mjg59: yes, thanks! still having OOo fun at the moment ... | 04:37 |
| mjg59 | doko: No problem | 04:56 |
| mjg59 | doko: Ok, it's H.J. Lu's fix for PR/1487 | 11:17 |
| mjg59 | The one from 2005-10-23 | 11:18 |
| doko | mjg59: looks like you couldn't rest ;-) | 11:20 |
| mjg59 | Heh | 11:20 |
| jbailey | CANT SLEEP. GENETICALLY ALTERED FIREFLYS (or whatever it is you grow) WILL EAT ME | 11:28 |
| mjg59 | Fruitflies | 11:29 |
| jbailey | mjg59: One of these days I'd like to take you for a drink and get you to tell me how one does gene alterations. | 11:29 |
| mjg59 | Haha | 11:29 |
| mjg59 | doko: The diff is at http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/tmp/binutils.diff | 11:39 |
| mjg59 | If that's reversed, it's happy | 11:39 |
| doko | ok, submitting an upstream bug report | 11:41 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!