/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2006/04/07/#ubuntu-server.txt

=== ivoks [n=ivoks@ubuntu/member/ivoks] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== mgalvin [n=mgalvin@ubuntu/member/mgalvin] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== truz24 [n=truz24@12-203-70-118.client.insightBB.com] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== yves [n=yves@unaffiliated/nictuku] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== mgalvin [n=mgalvin@ubuntu/member/mgalvin] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== ealden [n=ealden@203.76.213.198] has joined #ubuntu-server
nictukuhow reasonable is it to expect, in the long run, that ubuntu acts like a "Debian Enterprise" - but in the sense that it is supported by products of major players like Oracle?05:43
nictukuthat's a possibility I'm really excited with about ubuntu server.05:44
nictukuBut as I didn't see it mentioned in the UbuntuServer, I don't know if it is in the agenda.05:44
nictukuI only know that IBM's DB2 is homologated (is this wording fine?) for Ubuntu.05:45
neuralisnictuku: we're working onit.05:47
neuralison it, even.05:47
nictukunice :-D. is there any public information available somewhere?05:48
neuralisnot at the moment, no.05:48
nictukuhow can volunteers help on that?05:48
nictukuI mean, technically05:49
neuralisISV certifications are a pretty finicky and particular process. we appreciate your willingness to help, but i'm afraid the process mostly has to be left to canonical.05:51
nictukuI thought so, but it wouldn't hurt to ask.05:51
neuraliscertainly. and if you have contacts at ISVs, convincing them to get in touch with canonical about certifying ubuntu is certainly one way to help.05:52
nictukuThat would be a major news for, well, at least the whole Debian community.05:52
neuralisnictuku: rest assured, it's being taken seriously at canonical.05:53
=== chenjf [n=chenjf@210.21.253.170] has joined #ubuntu-server
nictukuneuralis, would you mind if I blog about what you're saying? I think many others would be interested05:55
neuralisnictuku: actually, i would. i'm not a canonical employee.05:57
nictukuOh I see05:57
neuralisnictuku: i'm happy to put you in touch with the right person if you wanted to get the official position, though.05:57
nictukuI'd be interested, yes.05:58
neuralisnictuku: Malcolm Yates <mdy@canonical.com>05:58
nictukuthank you05:59
neuralisnictuku: sure. you're also welcome to quote me as a member of the server team, as long as you make it perfectly clear it's unofficial and not coming from an employee.05:59
nictukusure06:00
nictukuthere is this mail from Mark Shuttleworth mentioning ISV certifications, which helps http://lwn.net/Articles/175272/06:01
nictukuby the way06:02
nictukuThere's a lot of road to run until official communication doesn't just help fostering the idea that ubuntu is only about desktop.06:03
neuralisyes, that's an unfortunate problem with our marketing. we're debunking some of it in the server chapter of the official ubuntu book, soon to be released, and i'm working on some extra advocacy efforts for ubuntu server.06:04
nictukuthat e-mail just reinforces that06:05
neuralisi disagree. a lot of that e-mail is desktop/server agnostic.06:06
neuralistesting, certification and 24x7 global tech support apply equally to servers and desktops, for instance.06:06
nictukumost part of it06:06
nictukuWe would like to show that a06:06
nictukuDebian-based distribution can deliver the same world class desktop punch06:06
nictukuthat you might traditionally expect from Novell or Red Hat.06:06
nictuku(quote)06:06
neuralisright. it would have been nice to have ubuntu server mentioned there, and i'll talk to mark about mentioning it next time, but the word about ubuntu server is definitely getting out.06:08
neuralisand we're still a young effort, with a lot of the really nifty features planned after dapper.06:08
nictukuAnother issues that worries me, and I'm sorry if that has been discussed too much (not in the ubuntu-server list, though, which I read), are the blessed server packages.06:09
neuraliswhat worries you?06:09
nictukusure, and we're excited with all that. I'm even trying to help with what I can, implementing one of the specs.06:09
neuralisnictuku: hm?06:10
nictukuwell, from a sysadmin point of view, this idea that only a part of main will have long time support is confusing, and even maybe useless sometimes.06:10
neuralisnictuku: i didn't understand the "we're excited with all that" message, was that aimed for a different channel?06:11
nictukusorry, I meant excited with the server effort.06:12
nictukuand "we" I meant, the community06:12
neuralisah, cool. which spec are you working on?06:12
nictukunetwork wide updates06:12
nictukueven having main and universe is confusing.06:13
neuralisas for only part of main being supported, it makes sense. the alternative is a different archive for server and desktop ubuntu, and that's really best avoided.06:13
nictukuI know the reasons, I'm just thinking from a marketing and user point of view.06:13
nictukuhttps://dev.ubuntubrasil.org/trac/nwu06:16
neuralislooks neat! i'll have to take a closer look later.06:21
nictukuthank you. I hope the PyGTK interface we're working on will be coolness compliant.06:23
neuralisi don't think i've seen this mentioned on ubuntu-server, can you post about it there?06:23
neuralishmm. why did you choose to go with SOAP?06:25
nictukuno, xml-rpc06:26
nictukuUsed SOAP, then moved to xml-rpc06:26
neuralisgood. the wiki mentions SOAP, i'll correct it.06:26
nictukuthank you06:26
nictukuI'm currently working on the packages so testing can be easier.06:26
neuralisgreat. please do post about it on the list, this is something that'll interest a lot of people, and you can benefit from the added testing.06:27
nictukuA Debian developer friend of mine have even offered to send it to unstable already06:27
nictukuand it's on revu too06:27
nictukuright, I will, despite being very afraid of disappointing testers.06:28
neuralisdisappointed testers are much better than apathetic testers.06:29
neuralisdisappointed testers complain and tell you what's not good, and then you can fix it.06:29
neuralisalso, in a tool like nwu, security is paramount. you'll want to find a security person or two to give you a review before making the case for distro inclusion.06:31
nictukuyes, that a major concern06:32
neuralisi'm happy to do a security review of this in a month or so when my schedule clears up, so feel free to mail me around then and remind me to do it.06:34
nictukuand one of the reasons I didn't mention it in the lists, because there are known unresolved security issues already. (clients always accept server SSL certificate)06:34
neuraliswell, you shouldn't let these things prevent you from asking people to test it. no one expects a perfect product on the first go. really. just mention the unresolved issues, and it'll be fine.06:35
nictukuyou're right, but i still have to convince the perfectionist part of myself of that06:45
neuralisi empathize; i'm the same way ;)06:46
nictukumy idea was to ship a very basic set of features, but a nice, stable and safe set of features.06:46
nictukuthe features are there already, I'm working on making it stable and safe.06:47
nictukuand, argh, writing documentation06:47
nictukucan i have your e-mail address? I'll contact you next month then, if you don't mind.06:54
neuralisnictuku: krstic@fas.harvard.edu06:57
nictukuthank you06:58
neuralissure. thanks for your work on this!07:02
nictukuI hope the CC recons that on the monday meeting :-).07:13
neuralishm?07:23
nictukui'm on the process of being accepted as a ubuntu member. That's on the community council meeting agenda..07:28
neuraliscool.07:29
=== Pygi [n=mario@83-131-247-79.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== fdb [n=fdb@host146-183.pool8255.interbusiness.it] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== allee [n=ach@dialin-212-144-131-136.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== Pygi [n=mario@83-131-247-29.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== Jobman [n=Jobman@p508E45C5.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== Jobman [n=Jobman@p508E45C5.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== bpuccio [n=brian@ool-457a9c38.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== tarvid [n=tarvid@dpc6919101029.direcpc.com] has joined #ubuntu-server
tarvidwith a default postfix and fetchmail  install, which is the easiest imap server to use with mbox?04:40
=== Jobman [n=Jobman@p508E6067.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== btdown [n=btdown@66.89.118.70.cfl.res.rr.com] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== Pygi [n=mario@83-131-247-29.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== mario_ [n=mario@83-131-232-196.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== zenrox [n=zenrox@71.115.198.118] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== yves [n=yves@unaffiliated/nictuku] has joined #ubuntu-server
yveshi07:39
=== truz24 [n=truz24@12-203-70-118.client.insightBB.com] has joined #ubuntu-server
nictukuAre there plans to LSB ceritication in Ubuntu? Mark Shuttleworth has once mentioned that "If we were to do LSB for Ubuntu, it would be done directly rather than as a compatibility layer.". So I guess that Ubuntu would rather take the long path of making Debian LSB-compatible - which seems to be the RightWay.07:57
=== hunger [n=tobias@p54A645C6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== mgalvin [n=mgalvin@ubuntu/member/mgalvin] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== Pygi [n=mario@83-131-245-69.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== bpuccio [n=brian@ool-457afde7.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== ivoks [n=ivoks@ubuntu/member/ivoks] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== bpuccio [n=brian@ool-457afde7.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #ubuntu-server
=== ivoks [n=ivoks@ubuntu/member/ivoks] has joined #ubuntu-server
ivokswe should really include new samba :/11:12
=== Pygi [n=mario@83-131-250-234.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #ubuntu-server

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!