=== shinmen [n=shinmen@nat1.inalambrica.net] has left #ubuntu-ports ["Ex-Chat"] === braddr_ drools over a gcc build with gmake -j 32.. and actually using all 16 cpus for a lot of the build. [07:58] braddr_: it's much more fun if you just do make -j [07:58] heh [07:59] I figured 2x cpu's is probably good enough.. but yes, I'll give that a whirl. [07:59] this is the first build I've done on the box, and it's having to do a bunch of configure scripts run, really limiting the parallelism. [08:00] i can imagine [08:00] after it finishes, a make clean; make ought to get much more opportunity [08:01] any word from davem? I assume he's still wrestling gdb and mono to the ground. [08:01] he is fighting with a bad cold [08:02] so he is not hacking much around === braddr_ nods.. "I know the feeling.. knock on wood, it's been a while since my last illness." [08:37] 370 processes: 213 sleeping, 139 running, 1 zombie, 17 on cpu [08:37] yes, unrestricted make -j is kinda fun [08:42] braddr_: when we started testing Niagara, davem was soft with -j32 [08:43] after i started with -j 512 we found all kind of smp bugs :P [08:43] heh [08:43] not suprisingly, solaris is holding up quite well under the load [08:43] we do too now [08:44] I'm willing to be convinced. :) [08:44] i have been sort of bashed by my boss, because nagios woke up the sysadmins due to "a few machines complaining load over 1000" [08:45] (i was preparing a kernel security release a few months back) [08:45] whee [08:45] well i was make -j on all arches at the same time [08:45] :) [08:45] with that kinda load, you're wasting an awful lot of time in context swapping [08:46] ok, maybe not a lot, but.. [08:46] 11m build for gcc 4.0.3 for c,c++ [08:47] pretty decent [08:47] point is that i was more waiting for I/O [08:47] since the kernel was already in ccache === braddr_ nods. === daq4th [n=darkness@netstation-005.cafe.zSeries.org] has joined #ubuntu-ports [11:06] fabbione: re: that 16 cpu t2000.. I'll be keeping it rather than getting the 32 cpu version. Not worth the hassle to get the right model. [11:07] so no worries about loosing the test case === jb-home tries to imagine the noise from a 32 CPU sparc box... [11:09] exactly the nose of a 16 cpu box.. in both of the cases for the t2000 series, its 1 physical core. [11:09] er.. 1 physical unit, just a varying number of cores. [11:10] the t2000 hardware is _nice_, from a physical layout standpoint. It's also nice from a performance standpoint. [11:10] it's unfortunatly pricy from a suck you dry standpoint.