[01:08] <theine> Hi, I just triple posted a comment in launchpad without noticing by reloading the web page. Is this intended behaviour?
[01:11] <bradb> theine: bug 38135
[01:11] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 38135 in malone "Commenting redirects to +index, so reloading duplicates comment" [Medium,Confirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/38135
[01:14] <theine> bradb: no, #50031
[01:15] <theine> bradb: ah, now I get it :)
[01:16] <dem> how do i integrate Rosetta with my application?
[01:18] <bradb> dem: ask carlos, who's not around, or https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RosettaFAQ#head-b356f13978780b88ed4844602554339ac2c33774 to learn more
[01:23] <dem> ok
[01:37] <Perze> Hello there!
[02:01] <mongolito404> Hi
[02:05] <mongolito404> I've just hosted a bazaar branch for a product on Launchpad. The branch shows up in the "Branches" section of the product. But, when I tried to "checkout" using "bzr branch http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mapdevs/support.points.map/dev/" I got this error message: "bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mapdevs/support.points.map/dev/". Is there some delay before an hosted branch becomes publically accessible ?
[02:07] <ajmitch> yep
[02:08] <ajmitch> I heard that it was a few hours, up to a day at the moment
[02:08] <ajmitch> soon to be cut down a lot
[02:09] <mongolito404> I should have wait before asking. Because it seems to already work now. Thanks.
[02:19] <siretart> I've just pushed my mldonkey branch, but it doesn't show up in https://launchpad.net/products/mldonkey/+branches, huh?
[02:22] <ajmitch> siretart: patience.. :)
[02:22] <ajmitch> I see the upstream branch there
[02:23] <siretart> ajmitch: interesting, the upstream branch is still pushing
[02:23] <ajmitch> how many packages do you have on launchpad now?
[02:23] <ajmitch> yes, I had that with f-spot
[02:23] <siretart> ajmitch: the 'ubuntu' branch is already finished half an hour ago
[02:23] <ajmitch> strange
[06:23] <Yannig> Hello everybody
[07:18] <bradb> BjornT: ping
[07:55] <BjornT> bradb: pong
[07:56] <bradb> BjornT: The reason we need a proper FileUpload widget is to get at the filename, right? Are there other reasons?
[07:58] <bradb> (maybe the widget would encapsulate getting the content type too?)
[07:59] <BjornT> bradb: yeah, i think getting the filename is the only reason, although i would imaging the widget returning a FileUpload object.
[08:00] <bradb> ok, thanks, just wanted to make sure i understood why the Bytes object wasn't good enough for the attachment view
[08:12] <FX2> can anybody help me
[08:15] <FX2> can anybody help me with ubuntu 5.10?
[08:19] <bradb> FX2: best to ask in #ubuntu
[10:05] <Paramed> hi
[11:56] <bradb> BjornT: around?