[01:02] <aa_> those little coloured "bug" icons are great
[01:53] <Hobbsee> hey all.  are we having trouble with ubuntueros not showing in launchpad properly?  ie, people who are obviously ubuntueros are shown as "not yet"?  
[01:54] <Hobbsee> https://launchpad.net/people/adconrad and https://launchpad.net/people/hobbsee would be two such examples
[01:54] <LarstiQ> Hobbsee: have they signed the CoC and uploaded to lp?
[01:55] <Hobbsee> LarstiQ: yes - both are members, one's a core dev
[01:55] <Hobbsee> they *have* to have signed the CoC and uploaded it before they went for membership
[01:55] <LarstiQ> I guess that is a bug then
[01:56] <Hobbsee> LarstiQ: at least for that second link - i know i used to show as an ubuntero - it's just recently been pointed out to me
[01:56] <LarstiQ> Hobbsee: now you mention it, my ubuntero flag has dropped as well
[01:57] <Hobbsee> https://launchpad.net/people/tonio & https://launchpad.net/people/jr-falleri are more example
[01:57] <Hobbsee> s
[01:57] <ajmitch> Hobbsee: it's a bug, it's been filed
[01:57] <Hobbsee> hehe, great
[01:57] <Hobbsee> okay
[01:57] <ajmitch> bug 48995
[01:57] <LarstiQ> bug 48995
[01:57] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 48995 in launchpad "People who have signed the Code of Conduct are now listed as not being Ubunteros." [Medium,Confirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/48995
[01:57] <LarstiQ> heh
[01:57] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 48995 in launchpad "People who have signed the Code of Conduct are now listed as not being Ubunteros." [Medium,Confirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/48995
[01:58] <Hobbsee> ah, just found that
[01:59] <Hobbsee> dont mind me then :P  i clearly cant search
[02:04] <Hobbsee> hey now!  dont you laugh at me!  :P
[02:07] <LarstiQ> Hobbsee: it is funny how different people look at launchpad
[02:07] <Hobbsee> LarstiQ: how so?
[02:07] <LarstiQ> Hobbsee: I realize a lot of the users come purely from ubuntu, and deal mainly with that part
[02:08] <LarstiQ> whereas I almost only deal with upstream products
[02:08] <Hobbsee> which upstream products?
[02:08] <LarstiQ> Hobbsee: bzr is the most important one
[02:08] <Hobbsee> true
[02:08] <Hobbsee> not played with that yet
[07:39] <Kamping_Kaiser> can someoen tell me if this is a bug, or just me not registering the way somethign should work properly?
[07:40] <Kamping_Kaiser> i went to the linux-restircted-modules page in LP, went to bugs, then put '686' in the search area and pressed enter.
[07:40] <Kamping_Kaiser> it jumped to but 686 in LP.
[07:40] <Kamping_Kaiser> is that expected?
[07:55] <SteveA> Kamping_Kaiser: yes, i think it is expected
[07:55] <SteveA> people often put bug numbers into search forms, and expect it to work
[07:55] <Kamping_Kaiser> ok. i was trying to search the bugs in l-r-m for 686 :/ thanks :)
[07:56] <SteveA> maybe we should make the x86 numbers special cases.  if you think so, file a bug on malone in launchpad about it.
[07:56] <Kamping_Kaiser> nah, i was just supprised :)
[08:00] <Yannig> Hello everybody :)
[08:00] <Kamping_Kaiser> :)
[11:54] <Ma5rad> ...no one has said anything,.
[11:54] <Ma5rad> This whole time.
[11:54] <Ma5rad> :|
[11:59] <LarstiQ> well, it wasn't _that_ long