[02:02] <zul> BenC: why the hell does it try to make xen-xen0-2.6.16 when i have xen-image in my control file?
[02:14] <BenC> no idea...something in make-kpkg
[02:14] <zul> yeah...is it possible to merge all of kernel-package since there might be some breakage with xen stuff that we dont know about from the patch
[02:16] <zul> since kernel-package also breaks xen on amd64 as well according to the changelog
[02:17] <zul> pretty please ;)
[02:19] <BenC> I'll work on it this week
[02:19] <zul> thanks
[02:54] <zul> hmmm...kernel-package wants to set i_package to $(INT_STEM)-xen0-$(version) when CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED IS set which i dont want it to do..
[02:56] <zul> im so tempted not to use kernel-package for xen-linux
[05:05] <ivoks> km, km, vmplauer-kernel-modules need rebuild :)
[05:05] <ivoks> vmware-player-kernel-modules
[05:10] <zul> eh?
[05:12] <ivoks> vmware-player-modules are still for -23 kernel
[05:12] <zul> ah ok the abi bumb
[05:13] <ivoks> right
[05:13] <zul> ill let Ben know
[05:23] <allee> zul: can't openafs-modules-source be added to the list of to-rebuild pkgs too? ;)
[05:24] <zul> allee can you open a bug please im at work right now
[05:25] <allee> 'k, 1st ssh-krb5 crash, then openafs-modules wish
[05:49] <Keybuk> BenC: ping?
[05:50] <zul> BenC: vmware-palyer needs to be version bumped
[05:53] <BenC> Keybuk: pong
[05:53] <BenC> zul: Ah, want to upload that again?
[05:54] <Keybuk> BenC: so, talk to me about linux-kernel-headers vs. linux-headers
[05:54] <Keybuk> what's the plan for edgy?
[05:56] <BenC> I included the patch for hdrinstall2 in edgy kernel
[05:56] <BenC> just waiting on jbailey to see if the kernel headers are able to be used, and if so, I'll be building linux-kernel-headers out of edgy's kernel build
[05:58] <Keybuk> ok, and how will that differ to the linux-headers package?
[06:00] <BenC> the only difference between linux-kernel-headers and linux-headers-2.6.17 (which is binary-arch as well) will be the installed location
[06:00] <BenC> oh wait, no that's wrong
[06:01] <BenC> the hdrinstall actually removes a lot of the files and file contents (removed everything wrapped in #ifdef __KERNEL__)
[06:01] <BenC> so there's a lot of difference
[06:02] <Keybuk> ok
[06:02] <Keybuk> so if this works, we'll be able to drop the linux-kernel-headers source package entirely?
[06:03] <BenC> yeah
[06:04] <Keybuk> cool
[06:04] <Keybuk> BenC: btw, do you plan to merge kernel-wedge and kernel-package today?
[06:05] <BenC> within the next few days
[06:05] <BenC> kernel-wedge should be easy, but kernel-package isn't
[06:05] <Keybuk> there's only one day left until UVF
[06:05] <Keybuk> when all merges need to be completed by
[06:05] <BenC> considering they both only really affect linux-source, can I get an exception? :)
[06:06] <BenC> I'm working on them today, but I can't guarantee I'll be able to test kernel-package fully
[06:08] <Keybuk> ok
[06:08] <Keybuk> try and at least get an upload before thursday
[06:08] <zul> BenC: sure i can do it tonight
[06:08] <BenC> ok, no problem
[06:08] <BenC> zul: thanks
[06:09] <zul> your welcome :)
[07:02] <jbailey> BenC: If you need a tester with the kernel nULL pointer dereference problem, my laptop has it.
[07:04] <BenC> I have a feeling 5.7 will fix it
[07:18] <zul> what are we at now for abi for dapper?
[07:18] <zul> 26?
[07:22] <jbailey> BenC: 'kay.  If you have a build for i386, I'll test it anytime. 
[07:23] <jbailey> Otherwise I'll grab it when you upload.
[07:29] <BenC> kernel-dailys has a -5 build
[07:29] <BenC> zul: 26
[07:29] <BenC> jbailey: that should have the fixes
[07:29] <jbailey> BenC: Cool, thanks.
[07:31] <astraw> I'm trying to apply a patch to the git kernel tree for dapper. The problem is I bump the version in the changelog (e.g. from 2.6.15-26.44 to 2.6.15-26.44.ads1) so my .debs supercede previous .debs but are replaced by future .debs, but then I get an ABI error: "Missing .../abi/2.6.15-26.44/i386/386 file". I've worked around this by generating the old .debs, then applying my patch, then re-generating, but this takes a long time.
[07:35] <jbailey> update-grub didn't seem to get run when I installed the daily.
[07:35] <jbailey> Nope, I'm on crack.
[07:35] <jbailey> I wget'd the deb and didn't install it.
[07:41] <jbailey> BenC: The daily from July 8th appears to be working.
[07:42] <BenC> sweet
[07:43] <astraw> BTW, the only reason I'm doing this is to fix bug #41228 (incorrect timestamps in video1394), so if that could get rolled into the next bugfix release, that'd be great.
[07:52] <BenC> astraw: Please read KernelGitGuide in topic for the best way to submit patches (especially since you have a git tree to do it from)
[07:58] <astraw> BenC: will do. Also, I just found the AUTOBUILD=1 setting. Gotta run now.
[07:59] <BenC> people really need to read more thoroughly
[07:59] <BenC> it specifically says that it is only useful in 2.6.17/edgy kernel
[08:02] <jbailey> USer's don't read. =)
[08:03] <zul> huker on phonics wurked for me
[08:07] <BenC> zul: feh, it's FONICKS
[08:07] <BenC> even I know that
[08:08] <zul> im canadian eh?
[08:09] <BenC> oh, sorry, eh :)
[08:09] <zul> lol
[08:12] <BenC> jbailey: do you know the bug number for that oops?
[08:13] <jbailey> BenC: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.17/+bug/51488
[08:13] <jbailey> No ubugtu here?
[08:13] <jbailey> Hmm, weird.
[08:18] <zul> nope
[11:44] <jbailey> BenC: It occurs to me that with lkh merging into the kernel, that you have to be part of edgy +1 toolchian roadmap.
[11:44] <jbailey> In the sense that the new lkh should be uploaded with glibc/gcc at the start of the release.
[11:46] <BenC> that sucks :)
[11:53] <kylem> :)