=== edattoli [n=Miranda@r200-40-189-182.ae-static.anteldata.net.uy]  has joined #ubuntu-x
=== edattoli [n=Miranda@r200-40-189-182.ae-static.anteldata.net.uy]  has left #ubuntu-x [] 
=== Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee]  has joined #ubuntu-x
=== fabbione [i=fabbione@gordian.fabbione.net]  has joined #ubuntu-x
=== rodarvus [n=rodarvus@ubuntu/member/rodarvus]  has joined #ubuntu-x
[10:17] [xur1z(n=chris@60.234.164.212)]  help
=== rodarvus [n=rodarvus@ubuntu/member/rodarvus]  has joined #ubuntu-x
[01:01] <rodarvus> fabbione: I'm curious to know what exactly have you changed to let mesa build without lesstiff support
[01:02] <rodarvus> that build system looks really non-intuitive
[01:02] <fabbione> rodarvus: kill the B-D and Depends. remove glw- reference from debian/libmap.dir (or something like that)
[01:03] <fabbione> there was also the option to remove the entries from debian/rules but that would have exploded in future merges
[01:04] <rodarvus> oh, I didn't changed debian/libmap.dir
[01:05] <fabbione> rodarvus: that's how i noticed it
[01:05] <rodarvus> fabbione: oh, btw I also would like to prepare nvidia and ati binary drivers as first task for today
[01:06] <fabbione> there is the debian/README-you-stupid-maintainer-that-wants-to-do-customs ;)
[01:06] <fabbione> note that i saw that after modifying everything possible before :P
[01:06] <rodarvus> haha
[01:06] <fabbione> rodarvus: looking at the nvidia and fglrx stuff
[01:15] <fabbione> rodarvus: ok i have done l-r-m
[01:15] <fabbione> l-r-m as in linux-restricted-modules
[01:15] <fabbione> that has nvidia and fglrx
[01:19] <rodarvus> nice, thanks!
[01:20] <rodarvus> I'll want to see the debdiff of this change as soon as its available on the archive :)
[01:21] <fabbione> cocktastic
[01:21] <fabbione> pitti did upload -4 as me
[01:21] <fabbione> now i need to wait for his -4 to propagate and upload -5
[07:00] <fabbione> Setting up xorg (7.0.22ubuntu3) ...
[07:00] <fabbione> Setting up x-window-system-core (7.0.22ubuntu3) ...
[07:00] <fabbione> root@gordian:~#
[07:00] <fabbione> so afaict mesa and fonts are ok now
[07:00] <fabbione> modulo ppc and sparc that are missing mesa
[07:16] <rodarvus> *nods*
[07:16] <rodarvus> just for reference, debian has most (but 4) of our x apps inside xbase-clients
[07:17] <rodarvus> if we decide to merge with them, we'd just need to conflicts/obsolete these packages and adopt xbase-clients
[07:17] <fabbione> rodarvus: how many of them are newer than the ones we have?
[07:18] <rodarvus> the other 4 apps need no manual merge (they have basically the same content here and there)
[07:18] <fabbione> meaning.. is it worth to do it?
[07:18] <rodarvus> fabbione: about twelve, I think
[07:18] <rodarvus> the main reason for doing this is that we'd basically never have trouble maintaining these packages again in the future :)
[07:18] <fabbione> right
[07:19] <rodarvus> they also have patches for some of these applications
[07:20] <fabbione> well just do it
[07:21] <fabbione> make sure you look into other packages too
[07:21] <fabbione> iirc source: xorg has a dummy package called xbase-clients
[07:21] <fabbione> that depends on the splitted ones we have
[07:21] <rodarvus> yes, it has
[07:21] <fabbione> so the transition needs to be done properly
[07:21] <rodarvus> we'd need to upload xorg together with the new xbase-clients
[07:22] <rodarvus> ok, I'll try to have everything ready for upload as soon as Knot 1 is uploaded
[07:22] <rodarvus> (shouldn't be hard at all, actually)
[07:22] <fabbione> yeps
[07:22] <fabbione> no, but we have some Depends: Conflicts: Replaces all around for the split
[07:22] <fabbione> so joining them again might be interesting
[07:23] <rodarvus> is it doable at all?
[07:23] <fabbione> yes it is
[07:23] <fabbione> it's just a matter of making sure that the upgrade path is clean
[07:24] <rodarvus> good :)
[09:13] <Mithrandir> yeah, please just get the apps merged; we shouldn't need to ever touch those again.
[10:59] <rodarvus> fabbione: regarding xserver-xorg-input-elographics (just to make sure I'm not doing something wrong) I'll check if it is seeded in the correct places (with the other main -input- drivers)
[11:00] <rodarvus> and update xsever-xorg-input-all to depend on it (which is not the case currently)
[11:00] <rodarvus> right?
[11:00] <fabbione> rodarvus: there was xorg depending on it.
[11:00] <fabbione> only on i386
[11:00] <fabbione> be careful that you don't need it for all arches
[11:00] <fabbione> but yeah do as you feel it's best
[11:00] <fabbione> (after knot 1 is out)
[11:01] <rodarvus> xorg is not depending on it, (on the current version at least)
[11:01] <rodarvus> just rebuilt it locally minutes ago to test
[11:01] <fabbione> source: xorg
[11:01] <fabbione> and the Depends: are arch dependent
=== fabbione -> bed
[11:02] <fabbione> good night
[11:03] <rodarvus> fabbione: good night!